Re: [Radiant] Why doesn't site pick up changes to the database?
I haven't done this before, but you may want to update the "updated_at" column and see if the site replaces the content. I noticed doing some work that the cache is updated when the model object is saved. You've bypassed this, so that may be why the cache isn't replacing the old pages. Another thing to check is the browser you're using- switch browsers. Check your log as you're looking at pages via a browser to see if the cache is being used, that's the final test, really. You can also set caching off in your environment.rb file (temporarily) to reflect changes then trn it on again. Really, all of this is because the model-save was bypassed. (from my understanding of Radiant & rails caching). ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org
Re: [Radiant] content tabs in admin panel not showing up
This is a javascript error. If you've updated Radiant, be sure to run rake radiant:update And check in any new files to your repository before deploying. Jim Gay http://www.saturnflyer.com On Mar 17, 2010, at 1:43 AM, Kunal Mahajan wrote: > Hello Everyboday, > > I am deploying a simple website on radiant first time. On my local > machine running OSX the site worked fine. However, when I deployed it > on a mongrel cluster with linux, page edit mode is rendered without > tabs. Each content part tab- body and extended - is rendered below > each other instead of displaying separately in tabs. Any idea why this > might be happening ? I am using 0.8.1. > > Thank you, > > Kunal ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org
[Radiant] copy move extension error
The Copy Move extension givses an error in the javascript to center the popup:
$('copy-move').centerInViewport();
An older version of the script does work however:
center($('copy-move'));
I am running radiant 0.8.1 and access the site with the latest version
of Safari.
Jan
___
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
Radiant: http://radiantcms.org
Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org
[Radiant] Why doesn't site pick up changes to the database?
Hello, all. I was attempting to find-and-replace some content in my site's database yesterday, using a sqlite client. I had stopped the apache that was running my Radiant site. I made the changes in page_parts, but when I started Radiant back up, it was still showing me the old content, both in the admin area and on the public side. I tried blowing away tmp/cache, and setting config.cache_classes to false, to no avail. What do I need to do to get Radiant to pick up the direct-to-database changes? Some suspected culprits here are Rack and the Chronicle extension. When I tried to update the yaml in Chronicle's versions table, I broke the whole site. Thanks! Leon = PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS BELOW = Leon Miller-Out President & CTO, Singlebrook Technology, Inc l...@singlebrook.com p 607-330-1493 f 607-697-0457 119 S. Cayuga St. - Suite 202 Ithaca, NY 14850 ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org
Re: [Radiant] 0.9 RC1 suitable for production use?
I just started a new client project and made the jump to .9 ... so far I'd say it's more than usable. Sure, it might be somewhat of a moving target over the next month or two, but once you get everything working as it should there's no reason you have to keep pulling the updates, right? That's my take. The changes from .8 to .9 for extensions isn't all that drastic from my experiences - after a little bit of hacking I managed to update the simple product manager extension, and I've never created my own before. The bulk of the update work was with the UI changes needed but to me that's the easiest part. Lastly - .9 is s much prettier. Just my $.02. - Joel On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Jim Gay wrote: > > On Mar 16, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Charles Roper wrote: > > > Great, thanks for the feedback, that's most helpful. A couple of > > further questions if it's not too much trouble: > > > > - Will upgrading from .8 to .9 be straightforward? > > That depends on what extensions you are using. The interface has changed > quite a bit and some extensions may not have been updated. There are > fallbacks which should ensure that everything works, however some extension > might need some UI tweaks. > > We're going to be merging in the i18n branch shortly. > > > - When you say 'soon' do you have a time-frame in mind or do you mean > > 'as soon as possible'? > > As soon as possible, but likely within a month or so. > > > Cheers, > > Charles > > > > On 16 March 2010 14:51, Jim Gay wrote: > >> I'd agree with that. But I do want to get 0.9 out soon. > >> I want to squash as many of the issues on github as possible and merge > in the i18n work. > >> > >> On Mar 16, 2010, at 10:45 AM, john muhl wrote: > >> > >>> if you want to use 0.9 i'd recommend using the current master branch > >>> as the RC1 release is far, far behind the current work. personally i'm > >>> still starting new projects with 0.8.1 mostly because these are sites > >>> for clients and being profitable means i don't want to be tracking a > >>> moving target; not because 0.9 is unstable or anything. > >>> > >>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Charles Roper > >>> wrote: > I'm about to start a new Radiant site and was wondering whether I > should > go with 0.9RC1 or 0.8.1? In the opinion of the community, is RC1 > stable > enough for production use? > >> ___ > >> Radiant mailing list > >> Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org > >> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ > >> List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant > >> Radiant: http://radiantcms.org > >> Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org > >> > > ___ > > Radiant mailing list > > Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org > > Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ > > List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant > > Radiant: http://radiantcms.org > > Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org > > ___ > Radiant mailing list > Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org > Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ > List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant > Radiant: http://radiantcms.org > Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org > ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org
Re: [Radiant] 0.9 RC1 suitable for production use?
On Mar 16, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Charles Roper wrote: > Great, thanks for the feedback, that's most helpful. A couple of > further questions if it's not too much trouble: > > - Will upgrading from .8 to .9 be straightforward? That depends on what extensions you are using. The interface has changed quite a bit and some extensions may not have been updated. There are fallbacks which should ensure that everything works, however some extension might need some UI tweaks. We're going to be merging in the i18n branch shortly. > - When you say 'soon' do you have a time-frame in mind or do you mean > 'as soon as possible'? As soon as possible, but likely within a month or so. > Cheers, > Charles > > On 16 March 2010 14:51, Jim Gay wrote: >> I'd agree with that. But I do want to get 0.9 out soon. >> I want to squash as many of the issues on github as possible and merge in >> the i18n work. >> >> On Mar 16, 2010, at 10:45 AM, john muhl wrote: >> >>> if you want to use 0.9 i'd recommend using the current master branch >>> as the RC1 release is far, far behind the current work. personally i'm >>> still starting new projects with 0.8.1 mostly because these are sites >>> for clients and being profitable means i don't want to be tracking a >>> moving target; not because 0.9 is unstable or anything. >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Charles Roper >>> wrote: I'm about to start a new Radiant site and was wondering whether I should go with 0.9RC1 or 0.8.1? In the opinion of the community, is RC1 stable enough for production use? >> ___ >> Radiant mailing list >> Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org >> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ >> List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant >> Radiant: http://radiantcms.org >> Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org >> > ___ > Radiant mailing list > Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org > Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ > List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant > Radiant: http://radiantcms.org > Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org
