Re: [R] Maximum likelihood estimate ofbivariatevonmises-weibulldistribut

2006-05-13 Thread Alan Cobo-Lewis
r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch on Saturday, May 13, 2006 at 6:00 AM -0500 wrote:
One of my friends recently wrote his PhD thesis from University of
Leeds under Kanti Mardia's direction. 

I bet your friend was really angling for that.


--
Alan B. Cobo-Lewis, Ph.D.   (207) 581-3840 tel
Department of Psychology(207) 581-6128 fax
University of Maine
Orono, ME 04469-5742[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.umaine.edu/visualperception

__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html


Re: [R] R-help Digest, Vol 39, Issue 13

2006-05-13 Thread Alan Cobo-Lewis
r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch on Saturday, May 13, 2006 at 6:00 AM -0500 wrote:
 lme(biomass~age, random=~woods/age)?

Jörn

Consult Pinheiro and Bates (2000, Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus, 
Springer, ISBN 0-387-98957-0 ref 7 at 
http://www.r-project.org/doc/bib/R-books.html ) for how to fit more elaborate 
models, but two straightforward ones that might be adequate
are
lme( biomass~age, random=~1|woods )
and
lme( biomass~age, random=~age|woods )

In the lme4 library corresponding syntax is
lmer( biomass~age+(1|woods) )
and
lmer( biomass~age+(age|woods) )

For vignettes on the lme4 library see the mlmRev library and
@ARTICLE{Rnews:Bates:2005,
  AUTHOR = {Douglas Bates},
  TITLE = {Fitting Linear Mixed Models in {R}},
  JOURNAL = {R News},
  YEAR = 2005,
  VOLUME = 5,
  NUMBER = 1,
  PAGES = {27--30},
  MONTH = {May},
  URL = {[ http://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/Rnews/ 
]http://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/Rnews/}
}

alan

--
Alan B. Cobo-Lewis, Ph.D.   (207) 581-3840 tel
Department of Psychology(207) 581-6128 fax
University of Maine
Orono, ME 04469-5742[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.umaine.edu/visualperception

__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html


Re: [R] monochrome mosaic plot in vcd package

2006-01-28 Thread Alan Cobo-Lewis
Michael,

How about using grayscale shading and setting the background color (the gaps 
between the tiles) to middle gray?

--
Alan B. Cobo-Lewis, Ph.D.   (207) 581-3840 tel
Department of Psychology(207) 581-6128 fax
University of Maine
Orono, ME 04469-5742[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.umaine.edu/visualperception



r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch on Saturday, January 28, 2006 at 6:00 AM -0500 wrote:
Content-Type: message/rfc822
MIME-Version: 1.0

From: Mike Townsley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:28:10 +
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Subject: [R] monochrome mosaic plot in vcd package
Message: 5

helpeRs,

I have a nice looking mosaic plot in an article to be published 
soon.  Sadly, the published version will be in black and white and so ruin 
the advantage of the default shading scheme of tiles.

What would readers suggest as an alternative shading scheme?  If I have a 
black-and-white shading scheme graduated according to suitable cutoffs I 
won't be able to tell positive from negative residuals.  The tile borders 
can be changed of course, but I'm uncertain that is will be clear enough 
for a reader.
Another option may be to use a fill pattern of sloping lines with different 
orientations for the sign and density for the magnitude.  The problem with 
this option is I wouldn't know where to start to incorporate into a legend.

The shading_binary function is no good as I would like the cells with 
residuals less than absolute 2 to be different from other cells.  How would 
readers of this list represent a mosaic plot so that it was easily 
interpretable in monochrome?

My data can be used as an example:


library(vcd)
library(MASS)

term.1 - gl(2,1,8, labels = LETTERS[1:2])
term.2 - gl(2,2,8, labels = LETTERS[3:4])
term.3 - gl(2,4,8, labels = LETTERS[5:6])

cell.count - c(72, 19, 5, 8, 117, 115, 81, 85)

mosaic(loglm(formula = cell.count ~ term.1 + term.2 + term.3),
shade = TRUE, gp = shading_hcl, legend = TRUE,
labeling_args = list(rot_labels = rep(0,4)),
gp_args = list(lty = 1:2),legend_width = unit(0.2, npc))




Dr Michael Townsley
Senior Research Fellow
Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science
University College London
Second Floor, Brook House
London, WC1E 7HN

Phone: 020 7679 0820
Fax: 020 7679 0828
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html


Re: [R] R-help Digest, Vol 32, Issue 26

2005-10-26 Thread Alan Cobo-Lewis
r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch on Wednesday, October 26, 2005 at 6:00 AM -0500 wrote:

Ronaldo,
Try Harold's suggestion. The df still won't agree, because lmer (at least in 
its current version) just puts an upper bound on the df. But that should be OK, 
because all those t tests are approximations anyways, and you can get better 
confidence
intervals (credible intervals, whatever) by using the mcmcsamp() function that 
works with lmer()
alan


Doran, Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED] responded:


There is an issue with implicit nesting in lmer. In your lme() model you nest
block/irrigation/density/fertilizer. In lmer you need to do something like
(I dind't include all of your variables, but I think the makes the point)

lmer(yield~irrigation*density*fertilizer+(1|fertilizer:density)+(1|density), 
data)

Which notes that fertilizer is nested in density. 

Try this and then compare the results. 

Ronaldo Reis-Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote:

I make the correct model with aov, lme do compare with lmer.

But I cant make a correct model in lmer. Look that the aov and lme results are
similars, but very different from lmer. In aov and lme is used the correct DF
for each variable, in lmer it use a same DF for all? Denom=54.


--
Alan B. Cobo-Lewis, Ph.D.   (207) 581-3840 tel
Department of Psychology(207) 581-6128 fax
University of Maine
Orono, ME 04469-5742[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.umaine.edu/visualperception

__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html


Re: [R] Any package to perform HLM (PROC GENMOD) like logistic

2005-10-21 Thread Alan Cobo-Lewis

I think you're looking for lmer( ... family=binomial ) in package lme4 by 
Bates  Sarkar.

William M. Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know there are very nice facilities in Pinhiero and Bates for doing 
HLM-type modeling for continuous dependent variables.  But I would 
like to be able to do repeated measures logistic regression, or LR on 
clustered observations

alan

--
Alan B. Cobo-Lewis, Ph.D.   (207) 581-3840 tel
Department of Psychology(207) 581-6128 fax
University of Maine
Orono, ME 04469-5742[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.umaine.edu/visualperception

__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html


Re: [R] anova on binomial LMER objects

2005-09-29 Thread Alan Cobo-Lewis
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Robert Bagchi wrote:
Hi Patrick

thanks for your advice. I have now tried glmmPQL, and it worked fine - 
I'm getting consistent results between plots and models fitted by 
glmmPQL. Plus it allows predict() and resid() which is another advantage 
over lmer at present.

quick question though: why does one need to use PQL for binomial models? 
Is there a good reference for this?

You don't have to use PQL for binomial models, but you can't use least-squares. 
PQL is an approximate solution. Laplace and Adaptive Gaussian Quadrature 
options in lmer are better approximations. So lmer would likely become the 
better option as it
progresses in its development (though the current issues you've found with the 
F ratios certainly sound like maybe lmer isn't better for you in its current 
incarnation).
alan

--
Alan B. Cobo-Lewis, Ph.D.   (207) 581-3840 tel
Department of Psychology(207) 581-6128 fax
University of Maine
Orono, ME 04469-5742[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.umaine.edu/visualperception

__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html


[R] Re: R-help Digest, Vol 16, Issue 11

2004-06-11 Thread Alan Cobo-Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I make a study in health econometrics and have a categorical dependent variable (take 
value 1-5). I would like to fit an ordered probit or ordered logit but i didn't find 
a command or package who make that. Does anyone know if it's exists ?

Try polr() from the MASS package (part of the standard install, also available from 
r-project.org)
Or try vglm() from Thomas Yee's VGAM package (in beta, available from Yee's web page, 
which you can find by googling Yee and VGAM)


--
Alan B. Cobo-Lewis, Ph.D.   (207) 581-3840 tel
Department of Psychology(207) 581-6128 fax
University of Maine
Orono, ME 04469-5742[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.umaine.edu/visualperception

__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html


Re: [R] Re: Use of the Foreign package to import Stata files

2003-10-07 Thread Alan Cobo-Lewis

Regarding an old version of foreign allegedly being able to read the file at
http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/examples/rwg/concord1.dta
Thomas Lumley [EMAIL PROTECTED] responded to my call for help:
I don't know why it used to work.  The file begins with 'h' (0x68), which
isn't in my list of valid Stata file types.  On the other hand, Stata has
no problem with it.  It's possible that it is a version 4 file (which
would make sense, since version 5 file start with 'i' and increase from
there) but that wouldn't explain why it used to work.

With the stataread package (which predates 0.5-x of foreign) I get Not a
Stata version 5-7 data file.

Thomas Lumley [EMAIL PROTECTED] continued:
I just found an old 1.6.2 (Mac OS/Darwin) lying around and it doesn't
recognize the file as a stata file (with foreign 0.5-8)

Thomas,

My apologies. It turns out that using R 1.6.2 and an old foreign library, I *can't* 
read the concord1.dta file at that url, though I *can* read a concord1.dta file that 
I'd downloaded several months ago. So either the archive at www.ats.ucla.edu
overwrote good files with bad, or maybe their site doesn't match an alternate source 
for the same data files. Either way, I'm sorry to have sent you on a wild goose chase. 
The error was not in your package. Thank you for your prompt replies.

alan

--
Alan B. Cobo-Lewis, Ph.D.   (207) 581-3840 tel
Department of Psychology(207) 581-6128 fax
University of Maine
Orono, ME 04469-5742[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.umaine.edu/visualperception

__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help


[R] Re: Use of the Foreign package to import Stata files

2003-10-06 Thread Alan Cobo-Lewis
Long ago (Sat, 2 Nov 2002), Bill Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 An R newbie here. I am using R 1.6 currently and have 
 (successfully, I think) installed the Foreign package. 
 Tried to import a data file created with Stata 7.0 
 SE. Had minor problems with syntax then R decided 
 that my file was not really a Stata file. It rejected 
 the file saying 'Not created by Stata 5-7/SE'. Any 
 suggestions on how to convince R that this is really, 
 truly a Stata file? 
 
Thomas Lumley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) responded:
 You need the version of read.dta that I wrote yesterday after finally 
 obtaining some 7/SE datasets for debugging. If you can compile packages 
 then I can send you the code, otherwise you will have to wait for the next 
 version of the foreign package. 

But sometimes older works better than newer. The read.dta() function in R 1.7.0's 
foreign package (package 0.6-3) fails to recognize as a Stata file what seems to be a 
genuine Stata file, even though R 1.6.2's foreign package (package 0.5-9) imports
the same file just work fine. Using R 1.7 and rolling the package back to foreign 0.5 
doesn't seem to fix the problem (haven't been able to roll R1.7 all the way back to 
foreign 0.5-9 yet, just to a newer 0.5 whose binary is still posted on cran).

An example of such a Stata file it at
http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/examples/rwg/concord1.dta

Does anyone have a hint or fix?

alan

--
Alan B. Cobo-Lewis, Ph.D.   (207) 581-3840 tel
Department of Psychology(207) 581-6128 fax
University of Maine
Orono, ME 04469-5742[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.umaine.edu/visualperception

__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help