Hi All: About a week ago I received a notice that my package 'rerddapXtracto' was failing nightly builds and i needed to fix it or face being archived. Fair enough. The next day I submitted a fix. My package has one example that always comes in just above the time that is checked for. That this is so is in the CRAN notes.
After I got the note that the new package failed the automated test for this reason, I responded with this fact and asked it to be reconsidered, as it has been in the past. Since then, I have sent two more reminders with no response. I realize CRAN folks are pretty busy, but I really don't want the package removed from CRAN, so am mainly hoping this email will give a little nudge, or if people have other suggestions. Thanks, -Roy ********************** "The contents of this message do not reflect any position of the U.S. Government or NOAA." ********************** Roy Mendelssohn Supervisory Operations Research Analyst NOAA/NMFS Environmental Research Division Southwest Fisheries Science Center ***Note new street address*** 110 McAllister Way Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Phone: (831)-420-3666 Fax: (831) 420-3980 e-mail: roy.mendelss...@noaa.gov www: https://www.pfeg.noaa.gov/ "Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill." "From those who have been given much, much will be expected" "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice" -MLK Jr. ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
