[R] mgcv::predict.gam lpmatrix for prediction outside of R

2008-04-09 Thread David Katz

This is in regards to the suggested use of type="lpmatrix" in the
documentation for mgcv::predict.gam. Could one not get the same result more
simply by using type="terms" and interpolating each term directly? What is
the advantage of the lpmatrix approach for prediction outside R? Thanks.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/mgcv%3A%3Apredict.gam-lpmatrix-for-prediction-outside-of-R-tp16587009p16587009.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] mgcv::predict.gam lpmatrix for prediction outside of R

2008-04-13 Thread Simon Wood
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 16:18, David Katz wrote:
> This is in regards to the suggested use of type="lpmatrix" in the
> documentation for mgcv::predict.gam. Could one not get the same result more
> simply by using type="terms" and interpolating each term directly? What is
> the advantage of the lpmatrix approach for prediction outside R? Thanks.

-- You can get standard errors on the predictions if you do the `lpmatrix' 
interpolation thing.

best,
Simon

-- 
> Simon Wood, Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
> +44 1225 386603  www.maths.bath.ac.uk/~sw283

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.