date:20180406

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

2018-04-06 Thread Dudek Andrzej

Thanks a lot !!!

I've been blind, I've read this message about twenty times and haven't noticed 
that letter v after - sign  is not capitalized so my thoughts went to spelling 
issues.  In fact after capitalizing this letter package has passed pre-tests. 
(Even without Bervin's solution which I plan to implement in next version)

Thanks Everyone for Help !

Andrzej

-Original Message-
From: Georgi Boshnakov [mailto:georgi.boshna...@manchester.ac.uk] 
Sent: Friday, April 6, 2018 8:32 AM
To: Dudek Andrzej 
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: RE: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

In fact, the reason for rejection is just after the 'misspelled' words:

>The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title case:
'>Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-valued Symbolic 
Data'
>'Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-Valued Symbolic 
>Data'

Just copy the second line, which is the suggested title in 'title case'.  
(and write in the Note field on the submission page that the misspelled words 
are actually names, which you have checked)

Georgi Boshnakov




-Original Message-
From: R-package-devel [mailto:r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf 
Of Dudek Andrzej
Sent: 06 April 2018 07:13
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

Ok, my fault sorry:

This is the original message for current submission from prof. Ligges  

---

Dear maintainer,

package mdsOpt_0.3-1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, 
please see the pre-test at:

Status: 1 NOTE

Current CRAN status: ERROR: 1, OK: 11
See: 

Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
If you are not sure how to fix the problems shown, please ask for help on the 
R-package-devel mailing list:

If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please reply-all 
to this message and explain.

More details are given in the directory:

The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.


Best regards,
CRAN teams' auto-check service

---

And following the first link:


* using log directory 'd:/RCompile/CRANincoming/R-devel/mdsOpt.Rcheck'
* using R version 3.5.0 alpha (2018-03-30 r74499)
* using platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32 (64-bit)
* using session charset: ISO8859-1
* checking for file 'mdsOpt/DESCRIPTION' ... OK
* this is package 'mdsOpt' version '0.3-1'
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: 'Andrzej Dudek '

Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
  De (13:2)
  Diday (14:47)
  Groenen (12:13, 14:2)
  Leeuw (13:5)
  Mair (12:30, 13:16)
  Walesiak (15:2, 16:2)
  Winsberg (14:18)

The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title case:
'Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-valued Symbolic 
Data'
'Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-Valued Symbolic 
Data'
* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking serialization versions ... OK
* checking whether package 'mdsOpt' can be installed ... OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package directory ... OK
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking top-level files ... OK
* checking for left-over files ... OK
* checking index information ... OK
* checking package subdirectories ... OK
* checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
* loading checks for arch 'i386'
** checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
** checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
** checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
** checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
** checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
** checking loading without being on the library search path ... OK
** checking use of S3 registration ... OK
* loading checks for arch 'x64'
** checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
** checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
** checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
** check

[R-pkg-devel] GPL + other licence

2018-04-06 Thread David C Sterratt

Dear all,

I'd appreciate help with a licence conundrum I have with the geometry
package (https://davidcsterratt.github.io/geometry/) that I maintain.

The geometry package contains some functions (e.g. convhulln(),
delaunayn()) that wrap the Qhull library (http://www.qhull.org), which
has its own, non-GPL, licence. The geometry package includes this source
code, and wraps it in C files that have GPL licence headers.

The geometry package also has functions that are not derived from Qhull
code and which are licensed under GPL, including a number of functions
that are ports of the Matlab distmesh package, and some other useful
functions to do with triangulation and coordinate systems (e.g.
tsearch() and cart2bary()).

I inherited this situation when I took over maintaining the package 8
years ago, though I have added functions to both Qhull-derived and GPL
categories.

In October last year I submitted the latest version of the geometry
package, which adds quite a bit of useful functionality:
https://github.com/davidcsterratt/geometry/blob/master/pkg/NEWS

I received the following response from the CRAN maintainers:

  For the license. It is CRAN policy that a package has to have a single
  license. Can you manage to convince all copyright hoders (e.g. of
  Qhull) to relicense under GPL?

I tried persuading the author of Qhull. He replied:

  There's only one license and that's the one included with the code
  (COPYING.txt). Several years ago, I tried to clarify the license with
  the Univ. of Minn. but had no success. So I think the best approach is
  to keep the original license as is. It has not been an issue so far.

At the same time as I wrote to the Qhull maintainer, I wrote to the CRAN
maintainers:

  I have written to the Qhull maintainer, but I doubt he will want to
  change the license, since Qhull is used in proprietary software such
  as MATLAB. Assuming this is the case, we'll have to create a new
  package - I would need help with managing the change for dependent
  packages.

The CRAN maintainers replied:

  Please try to find out how this can work.

In principle I could create a package containing only the functions
derived from Qhull (but still with GPL headers in the wrapper C files,
see e.g.,
https://github.com/davidcsterratt/geometry/blob/master/pkg/src/Rconvhulln.c
But wouldn't this package still have to have two licenses, due to the
GPL headers?

I don't want to start on any package splitting without having a plan
agreed that I know will be OK for CRAN. It would be quite a bit of work,
as there are a number of packages that depend on geometry, so I would
have to check all the revdeps for functions that they call in the
geometry package. I would have to then perhaps write wrapper functions
in the geometry package to make sure any functions moved to a new
package still worked when called from revdeps.

I know the CRAN maintainers are busy, so any help from the list would be
much appreciated.

Best wishes,

David.

--
David C Sterratt, Senior Research Associate
Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, School of Informatics
University of Edinburgh, 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, Scotland, UK
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/sterratt - tel: +44 131 651 1739

-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

2018-04-06 Thread Ben Bolker


  FWIW, the first (many) times I read the warning

"The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title
case:"

  I couldn't parse it at all. Brevity is wonderful, but I might submit a
patch/wish for this warning to be changed to (something like): "The
Title field should be in title case; the next line shows the current
version, while the following line shows the recommended format" (or even
"The Title field should be in title case! The next line ...")



On 18-04-06 03:10 PM, Dudek Andrzej wrote:
> Thanks a lot !!!
> 
> I've been blind, I've read this message about twenty times and haven't 
> noticed that letter v after - sign  is not capitalized so my thoughts went to 
> spelling issues.  In fact after capitalizing this letter package has passed 
> pre-tests. (Even without Bervin's solution which I plan to implement in next 
> version)
> 
> Thanks Everyone for Help !
> 
> Andrzej
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Georgi Boshnakov [mailto:georgi.boshna...@manchester.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Friday, April 6, 2018 8:32 AM
> To: Dudek Andrzej 
> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: RE: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note
> 
> In fact, the reason for rejection is just after the 'misspelled' words:
> 
>> The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title case:
> '>Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-valued Symbolic 
> Data'
>> 'Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-Valued Symbolic 
>> Data'
> 
> Just copy the second line, which is the suggested title in 'title case'.  
> (and write in the Note field on the submission page that the misspelled words 
> are actually names, which you have checked)
> 
> Georgi Boshnakov
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: R-package-devel [mailto:r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On 
> Behalf Of Dudek Andrzej
> Sent: 06 April 2018 07:13
> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note
> 
> Ok, my fault sorry:
> 
> This is the original message for current submission from prof. Ligges  
> 
> ---
> 
> Dear maintainer,
> 
> package mdsOpt_0.3-1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, 
> please see the pre-test at:
> 
> Status: 1 NOTE
> 
> Current CRAN status: ERROR: 1, OK: 11
> See: 
> 
> Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
> If you are not sure how to fix the problems shown, please ask for help on the 
> R-package-devel mailing list:
> 
> If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please reply-all 
> to this message and explain.
> 
> More details are given in the directory:
> 
> The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> CRAN teams' auto-check service
> 
> ---
> 
> And following the first link:
> 
> 
> * using log directory 'd:/RCompile/CRANincoming/R-devel/mdsOpt.Rcheck'
> * using R version 3.5.0 alpha (2018-03-30 r74499)
> * using platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32 (64-bit)
> * using session charset: ISO8859-1
> * checking for file 'mdsOpt/DESCRIPTION' ... OK
> * this is package 'mdsOpt' version '0.3-1'
> * package encoding: UTF-8
> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
> Maintainer: 'Andrzej Dudek '
> 
> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
>   De (13:2)
>   Diday (14:47)
>   Groenen (12:13, 14:2)
>   Leeuw (13:5)
>   Mair (12:30, 13:16)
>   Walesiak (15:2, 16:2)
>   Winsberg (14:18)
> 
> The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title case:
> 'Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-valued Symbolic 
> Data'
> 'Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-Valued Symbolic 
> Data'
> * checking package namespace information ... OK
> * checking package dependencies ... OK
> * checking if this is a source package ... OK
> * checking if there is a namespace ... OK
> * checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
> * checking for portable file names ... OK
> * checking serialization versions ... OK
> * checking whether package 'mdsOpt' can be installed ... OK
> * checking installed package size ... OK
> * checking package directory ... OK
> * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
> * checking top-level files ... OK
> * checking for left-over files ... OK
> * checking index information ... OK
> * checking package subdirectories ... OK
> * checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... O

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

2018-04-06 Thread Duncan Murdoch


On 06/04/2018 3:14 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:


   FWIW, the first (many) times I read the warning

"The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title
case:"

   I couldn't parse it at all. Brevity is wonderful, but I might submit a
patch/wish for this warning to be changed to (something like): "The
Title field should be in title case; the next line shows the current
version, while the following line shows the recommended format" (or even
"The Title field should be in title case! The next line ...")


I don't like the current wording either.  So I'd suggest putting 
together something that people here agree is clear, then actually 
submitting it as a patch.


What I don't like about your first one is that it is too complicated. 
I'd rather have something like your second one, specifically


"The Title field should be in title case!  Your submission has

   blah blah blah

This is not in title case, which would be

   Blah, Blah, Blah"








On 18-04-06 03:10 PM, Dudek Andrzej wrote:

Thanks a lot !!!

I've been blind, I've read this message about twenty times and haven't noticed 
that letter v after - sign  is not capitalized so my thoughts went to spelling 
issues.  In fact after capitalizing this letter package has passed pre-tests. 
(Even without Bervin's solution which I plan to implement in next version)

Thanks Everyone for Help !

Andrzej

-Original Message-
From: Georgi Boshnakov [mailto:georgi.boshna...@manchester.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, April 6, 2018 8:32 AM
To: Dudek Andrzej 
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: RE: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

In fact, the reason for rejection is just after the 'misspelled' words:


The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title case:

'>Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-valued Symbolic 
Data'

'Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-Valued Symbolic 
Data'


Just copy the second line, which is the suggested title in 'title case'.
(and write in the Note field on the submission page that the misspelled words 
are actually names, which you have checked)

Georgi Boshnakov




-Original Message-
From: R-package-devel [mailto:r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf 
Of Dudek Andrzej
Sent: 06 April 2018 07:13
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

Ok, my fault sorry:

This is the original message for current submission from prof. Ligges

---

Dear maintainer,

package mdsOpt_0.3-1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, 
please see the pre-test at:

Status: 1 NOTE

Current CRAN status: ERROR: 1, OK: 11
See: 

Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
If you are not sure how to fix the problems shown, please ask for help on the 
R-package-devel mailing list:

If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please reply-all 
to this message and explain.

More details are given in the directory:

The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.


Best regards,
CRAN teams' auto-check service

---

And following the first link:


* using log directory 'd:/RCompile/CRANincoming/R-devel/mdsOpt.Rcheck'
* using R version 3.5.0 alpha (2018-03-30 r74499)
* using platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32 (64-bit)
* using session charset: ISO8859-1
* checking for file 'mdsOpt/DESCRIPTION' ... OK
* this is package 'mdsOpt' version '0.3-1'
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: 'Andrzej Dudek '

Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
   De (13:2)
   Diday (14:47)
   Groenen (12:13, 14:2)
   Leeuw (13:5)
   Mair (12:30, 13:16)
   Walesiak (15:2, 16:2)
   Winsberg (14:18)

The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title case:
'Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-valued Symbolic 
Data'
'Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-Valued Symbolic 
Data'
* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking serialization versions ... OK
* checking whether package 'mdsOpt' can be installed ... OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package dir

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

2018-04-06 Thread Georgi Boshnakov


Since this message appears also in R CMD check locally, maybe change in 
Duncan's text 'submission' to something like

The Title field should be in title case!  Your title is

blah blah blah

This is not in title case, which would be

Blah, Blah, Blah"

-
Georgi Boshnakov  



From: R-package-devel [r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf of 
Duncan Murdoch [murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 April 2018 00:06
To: Ben Bolker; r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

On 06/04/2018 3:14 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>
>FWIW, the first (many) times I read the warning
>
> "The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title
> case:"
>
>I couldn't parse it at all. Brevity is wonderful, but I might submit a
> patch/wish for this warning to be changed to (something like): "The
> Title field should be in title case; the next line shows the current
> version, while the following line shows the recommended format" (or even
> "The Title field should be in title case! The next line ...")

I don't like the current wording either.  So I'd suggest putting
together something that people here agree is clear, then actually
submitting it as a patch.

What I don't like about your first one is that it is too complicated.
I'd rather have something like your second one, specifically

"The Title field should be in title case!  Your submission has

blah blah blah

This is not in title case, which would be

Blah, Blah, Blah"




>
>
>
> On 18-04-06 03:10 PM, Dudek Andrzej wrote:
>> Thanks a lot !!!
>>
>> I've been blind, I've read this message about twenty times and haven't 
>> noticed that letter v after - sign  is not capitalized so my thoughts went 
>> to spelling issues.  In fact after capitalizing this letter package has 
>> passed pre-tests. (Even without Bervin's solution which I plan to implement 
>> in next version)
>>
>> Thanks Everyone for Help !
>>
>> Andrzej
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Georgi Boshnakov [mailto:georgi.boshna...@manchester.ac.uk]
>> Sent: Friday, April 6, 2018 8:32 AM
>> To: Dudek Andrzej 
>> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
>> Subject: RE: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note
>>
>> In fact, the reason for rejection is just after the 'misspelled' words:
>>
>>> The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title case:
>> '>Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-valued 
>> Symbolic Data'
>>> 'Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-Valued 
>>> Symbolic Data'
>>
>> Just copy the second line, which is the suggested title in 'title case'.
>> (and write in the Note field on the submission page that the misspelled 
>> words are actually names, which you have checked)
>>
>> Georgi Boshnakov
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: R-package-devel [mailto:r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On 
>> Behalf Of Dudek Andrzej
>> Sent: 06 April 2018 07:13
>> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note
>>
>> Ok, my fault sorry:
>>
>> This is the original message for current submission from prof. Ligges
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Dear maintainer,
>>
>> package mdsOpt_0.3-1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, 
>> please see the pre-test at:
>> 
>> Status: 1 NOTE
>>
>> Current CRAN status: ERROR: 1, OK: 11
>> See: 
>>
>> Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
>> If you are not sure how to fix the problems shown, please ask for help on 
>> the R-package-devel mailing list:
>> 
>> If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please 
>> reply-all to this message and explain.
>>
>> More details are given in the directory:
>> 
>> The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> CRAN teams' auto-check service
>>
>> ---
>>
>> And following the first link:
>>
>>
>> * using log directory 'd:/RCompile/CRANincoming/R-devel/mdsOpt.Rcheck'
>> * using R version 3.5.0 alpha (2018-03-30 r74499)
>> * using platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32 (64-bit)
>> * using session charset: ISO8859-1
>> * checking for file 'mdsOpt/DESCRIPTION' ... OK
>> * this is package 'mdsOpt' version '0.3-1'
>> * package encoding: UTF-8
>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
>> Maintainer: 'Andrzej Dudek '
>>
>> Possibly

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

2018-04-06 Thread Duncan Murdoch


On 06/04/2018 7:29 PM, Georgi Boshnakov wrote:


Since this message appears also in R CMD check locally, maybe change in 
Duncan's text 'submission' to something like

The Title field should be in title case!  Your title is

 blah blah blah

This is not in title case, which would be

 Blah, Blah, Blah"


Good point, I agree.

Duncan Murdoch


-
Georgi Boshnakov



From: R-package-devel [r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf of 
Duncan Murdoch [murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 April 2018 00:06
To: Ben Bolker; r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

On 06/04/2018 3:14 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:


FWIW, the first (many) times I read the warning

"The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title
case:"

I couldn't parse it at all. Brevity is wonderful, but I might submit a
patch/wish for this warning to be changed to (something like): "The
Title field should be in title case; the next line shows the current
version, while the following line shows the recommended format" (or even
"The Title field should be in title case! The next line ...")


I don't like the current wording either.  So I'd suggest putting
together something that people here agree is clear, then actually
submitting it as a patch.

What I don't like about your first one is that it is too complicated.
I'd rather have something like your second one, specifically

"The Title field should be in title case!  Your submission has

 blah blah blah

This is not in title case, which would be

 Blah, Blah, Blah"








On 18-04-06 03:10 PM, Dudek Andrzej wrote:

Thanks a lot !!!

I've been blind, I've read this message about twenty times and haven't noticed 
that letter v after - sign  is not capitalized so my thoughts went to spelling 
issues.  In fact after capitalizing this letter package has passed pre-tests. 
(Even without Bervin's solution which I plan to implement in next version)

Thanks Everyone for Help !

Andrzej

-Original Message-
From: Georgi Boshnakov [mailto:georgi.boshna...@manchester.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, April 6, 2018 8:32 AM
To: Dudek Andrzej 
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: RE: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

In fact, the reason for rejection is just after the 'misspelled' words:


The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title case:

'>Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-valued Symbolic 
Data'

'Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-Valued Symbolic 
Data'


Just copy the second line, which is the suggested title in 'title case'.
(and write in the Note field on the submission page that the misspelled words 
are actually names, which you have checked)

Georgi Boshnakov




-Original Message-
From: R-package-devel [mailto:r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf 
Of Dudek Andrzej
Sent: 06 April 2018 07:13
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

Ok, my fault sorry:

This is the original message for current submission from prof. Ligges

---

Dear maintainer,

package mdsOpt_0.3-1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, 
please see the pre-test at:

Status: 1 NOTE

Current CRAN status: ERROR: 1, OK: 11
See: 

Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
If you are not sure how to fix the problems shown, please ask for help on the 
R-package-devel mailing list:

If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please reply-all 
to this message and explain.

More details are given in the directory:

The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.


Best regards,
CRAN teams' auto-check service

---

And following the first link:


* using log directory 'd:/RCompile/CRANincoming/R-devel/mdsOpt.Rcheck'
* using R version 3.5.0 alpha (2018-03-30 r74499)
* using platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32 (64-bit)
* using session charset: ISO8859-1
* checking for file 'mdsOpt/DESCRIPTION' ... OK
* this is package 'mdsOpt' version '0.3-1'
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: 'Andrzej Dudek '

Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
De (13:2)
Diday (14:47)
Groenen (12:13, 14:2)
Leeuw (13:5)
Mair (12:30, 13:16)
Walesiak (15:2, 16:2)
Winsberg (1

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

[R-pkg-devel] GPL + other licence

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note

6 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information