Re: [R] R vs octave development strategy (and success)

2013-10-29 Thread peter dalgaard
This is from the other perspective

http://www.r-project.org/conferences/DSC-2001/Proceedings/Eaton.pdf

I can’t spot any direct comparison (and there is no mention of R in the 
references), but I recall the ideas contrasting the two projects being bandied 
about at the time. That discussion is likely what is echoed in the Fox paper. 
John Eaton was running out of steam at the time and the paper is not making a 
secret of it. 

-pd

On 29 Oct 2013, at 18:32 , David Carlson  wrote:

> This covers the topic you mention, but from the perspective of
> the role of the R Core team. The point about Octave is a single
> sentence/footnote:
> 
> Fox, John. 2009. Aspects of the Social Organization and
> Trajectory of the R Project. The R Journal 1/2: 5-13.
> 
> http://rjournal.github.io/archive/2009-2/RJournal_2009-2_Fox.pdf
> 
> -
> David L Carlson
> Department of Anthropology
> Texas A&M University
> College Station, TX 77840-4352
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Federico
> Calboli
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 11:22 AM
> To: r-help
> Subject: [R] R vs octave development strategy (and success)
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> if memory serves me well I recall some paper comparing the
> relative success in getting mainstream acceptance (as mainstream
> as statistics can be) of both R and Octave.  I remember vaguely
> that the fact the development strategies (core team vs one main
> developer) played a major role in the relative success of the
> two programs.  I tried to find this paper, but my goggle skills
> are failing me.  Would anyone know where to find it?
> 
> Best
> 
> F
> 
> __
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

-- 
Peter Dalgaard, Professor,
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email: pd@cbs.dk  Priv: pda...@gmail.com

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] R vs octave development strategy (and success)

2013-10-29 Thread David Carlson
This covers the topic you mention, but from the perspective of
the role of the R Core team. The point about Octave is a single
sentence/footnote:

Fox, John. 2009. Aspects of the Social Organization and
Trajectory of the R Project. The R Journal 1/2: 5-13.

http://rjournal.github.io/archive/2009-2/RJournal_2009-2_Fox.pdf

-
David L Carlson
Department of Anthropology
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77840-4352

-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org
[mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Federico
Calboli
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 11:22 AM
To: r-help
Subject: [R] R vs octave development strategy (and success)

Hi All,

if memory serves me well I recall some paper comparing the
relative success in getting mainstream acceptance (as mainstream
as statistics can be) of both R and Octave.  I remember vaguely
that the fact the development strategies (core team vs one main
developer) played a major role in the relative success of the
two programs.  I tried to find this paper, but my goggle skills
are failing me.  Would anyone know where to find it?

Best

F

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] R vs octave development strategy (and success)

2013-10-29 Thread Federico Calboli
Hi All,

if memory serves me well I recall some paper comparing the relative success in 
getting mainstream acceptance (as mainstream as statistics can be) of both R 
and Octave.  I remember vaguely that the fact the development strategies (core 
team vs one main developer) played a major role in the relative success of the 
two programs.  I tried to find this paper, but my goggle skills are failing me. 
 Would anyone know where to find it?

Best

F


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.