Re: [R-pkg-devel] Note: checking CRAN incoming feasibility but the package did not pass

2021-02-13 Thread Uwe Ligges 

You should be reporting everything, the key issue here was

Check: Overall checktime, Result: NOTE
  Overall checktime 23 min > 10 min


which is mainly from the vignette.
Please reduce its check time by using
- few iterations
- toy data
- and if that is not quick enough, try to provide precomputed results.

CAN can also disable vignette checks for regular checks of a package, 
but that should always be the last option.


Best,
Uwe Ligges

On 14.02.2021 00:06, Elysée Aristide wrote:

Greetings,

I submitted my package CDatanet.
There was no error from Windows and Debian but just this note : "checking
CRAN incoming feasibility"
However, the package did not pass the incoming checks. My understanding was
that this note is normal and does not matter.
Here is the message I got from CRAN.

package CDatanet_0.0.1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
Windows: <
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/CDatanet_0.0.1_20210212_184621/Windows/00check.log



Status: 1 NOTE
Debian: <
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/CDatanet_0.0.1_20210212_184621/Debian/00check.log



Status: 1 NOTE



Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.


Please, could you help me to solve this issue?


Best,

*-*

*Aristide Elysée HOUNDETOUNGAN*
*Ph.D. Candidate in Economics at Université Laval*
*Personal website : *www.ahoundetoungan.com

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel



__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Note: checking CRAN incoming feasibility but the package did not pass

2021-02-13 Thread Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel 
To the best of my knowledge,  new submissions always get that note,  and new 
submissions are handled differently, as they are given closer inspection by a 
human, and since this is all-volunteer the amount of time that can take for the 
code review can vary greatly.  If you are greatly concerned there is something 
more than that.  you can respond to the email querying if the only problem is 
the new submission and you should just sit tight,  or if there is something 
else.  Again,  since it is a few individuals it may take a couple of days to 
receive a response.  You can also check the status of your submission both at:

https://itsalocke.com/cransays/articles/dashboard

and

 ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/.

If all is going correctly your package should be in the "inspect" folding 
pending review.

HTH,

-Roy


> On Feb 13, 2021, at 3:06 PM, Elysée Aristide  wrote:
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> I submitted my package CDatanet.
> There was no error from Windows and Debian but just this note : "checking
> CRAN incoming feasibility"
> However, the package did not pass the incoming checks. My understanding was
> that this note is normal and does not matter.
> Here is the message I got from CRAN.
> 
> package CDatanet_0.0.1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
> automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
> Windows: <
> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/CDatanet_0.0.1_20210212_184621/Windows/00check.log
>> 
> Status: 1 NOTE
> Debian: <
> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/CDatanet_0.0.1_20210212_184621/Debian/00check.log
>> 
> Status: 1 NOTE
> 
> 
> 
> Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
> 
> 
> Please, could you help me to solve this issue?
> 
> 
> Best,
> 
> *-*
> 
> *Aristide Elysée HOUNDETOUNGAN*
> *Ph.D. Candidate in Economics at Université Laval*
> *Personal website : *www.ahoundetoungan.com
> 
>   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

**
"The contents of this message do not reflect any position of the U.S. 
Government or NOAA."
**
Roy Mendelssohn
Supervisory Operations Research Analyst
NOAA/NMFS
Environmental Research Division
Southwest Fisheries Science Center
***Note new street address***
110 McAllister Way
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Phone: (831)-420-3666
Fax: (831) 420-3980
e-mail: roy.mendelss...@noaa.gov www: https://www.pfeg.noaa.gov/

"Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill."
"From those who have been given much, much will be expected" 
"the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice" -MLK Jr.

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Error occurring only when I submit to CRAN

2021-02-13 Thread Elysée Aristide 
Thank you for your explanation.

*-*

*Aristide Elysée HOUNDETOUNGAN*
*Ph.D. Candidate in Economics at Université Laval*
*Personal website : *www.ahoundetoungan.com




On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 11:08, Ivan Krylov  wrote:

> On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:47:37 -0500
> Elysée Aristide  wrote:
>
> > I did not want to put restrictions.
>
> Apologies, I could have phrased this better.
>
> If you want the whole of your package to be distributed under the terms
> of Apache-2.0 or GPL-3 license (at the user's choosing), the following
> DESCRIPTION fragment seems to be the way to express that intent:
>
> License: GPL-3 | file LICENSE
>
> > What is the better thing to put if I do not want to put
> > restrictions? The easiest one which allows sharing, copying ...?
>
> Personally, I would keep things simple by choosing only one license.
> Exactly which one to choose is a question of personal preference, as
> such known to result in flame wars, so I must try to stay neutral.
>
> For R packages, the line between Apache-style "please retain the
> copyright notice if you redistribute" licenses and GPL-style "please
> share your improvements as source code if you redistribute" is somewhat
> blurry, since people typically share source .tar.gz packages anyway,
> thus fulfilling the terms of both licenses. The differences only come
> into play only when other people distribute the _binary_ packages built
> from your source code they _modified_.
>
> Perhaps re-reading WRE 1.1.2
>  or
> consulting websites like  or
>  would help?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Ivan
>
> [If you don't mind, let's keep this correspondence on the list by
> replying-to-all and Cc:-ing ]
>

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Note: checking CRAN incoming feasibility but the package did not pass

2021-02-13 Thread Ben Bolker 
  That's weird, I agree that there don't seem to be any issues here for 
you to deal with.  I would write back to CRAN (at whatever e-mail 
address is suggested for correspondence, c...@r-project.org if you can't 
figure it out) and ask for clarification  (presumably the e-mail didn't 
list any other issues they wanted you to fix? Sometimes there are issues 
that are on CRAN's checklist that are *not* tested automatically ...)


On 2/13/21 6:06 PM, Elysée Aristide wrote:

Greetings,

I submitted my package CDatanet.
There was no error from Windows and Debian but just this note : "checking
CRAN incoming feasibility"
However, the package did not pass the incoming checks. My understanding was
that this note is normal and does not matter.
Here is the message I got from CRAN.

package CDatanet_0.0.1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
Windows: <
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/CDatanet_0.0.1_20210212_184621/Windows/00check.log



Status: 1 NOTE
Debian: <
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/CDatanet_0.0.1_20210212_184621/Debian/00check.log



Status: 1 NOTE



Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.


Please, could you help me to solve this issue?


Best,

*-*

*Aristide Elysée HOUNDETOUNGAN*
*Ph.D. Candidate in Economics at Université Laval*
*Personal website : *www.ahoundetoungan.com

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel



__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

[R-pkg-devel] Note: checking CRAN incoming feasibility but the package did not pass

2021-02-13 Thread Elysée Aristide 
Greetings,

I submitted my package CDatanet.
There was no error from Windows and Debian but just this note : "checking
CRAN incoming feasibility"
However, the package did not pass the incoming checks. My understanding was
that this note is normal and does not matter.
Here is the message I got from CRAN.

package CDatanet_0.0.1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
Windows: <
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/CDatanet_0.0.1_20210212_184621/Windows/00check.log
>
Status: 1 NOTE
Debian: <
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/CDatanet_0.0.1_20210212_184621/Debian/00check.log
>
Status: 1 NOTE



Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.


Please, could you help me to solve this issue?


Best,

*-*

*Aristide Elysée HOUNDETOUNGAN*
*Ph.D. Candidate in Economics at Université Laval*
*Personal website : *www.ahoundetoungan.com

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Subarchitectures

2021-02-13 Thread Duncan Murdoch 

On 12/02/2021 3:51 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:


On 11 February 2021 at 11:30, Balasubramanian Narasimhan wrote:
| If GNU make is acceptable as a system requirement, you can get any R
| configuration/runtime variable in Makevars, e.g.
|
| R_ARCH=$(shell $(R_HOME)/bin/Rscript -e 'cat(.Platform$r_arch)')

You can switch to backticks to not depend on bash so this

R_ARCH=`"${R_HOME}/bin/Rscript" -e 'cat(.Platform$r_arch)'`

should work too.


It didn't work for me, but I gave up on that approach pretty quickly so 
I might have made some other error that caused the failure.


Duncan Murdoch

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel