Re: [racket-users] Tensorflow bindings?
Hi all, Is this relevant? https://github.com/charlescearl/DeepRacket Kind regards Stephen On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 21:39, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > I had Racket TensorFlow bindings as a possible-TODO for me, but I don't > yet know ML tools I'll use, and what APIs/layers I'll prefer atop tools > that offer more than one. > > (One of the reasons to play with ML in Python initially: almost > everything has Python APIs, at the moment, and some of the most popular > ML tools are written substantially in Python rather than being a veneer > of bindings.) > > Also, some toolkits might make more sense to call from Racket through > something other than the current Racket FFI. > > (For example, Python ones, or C code you don't want to risk stomping on > your Racket code, and might not even be open source. Also, there's also > a good chance that you're running non-ideal vendor-specific GPU compute > libraries and drivers right now, though hopefully that will soon improve.) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [racket-users] Tensorflow bindings?
I had Racket TensorFlow bindings as a possible-TODO for me, but I don't yet know ML tools I'll use, and what APIs/layers I'll prefer atop tools that offer more than one. (One of the reasons to play with ML in Python initially: almost everything has Python APIs, at the moment, and some of the most popular ML tools are written substantially in Python rather than being a veneer of bindings.) Also, some toolkits might make more sense to call from Racket through something other than the current Racket FFI. (For example, Python ones, or C code you don't want to risk stomping on your Racket code, and might not even be open source. Also, there's also a good chance that you're running non-ideal vendor-specific GPU compute libraries and drivers right now, though hopefully that will soon improve.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[racket-users] Tensorflow bindings?
Hi all, https://www.tensorflow.org/install/lang_c Would there be interest/value in having FFI bindings for TensorFlow? If I poke it with a stick, are there others who would be willing to contribute to the development of a package that provided those bindings? I'm getting to the point with a project where I'm going to have to bail out of Racket in order to do some machine learn-y stats work, and I'd rather not have to switch languages just to do the analysis. Cheers, M -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
