Re: [R] local regression using loess

2009-07-28 Thread Alain Zuur


cindy Guo wrote:
 
 Hi, All,
 
 I have a dataset with binary response ( 0 and 1) and some numerical
 covariates. I know I can use logistic regression to fit the data. But I
 want
 to consider more locally. So I am wondering how can I fit the data with
 'loess' function in R? And what will be the response: 0/1 or the
 probability
 in either group like in logistic regression?
 
 Thank you,
 Cindy
 
   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
 
 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide
 http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
 
 


Why don't you fit a GAM with a logistic link function and binomial
distirbution?

Alain


-

Dr. Alain F. Zuur
First author of:

1. Analysing Ecological Data (2007).
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN and Smith, GM. Springer. 680 p.

2. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. (2009).
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN, Walker, N, Saveliev, AA, and Smith, GM. Springer.

3. A Beginner's Guide to R (2009).
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN, Meesters, EHWG. Springer


Statistical consultancy, courses, data analysis and software
Highland Statistics Ltd.
6 Laverock road
UK - AB41 6FN Newburgh
Email: highs...@highstat.com
URL: www.highstat.com



-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/local-regression-using-loess-tp24689834p24696908.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] local regression using loess

2009-07-28 Thread Bert Gunter

Actually, loess is much more than an interpolant.  I wouldn't 
even call it that.  It is a local regression  technique that comes 
with all the equipment you get in classical regression.  But it 
is meant for normal-like errors, which is not what you have.

-- This is misleading. The local smoother part makes a big difference. For
example df (and standard tests, consequently)are not defined as in
conventional multiple regression (though the enp argument gives you
something like df). Also, it was specifically designed for _non_-normal
errors -- specifically, long-tailed distributions -- via use of the
symmetric family argument which fits via a re-descending M-estimator not
Gaussian likelihood = least squares.

But you are certainly free to characterize it as you think appropriate if
you do not think interpolant is reasonable...

-- Bert



I would recommend that you take a look at the locfit package.  
It fits local likelihood models.  I've never tried it with binary data, 
but if y is your 0/1 response and x is a covariate, you might try 
something like:

locfit(y ~ x, ..., family=binomial)

If you have a good library at your disposal, try picking up Loader's 
book Local Regression and Likelihood.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] local regression using loess

2009-07-28 Thread Ryan Hafen
Are X1 and X2 both numeric?  You might want to get them on equivalent  
scales, and also play around with the smoothing parameter.

Try something like:

fit - locfit(Y ~ lp(X1, X2, nn=___, scale=TRUE), family=binomial)

and see what happens for different values of nn (try values between 0  
and 1 and then some larger than one).  I can't be much more help  
without data.


On Jul 27, 2009, at 9:41 PM, cindy Guo wrote:

 Hi, Ryan,

 Thank you for the information. I tried it. But there are some error  
 messages.

 When I use fit - locfit(Y~X1*X2,family='binomial'), the error  
 message is
 error lfproc(x, y, weights = weights, cens = cens, base = base, geth  
 = geth,  :
   compparcomp: parameters out of bounds

 And when I use fit - locfit(Y~X1*X2), the error message is
 error lfproc(x, y, weights = weights, cens = cens, base = base, geth  
 = geth,  :
   newsplit: out of vertex space

 This happens sometimes, not every time for different data. Do you  
 know what's the reason?

 Thank you,

 Cindy

 On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Ryan rha...@purdue.edu wrote:
  
   Hi, All,
  
   I have a dataset with binary response ( 0 and 1) and some  
 numerical
   covariates. I know I can use logistic regression to fit the  
 data. But I
   want
   to consider more locally. So I am wondering how can I fit the  
 data with
   'loess' function in R? And what will be the response: 0/1 or the
   probability
   in either group like in logistic regression?
  
   -- Neither. Loess is an algorithm that smoothly interpolates  
 the data. It
   makes no claim of modeling the probability for a binary response  
 variable.
  
   -- Bert Gunter
   Genentech Nonclinical Statistics
  
   Thank you,
   Cindy
  
  [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
  

 Actually, loess is much more than an interpolant.  I wouldn't
 even call it that.  It is a local regression  technique that comes
 with all the equipment you get in classical regression.  But it
 is meant for normal-like errors, which is not what you have.

 I would recommend that you take a look at the locfit package.
 It fits local likelihood models.  I've never tried it with binary  
 data,
 but if y is your 0/1 response and x is a covariate, you might try
 something like:

 locfit(y ~ x, ..., family=binomial)

 If you have a good library at your disposal, try picking up Loader's
 book Local Regression and Likelihood.

 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.



[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] local regression using loess

2009-07-28 Thread Ryan
Bert Gunter gunter.berton at gene.com writes:

 
 
 Actually, loess is much more than an interpolant.  I wouldn't 
 even call it that.  It is a local regression  technique that comes 
 with all the equipment you get in classical regression.  But it 
 is meant for normal-like errors, which is not what you have.
 


Bert - when I hear interpolate, I think of connecting the 
data points, like using something like divided differences 
or hermite interpolation, so I thought that's what you 
meant.  Sorry for the misunderstanding.  

True that loess was designed to be robust, but when I 
said it is meant for normal-like errors, I was referring 
to loess with statistical procedures analagous to the 
classical regression setting, such as confidence intervals, 
anova, etc. (see Locally Weighted Regression: An 
Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting, 1988).

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] local regression using loess

2009-07-28 Thread cindy Guo
Bert, Ryan, Alain,

You suggestions are very helpful. Thank you. I learned a lot from the
discussion.

Cindy

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Ryan rha...@purdue.edu wrote:

 Bert Gunter gunter.berton at gene.com writes:

 
 
  Actually, loess is much more than an interpolant.  I wouldn't
  even call it that.  It is a local regression  technique that comes
  with all the equipment you get in classical regression.  But it
  is meant for normal-like errors, which is not what you have.
 


 Bert - when I hear interpolate, I think of connecting the
 data points, like using something like divided differences
 or hermite interpolation, so I thought that's what you
 meant.  Sorry for the misunderstanding.

 True that loess was designed to be robust, but when I
 said it is meant for normal-like errors, I was referring
 to loess with statistical procedures analagous to the
 classical regression setting, such as confidence intervals,
 anova, etc. (see Locally Weighted Regression: An
 Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting, 1988).

 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide
 http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.htmlhttp://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] local regression using loess

2009-07-27 Thread Bert Gunter
-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf Of cindy Guo
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 4:06 PM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: [R] local regression using loess

Hi, All,

I have a dataset with binary response ( 0 and 1) and some numerical
covariates. I know I can use logistic regression to fit the data. But I want
to consider more locally. So I am wondering how can I fit the data with
'loess' function in R? And what will be the response: 0/1 or the probability
in either group like in logistic regression?

-- Neither. Loess is an algorithm that smoothly interpolates the data. It
makes no claim of modeling the probability for a binary response variable. 

-- Bert Gunter
Genentech Nonclinical Statistics

Thank you,
Cindy

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] local regression using loess

2009-07-27 Thread cindy Guo
Hi, Bert,

Thanks for the response. But then in this case, can I use loess to fit the
data? If yes, then how to interpret the results?

Cindy

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Bert Gunter gunter.ber...@gene.com wrote:

  -Original Message-
 From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org]
 On
 Behalf Of cindy Guo
 Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 4:06 PM
 To: r-help@r-project.org
 Subject: [R] local regression using loess

 Hi, All,

 I have a dataset with binary response ( 0 and 1) and some numerical
 covariates. I know I can use logistic regression to fit the data. But I
 want
 to consider more locally. So I am wondering how can I fit the data with
 'loess' function in R? And what will be the response: 0/1 or the
 probability
 in either group like in logistic regression?

 -- Neither. Loess is an algorithm that smoothly interpolates the data. It
 makes no claim of modeling the probability for a binary response variable.

 -- Bert Gunter
 Genentech Nonclinical Statistics

 Thank you,
 Cindy

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide
 http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.htmlhttp://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.



[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] local regression using loess

2009-07-27 Thread Ryan
 
  Hi, All,
 
  I have a dataset with binary response ( 0 and 1) and some numerical
  covariates. I know I can use logistic regression to fit the data. But I
  want
  to consider more locally. So I am wondering how can I fit the data with
  'loess' function in R? And what will be the response: 0/1 or the
  probability
  in either group like in logistic regression?
 
  -- Neither. Loess is an algorithm that smoothly interpolates the data. It
  makes no claim of modeling the probability for a binary response variable.
 
  -- Bert Gunter
  Genentech Nonclinical Statistics
 
  Thank you,
  Cindy
 
 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
 

Actually, loess is much more than an interpolant.  I wouldn't 
even call it that.  It is a local regression  technique that comes 
with all the equipment you get in classical regression.  But it 
is meant for normal-like errors, which is not what you have.

I would recommend that you take a look at the locfit package.  
It fits local likelihood models.  I've never tried it with binary data, 
but if y is your 0/1 response and x is a covariate, you might try 
something like:

locfit(y ~ x, ..., family=binomial)

If you have a good library at your disposal, try picking up Loader's 
book Local Regression and Likelihood.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] local regression using loess

2009-07-27 Thread cindy Guo
Hi, Ryan,

Thank you for the information. I tried it. But there are some error
messages.

When I use fit - locfit(Y~X1*X2,family='binomial'), the error message is
error lfproc(x, y, weights = weights, cens = cens, base = base, geth =
geth,  :
  compparcomp: parameters out of bounds

And when I use fit - locfit(Y~X1*X2), the error message is
error lfproc(x, y, weights = weights, cens = cens, base = base, geth =
geth,  :
  newsplit: out of vertex space

This happens sometimes, not every time for different data. Do you know
what's the reason?

Thank you,

Cindy

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Ryan rha...@purdue.edu wrote:

  
   Hi, All,
  
   I have a dataset with binary response ( 0 and 1) and some numerical
   covariates. I know I can use logistic regression to fit the data. But I
   want
   to consider more locally. So I am wondering how can I fit the data with
   'loess' function in R? And what will be the response: 0/1 or the
   probability
   in either group like in logistic regression?
  
   -- Neither. Loess is an algorithm that smoothly interpolates the
 data. It
   makes no claim of modeling the probability for a binary response
 variable.
  
   -- Bert Gunter
   Genentech Nonclinical Statistics
  
   Thank you,
   Cindy
  
  [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
  

 Actually, loess is much more than an interpolant.  I wouldn't
 even call it that.  It is a local regression  technique that comes
 with all the equipment you get in classical regression.  But it
 is meant for normal-like errors, which is not what you have.

 I would recommend that you take a look at the locfit package.
 It fits local likelihood models.  I've never tried it with binary data,
 but if y is your 0/1 response and x is a covariate, you might try
 something like:

 locfit(y ~ x, ..., family=binomial)

 If you have a good library at your disposal, try picking up Loader's
 book Local Regression and Likelihood.

 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide
 http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.htmlhttp://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.