Author of R.utils here. I happen to investigate this too right now,
because of extremely slow win-builder performance of R.rsp checks,
which in turn depends on R.utils.
It's not obvious to me why this happens on win-builder. I've noticed
slower and slower win-builder/cran-incoming checks over the years,
despite the code not changing. Right now, I'm investigating a piece of
code that calls shell("dir") as a fallback to figure out if a file is
a symbol link or not - it could be that that takes a very long time on
win-builder.
So, stay tuned ... I'll report back when I find something out.
/Henrik
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 4:43 PM Stefan Mayer
wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> I tried to submit an update to my R package imagefluency, but the update does
> not pass the incoming checks automatically. The problem is that one of the
> examples takes too long to execute – but only under Windows with the
> development version of R (R Under development (unstable) (2024-02-15 r85925
> ucrt)).
>
> I was able to pin down the problem to using R.utils::gzip(). I created a test
> package that illustrates the problem: https://github.com/stm/ziptest
> The package has two functions that zip a file given a file path. When using
> R.utils::gzip() (function `gzipit()` in the test package), I get a NOTE when
> checking the package using devtools::check_win_devel()
>
> * checking examples ... [55s] NOTE
> Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s
>user system elapsed
> gzipit 6.91 47.24 54.84
>
> There is no issue with utils::zip() (function `zipit()` in the test package).
> Is this somehow a bug in R.utils::gzip(), or is there an issue with the
> combination of Windows and r-devel?
>
> Best, Stefan
>
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
