Re: [RE-wrenches] EGC vs GEC, separately derived system

2012-11-29 Thread Jason Szumlanski
We typically run a #6 combined EGC/GEC on all residential systems just to
keep it simple. The cost difference is typically negligible. We use
irreversible C-crimps to combine the wires in a roof mounted junction box.

*Jason Szumlanski*

*Fafco Solar*


On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:56 PM, mac Lewis maclew...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello wrenches,

 What constitutes a separately derived system?  Would you consider a
 breaker tied enphase system a separately-derived system?  Suddenly,
 inspectors in our AHJ are considering all PV systems separately derived
 systems and thus requiring applying GEC sizing (as opposed to EGC sizing)
 from the inverter(s) to the tie in point.  This does not jive with my
 understanding.  Would like to hear other thoughts about this.

 Here is the definition of a separately derived system as per 2008 NEC
 Article 100 Definitions:

 *Separately Derived System*:  *A premises wiring system whose power is
 derived from a source of electric energy or equipment other than a service.
  Such systems have no direct electrical connection, including a solidly
 connected grounded circuit conductor, to supply conductors originating in
 another system.*

 For your enphase systems do you size your ground from roof to the breaker
 panel as an EGC or a GEC?


 Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

 --



 Mac Lewis

 *

 Yo solo sé que no sé nada. -Sócrates
 *

 ___
 List sponsored by Home Power magazine

 List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

 Options  settings:
 http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

 List-Archive:
 http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

 List rules  etiquette:
 www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

 Check out participant bios:
 www.members.re-wrenches.org



___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options  settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules  etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



Re: [RE-wrenches] EGC vs GEC, separately derived system

2012-11-29 Thread Brian Mehalic
The separately derived issue aside, enphase inverters have an internal DC
system ground and a marked point from which a DC GEC must be installed.
 Typically grounding is being done in the manner stated in 690.47(C)(3) - a
single conductor as both the DC GEC and EGC, meaning it has to be the
larger of the two sizes required; for most enphase systems, based on the
interconnection breaker size, the minimum EGC would typically be #12 (Table
250.122), but the minimum size for a DC EGC is #8.  A #6 may be preferable
under the array due to interpretations about the conductor being subject to
damage.

Brian Mehalic
NABCEP Certified Solar PV Installer™ R031508-59
IREC ISPQ Certified Affiliated Instructor/PV US-0132

PV Curriculum Developer and Instructor
Solar Energy International
http://www.solarenergy.org



On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:56 PM, mac Lewis maclew...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello wrenches,

 What constitutes a separately derived system?  Would you consider a
 breaker tied enphase system a separately-derived system?  Suddenly,
 inspectors in our AHJ are considering all PV systems separately derived
 systems and thus requiring applying GEC sizing (as opposed to EGC sizing)
 from the inverter(s) to the tie in point.  This does not jive with my
 understanding.  Would like to hear other thoughts about this.

 Here is the definition of a separately derived system as per 2008 NEC
 Article 100 Definitions:

 *Separately Derived System*:  *A premises wiring system whose power is
 derived from a source of electric energy or equipment other than a service.
  Such systems have no direct electrical connection, including a solidly
 connected grounded circuit conductor, to supply conductors originating in
 another system.*

 For your enphase systems do you size your ground from roof to the breaker
 panel as an EGC or a GEC?


 Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

 --



 Mac Lewis

 *

 Yo solo sé que no sé nada. -Sócrates
 *

 ___
 List sponsored by Home Power magazine

 List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

 Options  settings:
 http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

 List-Archive:
 http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

 List rules  etiquette:
 www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

 Check out participant bios:
 www.members.re-wrenches.org



___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options  settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules  etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



Re: [RE-wrenches] EGC vs GEC, separately derived system

2012-11-29 Thread August Goers
Hi Mac,



I think the answer to your separately derived system question is in the
code snippet you pasted in below. Clearly, your Enphase grid tied system
has a direct electrical connection to the utility. A generator system that
runs while the grid is down would be an example of a separately derived
system since it will always have a transfer switch to separate the
electrical connections. In other words, the grid tied solar system is
designed to work in unison with the grid while a separately must only
operate independently. At least that is how I try to explain it to
inspectors around here.



I believe Brian Mehalic's email clearly speaks to why you still need a GEC
for the Enphase based system. Incidentally, we're starting to work with
listed ACPV modules and transformerless (non-isolated) inverters which
don't have a DC GEC requirement. This is a major benefit to help reduce
installed costs.



Best,



August





August Goers



Luminalt Energy Corporation

1320 Potrero Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94110

m: 415.559.1525

o: 415.641.4000

aug...@luminalt.com



*From:* re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:
re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] *On Behalf Of *mac Lewis
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:56 PM
*To:* RE-wrenches
*Subject:* [RE-wrenches] EGC vs GEC, separately derived system



Hello wrenches,



What constitutes a separately derived system?  Would you consider a breaker
tied enphase system a separately-derived system?  Suddenly, inspectors in
our AHJ are considering all PV systems separately derived systems and thus
requiring applying GEC sizing (as opposed to EGC sizing) from the
inverter(s) to the tie in point.  This does not jive with my understanding.
 Would like to hear other thoughts about this.



Here is the definition of a separately derived system as per 2008 NEC
Article 100 Definitions:



*Separately Derived System*:  *A premises wiring system whose power is
derived from a source of electric energy or equipment other than a service.
 Such systems have no direct electrical connection, including a solidly
connected grounded circuit conductor, to supply conductors originating in
another system.*



For your enphase systems do you size your ground from roof to the breaker
panel as an EGC or a GEC?





Thanks in advance for your thoughts.



-- 







Mac Lewis**

Yo solo sé que no sé nada. *-Sócrates***
___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options  settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules  etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



[RE-wrenches] EGC vs GEC, separately derived system

2012-11-28 Thread mac Lewis
Hello wrenches,

What constitutes a separately derived system?  Would you consider a breaker
tied enphase system a separately-derived system?  Suddenly, inspectors in
our AHJ are considering all PV systems separately derived systems and thus
requiring applying GEC sizing (as opposed to EGC sizing) from the
inverter(s) to the tie in point.  This does not jive with my understanding.
 Would like to hear other thoughts about this.

Here is the definition of a separately derived system as per 2008 NEC
Article 100 Definitions:

*Separately Derived System*:  *A premises wiring system whose power is
derived from a source of electric energy or equipment other than a service.
 Such systems have no direct electrical connection, including a solidly
connected grounded circuit conductor, to supply conductors originating in
another system.*

For your enphase systems do you size your ground from roof to the breaker
panel as an EGC or a GEC?


Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

-- 



Mac Lewis

*

Yo solo sé que no sé nada. -Sócrates
*
___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options  settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules  etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org