(RADIATOR) 211 not defined in your dictionary
How do I go about figuring out what this actually is. Can someone explain how they got the answer so I can figure out future attributes that are not defined? Attribute number 211 (vendor ) is not defined in your dictionary Thank you, Robert MannSenior Systems AdministratorOneMain.com
(RADIATOR) A little confused by FAQ 71
71. My MAX sends authentication request for silly user names like "banner","route1" etcBy Default Ascend MAX will try to configure itself at startup by asking forvarious configuration items from the Radius server.You can turn this behavior off with: read EXTERNAL-AUTH set rad-auth-client allow-auth-config-rqsts = noWhere exactly do you enter these commands in an Ascend MAX?This is not valid for Terminal Server or Diag.Thank you, Robert MannSenior Systems AdministratorOneMain.com
(RADIATOR) Duplicate accounting records - MySQL
What is the easiest way to address this problem with MySQL. I am working on a companies Radiator server that uses MySQL as its database server for accounting and there are many duplicate records. In MS SQL it was easy as I could use a constraint that would prevent it from happening but it is my understanding that MySQL does not have this functionality. If I am wrong please right me and give me an example. If I am right then how do you work around this problem? Thank you, Robert MannSenior Systems AdministratorOneMain.com
(RADIATOR) Radius attributes...
Can someone help out with these attributes... Tue Feb 8 14:57:52 2000: ERR: Attribute number 39000 (vendor 429) is not defined in your dictionary Tue Feb 8 14:57:52 2000: ERR: Attribute number 39001 (vendor 429) is not defined in your dictionary Tue Feb 8 14:57:52 2000: ERR: Attribute number 39051 (vendor 429) is not defined in your dictionary Tue Feb 8 14:57:52 2000: ERR: Attribute number 38998 (vendor 429) is not defined in your dictionary === Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/ To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
(RADIATOR) Problems with ContinueWhileReject or ContinueUntilAccept
This is the last portion of my config file. The result I am looking for is as follows. We want to authenticate until we have an accept. We have two ISP's so what happens is that we try to authenticate from the primary ISP's radius server first and if authentication fails then it moves to the second ISP's radius server and try's to pass there. This is an excerpt from the radius.cfg PasswordLogFileName %L/password AuthByPolicyContinueUntilAccept RewriteUsername s/^([^@]+).*/$1/ RewriteUsername tr/-A-Za-z0-9\.\@//cd Hostradius_ip Secret password AddToReply Class=GRD Hostradius_ip2 Secret password These are the undesired results I get from the logfile. Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Packet dump: *** Received from 209.162.32.254 port 48630 Packet length = 70 01 e0 00 46 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 01 08 72 6f 62 65 72 74 06 06 00 00 00 02 04 06 cb 3f 9a 01 05 06 00 00 04 d2 3d 06 00 00 00 00 02 12 60 37 8b 32 91 f3 75 0b 5b ca 46 34 73 f4 7e 66 Code: Access-Request Identifier: 224 Authentic: 1234567890123456 Attributes: User-Name = "robert" Service-Type = Framed-User Client-Id = 203.63.154.1 NAS-Port = 1234 NAS-Port-Type = Async User-Password = "`7<139>2<145><243>u<11>[<202>F4s<244>~f" Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Check if Handler Called-Station-Id=12345 should be used to handle this request Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Check if Handler Realm=lightspeed.net should be used to handle this request Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Check if Handler Class=LSN should be used to handle this request Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Check if Handler should be used to handle this request Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Handling request with Handler '' Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Rewrote user name to robert Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Rewrote user name to robert Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Deleting session for robert, 203.63.154.1, 1234 Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Handling with Radius::AuthRADIUS Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Packet dump: *** Sending to 209.162.0.254 port 1645 Code: Access-Request Identifier: 4 Authentic: 1234567890123456 Attributes: User-Name = "robert" Service-Type = Framed-User Client-Id = 203.63.154.1 NAS-Port = 1234 NAS-Port-Type = Async User-Password = "`7<139>2<145><243>u<11>[<202>F4s<244>~f" Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Handling with Radius::AuthRADIUS Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Packet dump: *** Sending to 209.165.6.239 port 1645 Code: Access-Request Identifier: 4 Authentic: 1234567890123456 Attributes: User-Name = "robert" Service-Type = Framed-User Client-Id = 203.63.154.1 NAS-Port = 1234 NAS-Port-Type = Async User-Password = "`7<139>2<145><243>u<11>[<202>F4s<244>~f" Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Packet dump: *** Received from 209.162.0.254 port 1645 Packet length = 35 03 04 00 23 2e cb 9f b4 ba 27 5f 59 83 cc d0 55 f2 f7 b9 d3 12 0f 41 63 63 65 73 73 20 64 65 6e 69 65 64 Code: Access-Reject Identifier: 4 Authentic: .<203><159><180><186>'_Y<131><204><208>U<242><247><185><211> Attributes: Port-Message = "Access denied" Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Received reply in AuthRADIUS for req 4 from 209.162.0.254:1645 Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Packet dump: *** Sending to 209.162.32.254 port 48630 Code: Access-Reject Identifier: 224 Authentic: 1234567890123456 Attributes: Port-Message = "Access denied" Class = "GRD" Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: ERR: Attribute number 111 (vendor ) is not defined in your dictionary Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: ERR: Attribute number 155 (vendor ) is not defined in your dictionary Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Packet dump: *** Received from 209.165.6.239 port 1645 Packet length = 49 02 04 00 31 78 c0 30 44 2f a9 69 9e b7 e4 38 95 ee e4 78 2f 06 06 00 00 00 02 07 06 00 00 00 01 6f 06 00 00 00 01 9b 06 00 00 00 01 19 05 4c 53 4e Code: Access-Accept Identifier: 4 Authentic: x<192>0D/<169>i<158><183><228>8<149><238><228>x/ Attributes: Service-Type = Framed-User Framed-Protocol = PPP Class = "LSN" Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Received reply in AuthRADIUS for req 4 from 209.165.6.239:1645 Mon Aug 30 10:10:59 1999: DEBUG: Packet dump: *** Sending to 209.162.32.254 port 48630 Code: Access-Accept Identifier: 224 Authentic: 1234567890123456 Attributes: Port-Message = "Access denied" Class = "GRD" Service-Type = Framed-User Framed-Protocol = PPP Class = "LSN" The end result is it fails. Any ideas on how to make this work properly I would appreciate it. I would prefer that these attributes, Port-Message = "Access denied"
(RADIATOR) L2TP Tunneling with USR Total Control
Does anyone have a working solution for supporting L2TP tunneling with USR Total Control? We are determining the best way to handle this situation and would appreciate any advice. Robert Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lightspeed Net === Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/ To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
(RADIATOR) MS SQL 7.0 and FreeTDS
Has anyone had successful attempts to use FreeTDS with MS SQL 7? If so do you have any tips or problems that you encountered along the way? Certain versions of FreeTDS or other perl mods that have to be used with each other or any other helpful tips to making it work? We use Sparc 5's with Solaris for our radiator radius servers and of course NT for our database servers (Due to Platypus). Thanks in advance, Robert Mann === Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/ To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
(RADIATOR) Getting from a table in a database
Does anyone have a handler available for this? I would like to get the Client information from the database where I can make an easy to use web interface rather then having to add client information to a configuration file. If anyone has any information or an example of how this could be done I would appreciate it. Robert Mann Lightspeed Net === Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/ To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
(RADIATOR) AcctColumnDef
We have three different NAS types here USR, Ascend, Annex or (Bay). So if I need... AcctColumnDef TransSpd,USR-Connect-Speed AcctColumnDef TransSpd,Annex-Transmit-Speed AcctColumnDef TransSpd,Ascend-Xmit-Rate I was hoping that this would work but it does not. If a USR reports the USR-Connect-Speed then the TransSpd gets rewritten by a NULL Ascend-Xmit-Rate value and that is what makes it in the database. Is there a way around this behavior? Thank you, Robert Mann Lightspeed Net === To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
(RADIATOR) Scenario
values ('hywood', 'Feb 7, 99 7:22', 'Feb 7, 99 8:16',
'283527688', '209.165.53.56')': Server message number=2627 severit
y=14 state=2 line=1 server=IZANAGI text=Violation of UNIQUE KEY constraint
'UNC_rad_term': Attempt to insert duplicate key in object
'radiusdat'.Server message number=3621 severity=0 state=0 line=1
server=IZANAGI text=Command has been aborted.
# End Log Entry #
These happen all of the time. I am not real sure why it happens. It
appears that Radiator try's to enter accounting data multiple times to the
SQL database and it fails due to the unique key constraint. Does this look
like the NAS are impatient and are reporting to both Radius servers do to
slowness in response? What does this mean exactly maybe it will help to
solve why the auth problems take place. These happen way more often during
busy periods.
This message is just to see if anyone has any suggestions that might help.
We are totally open to suggestions at this time. We would really like to
move to SQL 7.0 so if anyone has had luck with heavy usage and OpenLinks
drivers I would like to hear your success stories. We also looked at
Intersolv's SequeLink solution but it is way expensive with this
configuration some where around 28,000.00 dollars to license 6 clients. I
am going to test the drivers to check the speed but from what I have heard
the products are pretty much equal in performance.
Does anyone know if running Intel boxes with NT running Radiator would be a
performance increase? Our System Administrator would not like this solution
as he is way pro Sparc but if it would work that is all that matters at this
point.
Thanks for any and all comments/advise,
Robert Mann
Lightspeed Net
===
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
