[rdiff-backup-users] Mozy Online Back-Up Problems

2009-08-25 Thread infomax467

I installed MOZY FREE Backup software on my computer by following their 
instructions.
After installation, my computer kept freezing and then I got the Windows Blue 
Screen of Death!
Basically, MOZY FREE Backup CRASHED my computer.  I could not even do a system 
restore. I had to restore my computer from scratch.  I am still in the process 
of putting back all my programs and files, this is very time consuming.
Furthermore, after I backed up my files, I could not retrieve them using 
another computer. It kept telling me that I had to register and install MOZY 
Backup, it just would not retrieve my previous registration.
I am still not able to retrieve my files.  Luckily, I kept local backups on 
some DVD's. MOZY may be free, but there is always a catch.  Please be aware 
Mozy free backup could crash your computer?
 Maybe that's how they get you; then they tell you have to purchase one of 
their plans???
FYI:  I have 2GB of RAM and a 2.0 GHz AMD processor and it still CRASHED it!

+--
|This was sent by jlri...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--




___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki


Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Mozy Online Back-Up Problems

2009-08-25 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 05:11:46PM -0400, infomax467 wrote:
 Basically, MOZY FREE Backup CRASHED my computer.  [...]
  Maybe that's how they get you; then they tell you have to purchase one of
  their plans???
 FYI:  I have 2GB of RAM and a 2.0 GHz AMD processor and it still CRASHED
 it!

It's most likely the software stressed your system to the point that an
existing problem was revealed. (Probably either a driver bug or an actual
hardware problem.) The conspiracy you suggest seems like it'd be bad
business -- who would trust such a company?

rdiff-backup can put similar stress on a system, and it's likely we can find
a similar story if we look hard enough.

-- 
Matthew Miller   mat...@mattdm.org  http://mattdm.org/


___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki


Re: [rdiff-backup-users] unable to recover from interrupted backup

2009-08-25 Thread Dominic Raferd

Ben Tucker wrote:

I had a machine fail in the midst of backing up a couple weeks ago and
ever since I have been unable to get it to successfully backup.
rdiff-backup --check-destination-dir runs without error, but then
running the actual backup command results in an exception.  I'm
running 1.2.8 stock deb install on Ubuntu jaunty.  The client machine
is also running 1.2.8 (also ubuntu).  These are the only versions of
rdiff-backup with have been used.  I'd greatly appreciate any pointers
on how to resolve this.  Thanks!
  
Did you get this sorted? It sounds an alarming problem for any of us who 
have important repositories of data going back over a long period; the 
whole thing could get trashed by one failed backup!


I give below a way (posted here by Steven a few weeks ago, all credit to 
him) to force a regression. This might undo the 'bad' backup(s) that you 
have and then allow you to make further backups. I haven't had the need 
to try it but it might help you:


Dominic

While rdiff-backup is making a backup it creates a new 
current_mirror.$timestamp.data file in the rdiff-backup-data 
destination directory.  Once it's done making the backup, it deletes the 
old current_mirror file.  In other words, while the backup is running 
there are two current_mirror files. In order to undo a backup, you'll 
need to to create a fake current_mirror file with the timestamp of the 
previous backup and run rdiff-backup -v6 --check-destination-dir 
$dest.  rdiff-backup will be fooled into thinking the latest backup 
failed and revert it.


I do not know of a way to regress more than one backup at once, but this 
method should work multiple times.


P.S. A full example in case my description isn't clear:

$ mkdir source

$ echo 1  source/a

$ echo 2  source/b

$ rdiff-backup source dest

$ ls dest
a  b  rdiff-backup-data

$ rm source/a

$ rdiff-backup source dest

$ ls dest
b  rdiff-backup-data

$ ls dest/rdiff-backup-data/mirror*
dest/rdiff-backup-data/mirror_metadata.2009-07-03T18:47:33-06:00.diff.gz
dest/rdiff-backup-data/mirror_metadata.2009-07-03T18:48:12-06:00.snapshot.gz 



$ echo PID 99  \
dest/rdiff-backup-data/current_mirror.2009-07-03T18:47:33-06:00.diff.gz

$ rdiff-backup -v6 --check-destination-dir dest
Using rdiff-backup version 1.2.7
... snip ...
Regressing to Fri Jul  3 18:47:33 2009
... snip ...
Regressing file a
... snip ...
Cleaning up

$ ls dest
a  b  rdiff-backup-data



___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki


Re: [rdiff-backup-users] A bug in rdiff-backup with changing files

2009-08-25 Thread Dominic Raferd

Josh Nisly wrote:
One of my clients encountered an interesting bug in rdiff-backup - 
under certain conditions, if a file changes while it is being backed 
up, rdiff-backup throws an unhandled exception...
I can't help on the main problem, but as a workaround (and a better 
approach anyway), users should backup from a snapshot - or, in Windows 
terminology, a 'Volume Shadow'. This is the approach I take in my 
TimeDicer script. That way files can't change or be locked during a 
backup. (Note that it might still be possible for files to be in an 
inconsistent state, though if the application manipulating them is 
'volume shadow aware', they shouldn't be.)


Dominic


___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki


[rdiff-backup-users] Bad index order

2009-08-25 Thread Daniel Roth

Hi!

I'm new to rdiff-backup. I'm using it under Windows (Vista). The first 
time I tried to backup my harddrive it gives me an error, which possibly 
originates from special characters I like to use. Please have a look:


Exception 'Bad index order: ('Pictures', '2006', '20060326-0401 
T\xfcrkei', '032
9 G\xfcnes Tutulmasi in Aspendos', 'p3292216.jpg') = ('Pictures', 
'2006', '2006
0326-0401 T\xfcrkei', '0329 G\xfcnes Tutulmasi in Aspendos')' raised of 
class '

type 'exceptions.AssertionError'':
 File rdiff_backup\Main.pyc, line 304, in error_check_Main
 File rdiff_backup\Main.pyc, line 324, in Main
 File rdiff_backup\Main.pyc, line 280, in take_action
 File rdiff_backup\Main.pyc, line 346, in Backup
 File rdiff_backup\backup.pyc, line 38, in Mirror
 File rdiff_backup\backup.pyc, line 232, in patch
 File rdiff_backup\rorpiter.pyc, line 275, in __call__

Traceback (most recent call last):
 File rdiff-backup, line 30, in module
 File rdiff_backup\Main.pyc, line 304, in error_check_Main
 File rdiff_backup\Main.pyc, line 324, in Main
 File rdiff_backup\Main.pyc, line 280, in take_action
 File rdiff_backup\Main.pyc, line 346, in Backup
 File rdiff_backup\backup.pyc, line 38, in Mirror
 File rdiff_backup\backup.pyc, line 232, in patch
 File rdiff_backup\rorpiter.pyc, line 275, in __call__
AssertionError: Bad index order: ('Pictures', '2006', '20060326-0401 
T\xfcrkei',
'0329 G\xfcnes Tutulmasi in Aspendos', 'p3292216.jpg') = ('Pictures', 
'2006',

'20060326-0401 T\xfcrkei', '0329 G\xfcnes Tutulmasi in Aspendos')


Can someone fix that? Is it really because of the character I'm using in 
the directory name?


The folder path is:
C:\Users\admin\Pictures\2006\20060326-0401 Türkei\0329 Günes Tutulmasi 
in Aspendos


Would be very nice if that could be fixed.

Thanks and best regards -
- Daniel




___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki


[rdiff-backup-users] Quick question - Can rdiff (or anything else) do this?

2009-08-25 Thread Edward Harvey
I have some large files, such as hard drive images for virtual machines,
which will change a few blocks at a time but most of the file remains
unchanged, and I would like to backup efficiently.  Needless to say it is
bad to send the whole file across every time.  I would like a diff-like
program which will analyze the file in chunks, and only send across the
chunks which changed from last time.  This would gain little or no
performance boost if copying from disk-to-disk, but when there is a WAN in
between the source and destination, it could greatly improve the transfer
time.

Can rdiff (or anything that anyone knows of) do this?

Thank you.
___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Quick question - Can rdiff (or anything else) do this?

2009-08-25 Thread Billy Crook
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 17:17, Edward
Harveyedward.har...@lyricsemiconductor.com wrote:
 Can rdiff (or anything that anyone knows of) do this?

storebackup can
http://www.nongnu.org/storebackup/


___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki


Re: [rdiff-backup-users] A bug in rdiff-backup with changing files

2009-08-25 Thread Dominic Raferd

Josh Nisly wrote:
One of my clients encountered an interesting bug in rdiff-backup - 
under certain conditions, if a file changes while it is being backed 
up, rdiff-backup throws an unhandled exception...
I can't help on the main problem, but as a workaround (and a better 
approach anyway), users should backup from a snapshot - or, in Windows 
terminology, a 'Volume Shadow'. This is the approach I take in my 
TimeDicer script. That way files can't change or be locked during a 
backup. (Note that it might still be possible for files to be in an 
inconsistent state, though if the application manipulating them is 
'volume shadow aware', they shouldn't be.)


Dominic



___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki


Re: [rdiff-backup-users] unable to recover from interrupted backup

2009-08-25 Thread Dominic Raferd

Ben Tucker wrote:

I had a machine fail in the midst of backing up a couple weeks ago and
ever since I have been unable to get it to successfully backup.
rdiff-backup --check-destination-dir runs without error, but then
running the actual backup command results in an exception.  I'm
running 1.2.8 stock deb install on Ubuntu jaunty.  The client machine
is also running 1.2.8 (also ubuntu).  These are the only versions of
rdiff-backup with have been used.  I'd greatly appreciate any pointers
on how to resolve this.  Thanks!
Did you get this sorted? It sounds an alarming problem for any of us who 
have important repositories of data going back over a long period; the 
whole thing could get trashed by one failed backup!


I give below a way (posted here by Steven a few weeks ago) to force a 
regression. This might undo the 'bad' backup(s) that you have and then 
allow you to make further backups. I haven't had the need to try it but 
it might help you:


Dominic

While rdiff-backup is making a backup it creates a new 
current_mirror.$timestamp.data file in the rdiff-backup-data 
destination directory.  Once it's done making the backup, it deletes the 
old current_mirror file.  In other words, while the backup is running 
there are two current_mirror files. In order to undo a backup, you'll 
need to to create a fake current_mirror file with the timestamp of the 
previous backup and run rdiff-backup -v6 --check-destination-dir 
$dest.  rdiff-backup will be fooled into thinking the latest backup 
failed and revert it.


I do not know of a way to regress more than one backup at once, but this 
method should work multiple times.


P.S. A full example in case my description isn't clear:

$ mkdir source

$ echo 1  source/a

$ echo 2  source/b

$ rdiff-backup source dest

$ ls dest
a  b  rdiff-backup-data

$ rm source/a

$ rdiff-backup source dest

$ ls dest
b  rdiff-backup-data

$ ls dest/rdiff-backup-data/mirror*
dest/rdiff-backup-data/mirror_metadata.2009-07-03T18:47:33-06:00.diff.gz
dest/rdiff-backup-data/mirror_metadata.2009-07-03T18:48:12-06:00.snapshot.gz 



$ echo PID 99  \
dest/rdiff-backup-data/current_mirror.2009-07-03T18:47:33-06:00.diff.gz

$ rdiff-backup -v6 --check-destination-dir dest
Using rdiff-backup version 1.2.7
... snip ...
Regressing to Fri Jul  3 18:47:33 2009
... snip ...
Regressing file a
... snip ...
Cleaning up

$ ls dest
a  b  rdiff-backup-data



___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki