Vartanian, Ara aravart at indiana.edu writes:
All,
I am looking for an optimization library that does well on something as
chaotic as the Schwefel function:
schwefel - function(x) sum(-x * sin(sqrt(abs(x
With these guys, not much luck:
optim(c(1,1), schwefel)$value
[1] -7.890603
optim(c(1,1), schwefel, method=SANN, control=list(maxit=1))$value
[1] -28.02825
optim(c(1,1), schwefel, lower=c(-500,-500), upper=c(500,500),
method=L-BFGS-B)$value
[1] -7.890603
optim(c(1,1), schwefel, method=BFGS)$value
[1] -7.890603
optim(c(1,1), schwefel, method=CG)$value
[1] -7.890603
Why is it necessary over and over again to point to the Optimization Task
View? This is a question about a global optimization problem, and the task
view tells you to look at packages like 'NLoptim' with specialized routines,
or use one of the packages with evolutionary algorithms, such as 'DEoptim'
or'pso'.
library(DEoptim)
schwefel - function(x) sum(-x * sin(sqrt(abs(x
de - DEoptim(schwefel, lower = c(-500,-500), upper = c(500,500),
control = list(trace = FALSE))
de$optim$bestmem
# par1 par2
# 420.9687 420.9687
de$optim$bestval
# [1] -837.9658
All trapped in local minima. I get the right answer when I pick a starting
point that's close:
optim(c(400,400), schwefel, lower=c(-500,-500), upper=c(500,500),
method=L-BFGS-B)$value
[1] -837.9658
Of course I can always roll my own:
r - vector()
for(i in 1:1000) {
x - runif(2, -500,500)
m - optim(x, schwefel, lower=c(-500,-500), upper=c(500,500),
method=L-BFGS-B)
r - rbind(r, c(m$par, m$value))
}
And this does fine. I'm just wondering if this is the right approach,
or if there is some other package that wraps this kind of multi-start
up so that the user doesn't have to think about it.
Best,
Ara
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
