Re: [R-pkg-devel] Pretest failed and I fail to find out what's the problem
Thanks a lot! Kind regards, Klaus Schliep On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 9:43 PM Uwe Ligges wrote: > Indeed, > > > * checking re-building of vignette outputs ... [13m] OK > > Please reduce the vignette build timings by using > - small toy data only > - few iterations > - or by providing precomputed results for the most lengthy parts. > Otherwise we cannot afford checking the vignette regularly on CRAN. > > Best, > Uwe Ligges > > > On 22.01.2023 19:55, Ben Bolker wrote: > >Seems pretty mysterious to me! (No cryptic NOTEs anywhere in the > > logs, other than the inevitable "Note_to_CRAN_maintainers") > > > >I will be curious to see if anyone else finds something, but my guess > > is a hiccup on the CRAN end (i.e., you'll end up sending e-mail to the > > CRAN maintainers to clarify what's going on) > > > > > > On 2023-01-22 1:51 p.m., Klaus Schliep wrote: > >> Dear all, > >> > >> I try to submit a new version of the package phangorn and got the mail > >> back: > >> > >> "Dear maintainer, > >> > >> package phangorn_2.11.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks > >> automatically, please see the following pre-tests: > >> Windows: < > >> > https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/phangorn_2.11.0_20230122_175755/Windows/00check.log > >>> > >> Status: OK > >> Debian: < > >> > https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/phangorn_2.11.0_20230122_175755/Debian/00check.log > >>> > >> Status: OK" > >> > >> I am kind of puzzled as to what the problem is, but it might well be > >> that I > >> missed something? I appreciate any suggestions. > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Klaus Schliep > >> > >> > > > > __ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > -- Klaus Schliep Senior Scientist Institute of Molecular Biotechnology TU Graz https://ubt.tugraz.at <https://icbt.tugraz.at> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
[R-pkg-devel] Pretest failed and I fail to find out what's the problem
Dear all, I try to submit a new version of the package phangorn and got the mail back: "Dear maintainer, package phangorn_2.11.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, please see the following pre-tests: Windows: < https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/phangorn_2.11.0_20230122_175755/Windows/00check.log > Status: OK Debian: < https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/phangorn_2.11.0_20230122_175755/Debian/00check.log > Status: OK" I am kind of puzzled as to what the problem is, but it might well be that I missed something? I appreciate any suggestions. Kind regards, Klaus Schliep -- Klaus Schliep Senior Scientist Institute of Molecular Biotechnology TU Graz [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] How to debug CRAN errors?
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019, 1:13 PM David Hugh-Jones
wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> I take your point. Meanwhile, though, is there any way to debug the
> problem? I’ll assume that making repeated uploads to CRAN is not a viable
> approach it would be great if there were a Docker image of their setup
> available, for example.
>
Have you tested your package on https://builder.r-hub.io/ or
https://win-builder.r-project.org/ ?
>
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 17:00, William Dunlap wrote:
>
> > The complaint
> >
> > > test_check("huxtable")
> > -- 1. Failure: Data written in appropriate format
> > (@test-openxlsx.R#101) --
> > `openxlsx::saveWorkbook(wb, file = "test-xlsx.xlsx", overwrite =
> > TRUE)` produced messages.
> >
> > comes from your call to testthat::expect_silent()
> >
> > test_that("Data written in appropriate format", {
> > hx <- huxtable(a = 1:2 + 0.5, b = -1:-2 + 0.5, d = letters[1:2],
> > add_colnames = TRUE)
> > wb <- as_Workbook(hx)
> > expect_silent(openxlsx::saveWorkbook(wb, file = "test-xlsx.xlsx",
> > overwrite = TRUE))
> >
> >
> > Perhaps you should suggest to the authors of testthat that it would be
> > nice if expect_silent() showed some of the text of the messages, etc.,
> > instead of just saying that messages were produced.
> >
> > By the way, I think your test test should write to a file in [a
> > subdirectory of]] tempdir(), not to a file in the current directory.
> >
> > comes from
> > Bill Dunlap
> > TIBCO Software
> > wdunlap tibco.com
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:50 AM David Hugh-Jones <
> davidhughjo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > My package has errors on CRAN's Linux and Solaris:
> > >
> > > https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_huxtable.html
> > >
> > > which I can't reproduce on my local OSX Machine, nor on Linux on
> Travis.
> > >
> > > Does anyone have any general hints on how to reproduce and/or debug
> such
> > > errors?
> > >
> > > Specifically the error relates to a call to openxlsx::saveWorkbook
> > > producing a message. openxlsx hasn't changed recently, though.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > David
> > >
> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> > >
> > > __
> > > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
