Re: [RDA-L] ISSN placement in 490
As I see it, double is best for machine readable semantics (preferred), for humans it could suffice to present both $x and $v only once as last element (but we don't do that with $v because we want to maintain the language of the resource in transcription fields). Peter -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] Namens Adam L. Schiff Verzonden: donderdag 30 mei 2013 1:43 Aan: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Onderwerp: [RDA-L] ISSN placement in 490 I've got a question about where to record the ISSN when there is both a series title proper and a parallel series title. RDA doesn't provide any guidance or examples for this situation. Consider this situation: Series Title Proper: Frankfurt contributions to natural history Numbering Within Series: volume 55 Parallel Series Title Proper: Frankfurter Beitrage zur Naturkunde Parallel Numbering Within Series: Band 55 ISSN appears once in the resource: 1613-2327 For ISBD punctuation, RDA appendix D tells us that a comma precedes the ISSN, but it doesn't tell us where to put the ISSN when there is a series title proper and a parallel series title proper. I went to the ISBD consolidated and it doesn't address this situation EXCEPT with this example: . -- (Title proper of series, ISSN ; numbering within series = Parallel title of series, ISSN ; parallel numbering within series) Based on the ISBD example, it seems that we should repeat the ISSN: 490 1_ $a Frankfurt contributions to natural history, $x 1613-2327 ; $v volume 55 = $a Frankfurter Beitrage zur Naturkunde, $x 1613-2327 ; $v Band 55 Is this what we should do in RDA? Or should we just record the ISSN once, and if so, does it go after the series title proper or after the parallel series title? --Adam Schiff ^^ Adam L. Schiff Principal Cataloger University of Washington Libraries Box 352900 Seattle, WA 98195-2900 (206) 543-8409 (206) 685-8782 fax asch...@u.washington.edu http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff ~~
[RDA-L] ISSN placement in 490
I've got a question about where to record the ISSN when there is both a series title proper and a parallel series title. RDA doesn't provide any guidance or examples for this situation. Consider this situation: Series Title Proper: Frankfurt contributions to natural history Numbering Within Series: volume 55 Parallel Series Title Proper: Frankfurter Beitrage zur Naturkunde Parallel Numbering Within Series: Band 55 ISSN appears once in the resource: 1613-2327 For ISBD punctuation, RDA appendix D tells us that a comma precedes the ISSN, but it doesn't tell us where to put the ISSN when there is a series title proper and a parallel series title proper. I went to the ISBD consolidated and it doesn't address this situation EXCEPT with this example: . -- (Title proper of series, ISSN ; numbering within series = Parallel title of series, ISSN ; parallel numbering within series) Based on the ISBD example, it seems that we should repeat the ISSN: 490 1_ $a Frankfurt contributions to natural history, $x 1613-2327 ; $v volume 55 = $a Frankfurter Beitrage zur Naturkunde, $x 1613-2327 ; $v Band 55 Is this what we should do in RDA? Or should we just record the ISSN once, and if so, does it go after the series title proper or after the parallel series title? --Adam Schiff ^^ Adam L. Schiff Principal Cataloger University of Washington Libraries Box 352900 Seattle, WA 98195-2900 (206) 543-8409 (206) 685-8782 fax asch...@u.washington.edu http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff ~~
Re: [RDA-L] Early distribution
Diane Goodman wrote:
>... don't we often get information from elsewhere? The information in
>bib. records that is in brackets
If the publisher website says it was published a year earlier, fine.
If there is no evidence other than early distribution, I think not.
Remember the fuss when some libraries made a Harry Potter book
available before the announced publication date, because they had it?
Early distribution is common so that the item is in stock when
officially "published".
>[Chevy Chase, MD] : $b Now You Know Media, $c 2012.
There is no rule, AACR2 or RDA, which approves providing a postal code
in brackets. It should be "[Md.]" in AACR2, "[Maryland]" in RDA, if
provided.
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__
[RDA-L] RDA Task Force Forums at ALA Annual
Please join us for the following RDA Task Force Forums at ALA Annual 2013. RDA Update Forum Brief Description: The Cataloging and Metadata Management Section (CaMMS) and the RDA Conference Forums and Programs Task Force (TF) are co-sponsoring the ALA Annual RDA Update Forum. Please join us on Sunday June 30, 2013 from 1:00-2:30 in Room E350 in McCormick Place for The Cataloging and Metadata Management Section (CaMMS) RDA Conference Forums and Programs Task Force (TF) ALA Final RDA Update Forum. Panelists will provide updates to RDA as well as resources to consult for future updates after implementation. Scheduled presenters include: Beacher Wiggins (Library of Congress), Phil Schreur (Chair PCC), Glenn Patton (OCLC), John Attig (JSC update), and Troy Linker (ALA Publishing). Vendor Update Forum Brief Description: How Will RDA Impact Your System?: A Forum Of Vendors Discussing Implementation Plans Now that Resource Description and Access (RDA) has been implemented in the U.S. national libraries, it is time to hear from the vendors that design our integrated library systems and bibliographic utilities. What changes will they make to accommodate changes introduced in RDA? How will these changes impact library staff workflows and ultimately the library user's experience? Come to this session on Sunday, June 30, 2013 from 8:30-10:00 in Room E350 of McCormick Place and hear the vendors discuss their development plans and timelines for implementing required changes. Representatives from ILS Vendors Sirsi/Dynyx, Polaris, ExLibris/Voyager, III, Follett, TLC, and VTLS will present their plans and will entertain questions and comments about their proposed system changes. RDA Implementation Stories and Strategies Brief Description: Join us on Sunday, June 30, 2013 from 3:00-5:30 in Room N427bc in McCormick Place to be regaled by stories about the implementation of RDA. "Storytellers" will include representatives from multiple contexts including academic, school and public libraries, as well as international training. Each will discuss their individual implementation of RDA and compare and contrast experiences between their different environments. Come and share your experiences with everyone!! June June Abbas, Ph.D. Associate Professor School of Library and Information Studies College of Arts and Sciences The University of Oklahoma 401 W. Brooks, Bizzell Library Norman, OK 73069 405-325-3921 jmab...@ou.edu
Re: [RDA-L] Bibframe
Thanks to everyone on clarifying what exactly BibFrame is. I printed out the link that Sally sent out. Mac, and all who responded to me on this, thank you. --angelina joseph -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Mitchell, Michael Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 7:53 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Bibframe -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Bernhard Eversberg Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 11:38 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Bibframe 28.05.2013 23:45, J. McRee Elrod: > Angelina Joseph asked: > >> Every now and then I see the word "Bibframe" in emails. Is it >> replacing MAR= C? How is that going to be? > > You will have answers from those more in the loop than I, but there is > my *very* biased answer. > > Bibframe is a work in progress, so no one knows if/when it will >replace MARC. >... LC's Sally McCallum on May 24 informed the VBIBFRAME community thus: http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1305&L=bibframe&T=0&P=43920 And this is but one example of the openness of the Bibframe development process of which I am very impressed. We catalogers do have a chance to monitor and influence the development of our future toolset. There are several first rate info sci people working on this but as Mac wrote there seems to be a lack of frontline cataloger input at this point (not absent, just a minority). Michael Mitchell Technical Services Librarian Brazosport College Lake Jackson, TX Michael.mitchell at brazosport.edu
Re: [RDA-L] Bibframe
-Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Bernhard Eversberg Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 11:38 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Bibframe 28.05.2013 23:45, J. McRee Elrod: > Angelina Joseph asked: > >> Every now and then I see the word "Bibframe" in emails. Is it >> replacing MAR= C? How is that going to be? > > You will have answers from those more in the loop than I, but there is > my *very* biased answer. > > Bibframe is a work in progress, so no one knows if/when it will >replace MARC. >... LC's Sally McCallum on May 24 informed the VBIBFRAME community thus: http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1305&L=bibframe&T=0&P=43920 And this is but one example of the openness of the Bibframe development process of which I am very impressed. We catalogers do have a chance to monitor and influence the development of our future toolset. There are several first rate info sci people working on this but as Mac wrote there seems to be a lack of frontline cataloger input at this point (not absent, just a minority). Michael Mitchell Technical Services Librarian Brazosport College Lake Jackson, TX Michael.mitchell at brazosport.edu
