Re: [R] NAs are removed
I do not know what your major problem/issue is but the code you shared seems to
be looking for a character value of '2' in what looks like a numeric vector
containing the number 2.
-Original Message-
From: Neha gupta
To: Ebert,Timothy Aaron
Cc: r-help mailing list
Sent: Fri, Jan 14, 2022 5:11 pm
Subject: Re: [R] NAs are removed
I have a variable in dataset "CA", which has the following values:
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1
[40] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2
then I used this statement
prot <- ifelse(ts$CA == '2', 0, 1)
Is the problem exist here?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:02 PM Ebert,Timothy Aaron wrote:
> Hi Neha,
> You used a variable named "fraction" so we took a guess. However, as
> another pointed out 1/0 does not give NA in R. number/0 returns Inf except
> 0/0 which returns NaN. So 1/0 <= 1 returns FALSE and 0/0 <= 1 returns NA. A
> great deal of the behavior of your program hinges on what "fraction" is in
> your program.
>
> Tim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: R-help On Behalf Of Neha gupta
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 4:50 PM
> To: Jim Lemon
> Cc: r-help mailing list
> Subject: Re: [R] NAs are removed
>
> [External Email]
>
> Hi Jim and Ebert
>
> How I am using divide by zero, I did not understand? I am using caret and
> AUC metric.
>
> If I do, what is the solution?
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:41 PM Jim Lemon wrote:
>
> > Hi Neha,
> > You're using the argument "na.omit" in what function? My blind guess
> > is that there's a divide by zero shooting you from behind.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 6:32 AM Neha gupta
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone
> > >
> > > I use na.omit to remove NAs but still it gives me error
> > >
> > > Error in if (fraction <= 1) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE
> > > needed
> > >
> > > My data is:
> > >
> > > data.frame': 340 obs. of 15 variables:
> > > $ DepthTree : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> > > $ NumSubclass : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> > > $ McCabe : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 ...
> > > $ LOC : num 3 4 3 3 4 4 10 10 10 10 ...
> > > $ DepthNested : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ...
> > > $ CA : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> > > $ CE : num 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
> > > $ Instability : num 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667
> > > 0.667
> > > 0.667 0.667 ...
> > > $ numCovered : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> > > $ operator : Factor w/ 16 levels "T0","T1","T2",..: 2 2 4 13 13 13
> > 1 3
> > > 4 7 ...
> > > $ methodReturn : Factor w/ 22 levels "I","V","Z","method",..: 2 2 2
> > > 2 2
> > 2
> > > 2 2 2 2 ...
> > >
> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> > >
> > > __
> > > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_ma
> > > ilman_listinfo_r-2Dhelp=DwICAg=sJ6xIWYx-zLMB3EPkvcnVg=9PEhQh2k
> > > VeAsRzsn7AkP-g=WsafNBaOwXzuF-v3jJZaUbBRngZTxjDnPCJN1jlMOzYqG9yy06S
> > > kfQKtGPM2OWM5=LqAgI3qNLyTF5KeFM9sT9jTT4rkvlcJa1V9CIW_SVy4=
> > > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.R-2Dproject.or
> > g_posting-2Dguide.html=DwICAg=sJ6xIWYx-zLMB3EPkvcnVg=9PEhQh2kVeA
> > sRzsn7AkP-g=WsafNBaOwXzuF-v3jJZaUbBRngZTxjDnPCJN1jlMOzYqG9yy06SkfQKt
> > GPM2OWM5=hUs_mg3eaWhd-I4H-9rKF6C4B7CFwLsuBkx3Qv68_o0=
> > > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
> >
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> __
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_r-2Dhelp=DwICAg=sJ6xIWYx-zLMB3EPkvcnVg=9PEhQh2kVeAsRzsn7AkP-g=WsafNBaOwXzuF-v3jJZaUbBRngZTxjDnPCJN1jlMOzYqG9yy06SkfQKtGPM2OWM5=LqAgI3qNLyTF5KeFM9sT9jTT4rkvlcJa1V9CIW_SVy4=
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.R-2Dproject.org_posting-2Dguide.html=DwICAg=sJ6xIWYx-zLMB3EPkvcnVg=9PEhQh2kVeAsRzsn7AkP-g=WsafNBaOwXzuF-v3jJZaUbBRngZTxjDnPCJN1jlMOzYqG9yy06SkfQKtGPM2OWM5=hUs_mg3eaWhd-I4H-9rKF6C4B7CFwLsuBkx3Qv68_o0=
> and provide commented, minimal, self-containe
Re: [R] NAs are removed
I don’t see any. To support this claim I tried it (but no dataframe):
CA = c(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2,
2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2)
prot <- ifelse(CA == '2', 0, 1)
print(prot)
R responds:
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[37] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
[73] 0 0 0 0 0 0
You can check other statements in the same way. That said, in a huge dataset
you might want to ask if the data provided match what you are assuming is
there. If you type unique(ts$CA) do you get anything other than 1 and 2? This
is a common task of figuring out if the problem is with the code or the data.
Tim
From: Neha gupta
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 5:11 PM
To: Ebert,Timothy Aaron
Cc: Jim Lemon ; r-help mailing list
Subject: Re: [R] NAs are removed
[External Email]
I have a variable in dataset "CA", which has the following values:
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
[40] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2 2
then I used this statement
prot <- ifelse(ts$CA == '2', 0, 1)
Is the problem exist here?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:02 PM Ebert,Timothy Aaron
mailto:teb...@ufl.edu>> wrote:
Hi Neha,
You used a variable named "fraction" so we took a guess. However, as another
pointed out 1/0 does not give NA in R. number/0 returns Inf except 0/0 which
returns NaN. So 1/0 <= 1 returns FALSE and 0/0 <= 1 returns NA. A great deal of
the behavior of your program hinges on what "fraction" is in your program.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: R-help
mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org>> On Behalf
Of Neha gupta
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 4:50 PM
To: Jim Lemon mailto:drjimle...@gmail.com>>
Cc: r-help mailing list mailto:r-help@r-project.org>>
Subject: Re: [R] NAs are removed
[External Email]
Hi Jim and Ebert
How I am using divide by zero, I did not understand? I am using caret and AUC
metric.
If I do, what is the solution?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:41 PM Jim Lemon
mailto:drjimle...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi Neha,
> You're using the argument "na.omit" in what function? My blind guess
> is that there's a divide by zero shooting you from behind.
>
> Jim
>
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 6:32 AM Neha gupta
> mailto:neha.bologn...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > I use na.omit to remove NAs but still it gives me error
> >
> > Error in if (fraction <= 1) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE
> > needed
> >
> > My data is:
> >
> > data.frame': 340 obs. of 15 variables:
> > $ DepthTree: num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> > $ NumSubclass : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> > $ McCabe : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 ...
> > $ LOC : num 3 4 3 3 4 4 10 10 10 10 ...
> > $ DepthNested : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ...
> > $ CA : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> > $ CE : num 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
> > $ Instability : num 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667
> > 0.667
> > 0.667 0.667 ...
> > $ numCovered : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> > $ operator : Factor w/ 16 levels "T0","T1","T2",..: 2 2 4 13 13 13
> 1 3
> > 4 7 ...
> > $ methodReturn : Factor w/ 22 levels "I","V","Z","method",..: 2 2 2
> > 2 2
> 2
> > 2 2 2 2 ...
> >
> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > __
> > R-help@r-project.org<mailto:R-help@r-project.org> mailing list -- To
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_ma
> > ilman_listinfo_r-2Dhelp=DwICAg=sJ6xIWYx-zLMB3EPkvcnVg=9PEhQh2k
> > VeAsRzsn7AkP-g=WsafNBaOwXzuF-v3jJZaUbBRngZTxjDnPCJN1jlMOzYqG9yy06S
> > kfQKtGPM2OWM5=LqAgI3qNLyTF5KeFM9sT9jTT4rkvlcJa1V9CIW_SVy4=
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.R-2Dproject.or
> g_posting-2Dguide.html=DwICAg=sJ6xIWYx-zLMB3EPkvcnVg=9PEhQh2kVeA
> sRzsn7AkP-g=WsafNBaOwXzuF-v3jJZaUbBRngZTxjDnPCJN1jlMOzYqG9yy06SkfQKt
> GPM2OWM5=hUs_mg3eaWhd-I4H-9rKF6C4B7CFwLsuBkx3Qv68_o0=
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org<mailto:R-help@r-project.org> mailing list -- To
UNSUBSCRIBE and more
Re: [R] NAs are removed
I have a variable in dataset "CA", which has the following values:
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1
[40] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2
then I used this statement
prot <- ifelse(ts$CA == '2', 0, 1)
Is the problem exist here?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:02 PM Ebert,Timothy Aaron wrote:
> Hi Neha,
>You used a variable named "fraction" so we took a guess. However, as
> another pointed out 1/0 does not give NA in R. number/0 returns Inf except
> 0/0 which returns NaN. So 1/0 <= 1 returns FALSE and 0/0 <= 1 returns NA. A
> great deal of the behavior of your program hinges on what "fraction" is in
> your program.
>
> Tim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: R-help On Behalf Of Neha gupta
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 4:50 PM
> To: Jim Lemon
> Cc: r-help mailing list
> Subject: Re: [R] NAs are removed
>
> [External Email]
>
> Hi Jim and Ebert
>
> How I am using divide by zero, I did not understand? I am using caret and
> AUC metric.
>
> If I do, what is the solution?
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:41 PM Jim Lemon wrote:
>
> > Hi Neha,
> > You're using the argument "na.omit" in what function? My blind guess
> > is that there's a divide by zero shooting you from behind.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 6:32 AM Neha gupta
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone
> > >
> > > I use na.omit to remove NAs but still it gives me error
> > >
> > > Error in if (fraction <= 1) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE
> > > needed
> > >
> > > My data is:
> > >
> > > data.frame': 340 obs. of 15 variables:
> > > $ DepthTree: num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> > > $ NumSubclass : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> > > $ McCabe : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 ...
> > > $ LOC : num 3 4 3 3 4 4 10 10 10 10 ...
> > > $ DepthNested : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ...
> > > $ CA : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> > > $ CE : num 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
> > > $ Instability : num 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667
> > > 0.667
> > > 0.667 0.667 ...
> > > $ numCovered : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> > > $ operator : Factor w/ 16 levels "T0","T1","T2",..: 2 2 4 13 13 13
> > 1 3
> > > 4 7 ...
> > > $ methodReturn : Factor w/ 22 levels "I","V","Z","method",..: 2 2 2
> > > 2 2
> > 2
> > > 2 2 2 2 ...
> > >
> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> > >
> > > __
> > > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_ma
> > > ilman_listinfo_r-2Dhelp=DwICAg=sJ6xIWYx-zLMB3EPkvcnVg=9PEhQh2k
> > > VeAsRzsn7AkP-g=WsafNBaOwXzuF-v3jJZaUbBRngZTxjDnPCJN1jlMOzYqG9yy06S
> > > kfQKtGPM2OWM5=LqAgI3qNLyTF5KeFM9sT9jTT4rkvlcJa1V9CIW_SVy4=
> > > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.R-2Dproject.or
> > g_posting-2Dguide.html=DwICAg=sJ6xIWYx-zLMB3EPkvcnVg=9PEhQh2kVeA
> > sRzsn7AkP-g=WsafNBaOwXzuF-v3jJZaUbBRngZTxjDnPCJN1jlMOzYqG9yy06SkfQKt
> > GPM2OWM5=hUs_mg3eaWhd-I4H-9rKF6C4B7CFwLsuBkx3Qv68_o0=
> > > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
> >
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> __
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_r-2Dhelp=DwICAg=sJ6xIWYx-zLMB3EPkvcnVg=9PEhQh2kVeAsRzsn7AkP-g=WsafNBaOwXzuF-v3jJZaUbBRngZTxjDnPCJN1jlMOzYqG9yy06SkfQKtGPM2OWM5=LqAgI3qNLyTF5KeFM9sT9jTT4rkvlcJa1V9CIW_SVy4=
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.R-2Dproject.org_posting-2Dguide.html=DwICAg=sJ6xIWYx-zLMB3EPkvcnVg=9PEhQh2kVeAsRzsn7AkP-g=WsafNBaOwXzuF-v3jJZaUbBRngZTxjDnPCJN1jlMOzYqG9yy06SkfQKtGPM2OWM5=hUs_mg3eaWhd-I4H-9rKF6C4B7CFwLsuBkx3Qv68_o0=
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] NAs are removed
Hi Neha,
You used a variable named "fraction" so we took a guess. However, as another
pointed out 1/0 does not give NA in R. number/0 returns Inf except 0/0 which
returns NaN. So 1/0 <= 1 returns FALSE and 0/0 <= 1 returns NA. A great deal of
the behavior of your program hinges on what "fraction" is in your program.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: R-help On Behalf Of Neha gupta
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 4:50 PM
To: Jim Lemon
Cc: r-help mailing list
Subject: Re: [R] NAs are removed
[External Email]
Hi Jim and Ebert
How I am using divide by zero, I did not understand? I am using caret and AUC
metric.
If I do, what is the solution?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:41 PM Jim Lemon wrote:
> Hi Neha,
> You're using the argument "na.omit" in what function? My blind guess
> is that there's a divide by zero shooting you from behind.
>
> Jim
>
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 6:32 AM Neha gupta
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > I use na.omit to remove NAs but still it gives me error
> >
> > Error in if (fraction <= 1) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE
> > needed
> >
> > My data is:
> >
> > data.frame': 340 obs. of 15 variables:
> > $ DepthTree: num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> > $ NumSubclass : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> > $ McCabe : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 ...
> > $ LOC : num 3 4 3 3 4 4 10 10 10 10 ...
> > $ DepthNested : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ...
> > $ CA : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> > $ CE : num 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
> > $ Instability : num 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667
> > 0.667
> > 0.667 0.667 ...
> > $ numCovered : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> > $ operator : Factor w/ 16 levels "T0","T1","T2",..: 2 2 4 13 13 13
> 1 3
> > 4 7 ...
> > $ methodReturn : Factor w/ 22 levels "I","V","Z","method",..: 2 2 2
> > 2 2
> 2
> > 2 2 2 2 ...
> >
> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > __
> > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_ma
> > ilman_listinfo_r-2Dhelp=DwICAg=sJ6xIWYx-zLMB3EPkvcnVg=9PEhQh2k
> > VeAsRzsn7AkP-g=WsafNBaOwXzuF-v3jJZaUbBRngZTxjDnPCJN1jlMOzYqG9yy06S
> > kfQKtGPM2OWM5=LqAgI3qNLyTF5KeFM9sT9jTT4rkvlcJa1V9CIW_SVy4=
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.R-2Dproject.or
> g_posting-2Dguide.html=DwICAg=sJ6xIWYx-zLMB3EPkvcnVg=9PEhQh2kVeA
> sRzsn7AkP-g=WsafNBaOwXzuF-v3jJZaUbBRngZTxjDnPCJN1jlMOzYqG9yy06SkfQKt
> GPM2OWM5=hUs_mg3eaWhd-I4H-9rKF6C4B7CFwLsuBkx3Qv68_o0=
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_r-2Dhelp=DwICAg=sJ6xIWYx-zLMB3EPkvcnVg=9PEhQh2kVeAsRzsn7AkP-g=WsafNBaOwXzuF-v3jJZaUbBRngZTxjDnPCJN1jlMOzYqG9yy06SkfQKtGPM2OWM5=LqAgI3qNLyTF5KeFM9sT9jTT4rkvlcJa1V9CIW_SVy4=
PLEASE do read the posting guide
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.R-2Dproject.org_posting-2Dguide.html=DwICAg=sJ6xIWYx-zLMB3EPkvcnVg=9PEhQh2kVeAsRzsn7AkP-g=WsafNBaOwXzuF-v3jJZaUbBRngZTxjDnPCJN1jlMOzYqG9yy06SkfQKtGPM2OWM5=hUs_mg3eaWhd-I4H-9rKF6C4B7CFwLsuBkx3Qv68_o0=
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] NAs are removed
I have a variable CA which has a value of 1 or 2, and I am using this code
in if statement
prot <- ifelse(ts$CA == '2', 0, 1)
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:04 PM Bill Dunlap
wrote:
> > fraction <- 0/0
> > if (fraction < .5) TRUE else FALSE
> Error in if (fraction < 0.5) TRUE else FALSE :
> missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
>
> -Bill
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:55 PM Bert Gunter
> wrote:
>
>> Unlikely.
>>
>> > 1/0
>> [1] Inf ## not NA
>>
>> Bert
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:41 PM Jim Lemon wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Neha,
>> > You're using the argument "na.omit" in what function? My blind guess
>> > is that there's a divide by zero shooting you from behind.
>> >
>> > Jim
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 6:32 AM Neha gupta
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi everyone
>> > >
>> > > I use na.omit to remove NAs but still it gives me error
>> > >
>> > > Error in if (fraction <= 1) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
>> > >
>> > > My data is:
>> > >
>> > > data.frame': 340 obs. of 15 variables:
>> > > $ DepthTree: num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
>> > > $ NumSubclass : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
>> > > $ McCabe : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 ...
>> > > $ LOC : num 3 4 3 3 4 4 10 10 10 10 ...
>> > > $ DepthNested : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ...
>> > > $ CA : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
>> > > $ CE : num 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
>> > > $ Instability : num 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667
>> > > 0.667 0.667 ...
>> > > $ numCovered : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
>> > > $ operator : Factor w/ 16 levels "T0","T1","T2",..: 2 2 4 13 13
>> 13
>> > 1 3
>> > > 4 7 ...
>> > > $ methodReturn : Factor w/ 22 levels "I","V","Z","method",..: 2 2 2
>> 2 2
>> > 2
>> > > 2 2 2 2 ...
>> > >
>> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> > >
>> > > __
>> > > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> > > PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> > > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>> >
>> > __
>> > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>> >
>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> __
>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] NAs are removed
Hi Jim and Ebert
How I am using divide by zero, I did not understand? I am using caret and
AUC metric.
If I do, what is the solution?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:41 PM Jim Lemon wrote:
> Hi Neha,
> You're using the argument "na.omit" in what function? My blind guess
> is that there's a divide by zero shooting you from behind.
>
> Jim
>
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 6:32 AM Neha gupta
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > I use na.omit to remove NAs but still it gives me error
> >
> > Error in if (fraction <= 1) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
> >
> > My data is:
> >
> > data.frame': 340 obs. of 15 variables:
> > $ DepthTree: num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> > $ NumSubclass : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> > $ McCabe : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 ...
> > $ LOC : num 3 4 3 3 4 4 10 10 10 10 ...
> > $ DepthNested : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ...
> > $ CA : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> > $ CE : num 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
> > $ Instability : num 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667
> > 0.667 0.667 ...
> > $ numCovered : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> > $ operator : Factor w/ 16 levels "T0","T1","T2",..: 2 2 4 13 13 13
> 1 3
> > 4 7 ...
> > $ methodReturn : Factor w/ 22 levels "I","V","Z","method",..: 2 2 2 2 2
> 2
> > 2 2 2 2 ...
> >
> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > __
> > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] NAs are removed
> fraction <- 0/0
> if (fraction < .5) TRUE else FALSE
Error in if (fraction < 0.5) TRUE else FALSE :
missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
-Bill
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:55 PM Bert Gunter wrote:
> Unlikely.
>
> > 1/0
> [1] Inf ## not NA
>
> Bert
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:41 PM Jim Lemon wrote:
>
> > Hi Neha,
> > You're using the argument "na.omit" in what function? My blind guess
> > is that there's a divide by zero shooting you from behind.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 6:32 AM Neha gupta
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone
> > >
> > > I use na.omit to remove NAs but still it gives me error
> > >
> > > Error in if (fraction <= 1) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
> > >
> > > My data is:
> > >
> > > data.frame': 340 obs. of 15 variables:
> > > $ DepthTree: num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> > > $ NumSubclass : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> > > $ McCabe : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 ...
> > > $ LOC : num 3 4 3 3 4 4 10 10 10 10 ...
> > > $ DepthNested : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ...
> > > $ CA : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> > > $ CE : num 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
> > > $ Instability : num 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667
> > > 0.667 0.667 ...
> > > $ numCovered : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> > > $ operator : Factor w/ 16 levels "T0","T1","T2",..: 2 2 4 13 13 13
> > 1 3
> > > 4 7 ...
> > > $ methodReturn : Factor w/ 22 levels "I","V","Z","method",..: 2 2 2 2
> 2
> > 2
> > > 2 2 2 2 ...
> > >
> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> > >
> > > __
> > > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> > > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
> >
> > __
> > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
> >
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> __
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] NAs are removed
On 14/01/2022 3:54 p.m., Bert Gunter wrote:
Unlikely.
1/0
[1] Inf ## not NA
However:
> if (0/0 <= 1) print("something")
Error in if (0/0 <= 1) print("something") :
missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
Duncan Murdoch
Bert
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:41 PM Jim Lemon wrote:
Hi Neha,
You're using the argument "na.omit" in what function? My blind guess
is that there's a divide by zero shooting you from behind.
Jim
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 6:32 AM Neha gupta
wrote:
Hi everyone
I use na.omit to remove NAs but still it gives me error
Error in if (fraction <= 1) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
My data is:
data.frame': 340 obs. of 15 variables:
$ DepthTree: num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
$ NumSubclass : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
$ McCabe : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 ...
$ LOC : num 3 4 3 3 4 4 10 10 10 10 ...
$ DepthNested : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ...
$ CA : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
$ CE : num 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
$ Instability : num 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667
0.667 0.667 ...
$ numCovered : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
$ operator : Factor w/ 16 levels "T0","T1","T2",..: 2 2 4 13 13 13
1 3
4 7 ...
$ methodReturn : Factor w/ 22 levels "I","V","Z","method",..: 2 2 2 2 2
2
2 2 2 2 ...
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] NAs are removed
Unlikely.
> 1/0
[1] Inf ## not NA
Bert
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:41 PM Jim Lemon wrote:
> Hi Neha,
> You're using the argument "na.omit" in what function? My blind guess
> is that there's a divide by zero shooting you from behind.
>
> Jim
>
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 6:32 AM Neha gupta
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > I use na.omit to remove NAs but still it gives me error
> >
> > Error in if (fraction <= 1) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
> >
> > My data is:
> >
> > data.frame': 340 obs. of 15 variables:
> > $ DepthTree: num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> > $ NumSubclass : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> > $ McCabe : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 ...
> > $ LOC : num 3 4 3 3 4 4 10 10 10 10 ...
> > $ DepthNested : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ...
> > $ CA : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> > $ CE : num 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
> > $ Instability : num 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667
> > 0.667 0.667 ...
> > $ numCovered : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> > $ operator : Factor w/ 16 levels "T0","T1","T2",..: 2 2 4 13 13 13
> 1 3
> > 4 7 ...
> > $ methodReturn : Factor w/ 22 levels "I","V","Z","method",..: 2 2 2 2 2
> 2
> > 2 2 2 2 ...
> >
> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > __
> > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
> __
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] NAs are removed
Hi Neha,
You're using the argument "na.omit" in what function? My blind guess
is that there's a divide by zero shooting you from behind.
Jim
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 6:32 AM Neha gupta wrote:
>
> Hi everyone
>
> I use na.omit to remove NAs but still it gives me error
>
> Error in if (fraction <= 1) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
>
> My data is:
>
> data.frame': 340 obs. of 15 variables:
> $ DepthTree: num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> $ NumSubclass : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> $ McCabe : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 ...
> $ LOC : num 3 4 3 3 4 4 10 10 10 10 ...
> $ DepthNested : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ...
> $ CA : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
> $ CE : num 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
> $ Instability : num 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667
> 0.667 0.667 ...
> $ numCovered : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
> $ operator : Factor w/ 16 levels "T0","T1","T2",..: 2 2 4 13 13 13 1 3
> 4 7 ...
> $ methodReturn : Factor w/ 22 levels "I","V","Z","method",..: 2 2 2 2 2 2
> 2 2 2 2 ...
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> __
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[R] NAs are removed
Hi everyone
I use na.omit to remove NAs but still it gives me error
Error in if (fraction <= 1) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
My data is:
data.frame': 340 obs. of 15 variables:
$ DepthTree: num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
$ NumSubclass : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
$ McCabe : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 ...
$ LOC : num 3 4 3 3 4 4 10 10 10 10 ...
$ DepthNested : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ...
$ CA : num 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
$ CE : num 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
$ Instability : num 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667
0.667 0.667 ...
$ numCovered : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
$ operator : Factor w/ 16 levels "T0","T1","T2",..: 2 2 4 13 13 13 1 3
4 7 ...
$ methodReturn : Factor w/ 22 levels "I","V","Z","method",..: 2 2 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 ...
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
