August,

Here's some additional info:

http://solarprofessional.com/articles/design-installation/fire-classification-for-roof-mounted-pv-systems?v=disable_pagination

Best regards,

David Brearley
Senior Technical Editor, SolarPro magazine
NABCEP Certified PV Installation Professional
david.brear...@solarprofessional.com
Direct: 541.261.6545

Check out this AMAZING music video tribute to SolarPro: http://bit.ly/1qfMCCh


On Dec 9, 2014, at 7:50 AM, re-wrenches-requ...@lists.re-wrenches.org wrote:

> Send RE-wrenches mailing list submissions to
>       re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://lists.re-wrenches.org/listinfo.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       re-wrenches-requ...@lists.re-wrenches.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       re-wrenches-ow...@lists.re-wrenches.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RE-wrenches digest..."
> When responding to posts within the Digest, be sure to restore the Subject: 
> line to the original, and please edit out any extraneous lines from the 
> quoted message.
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1.  UL 1703 coming to California - anyone ready? (August Goers)
>   2. Re: UL 1703 coming to California - anyone ready? (August Goers)
>   3. Re: UL 1703 coming to California - anyone ready? (Glenn Burt)
>   4. Re: Magnum Back Plates (Baxter, Gary)
> 
> From: August Goers <aug...@luminalt.com>
> Subject: [RE-wrenches] UL 1703 coming to California - anyone ready?
> Date: December 8, 2014 5:07:54 PM CST
> To: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>
> Reply-To: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>
> 
> 
> Hi All California Wrenches,
>  
> As far as I understand, UL 1703 goes into law in California on Jan 1, 2015 
> and will require new fire rating classifications for many projects. Is anyone 
> else currently planning what racking and modules they will be using to meet 
> these requirements? I’ve been trying to get my head around this for a while 
> now and I’m having a hard time finding substantial information from both 
> racking and module manufacturers.
>  
> A little info:
>  
> http://osfm.fire.ca.gov/informationbulletin/pdf/2014/IB14002PVFireClassification.pdf
>  
> Best,
>  
> August
>  
> Luminalt
> 
> 
> 
> From: August Goers <aug...@luminalt.com>
> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] UL 1703 coming to California - anyone ready?
> Date: December 8, 2014 6:48:34 PM CST
> To: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>
> Reply-To: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>
> 
> 
> All –
>  
> Bill Brooks wrote back to me and shared a draft NREL whitepaper on fire 
> performance of PV systems he wrote. If you are interested, please contact me 
> off list and I will share it with you (he said it was okay to share).
>  
> Best,
>  
> August
> 
>  
> From: August Goers [mailto:aug...@luminalt.com] 
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 3:08 PM
> To: 'RE-wrenches'
> Subject: [RE-wrenches] UL 1703 coming to California - anyone ready?
>  
> Hi All California Wrenches,
>  
> As far as I understand, UL 1703 goes into law in California on Jan 1, 2015 
> and will require new fire rating classifications for many projects. Is anyone 
> else currently planning what racking and modules they will be using to meet 
> these requirements? I’ve been trying to get my head around this for a while 
> now and I’m having a hard time finding substantial information from both 
> racking and module manufacturers.
>  
> A little info:
>  
> http://osfm.fire.ca.gov/informationbulletin/pdf/2014/IB14002PVFireClassification.pdf
>  
> Best,
>  
> August
>  
> Luminalt
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Glenn Burt" <glenn.b...@glbcc.com>
> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] UL 1703 coming to California - anyone ready?
> Date: December 8, 2014 7:14:01 PM CST
> To: "'RE-wrenches'" <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>
> Reply-To: glenn.b...@glbcc.com, RE-wrenches 
> <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>
> 
> 
> I think Quick Mount did a presentation covering this not too long ago.
> Maybe it is up on their website now. – indeed it is under Roofing Codes for 
> Solar, from their Resources & Support links.
>  
> HTH
> Glenn
>  
> From: RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On 
> Behalf Of August Goers
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 7:49 PM
> To: RE-wrenches
> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] UL 1703 coming to California - anyone ready?
>  
> All –
>  
> Bill Brooks wrote back to me and shared a draft NREL whitepaper on fire 
> performance of PV systems he wrote. If you are interested, please contact me 
> off list and I will share it with you (he said it was okay to share).
>  
> Best,
>  
> August
>  
> From: August Goers [mailto:aug...@luminalt.com] 
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 3:08 PM
> To: 'RE-wrenches'
> Subject: [RE-wrenches] UL 1703 coming to California - anyone ready?
>  
> Hi All California Wrenches,
>  
> As far as I understand, UL 1703 goes into law in California on Jan 1, 2015 
> and will require new fire rating classifications for many projects. Is anyone 
> else currently planning what racking and modules they will be using to meet 
> these requirements? I’ve been trying to get my head around this for a while 
> now and I’m having a hard time finding substantial information from both 
> racking and module manufacturers.
>  
> A little info:
>  
> http://osfm.fire.ca.gov/informationbulletin/pdf/2014/IB14002PVFireClassification.pdf
>  
> Best,
>  
> August
>  
> Luminalt
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Baxter, Gary" <gbax...@sensata.com>
> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Magnum Back Plates
> Date: December 8, 2014 7:24:34 PM CST
> To: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>
> Reply-To: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>
> 
> 
> Mac,
> You should be able to add another BP-S next to the existing unit and just 
> “add on” without taking anything existing apart. There is also a BP-MMP which 
> only fits the Magnum mini panel and will not add on to the BP-S. If you look 
> on the website you will see the difference in the mounting flange around the 
> edge between the two backplates.
>  
> Gary
>  
> Gary Baxter
> Product Manager
> Magnum | Dimensions
> 2211 West Casino Rd.
> Everett, WA. 98204
> Office 425.353.8833 | Mobile 425.501.0289 | Fax. 425.353.8390
>  
> Please Note My New Email Address:
>  
> gbax...@sensata.com | www.magnumenergy.com
>  
> A Sensata Technologies Business Unit
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On 
> Behalf Of Mac Lewis
> Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2014 5:41 AM
> To: RE-wrenches
> Subject: [RE-wrenches] Magnum Back Plates
>  
> Hello wrenches,
>  
> I have a client who has a MS4448 mounted on a single magnum back plate BP-S 
> with an MPSL-30D enclosure.  For an expansion to two inverters, is it 
> necessary to pull the installed inverter off, and remount it on a dual 
> backplate (BP-D) or can I butt another single backplate against the older 
> one?  I plan on using a MPXS-30D-R extension box.
>  
> Thanks
>  
> --
>  
>  
>  
> Mac Lewis
> 
> "Yo solo sé que no sé nada." -Sócrates
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
> 
> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
> 
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List-Archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to