Re: [R] The .tex version of the manual in foo.Rcheck
Bendix,
you can also take a source package an run
R CMD Rd2dvi --no-clean packageName
on it and you will get a temporary directory with the TeX sources in it.
Best wishes,
Uwe
BXC (Bendix Carstensen) wrote:
In version 2.8.1, running Rcmd check on the package foo would leave the file
foo-manual.tex in the folder foo.Rcheck.
But as of 2.9.0 only foo-manual.pdf and foo-manual.log are there.
Is this intentional?
Anyway it is inconvenient, because I would occasionally like to include the
manual at the end of a set of exercises, and this was a convenient file to
\input with a few select %'s added.
br.
Bendix
___
Bendix Carstensen
Senior Statistician
Steno Diabetes Center
Niels Steensens Vej 2-4
DK-2820 Gentofte
Denmark
+45 44 43 87 38 (direct)
+45 30 75 87 38 (mobile)
b...@steno.dk http://www.biostat.ku.dk/~bxc
www.steno.dk
This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended for ...{{dropped:8}}
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] The .tex version of the manual in foo.Rcheck
G'day Uwe, On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:03:43 +0200 Uwe Ligges lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de wrote: you can also take a source package an run R CMD Rd2dvi --no-clean packageName on it and you will get a temporary directory with the TeX sources in it. Which is fine for manual processing and when done once or twice, but somewhat less helpful for automatic processing in scripts since the name of the temporary directory is hard to predict. `R CMD check foo' copies already unconditionally the foo-manual.log file from the temporary directory to the foo.Rcheck directory; and the foo-manual.tex file is copied if an error occurs during processing. What is the problem with also copying the foo-manual.tex file unconditionally to foo.Rcheck? Cheers, Berwin __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] The .tex version of the manual in foo.Rcheck
Berwin A Turlach wrote: G'day Uwe, On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:03:43 +0200 Uwe Ligges lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de wrote: you can also take a source package an run R CMD Rd2dvi --no-clean packageName on it and you will get a temporary directory with the TeX sources in it. Which is fine for manual processing and when done once or twice, but somewhat less helpful for automatic processing in scripts since the name of the temporary directory is hard to predict. `R CMD check foo' copies already unconditionally the foo-manual.log file from the temporary directory to the foo.Rcheck directory; and the foo-manual.tex file is copied if an error occurs during processing. What is the problem with also copying the foo-manual.tex file unconditionally to foo.Rcheck? No problem at all, I think. Uwe Cheers, Berwin __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] The .tex version of the manual in foo.Rcheck
G'day Bendix, On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:52:02 +0200 BXC (Bendix Carstensen) b...@steno.dk wrote: In version 2.8.1, running Rcmd check on the package foo would leave the file foo-manual.tex in the folder foo.Rcheck. But as of 2.9.0 only foo-manual.pdf and foo-manual.log are there. Is this intentional? I do not know whether it is intentional, but it seems that parts of `check' were substantially re-written due to the new Rd parser. As far as I can understand the Perl code, the .tex file is only copied to the .Rcheck directory if an error occurs while the file is processed. But this can easily be changed by moving two lines in the script a bit higher, see the attached patch. Cheers, Berwin === Full address = Berwin A TurlachTel.: +65 6516 4416 (secr) Dept of Statistics and Applied Probability+65 6516 6650 (self) Faculty of Science FAX : +65 6872 3919 National University of Singapore 6 Science Drive 2, Blk S16, Level 7 e-mail: sta...@nus.edu.sg Singapore 117546http://www.stat.nus.edu.sg/~statba __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[R] The .tex version of the manual in foo.Rcheck
In version 2.8.1, running Rcmd check on the package foo would leave the file
foo-manual.tex in the folder foo.Rcheck.
But as of 2.9.0 only foo-manual.pdf and foo-manual.log are there.
Is this intentional?
Anyway it is inconvenient, because I would occasionally like to include the
manual at the end of a set of exercises, and this was a convenient file to
\input with a few select %'s added.
br.
Bendix
___
Bendix Carstensen
Senior Statistician
Steno Diabetes Center
Niels Steensens Vej 2-4
DK-2820 Gentofte
Denmark
+45 44 43 87 38 (direct)
+45 30 75 87 38 (mobile)
b...@steno.dk http://www.biostat.ku.dk/~bxc
www.steno.dk
This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended for ...{{dropped:8}}
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
