Re: [R-pkg-devel] Submission after archived version

2024-03-12 Thread Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel
В Mon, 11 Mar 2024 23:45:13 +0100
Nils Mechtel  пишет:

> Debian:
> 
> Status: 3 NOTEs

>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... [4s/6s] NOTE

>> Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION:
>>  metabolomics (36:78)

This one can be explained in the submission comment. The rest of the
NOTE is to be expected.

>> * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... NOTE
>> Author field differs from that derived from Authors@R

Just remove the Author: field from your DESCRIPTION and let R CMD build
automatically generate it from Authors@R.

>> * checking for non-standard things in the check directory ... NOTE
>> Found the following files/directories:
>>  ‘metabolomics_data.csv’

Make sure that when your tests and examples create files, they do so in
the session temp directory and then remove the files afterwards. If a
user had a valuable file named metabolomics_data.csv in the current
directory, ran example(...) and had it overwritten as a result, they
would be very unhappy.

The NOTEs on Windows are similar.

Good luck!

-- 
Best regards,
Ivan

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] Submission after archived version

2024-03-12 Thread Duncan Murdoch

On 11/03/2024 6:45 p.m., Nils Mechtel wrote:

Hi,

Our package was archived at the end of last year, and after some major rework 
we submitted a newer version yesterday. Despite R CMD check not giving any 
errors or warnings, the package doesn’t pass the pre-tests:

package MetAlyzer_1.0.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, 
please see the following pre-tests:
Windows: 

Status: 2 NOTEs
Debian: 

Status: 3 NOTEs

Last released version's CRAN status: OK: 5, ERROR: 8
See: 


Do we miss something here?


The first note is mostly informational, though you might want to mention 
that metabolomics is spelled correctly in your submission message.


The second note should be fixed.  Apparently your package has both 
Authors and Authors@R fields.  Delete Authors and that should go away.


The third note only happened on one system, so it may be a false 
positive, but what it says is that your checks created a file called 
metabolomics_data.csv some place where it shouldn't have created it. 
You should only be writing in the temp directory, and you should clean 
up afterwards.


Duncan Murdoch

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


[R-pkg-devel] Submission after archived version

2024-03-12 Thread Nils Mechtel
Hi,

Our package was archived at the end of last year, and after some major rework 
we submitted a newer version yesterday. Despite R CMD check not giving any 
errors or warnings, the package doesn’t pass the pre-tests:

package MetAlyzer_1.0.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, 
please see the following pre-tests:
Windows: 

Status: 2 NOTEs
Debian: 

Status: 3 NOTEs

Last released version's CRAN status: OK: 5, ERROR: 8
See: 


Do we miss something here?

Best,
Nils
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] [EXTERN] Re: [EXTERN] Re: [EXTERN] Re: @doctype is deprecated. need help for r package documentation

2024-03-12 Thread Duncan Murdoch

On 12/03/2024 6:58 a.m., Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote:

В Mon, 11 Mar 2024 14:57:58 +
"Ruff, Sergej"  пишет:


I uploaded the old version of the package to my repo:
https://github.com/SergejRuff/boot


After installing this tarball, running RStudio and typing:

library(bootGSEA)
?bootGSEA

...I see the help page in RStudio's help tab, not in the browser. I
think this is the expected behaviour for RStudio.


You can tell R to use an external browser in RStudio by setting the 
"browser" option.  For example,


  options(browser="open")

causes help to open in the default browser on MacOS.  See ?browseURL for 
details of how to specify other browsers.


Duncan Murdoch

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] [EXTERN] Re: [EXTERN] Re: [EXTERN] Re: @doctype is deprecated. need help for r package documentation

2024-03-12 Thread Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel
В Mon, 11 Mar 2024 14:57:58 +
"Ruff, Sergej"  пишет:

> I uploaded the old version of the package to my repo:
> https://github.com/SergejRuff/boot

After installing this tarball, running RStudio and typing:

library(bootGSEA)
?bootGSEA

...I see the help page in RStudio's help tab, not in the browser. I
think this is the expected behaviour for RStudio.

-- 
Best regards,
Ivan

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel