Re: [Radiant] setting up Gravitar for a site
Yeah I guess you would :) Thanks Jim, I have comments running fine installed from gem. I'm having problems now understanding how to get the gravatars picked up for any but the author of page. Saw your site saturnflyer and would like to do something similar. Does your fork of comments have features that would make enabling for all commenters easier? Thanks, Daniel Sent from my iPhone On Nov 21, 2011, at 12:50 PM, Jim Gay wrote: > I know the guy who put that site together. > > It uses the comments extension. Specifically > https://github.com/saturnflyer/radiant-comments/blob/master/lib/comment_tags.rb#L154 > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Daniel O'Connell wrote: >> How do I show the author of every comment on a page on a site, such as >> Saturnflyer.com does? >> >> Thanks >> >> On Nov 20, 2011, at 5:45 PM, john wrote: >> >>> returns a url so >>> >>> would show the gravatar for the author of the >>> current page >>> would show bob's gravatar >> >> > > > > -- > Write intention revealing code #=> http://www.clean-ruby.com > Jim Gay > Saturn Flyer LLC > 571-403-0338
Re: [Radiant] setting up Gravitar for a site
How do I show the author of every comment on a page on a site, such as Saturnflyer.com does? Thanks On Nov 20, 2011, at 5:45 PM, john wrote: > returns a url so > > would show the gravatar for the author of the > current page > would show bob's gravatar
[Radiant] setting up Gravitar for a site
Hello, I'm working on getting comments going for a site using the comments extension. I notice the radius tag for gravitar () is included as of 0.9. How do I hook into this? Tried using tag on a page but got text without any image at all. Is there some other config or install of a gem needed? Thanks, Daniel
[Radiant] Some thoughts after spending time away from Radiant
Hello, Here are some thoughts after spending time away from Radiant: I have been running the 1.0 RC3 gem for a couple of weeks now on a production site. I'm very pleased with the simplicity and stability of the app. Using gems has also been such a pleasure. When I last used Radiant (0.7.1) I had such a problem working with extensions, that I did not feel comfortable in a production environment or passing the project on to others. The inclusion "Assets" means that for the present project, I only need three extensions; Copy Move, Banner Rotator and Mailer. Radiant is so elegant and simple, yet therein lies the power that unlocks the creative mind. Very ingenious and a pleasure to work in. So many CMSes are so full of bloat and eye candy as to be dizzying to the senses. I find this especially so for extended use. Radiant has taken a more minimalist approach that really shines especially for those 80% of sites and small teams. Word. There is a bug (I just filed #290), where if a default page status is not first chosen, creating a new child page throws an application error. If this happens, simply go into settings and choose a default page type e.g. draft and all is well again. Thanks again to all the developers for all of the hard work that has gone into the redesign of the interface and the effort to move their extension to gems. Sweet. -Dan
Re: [Radiant] Creating blog from template
Do you have RMagick gem or ImageMagick installed? On Oct 28, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Bentley78 wrote: > The CSS path was it. When I put in the full url the styles show up > but not the images. Perhaps I should try the r:inside_layout to fix > that? > > On Oct 23, 9:42 am, Benny Degezelle > wrote: >> Check the source of that page. Either the link to the stylesheet is >> off, probably because it's a relative url. >> Another possibility is that you selected the wrong layout for that >> page, or that the layout you selected should be nested >> (r:inside_layout) but it's not.. >> Do you have an URI to the page so I can check? >> >> On Oct 21, 9:00 pm, Bentley78 wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I got it now. Thanks for the help. >> >>> I have the extended page part in some of my posts and it inserts a >>> "continue reading" link but when I click on it it just goes to a page >>> without CSS styling and most of my content is gone. >> >>> On Oct 19, 11:30 am, Benny Degezelle >>> wrote: >> doesn't matter where you set that; the r:find bit sets the scope for the rest of the snippet.. >> On Oct 18, 4:31 pm, Bentley78 wrote: >> > Thanks for the reply Benny, this would be under the homepage? >> > On Oct 14, 9:22 am, Benny Degezelle > wrote: >> >> Assuming that under your homepage you have a 'Blog' page, holding the >> articles: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > format="%d" /> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 11, 8:15 pm, Bentley78 wrote: >> >>> Good Afternoon all, >> >>> I have a statictemplateand I have been trying to create a blog >>> from. I have the following in the body of the document: >>> >>> >>> Title >>> Jan >>> 05th >>> Words here >>> >>> >> >>> So I followed the guide on the wiki and have this: >>> >>> >>> >>> >> format="%d" /> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> Okay, so it picks up the entries in the "Articles" section but it puts >>> them all into one "Block" instead of creating a separate entry per >>> block. So essentially I want each entry to create it's own div and >>> want this in the front page. So what I'm looking at producing is >>> this: >>> >>> >>> Title >>> Jan >>> 05th >>> Words here >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Title 1 >>> Jan >>> 06th >>> More words here >>> >>> >> >>> I notice it creates a block from the "Home Page" I just want the >>> "articles on the front page and nothing else. >> >>> I hope that makes sense. I've tried creating snippets and moving >>> stuff do different pages in the content section but I can't seem to >>> get it down. Any help would ne appreciated. Thanks again.
