[RE-wrenches] FW: Enphase performance

2010-05-06 Thread Marco Mangelsdorf

Marco,

 

I have a revenue grade kWh meter on my 3 Enphase 175 system that is owned by
the utility (production based incentive in WA state) and the Enphase
monitoring reads about 6% over the revenue meter. This has been over a one
year period. I've been very pleased with the performance using either
measurement.

Brad
AEE Solar

 

___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



Re: [RE-wrenches] FW: Enphase performance

2010-05-07 Thread Randy
Marco,

My email doesn't seem to work on wrenches, so I am replying to you directly.

 

We definitely experienced an overstatement. 

 

We have a client who installed 5kW on a string inverter and 5kW on enphase
and it is that side-by-side comparison that enabled us to positively
identify a problem. There was a significant overstatement of output. We
finally got a Enphase person who told us it was a software glitch. The
problem appears to be fixed.  They explained to us that our problem was
isolated without giving us a detailed explanation of what happened.  Since
that problem was fixed, we have seen no difference in output between a
string inverter and enphase.

 

Randy

 

Randy Sadewic

Positive Energy

 

 

 

Randy Sadewic

Positive Energy

 

Office: 505 424-1112

Cell:505 570-0137

From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Marco
Mangelsdorf
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 12:11 AM
To: 'RE-wrenches'
Cc: 'Douglas Bath'
Subject: [RE-wrenches] FW: Enphase performance

 


Marco,

 

I have a revenue grade kWh meter on my 3 Enphase 175 system that is owned by
the utility (production based incentive in WA state) and the Enphase
monitoring reads about 6% over the revenue meter. This has been over a one
year period. I've been very pleased with the performance using either
measurement.

Brad
AEE Solar

 

___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



Re: [RE-wrenches] FW: Enphase performance

2010-05-07 Thread Keith Cronin
Makes you wonder what is officially calibrated to whatis digital more 
accurate or analog utility meters...??




From: Marco Mangelsdorf 
To: RE-wrenches 
Cc: Douglas Bath 
Sent: Thu, May 6, 2010 8:11:16 PM
Subject: [RE-wrenches] FW: Enphase performance

 
Marco,
 
I have a revenue grade kWh meter on my 3 Enphase 175 system that is owned by 
the utility (production based incentive in WA state) and the Enphase monitoring 
reads about 6% over the revenue meter. This has been over a one year period. 
I've been very pleased with the performance using either measurement.

Brad
AEE Solar ___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



Re: [RE-wrenches] FW: Enphase performance

2010-05-07 Thread Peter Parrish
All meters are analog at the point of measurement, because the signals that
are being measured are analog. What makes a meter "digital" is the
conversion of the original analog data to digital format and downstream data
manipulation. Therefore I doubt digital meters are fundamentally more or
less accurate than analog.
 
There is one point I would like to make: we have not used the GE I70S, the
electromechanical (100% analog) meter with pointers, for several years now.
We were told by a Southern California Edison engineer that they were not
reliable (i.e. stopped working) and they were less accurate than +/-5%. Sure
enough within a month the meter in question stopped worked and required a
"rap" on the bezel to start working again, only to freeze up again in a few
days. I remember two others that stopped working (one perhaps never worked).
We got these puppies from Austin International in SC. We use the Itron
Centron C1S and have been happy ever since.
 
- Peter
Peter T. Parrish, Ph.D., President
California Solar Engineering, Inc.
820 Cynthia Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90065
CA Lic. 854779, NABCEP Cert. 031806-26
peter.parr...@calsolareng.com  
Ph 323-258-8883, Mobile 323-839-6108, Fax 323-258-8885

 
  _  

From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Keith Cronin
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 12:28 AM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] FW: Enphase performance
 
Makes you wonder what is officially calibrated to whatis digital more
accurate or analog utility meters...??
 
  _  

From: Marco Mangelsdorf 
To: RE-wrenches 
Cc: Douglas Bath 
Sent: Thu, May 6, 2010 8:11:16 PM
Subject: [RE-wrenches] FW: Enphase performance

Marco,
 
I have a revenue grade kWh meter on my 3 Enphase 175 system that is owned by
the utility (production based incentive in WA state) and the Enphase
monitoring reads about 6% over the revenue meter. This has been over a one
year period. I've been very pleased with the performance using either
measurement.

Brad
AEE Solar
 
___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



Re: [RE-wrenches] FW: Enphase performance

2010-05-07 Thread Kirpal Khalsa
This same issue has come up over the years for us..first with PV Powered
inverters and then noticed in Fronius as well..We have noticed in most
of our grid tied systems that are connected thru a "revenue grade meter" for
Oregon Energy Trust production reporting, that the inverter always has a
higher performance than indicated on the "utility grade meter".  We have
seen the discrepency  as high as 10%.   Over time this adds up to
significant kWh differences.  In our experience the inverter always has the
higher kWh reporting, we have attributed this to the inverter wanting to
report a good production number, to boost their efficiency claims..maybe
even more than is accurate.I have asked PV Powered and Fronius about
this and their line is that to put a "revenue grade meter" into the inverter
would be cost prohibitive..interesting as the readily available revenue
grade meters are only $30-$60.   I would gladly pay that much extra if I
didn't have to wire in an additional meter.
I don't think this problem is unique to the Enphase units (i haven't
installed any of these), I think all inverters should be required to install
the revenue grade meters to give accurate reporting of actual production.
Similar to how states have a "weights and scales" accuracy certification,
energy consumption and production meters should be similarly calibratable.

-- 
Sunny Regards,
Kirpal Khalsa
NABCEP Certified Solar PV Installer
Renewable Energy Systems
www.oregonsolarworks.com
541-218-0201 m
541-592-3958 o
___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



Re: [RE-wrenches] FW: Enphase performance

2010-05-11 Thread Dave Click
I've got my SMA SB5 on a revenue grade meter and it's actually 
under-reported slightly since I started comparing it last August. SMA's 
counter has increased by 5649 kWh while the revenue meter has increased 
5666 kWh- only 0.3% off. If I remember correctly from their training 
session they said they're usually within 1%, but their tech documents 
say +/- 5%. YMMV.


 Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] FW: Enphase performance
From: Kirpal Khalsa 
To: RE-wrenches 
Date: 2010/5/7 12:38


This same issue has come up over the years for us..first with PV
Powered inverters and then noticed in Fronius as well..We have
noticed in most of our grid tied systems that are connected thru a
"revenue grade meter" for Oregon Energy Trust production reporting, that
the inverter always has a higher performance than indicated on the
"utility grade meter".  We have seen the discrepency  as high as 10%.
Over time this adds up to significant kWh differences.  In our
experience the inverter always has the higher kWh reporting, we have
attributed this to the inverter wanting to report a good production
number, to boost their efficiency claims..maybe even more than is
accurate.I have asked PV Powered and Fronius about this and their
line is that to put a "revenue grade meter" into the inverter would be
cost prohibitive..interesting as the readily available revenue grade
meters are only $30-$60.   I would gladly pay that much extra if I
didn't have to wire in an additional meter.
I don't think this problem is unique to the Enphase units (i haven't
installed any of these), I think all inverters should be required to
install the revenue grade meters to give accurate reporting of actual
production.   Similar to how states have a "weights and scales" accuracy
certification, energy consumption and production meters should be
similarly calibratable.

--
Sunny Regards,
Kirpal Khalsa
NABCEP Certified Solar PV Installer
Renewable Energy Systems
www.oregonsolarworks.com <http://www.oregonsolarworks.com>
541-218-0201 m
541-592-3958 o



___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options&  settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules&  etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org


___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org