[rdiff-backup-users] Why using --force while restoring is dangerous?

2011-02-09 Thread Filip Gruszczyński
I have read in manual, that --force can be dangerous, when restoring
files from backup. I am using --force, when calling rdiff-backup in my
filesystem to restore a file. I can't yet remove it, because otherwise
it fails to restore file. Is it really dangerous or maybe I can keep
it?

-- 
Filip Gruszczyński

___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki


Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Why using --force while restoring is dangerous?

2011-02-09 Thread Dominic Raferd
My reading is that using --force on a restore will overwrite existing 
files with the same name - so you may lose previous data at the restore 
destination. In general if you are restoring a directory (or a complete 
repository) it is logical to use a clean destination, in which case it 
shouldn't be a problem.


Anyone know different?

Dominic

On 09/02/2011 12:40, Filip Gruszczyński wrote:

I have read in manual, that --force can be dangerous, when restoring
files from backup. I am using --force, when calling rdiff-backup in my
filesystem to restore a file. I can't yet remove it, because otherwise
it fails to restore file. Is it really dangerous or maybe I can keep
it?




___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki