RE: [R] R 2.0.0 not suffisantly reliable to be be used
From: Fan After wasting one whole day, I've finally decided to stay with 1.9.1, some problems have been reported to R-Bugs. For occasional users, I would say, there's no worst thing than that: you installed the new release, and soem of your existing codes no longer work ! Given the attitude that you've taken, I'd guess you do not deserve the improvements introduced in R-2.0.0. If you are at all serious about having your code working with R-2.0.0, you would have tested it in the alpha/beta cycle, and try to resolve it before the official release, rather than ranting about it after the fact. Most people know better, and will not appreciate how you denigrate R-core's effort. Andy ps: If it's too hard for you to learn to spell, at least learn to use a spell checker. -- Fan __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
Re: [R] R 2.0.0 is not suffisantly reliable to be used
WHAT CAN I DO FOR YOU, SIR ? Perhaps you're expecting some sort of congratulations for that new release ? I've taken time to download it, test it, and I've said what I've got to say. You're helping nobody with that sort of process of intention. -- Fan Liaw, Andy wrote: From: Fan After wasting one whole day, I've finally decided to stay with 1.9.1, some problems have been reported to R-Bugs. For occasional users, I would say, there's no worst thing than that: you installed the new release, and soem of your existing codes no longer work ! Given the attitude that you've taken, I'd guess you do not deserve the improvements introduced in R-2.0.0. If you are at all serious about having your code working with R-2.0.0, you would have tested it in the alpha/beta cycle, and try to resolve it before the official release, rather than ranting about it after the fact. Most people know better, and will not appreciate how you denigrate R-core's effort. Andy ps: If it's too hard for you to learn to spell, at least learn to use a spell checker. -- Fan __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html -- Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system. -- __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
Re: [R] R 2.0.0 is not suffisantly reliable to be used
Fan wrote: WHAT CAN I DO FOR YOU, SIR ? Perhaps you're expecting some sort of congratulations for that new release ? I've taken time to download it, test it, and I've said what I've got to say. You're helping nobody with that sort of process of intention. -- Fan Liaw, Andy wrote: From: Fan After wasting one whole day, I've finally decided to stay with 1.9.1, some problems have been reported to R-Bugs. For occasional users, I would say, there's no worst thing than that: you installed the new release, and soem of your existing codes no longer work ! Given the attitude that you've taken, I'd guess you do not deserve the improvements introduced in R-2.0.0. If you are at all serious about having your code working with R-2.0.0, you would have tested it in the alpha/beta cycle, and try to resolve it before the official release, rather than ranting about it after the fact. Most people know better, and will not appreciate how you denigrate R-core's effort. Andy ps: If it's too hard for you to learn to spell, at least learn to use a spell checker. -- Fan __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html -- Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system. -- __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html Hey Fan, sorry to hear that the latest version isn't working for you. You know, maybe I can help... what specifically were the problems that emerged when you installed the new version? I'd be happy to try to diagnose the lines or commands that are now giving you errors. I have a vast amount of existing code that ported with very few problems from 1.9.1 to 2.0.0. I think it would be very informative for everyone--and you may get some quality answers--if you posted the lines that once worked but now bomb out. Kevin __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
Re: [R] some help interpreting ANOVA results, please?
RenE J.V. Bertin wrote: ... Would you have any suggestions for an accessible text explaining lme, apart from MASS-4? The standard reference on lme is Pinheiro and Bates (2000) Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus (Springer). I have found this book very valuable (as I have Bates' other book on nonlinear regression with Don Watts). hope this helps. spencer graves __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
