Hi, A general knowledge question: what would be the typical use cases of Racket generics vs. the typical use cases of Racket classes?
Am I correct in assuming that I can do everything with classes what I could do with generics, and that generics have made their way into the language before the classes? - Sergiu P.S. I'm reading the section on classes in the updated Typed Racket reference, and I'm very happy to see this new functionality! Very good job the Typed Racket Team! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/e992ac74-4aed-4b3f-a160-193bd7fb6026n%40googlegroups.com.
