Re: [RE-wrenches] Solar Edge Experience?
No trunk cable is bonus. Working with regular PV cable is easier on stocking materials. Safe working voltage is real bonus and makes testing during installation reasonable. Strings over 12 is bonus. Sometimes, 16, 18+ makes sense physically. Now it can make sense electrically. With different solar exposures. Still needing to use metal conduit inside is sometimes a hassle, but MC cable makes it doable. No way to test communication with optimizer until DC voltage is applied. This means if you have a DOA optimizer that reads correct voltage, you are removing modules to get to an optimizer. That is a drag. Support is pretty good. The new 7kw inverter matched to 40a OCP to max out residential 200A panel backfed breaker sounds good. Erika Weliczko REpower Solutions cell: 216.402.4458 On May 5, 2014, at 11:56 AM, August Goers wrote: > Hi Wrenches, > > I have been watching Solar Edge for a while now and am curious if other > wrenches have been using their product and what they think about it. I’m > generally hesitant to adopt new technology until it has a good track record > but I have to admit that I’m seeing some serious benefits in the Solar Edge > system – long strings, module level tracking and monitoring, design > flexibility, etc. Can folks who have tried their product let me know what you > think and if you’ve had any failures? > > http://www.solaredge.us/groups/us/inverter/single-phase-solar-inverter > > Best, > > August > > Luminalt > ___ > List sponsored by Home Power magazine > > List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org > > Change email address & settings: > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org > > List-Archive: > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org > > List rules & etiquette: > www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm > > Check out participant bios: > www.members.re-wrenches.org > ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Change email address & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
Re: [RE-wrenches] Capacitive Discharge Test Results
Given the recent discussions about transformerless inverters, troubleshooting, misc voltages Do we need some guidance from inverter manufacturers and others to evaluate BEFORE all this equipment is in? Electrical tests for metal roofs, etc? Erika Weliczko REpower Solutions cell: 216.402.4458 On Mar 28, 2014, at 3:41 PM, Corey Shalanski wrote: > Fellow Wrenches, > > We recently commissioned a 220kW rooftop PV system and are having some > inverter malfunction issues. The system details are as follows: > - Inverters: Power One Aurora Trio-27.6 (x7) > - Modules: Stion STN-130 (x1690) > - Array: Strings of 14-16 modules each, 8 strings per combiner, 1 combiner > per MPPT input > > It has been less than two months since we commissioned the system, and we > have already seen five of the inverters malfunction. While troubleshooting > these issues the inverter manufacturer had me measure positive-to-ground and > negative-to-ground voltage readings. At the inverter level I measured > instantaneous voltages of 100-200V before seeing a bleedoff; at the string > level the voltages were 10-20V before bleedoff. > > The inverter manufacturer is concerned with the magnitude (~200V) of this > instantaneous voltage and also the delay in bleeding off to zero - after > about five seconds the voltage level was still approximately 50V (but still > dropping). The manufacturer is claiming that this residual voltage should > drop to zero much more rapidly AND the presence of such a delayed bleedoff > indicates significant "leakage" coming from the array.They are further > claiming that this leakage is responsible for the damage to the inverters. > They suggested using a megger to test insulation resistance throughout the > installation. > > My questions to the group: > - Is there any truth in the inverter manufacturer's claims? > - Do my field measurements seem out of range from what others are seeing with > ungrounded arrays? > > Thanks for any information you can provide. > -- > Corey Shalanski > Joule Energy > New Orleans, LA > ᐧ > ___ > List sponsored by Home Power magazine > > List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org > > Change email address & settings: > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org > > List-Archive: > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org > > List rules & etiquette: > www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm > > Check out participant bios: > www.members.re-wrenches.org > ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Change email address & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
Re: [RE-wrenches] Concrete tight versus raintight
Madison Electric has an actual rubber washer to seal fitting to box as lock ring is tightened. They are however fussy with the internal rings. Erika Weliczko REpower Solutions cell: 216.402.4458 On Jan 16, 2014, at 2:54 PM, "William Miller" wrote: > Friends: > > We used some Bridgeport fittings yesterday. My foreman reports the following: > > The new blue rain tite connectors have a prob. The connectors have a plastic > gasket/ring that seals between the connector body and the box. It is > impossible to tighten the con to box without destroying the ring or having a > slightly loose con/box connection. A loose connection means poor bonding. > > I would add that any looseness of these fittings can contribute to mechanical > failure of conduit runs. We rely on code compliant strapping *and* secure > tightening of fittings to keep a conduit assembly secure and in place for > years to come. It looks like we need to find a fitting with firmer washers. > The Arlington NMLT fittings have yellow washers that are pretty rigid. I > will rob one and try it on the Bridgeports. We bought a quantity of the EMT > fittings and I don’t want to have to replace them… > > William > > > > From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org > [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of August Goers > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 8:00 AM > To: RE-wrenches > Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Concrete tight versus raintight > > Hi William, > > About 5 years ago this became a big issue up in San Francisco and we had to > learn the hard way. We used to just go buy outdoor EMT fittings and we were > okay, then the inspectors started requiring fittings that say raintight or > wet location (often stamped “wetloc”) on them. I don’t know for certain, but > I believe it might have been a clarification added in the 2008 NEC at the > time. See “NEC 358.42 Couplings and Connectors. Couplings and connectors used > with EMT shall be made up tight. Where buried in masonry or concrete, they > shall be concretetight type. Where installed in wet locations, they shall > comply with 314.15.” > > If you go over to NEC 314.15 they mention that fittings installed in wet > locations shall be listed for use in wet locations. > > So, you just need to make sure that the fittings you get are listed for the > correct purpose. I have seen both concretetight and wetloc type. As someone > else mentioned, most of the wetloc fittings have a plastic sealing ring in > them and many or blue colored. > > Best, > > August > Luminalt > > From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org > [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of William Miller > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:32 PM > To: RE-wrenches > Subject: [RE-wrenches] Concrete tight versus raintight > > Friends: > > It appears I may have a whole in my education. I thought all EMT compression > fittings were alike. It appears that I have been using “concrete tight” > fittings where I should have been using “raintight” fittings. Did they use > to be the same item? I did a web search on the differences and came up > empty. I want to be informed in this area and appreciate any knowledge. > > William Miller > > > > Lic 773985 > millersolar.com > 805-438-5600 > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2013.0.3462 / Virus Database: 3681/7008 - Release Date: 01/16/14 > ___ > List sponsored by Home Power magazine > > List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org > > Change email address & settings: > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org > > List-Archive: > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org > > List rules & etiquette: > www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm > > Check out participant bios: > www.members.re-wrenches.org > ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Change email address & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
Re: [RE-wrenches] Electric fence, metal buildings, lightning protection systems
SB3000TL-US inverters. The concern is possible voltage that may lead the inverter to believe there is a ground fault because of fence connections. I wonder what the tolerable window of voltage of + or – to ground is for this unit before it cries GF. During a drizzle I had a little tingle while assembling EMT. I did not get a meter out, but it sorta felt like a 9V battery across your tongue. In the end even a little tingle is not really supposed to be there… Regards, Erika From: jay peltz [mailto:j...@asis.com] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 11:05 AM To: er...@repowersolutions.com; RE-wrenches Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Electric fence, metal buildings, lightning protection systems Hi Erika, What seems to be the issue? And what equipment ( inverters ) are you using Jay Peltz power On Dec 6, 2013, at 5:57 AM, "Erika Weliczko" wrote: Anyone had to contend with electric fence installation (AC controller) using a ground rod (not main service) at remote farm building and messing with inverters? And perhaps causing other issues? Of course, this is a metal roof with a lightning protection system (i.e. bare braided copper on roof all the way to rod.) I think we need to redirect the electric fence wire to its own dedicated rods, away from the building that has solar. Insights are appreciated. Thanks, Erika ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Change email address & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Change email address & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
[RE-wrenches] Electric fence, metal buildings, lightning protection systems
Anyone had to contend with electric fence installation (AC controller) using a ground rod (not main service) at remote farm building and messing with inverters? And perhaps causing other issues? Of course, this is a metal roof with a lightning protection system (i.e. bare braided copper on roof all the way to rod.) I think we need to redirect the electric fence wire to its own dedicated rods, away from the building that has solar. Insights are appreciated. Thanks, Erika ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Change email address & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
[RE-wrenches] SB and SI
Has anyone had a good way of allowing a sunny boy in a remote building talking to an SI in the main building? Maybe wirelessly? I have an application for remote PV but SB Needs to be at remote building where grid backup is needed at main building. Thanks in advance, Erika ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Change email address & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
[RE-wrenches] diesel vs. solar
Does anyone know of an efficient calculator tool to help compare diesel /gas generator to PV + batt + small generator for an off-grid vacation house? Regards, Erika ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Change email address & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
Re: [RE-wrenches] Non-internet based Monitoring System for secure facilities
Egauge Still have LAN right? Erika Weliczko REpower Solutions cell: 216.402.4458 On Nov 6, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Lee Bristol wrote: > Does anyone know of a non-internet based monitoring system for commercial > sized PV systems? I need something like Locus or Draker which can store the > data locally and prepare the browser based displays and reports from this > local data. We run across many government and data center applications where > we can't connect to the internet from the facility but still need the > functionality of Locus/Draker. > > Thanks. > Lee > > -- > Lee Bristol > NABCEP Certified Solar Designer/Installer > > Co-Founder & Commercial Channel Manager > Standard Solar, Inc. > 1355 Piccard Drive, #300 > Rockville, MD 20850 > (301) 944-5105 > (240) 479-1510 (c) > www.standardsolar.com > > ___ > List sponsored by Home Power magazine > > List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org > > Options & settings: > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org > > List-Archive: > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org > > List rules & etiquette: > www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm > > Check out participant bios: > www.members.re-wrenches.org > ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
[RE-wrenches] Utility inverter rating
Greetings all. I recently received this back regarding an interconnection application proposing a Sunny Island 6048 and a SB7000: "we have to rate the system at the max output of the inverters, and since that battery backup has an inverter that can export 11kW, (albeit for 3 seconds) I have to review the system for a total of 18kW." This is a new one on me. I might argue that the SB7000 is upstream of the SI6048 and really the SI6048 is the point of interconnection, so the SB7000 is irrelevant. And 3 seconds is not really continuous operation. It seems that batteryless inverters show continuous output ratings, though I know there are some that specify a larger than expected OCP for various reasons, but that is not what the utility cares about. Any insights here? Thanks, Erika REpower SOLUTIONS www.repowersolutions.com P: 216.268.2275 C: 216.402.4458 ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
Re: [RE-wrenches] Combating requests for itemized PV pricing
I find the rough percent breakdown as you suggest is useful in getting them to understand that they don't need those numbers or an itemized BOM before they agree to do a project. There are many customers that think if total cost is X and modules are Y that the cost to install is REALLY expensive at X-Y. If we were selling itemized lists, I'd be running buysolarcraponline.com, so I refrain from providing lists. My contract is for a total sum. If the prospect does not want a turnkey solution, then they are not a good fit for those of us that provide these products and services. And that is OK. Some days are easier going down this road than others. Erika Weliczko REpower Solutions cell: 216.402.4458 On Aug 18, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Jason Szumlanski wrote: > We are getting more and more people calling that want to provide their own > equipment and have us install it. It's frustrating, because usually they are > looking at prices for materials that either I would not consider selling, or > would not meet the mounting requirements of the Florida Building Code. Of > course, they do not understand and consider all of the other costs. > > In addition, lots of people are looking for a breakdown of prices (down to > the line item - nuts and bolts). I generally refuse to provide it because it > inevitably leads to the response "I can get that module/inverter online > cheaper." The "I need to make money" response leads to "yeah, but you must be > getting better prices than I see online" argument. And so on, and so on... > I'm sure you've heard it... > > I've resorted recently to just providing a percentage breakdown, stating that > the price is roughly 25% each: > PV Modules > Inverters and Electrical > Mounting System > Design/Engineering, Permitting, Labor, Overhead, and Profit > Any other tips out there to answer the request for line item details? > > Jason Szumlanski > Fafco Solar > > ___ > List sponsored by Home Power magazine > > List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org > > Options & settings: > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org > > List-Archive: > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org > > List rules & etiquette: > www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm > > Check out participant bios: > www.members.re-wrenches.org > ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
Re: [RE-wrenches] Expansion joints
http://www.steelconduit.org/pdf/ConGuide.pdf page 16 The NEC does not directly dictate when expansion coupling are required for EMT. 300.7 merely says to accommodate for expansion. If PVC requires it for ¼ in of movement and you extrapolate, then 100ft of steel conduit exposed to a 35 degree temperature difference would require an expansion coupling. Im counting on about 100-120 degrees of temperature difference for steel conduit on a rooftop. Thats 32 or 26.6 ft of pipe, respectively. regards, Erika REpower SOLUTIONS www.repowersolutions.com P: 216.268.2275 C: 216.402.4458 From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Hans Frederickson Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 12:02 PM To: 'RE-wrenches' Subject: [SPAM] Re: [RE-wrenches] Expansion joints See the FPN for NEC 300.7(B). You take the values in Table 352.44 and multiply by 0.2 for steel conduit. -Hans _ From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Mark Dickson Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 8:27 AM To: 'RE-wrenches' Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Expansion joints Are there any usage charts to tell you when or how to use expansion joints in EMT? The NEC has one for PVC, but what do you refer to for EMT? Best regards, Mark Dickson, NABCEP Certified Solar PV Installer Oasis Montana Inc. _ From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Hans Frederickson Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 9:15 AM To: 'RE-wrenches' Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Expansion joints We used an OZ-Gedney expansion coupling for 1-1/4" EMT on a recent job. The part # is TX-125 for 1-1/4", and it would be TX-150 for 1-1/2". It is the same as the OZ-Gedney AX expansion coupling for rigid conduit, but uses a rigid nipple and EMT connectors to adapt to EMT. The assembly is UL listed. -Hans _ From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Erika Weliczko Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 5:54 PM To: 'RE-wrenches' Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Expansion joints I recently used a Hubbell Killark product for rigid/IMC and was not happy with how the threads of the coupling engaged in factory conduit threads. Crousehinds XJG-EMT series is intended for EMT. And is described as being used indoors or outdoors. The EMT couplings mostly seem to be compression. REpower SOLUTIONS www.repowersolutions.com P: 216.268.2275 C: 216.402.4458 From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Jamie Johnson Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 2:33 PM To: RE-wrenches Subject: [SPAM] Re: [RE-wrenches] Expansion joints Peter, Cooper makes one for 1.5" emt, not sure if it is rated for wet locations or not. part #XJG54 EMT, it allows for up to 4" max of conduit movement. Jamie Johnson NABCEP Certified PV Technical Sales Professional NABCEP Certified Solar PV Installer General Manager SOLAR POWER ELECTRIC Original Message Subject: [RE-wrenches] Expansion joints From: "Peter Parrish" http://peter.parr...@calsolareng.com%3e> >; Date: Tue, March 29, 2011 1:04 pm To: "'RE-wrenches'" Does anyone have information (manu and part number) for expansion joints for 1-1/2 EMT? I have also heard that many EJs are designed for rigid conduit (RMC) and may not be directly applicable to EMT. - Peter Peter T. Parrish, Ph.D., President California Solar Engineering, Inc. 820 Cynthia Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90065 CA Lic. 854779, NABCEP Cert. 031806-26 peter.parr...@calsolareng.com Ph 323-258-8883, Mobile 323-839-6108, Fax 323-258-8885 ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org <>___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
Re: [RE-wrenches] Expansion joints
I recently used a Hubbell Killark product for rigid/IMC and was not happy with how the threads of the coupling engaged in factory conduit threads. Crousehinds XJG-EMT series is intended for EMT. And is described as being used indoors or outdoors. The EMT couplings mostly seem to be compression. REpower SOLUTIONS www.repowersolutions.com P: 216.268.2275 C: 216.402.4458 From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Jamie Johnson Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 2:33 PM To: RE-wrenches Subject: [SPAM] Re: [RE-wrenches] Expansion joints Peter, Cooper makes one for 1.5" emt, not sure if it is rated for wet locations or not. part #XJG54 EMT, it allows for up to 4" max of conduit movement. Jamie Johnson NABCEP Certified PV Technical Sales Professional NABCEP Certified Solar PV Installer General Manager SOLAR POWER ELECTRIC Original Message Subject: [RE-wrenches] Expansion joints From: "Peter Parrish" http://peter.parr...@calsolareng.com%3e> >; Date: Tue, March 29, 2011 1:04 pm To: "'RE-wrenches'" Does anyone have information (manu and part number) for expansion joints for 1-1/2 EMT? I have also heard that many EJs are designed for rigid conduit (RMC) and may not be directly applicable to EMT. - Peter Peter T. Parrish, Ph.D., President California Solar Engineering, Inc. 820 Cynthia Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90065 CA Lic. 854779, NABCEP Cert. 031806-26 peter.parr...@calsolareng.com Ph 323-258-8883, Mobile 323-839-6108, Fax 323-258-8885 ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org <>___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
Re: [RE-wrenches] NABCEP Stamp
I hate to mention the evil insurance industry. However, a stamp implies some professional liability insurance to me. There are other professional membership organizations (RESNET) that have developed a tailored professional liability insurance package for its credentialed members with a preferred vendor. Is NABCEP looking toward this? I do not know if there is a need, but may be an advantage under certain circumstances. Peace, Erika REpower SOLUTIONS www.repowersolutions.com P: 216.268.2275 C: 216.402.4458 -Original Message- From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Bob-O Schultze Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 5:47 PM To: RE-wrenches Subject: [SPAM] Re: [RE-wrenches] NABCEP Stamp Troy, On Mar 30, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Troy Harvey wrote: I am wondering if anyone has had a NABCEP stamp made to stamp plans. I have a city agency who is comfortable with the NABCEP certification as a qualification, but would like to see a stamp. Has anyone out there done this? Troy I'm with Andrew here. If a NABCEP stamp of some kind makes the city happy and greases your permit approval, that's OK. If it is a city requirement, then we'd sure like to know about that. IF you do have one made, please remember to follow the NABCEP guidelines as to the use of our "Mark". IE, your name -not the company name and not nothing- has to appear next to the Mark. Cheers, bob-O ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
[RE-wrenches] evergreen spruce
Anyone have 6 evergreen 180/190 varieties sitting around collecting dust? Please contact offlist. Thanks, Erika REpower SOLUTIONS www.repowersolutions.com P: 216.268.2275 C: 216.402.4458 ___ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
