Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux
On 6/7/2016 11:46 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: On 06/06/2016 05:04 PM, Brian Fallik wrote: Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a thread if I'm not subscribed. We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I can confirm that updated to 3.3.0-5 does address the build failure. Will 3.3.0-5 make it into EPEL? If so, do you have any idea when? The current package is breaking our build process and I'm wondering if it's worth the effort to implement a workaround or not. Yes, this package is going through the update process right now. You can speed it along by logging into the Fedora Update system and giving positive karma: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-93778a4eeb If the build gets +3 karma, it will go to stable immediately. Otherwise, it takes two weeks to be pushed to stable according to EPEL policies. ~tom Done, as of 30 seconds ago. == Red Hat ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Tom Callawaywrote: > On 06/06/2016 05:04 PM, Brian Fallik wrote: > > Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a > > thread if I'm not subscribed. > > > > We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I > can > > confirm that updated to 3.3.0-5 does address the build failure. Will > > 3.3.0-5 make it into EPEL? If so, do you have any idea when? The current > > package is breaking our build process and I'm wondering if it's worth the > > effort to implement a workaround or not. > > Yes, this package is going through the update process right now. You can > speed it along by logging into the Fedora Update system and giving > positive karma: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-93778a4eeb > > If the build gets +3 karma, it will go to stable immediately. > Otherwise, it takes two weeks to be pushed to stable according to EPEL > policies. > Thanks, Tom. I'll go try and help the karma process along. brian > > ~tom > > == > Red Hat > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux
On 06/06/2016 05:04 PM, Brian Fallik wrote: > Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a > thread if I'm not subscribed. > > We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I can > confirm that updated to 3.3.0-5 does address the build failure. Will > 3.3.0-5 make it into EPEL? If so, do you have any idea when? The current > package is breaking our build process and I'm wondering if it's worth the > effort to implement a workaround or not. Yes, this package is going through the update process right now. You can speed it along by logging into the Fedora Update system and giving positive karma: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-93778a4eeb If the build gets +3 karma, it will go to stable immediately. Otherwise, it takes two weeks to be pushed to stable according to EPEL policies. ~tom == Red Hat ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora