[RBW] Re: Terminological Inexactitude

2012-02-20 Thread colin p. cummings
I love it.  All of it.  Especially the part about quick steering; I
myself have never had a good experience where quick steering is
required.

As far as supple tires go...in my mind, this term is reserved only for
describing leather and, well, let's just say skin.  I have a friend
who used to cringe at two words: supple and moist.  I still cringe a
little when a tire is described as supple.  It's a little too sexy for
a bike tire.

On Feb 20, 12:43 pm, David T. davidtren...@yahoo.ca wrote:
 There seems to be a notion that a bike frame can be “sprightly” or
 “lively”. On the other hand, a frame can supposedly be “sluggish.” I
 assume this means that the tubing is more or less flexible. Does
 flexible tubing make a bike more sprightly? Couldn’t you just as well
 call it “floppy” or “saggy?” Can a bike even be sprightly, after all
 it just sits there unless someone gets on it and pedals. Does flexible
 tubing even make a bicycle faster, or more efficient to pedal? If it
 does then why do the sprinters use bikes that are as stiff as
 possible?

 There are words used to describe bicycles that are starting to lose
 their meaning.

 “Comfy” gets used a lot, to describe handlebars, tires, handlebar
 tape, saddles; even whole bikes probably. I think it has come to mean
 upholstered or padded in some way, but that isn’t always the most
 comfortable. For example I find a single wrap of cloth tape with a
 single coat of shellac to be the easiest on my hands…but that wouldn’t
 be “comfy” would it? It brings to mind the dreaded “comfort bike”
 which is maybe comfortable to sit on inside the bike shop, but not to
 ride from point A to point B if point A and point B are more than
 about half a mile apart.

 “Relaxed Geometry”: This has some basis in reality, but can a geometry
 really be relaxed? If you push it too far, it isn’t relaxing. ( I
 actually like how it gets expanded as “slack” geometry, “forgiving”…or
 is that “forgiving” steel tubing? It bet it’s not too forgiving if
 someone get whacked on the forehead with it. Would you be forgiven for
 that?) You could turn it around and call it “acute angle” or “sharp
 angle” geometry, but that doesn’t sound very relaxing. Plus for
 someone riding a time trial bike, they may be more relaxed with a more
 “open” geometry ( i.e. a steeper  seat tube angle. ) I guess the
 ultimate “relaxed” geometry is the recumbent bike, which indeed is a
 relaxed position, until the first time you try to ride up a hill and
 you immediately want to go back to your more uptight upright bike.

 “Quick” geometry, which tends to be another way of saying a short
 chainstay.  This makes the bike turn quicker, but it tends to get
 muddled with thinking that the bike will go quicker or faster, which
 of course makes no sense at all. ( Just think of boats and drag racing
 cars, the fastest ones are long and narrow, so instead of “quick”
 geometry you could call it “slow” or “meandering” geometry…once again,
 how can geometry be “quick?” ) Oh, I almost forgot about quick
 steering...why do I always want my steering to be as slow as
 possible?

 If you read the reviews of some bicycles they are almost as bereft of
 meaning as one of those fine wine descriptions...eager,
 aggressive,  responsive, nuanced, what's next, insouciant?

 “Supple” tires….no comment.

 There are lots more of these, does anyone know what I am talking
 about? It’s a holiday…

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Terminological Inexactitude

2012-02-20 Thread jpp
The words are weird.  The one that always gets me is the widespread use of 
the word bombproof.  People like everything on their bike to be 
bombproof, frame, tires, wheels, etc.   I have been riding a long time but 
have yet to ever run over a bomb.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/6a4nBqvOEHkJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Terminological Inexactitude

2012-02-20 Thread David T.

I forgot about bombproof. This is often used in reference to tents as
well, although if I were being bombed I think a tent would be the last
place I would go.

And I forgot one of my favourites, the laid-back seatpost. It sounds
like the hippy of seatposts, relaxed, non-aggressive. Probably quite
forgiving too. ( I actually have one of these on my bike, just knowing
it is there puts me in a mellower mood. )

:-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Terminological Inexactitude

2012-02-20 Thread dougP
Some the writers for bike mags went to the school where wine
descriptions are taught, and have applied the same weird ideas to
describing the characteristics of bicycles.  Hey, if you're paying the
big bucks, shouldn't you get some ecstatic experience?

Loving the plush ride of my Atlantis, as it glides over every ripple
with nary a bobble...

dougP

On Feb 20, 10:43 am, David T. davidtren...@yahoo.ca wrote:
 There seems to be a notion that a bike frame can be “sprightly” or
 “lively”. On the other hand, a frame can supposedly be “sluggish.” I
 assume this means that the tubing is more or less flexible. Does
 flexible tubing make a bike more sprightly? Couldn’t you just as well
 call it “floppy” or “saggy?” Can a bike even be sprightly, after all
 it just sits there unless someone gets on it and pedals. Does flexible
 tubing even make a bicycle faster, or more efficient to pedal? If it
 does then why do the sprinters use bikes that are as stiff as
 possible?

 There are words used to describe bicycles that are starting to lose
 their meaning.

 “Comfy” gets used a lot, to describe handlebars, tires, handlebar
 tape, saddles; even whole bikes probably. I think it has come to mean
 upholstered or padded in some way, but that isn’t always the most
 comfortable. For example I find a single wrap of cloth tape with a
 single coat of shellac to be the easiest on my hands…but that wouldn’t
 be “comfy” would it? It brings to mind the dreaded “comfort bike”
 which is maybe comfortable to sit on inside the bike shop, but not to
 ride from point A to point B if point A and point B are more than
 about half a mile apart.

 “Relaxed Geometry”: This has some basis in reality, but can a geometry
 really be relaxed? If you push it too far, it isn’t relaxing. ( I
 actually like how it gets expanded as “slack” geometry, “forgiving”…or
 is that “forgiving” steel tubing? It bet it’s not too forgiving if
 someone get whacked on the forehead with it. Would you be forgiven for
 that?) You could turn it around and call it “acute angle” or “sharp
 angle” geometry, but that doesn’t sound very relaxing. Plus for
 someone riding a time trial bike, they may be more relaxed with a more
 “open” geometry ( i.e. a steeper  seat tube angle. ) I guess the
 ultimate “relaxed” geometry is the recumbent bike, which indeed is a
 relaxed position, until the first time you try to ride up a hill and
 you immediately want to go back to your more uptight upright bike.

 “Quick” geometry, which tends to be another way of saying a short
 chainstay.  This makes the bike turn quicker, but it tends to get
 muddled with thinking that the bike will go quicker or faster, which
 of course makes no sense at all. ( Just think of boats and drag racing
 cars, the fastest ones are long and narrow, so instead of “quick”
 geometry you could call it “slow” or “meandering” geometry…once again,
 how can geometry be “quick?” ) Oh, I almost forgot about quick
 steering...why do I always want my steering to be as slow as
 possible?

 If you read the reviews of some bicycles they are almost as bereft of
 meaning as one of those fine wine descriptions...eager,
 aggressive,  responsive, nuanced, what's next, insouciant?

 “Supple” tires….no comment.

 There are lots more of these, does anyone know what I am talking
 about? It’s a holiday…

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Terminological Inexactitude

2012-02-20 Thread rob markwardt
...it's fruity with hints of soil, tobacco and saddle leather!

On Feb 20, 8:11 pm, dougP dougpn...@cox.net wrote:
 Some the writers for bike mags went to the school where wine
 descriptions are taught, and have applied the same weird ideas to
 describing the characteristics of bicycles.  Hey, if you're paying the
 big bucks, shouldn't you get some ecstatic experience?

 Loving the plush ride of my Atlantis, as it glides over every ripple
 with nary a bobble...

 dougP

 On Feb 20, 10:43 am, David T. davidtren...@yahoo.ca wrote:



  There seems to be a notion that a bike frame can be “sprightly” or
  “lively”. On the other hand, a frame can supposedly be “sluggish.” I
  assume this means that the tubing is more or less flexible. Does
  flexible tubing make a bike more sprightly? Couldn’t you just as well
  call it “floppy” or “saggy?” Can a bike even be sprightly, after all
  it just sits there unless someone gets on it and pedals. Does flexible
  tubing even make a bicycle faster, or more efficient to pedal? If it
  does then why do the sprinters use bikes that are as stiff as
  possible?

  There are words used to describe bicycles that are starting to lose
  their meaning.

  “Comfy” gets used a lot, to describe handlebars, tires, handlebar
  tape, saddles; even whole bikes probably. I think it has come to mean
  upholstered or padded in some way, but that isn’t always the most
  comfortable. For example I find a single wrap of cloth tape with a
  single coat of shellac to be the easiest on my hands…but that wouldn’t
  be “comfy” would it? It brings to mind the dreaded “comfort bike”
  which is maybe comfortable to sit on inside the bike shop, but not to
  ride from point A to point B if point A and point B are more than
  about half a mile apart.

  “Relaxed Geometry”: This has some basis in reality, but can a geometry
  really be relaxed? If you push it too far, it isn’t relaxing. ( I
  actually like how it gets expanded as “slack” geometry, “forgiving”…or
  is that “forgiving” steel tubing? It bet it’s not too forgiving if
  someone get whacked on the forehead with it. Would you be forgiven for
  that?) You could turn it around and call it “acute angle” or “sharp
  angle” geometry, but that doesn’t sound very relaxing. Plus for
  someone riding a time trial bike, they may be more relaxed with a more
  “open” geometry ( i.e. a steeper  seat tube angle. ) I guess the
  ultimate “relaxed” geometry is the recumbent bike, which indeed is a
  relaxed position, until the first time you try to ride up a hill and
  you immediately want to go back to your more uptight upright bike.

  “Quick” geometry, which tends to be another way of saying a short
  chainstay.  This makes the bike turn quicker, but it tends to get
  muddled with thinking that the bike will go quicker or faster, which
  of course makes no sense at all. ( Just think of boats and drag racing
  cars, the fastest ones are long and narrow, so instead of “quick”
  geometry you could call it “slow” or “meandering” geometry…once again,
  how can geometry be “quick?” ) Oh, I almost forgot about quick
  steering...why do I always want my steering to be as slow as
  possible?

  If you read the reviews of some bicycles they are almost as bereft of
  meaning as one of those fine wine descriptions...eager,
  aggressive,  responsive, nuanced, what's next, insouciant?

  “Supple” tires….no comment.

  There are lots more of these, does anyone know what I am talking
  about? It’s a holiday…- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.