Re: [R] Compiling R code to native code?

2012-01-28 Thread Jeff Newmiller
Nope. Most users get speed by using vectorized calculations. If you have 
already identified how to get correct answers, the next step is something like 
Rcpp or linking to a shared library written in your language of choice.

But seriously, vectorizing is enough for most applications, and making sure the 
answer is right doesn't usually require compiled code.
---
Jeff NewmillerThe .   .  Go Live...
DCN:jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.usBasics: ##.#.   ##.#.  Live Go...
  Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#.   #.O#.  with
/Software/Embedded Controllers)   .OO#.   .OO#.  rocks...1k
--- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.

Gregory Propf gregorypr...@yahoo.com wrote:

Simple question: is there a way to compile R scripts to native code?
�If not is there anything else that might improve speed? �I'm not even
sure that R compiles internally to byte code or not. �I assume it does
since all modern languages seem to do this. �Maybe there's a JIT
compiler? �Yes, I have searched Google and get lots of stuff that's
seems confusing. �I just want to know what packages to install and how
to use them to generate binaries if they exist.
   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] Compiling R code to native code?

2012-01-28 Thread Bert Gunter
Facts:

1. R does not by default compile bytecode. It uses a read-parse-eval
cycle as described in the R Language Manual.

2. However, as of 2.14.0 (anyway) there is a compiler package that
is shipped as part of the standard distribution. Written by Luke
Tierney and his graduate student minions, it is described here:
http://www.divms.uiowa.edu/~luke/R/compiler/compiler.pdf

As usual, it can result in considerable speedup, though vectorization
is still a good strategy when possible.

To be clear, Jeff's original reply is correct -- R is interpreted, not compiled.

Cheers,
Bert

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jeff Newmiller
jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us wrote:
 Nope. Most users get speed by using vectorized calculations. If you have 
 already identified how to get correct answers, the next step is something 
 like Rcpp or linking to a shared library written in your language of choice.

 But seriously, vectorizing is enough for most applications, and making sure 
 the answer is right doesn't usually require compiled code.
 ---
 Jeff Newmiller                        The     .       .  Go Live...
 DCN:jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us        Basics: ##.#.       ##.#.  Live Go...
                                      Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
 Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries            O.O#.       #.O#.  with
 /Software/Embedded Controllers)               .OO#.       .OO#.  rocks...1k
 ---
 Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.

 Gregory Propf gregorypr...@yahoo.com wrote:

Simple question: is there a way to compile R scripts to native code?
�If not is there anything else that might improve speed? �I'm not even
sure that R compiles internally to byte code or not. �I assume it does
since all modern languages seem to do this. �Maybe there's a JIT
compiler? �Yes, I have searched Google and get lots of stuff that's
seems confusing. �I just want to know what packages to install and how
to use them to generate binaries if they exist.
       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.



-- 

Bert Gunter
Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics

Internal Contact Info:
Phone: 467-7374
Website:
http://pharmadevelopment.roche.com/index/pdb/pdb-functional-groups/pdb-biostatistics/pdb-ncb-home.htm

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] Compiling R code to native code?

2012-01-28 Thread Ben Bolker
Jeff Newmiller jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us writes:

  Nope. Most users get speed by using vectorized calculations. If you
 have already identified how to get correct answers, the next step is
 something like Rcpp or linking to a shared library written in your
 language of choice.

  But seriously, vectorizing is enough for most applications, and
 making sure the answer is right doesn't usually require compiled
 code.


 Gregory Propf gregorypropf at yahoo.com wrote:
 
 Simple question: is there a way to compile R scripts to native code?
 �If not is there anything else that might improve speed? �I'm not even
 sure that R compiles internally to byte code or not. �I assume it does
 since all modern languages seem to do this. �Maybe there's a JIT
 compiler? �Yes, I have searched Google and get lots of stuff that's
 seems confusing. �I just want to know what packages to install and how
 to use them to generate binaries if they exist.
  [[alternative HTML version deleted]]


  Note that there is a fairly recently introduced byte-compiler
for R (library(compiler); ?compile).  There's also
http://www.milbo.users.sonic.net/ra/ , which looks a little out
of date by now (last release August 2011), but it might be
worht comparing.  As Jeff said, though, there is usually room
for lots of speed improvement via vectorizing (or using add-on
packages such as data.table ).  I *believe* typical speed-ups
from the built-in compiler are on the order of three-fold.
Porting to compiled languages (most popularly via Rcpp) can
give much higher speed-ups.  For more information we'd really
need to know what you are trying to do.  You might try searching
Stack Overflow for [r] speed up ...

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.