[R-sig-phylo] Phylogenetic quantile regression

2012-09-17 Thread Agus Camacho
Dear list,
Anybody knows if it would be possible to do a phylogenetic quantile
regression procedure in R or other software?
Im trying to model a relationship in which other factors beyond the ones
which entered in the analysis are potentially misleading the analysis
results. Quantile regression seems to deal well in such situations.
However, ive been looking through the internet but did not find a way to
implment PGLS over quantile regression. Is it even possible?
Thanks in advance.
Agus


-- 
Agustín Camacho Guerrero.
Doutorando em Zoologia.
Laboratório de Herpetologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de
Biociências, USP.
Rua do Matão, trav. 14, nº 321, Cidade Universitária,
São Paulo - SP, CEP: 05508-090, Brasil.
attachment: dist size e morph.png___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo


[R-sig-phylo] alternative to Bartlett test of homogeneity of variances

2012-09-17 Thread Jason S


Hi there,

Is there a PCM that is analogous to the Bartlett test of homogeneity of 
variances?

Thanks,

Jason Mustakas
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo


Re: [R-sig-phylo] alternative to Bartlett test of homogeneity of variances

2012-09-17 Thread Theodore Garland Jr
Several.  See these papers for starters:

Garland, T., Jr. 1992. Rate tests for phenotypic evolution using 
phylogenetically independent contrasts. Am. Nat. 140:509-519.

Garland, T., Jr., A. W. Dickerman, C. M. Janis, and J. A. Jones. 1993. 
Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Systematic Biology 
42:265-292.

Hutcheon, J. M., and T. Garland, Jr. 2004. Are megabats big? Journal of 
Mammalian Evolution 11:257-276.

Collar, D. C., P. C. Wainwright, T. J. Near. 2005. Comparative analysis of 
morphological diversity: does morphological disparity evolve at the same rate 
in two lineages of centrarchid fishes. Evolution 58:1783-1794. [first use of 
method by O'Meara et al., 2006]

O'Meara, B. C., C. Ane, M. J. Sanderson, and P. C. Wainwright. 2006. Testing 
for different rates of continuous trait evolution using likelihood. Evolution 
60:922-933. [full explanation of method used by Collar et al., 2005]

Rezende, E. L., and J. A. F. Diniz-Filho. 2012. Phylogenetic analyses: 
comparing species to infer adaptations and physiological mechanisms. 
Comprehensive Physiology 2:639-674.

Cheers,
Ted

Theodore Garland, Jr.
Professor
Department of Biology
University of California, Riverside
Riverside, CA 92521
Office Phone:  (951) 827-3524
Facsimile:  (951) 827-4286 = Dept. office (not confidential)
Email:  tgarl...@ucr.edu
http://www.biology.ucr.edu/people/faculty/Garland.html
http://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=enuser=iSSbrhwJ

Experimental Evolution: Concepts, Methods, and Applications of Selection 
Experiments. 2009.
Edited by Theodore Garland, Jr. and Michael R. Rose
http://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520261808
(PDFs of chapters are available from me or from the individual authors)


From: r-sig-phylo-boun...@r-project.org [r-sig-phylo-boun...@r-project.org] on 
behalf of Jason S [jas2...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 1:08 PM
To: R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
Subject: [R-sig-phylo] alternative to Bartlett test of homogeneity of   
variances

Hi there,

Is there a PCM that is analogous to the Bartlett test of homogeneity of 
variances?

Thanks,

Jason Mustakas
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo

___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo


Re: [R-sig-phylo] variation in rates over time

2012-09-17 Thread Matt Pennell
Jason,

I think the best way to do this is with the approach of O'Meara et al. 2006
Evolution Brownie.

Liam Revell has implemented this in R in his package phytools. You can
modify the steps taken in this tutorial here
http://phytools.blogspot.com/2011/07/running-brownielite-for-arbitrarily.html
perhaps
in conjunction with the function make.era.map()
http://phytools.blogspot.com/2011/10/new-function-to-plot-eras-on-tree.html
though
I admittedly have not tried this myself.

Perhaps Liam or someone else has a better explanation but I hope this is at
least somewhat helpful.

cheers,
matt

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Jason S jas2...@yahoo.com wrote:



 Hello,

 I see that there are several interesting alternatives to test for
 different rates among clades. However, I was wondering if there is a method
 to test for varying rates over time. I'm aware of Pagel's delta and the EB
 model, but I was thinking more in terms of testing if there is a different
 rate for the entire tree after a specified point in time. For instance, if
 a snail predator colonizes an island 3.4 Mya, is there evidence for an
 increased rate of evolution in the prey after that point in time? Something
 like two lambdas, one for before and one for after that point in time.

 Thanks!

 Jason
 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

 ___
 R-sig-phylo mailing list
 R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo


Re: [R-sig-phylo] variation in rates over time

2012-09-17 Thread Liam J. Revell
Hi Jason. Matt is absolutely correct. You can do this with phytools. 
Say, for instance, you have an ultrametric phylogeny with branches in 
millions of years (tree) and data vector containing the trait values for 
species (x) and you want to test the hypothesis that the last 3.4 my has 
a different rate of evolution than the rest of the tree, you could do 
this as follows:


library(phytools) # load phytools
tree-make.era.map(tree,c(0,max(nodeHeights(tree))-3.4))
plotSimmap(tree,pts=F,lwd=3) # visualize
fit-brownie.lite(tree,x) # fit model

That's it. Good luck. Liam

Liam J. Revell, Assistant Professor of Biology
University of Massachusetts Boston
web: http://faculty.umb.edu/liam.revell/
email: liam.rev...@umb.edu
blog: http://phytools.blogspot.com

On 9/17/2012 7:46 PM, Matt Pennell wrote:

Jason,

I think the best way to do this is with the approach of O'Meara et al. 2006
Evolution Brownie.

Liam Revell has implemented this in R in his package phytools. You can
modify the steps taken in this tutorial here
http://phytools.blogspot.com/2011/07/running-brownielite-for-arbitrarily.html
perhaps
in conjunction with the function make.era.map()
http://phytools.blogspot.com/2011/10/new-function-to-plot-eras-on-tree.html
though
I admittedly have not tried this myself.

Perhaps Liam or someone else has a better explanation but I hope this is at
least somewhat helpful.

cheers,
matt

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Jason S jas2...@yahoo.com wrote:




Hello,

I see that there are several interesting alternatives to test for
different rates among clades. However, I was wondering if there is a method
to test for varying rates over time. I'm aware of Pagel's delta and the EB
model, but I was thinking more in terms of testing if there is a different
rate for the entire tree after a specified point in time. For instance, if
a snail predator colonizes an island 3.4 Mya, is there evidence for an
increased rate of evolution in the prey after that point in time? Something
like two lambdas, one for before and one for after that point in time.

Thanks!

Jason
 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo



[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo



___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo


Re: [R-sig-phylo] variation in rates over time

2012-09-17 Thread Jason S


Thanks, guys. That's exactly what I needed. 



 From: Liam J. Revell liam.rev...@umb.edu
To: Matt Pennell mwpenn...@gmail.com 

-project.org 
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: [R-sig-phylo] variation in rates over time

Hi Jason. Matt is absolutely correct. You can do this with phytools. 
Say, for instance, you have an ultrametric phylogeny with branches in 
millions of years (tree) and data vector containing the trait values for 
species (x) and you want to test the hypothesis that the last 3.4 my has 
a different rate of evolution than the rest of the tree, you could do 
this as follows:

library(phytools) # load phytools
tree-make.era.map(tree,c(0,max(nodeHeights(tree))-3.4))
plotSimmap(tree,pts=F,lwd=3) # visualize
fit-brownie.lite(tree,x) # fit model

That's it. Good luck. Liam

Liam J. Revell, Assistant Professor of Biology
University of Massachusetts Boston
web: http://faculty.umb.edu/liam.revell/
email: liam.rev...@umb.edu
blog: http://phytools.blogspot.com

On 9/17/2012 7:46 PM, Matt Pennell wrote:

 Jason,

 I think the best way to do this is with the approach of O'Meara et al. 2006
 Evolution Brownie.

 Liam Revell has implemented this in R in his package phytools. You can
 modify the steps taken in this tutorial here
 http://phytools.blogspot.com/2011/07/running-brownielite-for-arbitrarily.html
 perhaps
 in conjunction with the function make.era.map()
 http://phytools.blogspot.com/2011/10/new-function-to-plot-eras-on-tree.html
 though
 I admittedly have not tried this myself.

 Perhaps Liam or someone else has a better explanation but I hope this is at
 least somewhat helpful.

 cheers,
 matt






 Hello,

 I see that there are several interesting alternatives to test for
 different rates among clades. However, I was wondering if there is a method
 to test for varying rates over time. I'm aware of Pagel's delta and the EB
 model, but I was thinking more in terms of testing if there is a different
 rate for the entire tree after a specified point in time. For instance, if
 a snail predator colonizes an island 3.4 Mya, is there evidence for an
 increased rate of evolution in the prey after that point in time? Something
 like two lambdas, one for before and one for after that point in time.

 Thanks!

 Jason
          [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

 ___
 R-sig-phylo mailing list
 R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo


     [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

 ___
 R-sig-phylo mailing list
 R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo


Re: [R-sig-phylo] variation in rates over time

2012-09-17 Thread Brian O'Meara
I agree with the suggestions so far. I just wanted to point out a few more
alternatives:

You could use the geiger package to estimate the best scaling for the
tworatetree transformation to do this (should be equivalent to the earlier
solutions, though it would require running optimization).

You could also use the OUwie package with a tree that has been given simmap
mappings using phytools. The advantage of this is that you could evaluate
Brownian models but you could also look at various Ornstein-Uhlenbeck
models (though note that while there is information about different
Brownian rates before and after a time slice, info about different alphas
(strength of pull parameter) and thetas (the attractor, aka optimal
value) is rapidly (but not immediately) lost under an OU process).

For completeness, especially for citations, note that O'Meara et al. (2006)
and Thomas et al. (2006) independently arrived at essentially the same
method, so it is worth reading both papers.

Best,
Brian

___
Brian O'Meara
Assistant Professor
Dept. of Ecology  Evolutionary Biology
U. of Tennessee, Knoxville
http://www.brianomeara.info

Students wanted: Applications due Dec. 15, annually
Postdoc collaborators wanted: Check NIMBioS' website
Calendar: http://www.brianomeara.info/calendars/omeara


On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Jason S jas2...@yahoo.com wrote:



 Thanks, guys. That's exactly what I needed.


 
  From: Liam J. Revell liam.rev...@umb.edu
 To: Matt Pennell mwpenn...@gmail.com

 -project.org
 Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 9:22 PM
 Subject: Re: [R-sig-phylo] variation in rates over time

 Hi Jason. Matt is absolutely correct. You can do this with phytools.
 Say, for instance, you have an ultrametric phylogeny with branches in
 millions of years (tree) and data vector containing the trait values for
 species (x) and you want to test the hypothesis that the last 3.4 my has
 a different rate of evolution than the rest of the tree, you could do
 this as follows:

 library(phytools) # load phytools
 tree-make.era.map(tree,c(0,max(nodeHeights(tree))-3.4))
 plotSimmap(tree,pts=F,lwd=3) # visualize
 fit-brownie.lite(tree,x) # fit model

 That's it. Good luck. Liam

 Liam J. Revell, Assistant Professor of Biology
 University of Massachusetts Boston
 web: http://faculty.umb.edu/liam.revell/
 email: liam.rev...@umb.edu
 blog: http://phytools.blogspot.com

 On 9/17/2012 7:46 PM, Matt Pennell wrote:
 
  Jason,
 
  I think the best way to do this is with the approach of O'Meara et al.
 2006
  Evolution Brownie.
 
  Liam Revell has implemented this in R in his package phytools. You can
  modify the steps taken in this tutorial here
 
 http://phytools.blogspot.com/2011/07/running-brownielite-for-arbitrarily.html
  perhaps
  in conjunction with the function make.era.map()
 
 http://phytools.blogspot.com/2011/10/new-function-to-plot-eras-on-tree.html
  though
  I admittedly have not tried this myself.
 
  Perhaps Liam or someone else has a better explanation but I hope this is
 at
  least somewhat helpful.
 
  cheers,
  matt
 

 
 
 
 
  Hello,
 
  I see that there are several interesting alternatives to test for
  different rates among clades. However, I was wondering if there is a
 method
  to test for varying rates over time. I'm aware of Pagel's delta and the
 EB
  model, but I was thinking more in terms of testing if there is a
 different
  rate for the entire tree after a specified point in time. For instance,
 if
  a snail predator colonizes an island 3.4 Mya, is there evidence for an
  increased rate of evolution in the prey after that point in time?
 Something
  like two lambdas, one for before and one for after that point in time.
 
  Thanks!
 
  Jason
   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
 
  ___
  R-sig-phylo mailing list
  R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
  https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
 
 
  [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
 
  ___
  R-sig-phylo mailing list
  R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
  https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
 
 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]


 ___
 R-sig-phylo mailing list
 R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo



[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo