Re: [R-pkg-devel] Check results on r-devel-windows claiming error but tests seem to pass?

2024-03-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel


On 26 March 2024 at 09:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| 
| Avi,
| 
| That was a hickup and is now taken care of. When discussing this (off-line)
| with Jeroen we (rightly) suggested that keeping an eye on

Typo, as usual, "he (rightly) suggested".  My bad.

D.

| 
|https://contributor.r-project.org/svn-dashboard/
| 
| is one possibility to keep track while we have no status alert system from
| CRAN.  I too was quite confused because a new upload showed errors, and
| win-builder for r-devel just swallowed any uploads.
| 
| Cheers, Dirk
| 
| -- 
| dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
| 
| __
| R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
| https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] Check results on r-devel-windows claiming error but tests seem to pass?

2024-03-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel


Avi,

That was a hickup and is now taken care of. When discussing this (off-line)
with Jeroen we (rightly) suggested that keeping an eye on

   https://contributor.r-project.org/svn-dashboard/

is one possibility to keep track while we have no status alert system from
CRAN.  I too was quite confused because a new upload showed errors, and
win-builder for r-devel just swallowed any uploads.

Cheers, Dirk

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


[R-pkg-devel] Check results on r-devel-windows claiming error but tests seem to pass?

2024-03-25 Thread Avraham Adler
I noticed that a few of my packages appear to be failing on
"r-devel-windows-x86_64". Specficially, Delaporte [1], lamW [2], and
revss[3]. However, checking the output of the tests shows that all
passed. Is this a hiccup or is there something that needs to be
changed? And why would my other two packages not suffer from this
(minimaApprox [4] and Pade [5])? I'm a bit confused.

Thank you,

Avi

[1] https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_Delaporte.html
[2] https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_lamW.html
[3] https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_revss.html
[4] https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_minimaxApprox.html
[5] https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_Pade.html

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel