Re: [R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package
You have
Check: C++ specification, Result: NOTE
Specified C++11: please drop specification unless essential
in your check reuslts and I see no response nor comment why it is.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 12.06.2024 20:12, Lucas Godoy wrote:
Hello everyone,
Recently, my R package {smile} was archived due to NOTES. At the time, I
was in the final stages of my PhD and unfortunately, I couldn't address the
issue in time to prevent the package from being archived.
Long story short, I fixed the issues, and now the `R CMD check --as-cran`
returns no notes (I'm on a Mac. However, when I submit the package to
"win-builder" to get it checked on Windows, I get the following NOTES:
"* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: 'Lucas da Cunha Godoy '
New submission
Package was archived on CRAN
Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION:
ISSN (17:54)
Moraga (13:60)
al (14:9)
et (13:67)
CRAN repository db overrides:
X-CRAN-Comment: Archived on 2024-04-09 as issues were not corrected
in time."
The "misspelled" words are author names included in the DESCRIPTION file as
references. Also, there is a note that the package is being archived.
I used GitHub workflows to get the package checked on Linux as well (see
here
),
and there I got a note about sub-directories with more than 1Mb. To this
point, I don't believe I can further shrink those directories.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix those issues to get the
package on CRAN?
My session info is below, just in case.
R version 4.3.2 (2023-10-31)
Platform: aarch64-apple-darwin20 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS Sonoma 14.5
Matrix products: default
BLAS:
/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.3-arm64/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
LAPACK:
/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.3-arm64/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib;
LAPACK version 3.11.0
Thanks a lot,
Lucas.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package
If you run a spell checker before you submit then it helps if you put in your
cran-comments.md file the list of words flagged and that all of them are
correct. This makes it just a little easier for CRAN.
-Roy
> On Jun 12, 2024, at 3:35 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>
> As far as I know these are all harmless.
>
> * the first NOTE is for CRAN consumption
> * the rest are false positives
>
>
>
> The spell-checking machinery used in package checking is under-documented.
> There are some useful references here
>
> https://github.com/r-lib/usethis/issues/1466
> https://ropensci.org/blog/2022/01/21/ropensci-news-digest-january-2022/#to-quote-or-not-to-quote-non-existing-words-in-description
> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2016q3/000943.html
> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2017q3/001764.html
>
> I've been meaning to submit a patch to "Writing R Extensions" that would
> describe this, but so far I haven't. However, I also think that win-builder
> does *not* pay attention to the .aspell/ stuff documented above ...
>
>
>
> On 2024-06-12 2:12 p.m., Lucas Godoy wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>> Recently, my R package {smile} was archived due to NOTES. At the time, I
>> was in the final stages of my PhD and unfortunately, I couldn't address the
>> issue in time to prevent the package from being archived.
>> Long story short, I fixed the issues, and now the `R CMD check --as-cran`
>> returns no notes (I'm on a Mac. However, when I submit the package to
>> "win-builder" to get it checked on Windows, I get the following NOTES:
>> "* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
>> Maintainer: 'Lucas da Cunha Godoy '
>> New submission
>> Package was archived on CRAN
>> Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION:
>> ISSN (17:54)
>> Moraga (13:60)
>> al (14:9)
>> et (13:67)
>> CRAN repository db overrides:
>> X-CRAN-Comment: Archived on 2024-04-09 as issues were not corrected
>> in time."
>> The "misspelled" words are author names included in the DESCRIPTION file as
>> references. Also, there is a note that the package is being archived.
>> I used GitHub workflows to get the package checked on Linux as well (see
>> here
>> ),
>> and there I got a note about sub-directories with more than 1Mb. To this
>> point, I don't believe I can further shrink those directories.
>> Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix those issues to get the
>> package on CRAN?
>> My session info is below, just in case.
>> R version 4.3.2 (2023-10-31)
>> Platform: aarch64-apple-darwin20 (64-bit)
>> Running under: macOS Sonoma 14.5
>> Matrix products: default
>> BLAS:
>> /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.3-arm64/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
>> LAPACK:
>> /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.3-arm64/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib;
>> LAPACK version 3.11.0
>> Thanks a lot,
>> Lucas.
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> __
>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
> --
> Dr. Benjamin Bolker
> Professor, Mathematics & Statistics and Biology, McMaster University
> Director, School of Computational Science and Engineering
> (Acting) Graduate chair, Mathematics & Statistics
> > E-mail is sent at my convenience; I don't expect replies outside of working
> > hours.
>
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
**
"The contents of this message do not reflect any position of the U.S.
Government or NOAA."
**
Roy Mendelssohn
Supervisory Operations Research Analyst
NOAA/NMFS
Environmental Research Division
Southwest Fisheries Science Center
***Note new street address***
110 McAllister Way
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Phone: (831)-420-3666
Fax: (831) 420-3980
e-mail: roy.mendelss...@noaa.gov www: https://www.pfeg.noaa.gov/
"Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill."
"From those who have been given much, much will be expected"
"the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice" -MLK Jr.
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package
As far as I know these are all harmless.
* the first NOTE is for CRAN consumption
* the rest are false positives
The spell-checking machinery used in package checking is
under-documented. There are some useful references here
https://github.com/r-lib/usethis/issues/1466
https://ropensci.org/blog/2022/01/21/ropensci-news-digest-january-2022/#to-quote-or-not-to-quote-non-existing-words-in-description
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2016q3/000943.html
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2017q3/001764.html
I've been meaning to submit a patch to "Writing R Extensions" that
would describe this, but so far I haven't. However, I also think that
win-builder does *not* pay attention to the .aspell/ stuff documented
above ...
On 2024-06-12 2:12 p.m., Lucas Godoy wrote:
Hello everyone,
Recently, my R package {smile} was archived due to NOTES. At the time, I
was in the final stages of my PhD and unfortunately, I couldn't address the
issue in time to prevent the package from being archived.
Long story short, I fixed the issues, and now the `R CMD check --as-cran`
returns no notes (I'm on a Mac. However, when I submit the package to
"win-builder" to get it checked on Windows, I get the following NOTES:
"* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: 'Lucas da Cunha Godoy '
New submission
Package was archived on CRAN
Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION:
ISSN (17:54)
Moraga (13:60)
al (14:9)
et (13:67)
CRAN repository db overrides:
X-CRAN-Comment: Archived on 2024-04-09 as issues were not corrected
in time."
The "misspelled" words are author names included in the DESCRIPTION file as
references. Also, there is a note that the package is being archived.
I used GitHub workflows to get the package checked on Linux as well (see
here
),
and there I got a note about sub-directories with more than 1Mb. To this
point, I don't believe I can further shrink those directories.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix those issues to get the
package on CRAN?
My session info is below, just in case.
R version 4.3.2 (2023-10-31)
Platform: aarch64-apple-darwin20 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS Sonoma 14.5
Matrix products: default
BLAS:
/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.3-arm64/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
LAPACK:
/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.3-arm64/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib;
LAPACK version 3.11.0
Thanks a lot,
Lucas.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
--
Dr. Benjamin Bolker
Professor, Mathematics & Statistics and Biology, McMaster University
Director, School of Computational Science and Engineering
(Acting) Graduate chair, Mathematics & Statistics
> E-mail is sent at my convenience; I don't expect replies outside of
working hours.
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
[R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package
Hello everyone,
Recently, my R package {smile} was archived due to NOTES. At the time, I
was in the final stages of my PhD and unfortunately, I couldn't address the
issue in time to prevent the package from being archived.
Long story short, I fixed the issues, and now the `R CMD check --as-cran`
returns no notes (I'm on a Mac. However, when I submit the package to
"win-builder" to get it checked on Windows, I get the following NOTES:
"* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: 'Lucas da Cunha Godoy '
New submission
Package was archived on CRAN
Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION:
ISSN (17:54)
Moraga (13:60)
al (14:9)
et (13:67)
CRAN repository db overrides:
X-CRAN-Comment: Archived on 2024-04-09 as issues were not corrected
in time."
The "misspelled" words are author names included in the DESCRIPTION file as
references. Also, there is a note that the package is being archived.
I used GitHub workflows to get the package checked on Linux as well (see
here
),
and there I got a note about sub-directories with more than 1Mb. To this
point, I don't believe I can further shrink those directories.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix those issues to get the
package on CRAN?
My session info is below, just in case.
R version 4.3.2 (2023-10-31)
Platform: aarch64-apple-darwin20 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS Sonoma 14.5
Matrix products: default
BLAS:
/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.3-arm64/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
LAPACK:
/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.3-arm64/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib;
LAPACK version 3.11.0
Thanks a lot,
Lucas.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package
Thank you Uwe, I don't know how this last line in the note escaped my attention.. Sorry for the trouble Yours HP Envoyé avec la messagerie sécurisée Proton Mail. Le mardi 11 juin 2024 à 2:24 PM, Uwe Ligges a écrit : > Actually none of the reported things led to rejection, but the quote was > not complete, we also see > > "The Date field is over a month old." > > so please update the Date field and resubmit. > > Best, > Uwe Ligges > > > > > > > On 11.06.2024 14:17, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > > I'm not sure what you mean by the note interrupting the process. Did > > you submit it and get rejected? > > > > To me the notes look as though they are for information only, with the > > possible exception that CRAN prefers abbreviations like GWAS to be > > written in single quotes as 'GWAS'. > > > > You should definitely mention each of the issues that led to archiving > > in the note you submit with your package. > > > > Duncan Murdoch > > > > On 2024-06-11 6:27 a.m., Hervé Perdry wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I 'm new here! I'm the maintainer of a handful of packages and should > > > have subscribed long ago. > > > > > > Here's my problem. I didn't have time to deal with a compilation issue > > > of my package milorGWAS a few months ago, and it has been archived. > > > I've now corrected the issue and I want to resubmit it. The following > > > NOTE at check --as-cran interrupts the process. Can you please tell me > > > how to deal with this situation? > > > Thanks in advance. > > > Yours, HP > > > > > > * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... [15s] NOTE > > > Maintainer: 'Hervé Perdry herve.per...@u-psud.fr' > > > > > > New submission > > > > > > Package was archived on CRAN > > > > > > Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION: > > > GWAS (4:10, 10:102) > > > Milet (10:109) > > > al (10:118) > > > et (10:115) > > > > > > CRAN repository db overrides: > > > X-CRAN-Comment: Archived on 2024-01-11 as issues were not corrected > > > in time. > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > > > __ > > > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > > > > __ > > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package
Actually none of the reported things led to rejection, but the quote was not complete, we also see "The Date field is over a month old." so please update the Date field and resubmit. Best, Uwe Ligges On 11.06.2024 14:17, Duncan Murdoch wrote: I'm not sure what you mean by the note interrupting the process. Did you submit it and get rejected? To me the notes look as though they are for information only, with the possible exception that CRAN prefers abbreviations like GWAS to be written in single quotes as 'GWAS'. You should definitely mention each of the issues that led to archiving in the note you submit with your package. Duncan Murdoch On 2024-06-11 6:27 a.m., Hervé Perdry wrote: Hello, I 'm new here! I'm the maintainer of a handful of packages and should have subscribed long ago. Here's my problem. I didn't have time to deal with a compilation issue of my package milorGWAS a few months ago, and it has been archived. I've now corrected the issue and I want to resubmit it. The following NOTE at check --as-cran interrupts the process. Can you please tell me how to deal with this situation? Thanks in advance. Yours, HP * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... [15s] NOTE Maintainer: 'Hervé Perdry ' New submission Package was archived on CRAN Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION: GWAS (4:10, 10:102) Milet (10:109) al (10:118) et (10:115) CRAN repository db overrides: X-CRAN-Comment: Archived on 2024-01-11 as issues were not corrected in time. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package
I'm not sure what you mean by the note interrupting the process. Did you submit it and get rejected? To me the notes look as though they are for information only, with the possible exception that CRAN prefers abbreviations like GWAS to be written in single quotes as 'GWAS'. You should definitely mention each of the issues that led to archiving in the note you submit with your package. Duncan Murdoch On 2024-06-11 6:27 a.m., Hervé Perdry wrote: Hello, I 'm new here! I'm the maintainer of a handful of packages and should have subscribed long ago. Here's my problem. I didn't have time to deal with a compilation issue of my package milorGWAS a few months ago, and it has been archived. I've now corrected the issue and I want to resubmit it. The following NOTE at check --as-cran interrupts the process. Can you please tell me how to deal with this situation? Thanks in advance. Yours, HP * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... [15s] NOTE Maintainer: 'Hervé Perdry ' New submission Package was archived on CRAN Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION: GWAS (4:10, 10:102) Milet (10:109) al (10:118) et (10:115) CRAN repository db overrides: X-CRAN-Comment: Archived on 2024-01-11 as issues were not corrected in time. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
[R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package
Hello, I 'm new here! I'm the maintainer of a handful of packages and should have subscribed long ago. Here's my problem. I didn't have time to deal with a compilation issue of my package milorGWAS a few months ago, and it has been archived. I've now corrected the issue and I want to resubmit it. The following NOTE at check --as-cran interrupts the process. Can you please tell me how to deal with this situation? Thanks in advance. Yours, HP * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... [15s] NOTE Maintainer: 'Hervé Perdry ' New submission Package was archived on CRAN Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION: GWAS (4:10, 10:102) Milet (10:109) al (10:118) et (10:115) CRAN repository db overrides: X-CRAN-Comment: Archived on 2024-01-11 as issues were not corrected in time. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
