Re: [RE-wrenches] TED MONITORING

2010-05-21 Thread Roy Butler

I'm also testing the Envi and so far, I have identified 2 problems.

The first is that it does not show you kilowatt hours, only cumulative cost.
The second is that the power display is called "instantaneous energy."

Isn't that an awful lot like power? ;-)

So far, I'm underwhelmed by the Envi

Roy Butler
NABCEP Certified Solar PV Installer®
NYSERDA eligible PV&  wind installer
PA Sunshine Program Approved PV Installer
Four Winds Renewable Energy, LLC
8902 Route 46
Arkport, NY 14807
607-324-9747

www.four-winds-energy.com

Although no trees were killed in the sending of this message,
a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

===
The 6th Annual Small Wind Conference
A Gathering of small wind industry stakeholders
June 15 and 16, 2010
Stevens Point, Wisconsin
i...@smallwindconference.com
http://www.smallwindconference.com


On 5/21/2010 10:17 AM, Jason Szumlanski wrote:

We have had serious interference issues with TED installations. One
small office was completely unable to transmit MTU->gateway signals. TED
tech support just blamed it on interference from fluorescent lights and
UPS systems. I would say their tech support leaves a lot to be desired,
although it is easy to get them on the line. I just think the product is
inherently problematic, and there is not much they can do to assist. We
were unable to isolate any circuits that were causing the interference.
The same unit worked perfectly at another location. On a larger home, it
took hours of trial and error to find a suitable gateway location
(especially given that it needs to be close to a LAN connection).

It's really hard to sell a product when you have to tell customers that
it may or may not work in their home/business. And wasting time trying
it, only to fail is time/money spent.

We have been evaluating the Envi as an alternative. It is completely
wireless and can monitor up to 9 circuits with the same base. The web
interface is not as robust, and the MTUs are insanely huge, but it does
have many advantages (and it costs less).

The Google Powermeter is pretty lame. It does not provide the
granularity that we need to make useful analyses. Hopefully they update
and improve the product.

Finally, I am not convinced about the accuracy of any of these devices.
Under normal conditions, the Envi seems to read low, the TED seems to
read high. At very low current, the opposite is true. Each one seems to
have a sweet spot for accuracy. Strangely enough, although instantaneous
readings often do not appear right, our TED test unit matched our meter
over the last two months within the specs of 2% error.

Jason Szumlanski
Fafco Solar
http://fafcosolar.com

-Original Message-

Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 12:04:07 -0700
From: i2p
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: [RE-wrenches] TED MONITORING
Message-ID:<930bbe08.6c44.43d1.a848.110bcbdff...@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


I was intrigued by a previous thread on Google Powermeter and the TED
5000 and tried to setup on two system.

In both cases, they did not work. ?I know they were installed correctly
and factory support has me moving wires, getting noise filters, using
different branch circuits, etc. In other word they make it my problem.
Their out is "you have too much noise".

Who else has given the TED a try and what are your results? At this
point no comment on Google Power meter since I have not gotten to that
point in the setup yet. ?My suspicion is the TED is not up to speed
design wise.?

Don Lowerburg
Offline Solar

___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options&  settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules&  etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



   


___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



Re: [RE-wrenches] TED MONITORING

2010-05-21 Thread Jason Szumlanski
We have had serious interference issues with TED installations. One
small office was completely unable to transmit MTU->gateway signals. TED
tech support just blamed it on interference from fluorescent lights and
UPS systems. I would say their tech support leaves a lot to be desired,
although it is easy to get them on the line. I just think the product is
inherently problematic, and there is not much they can do to assist. We
were unable to isolate any circuits that were causing the interference.
The same unit worked perfectly at another location. On a larger home, it
took hours of trial and error to find a suitable gateway location
(especially given that it needs to be close to a LAN connection).

It's really hard to sell a product when you have to tell customers that
it may or may not work in their home/business. And wasting time trying
it, only to fail is time/money spent.

We have been evaluating the Envi as an alternative. It is completely
wireless and can monitor up to 9 circuits with the same base. The web
interface is not as robust, and the MTUs are insanely huge, but it does
have many advantages (and it costs less).

The Google Powermeter is pretty lame. It does not provide the
granularity that we need to make useful analyses. Hopefully they update
and improve the product.

Finally, I am not convinced about the accuracy of any of these devices.
Under normal conditions, the Envi seems to read low, the TED seems to
read high. At very low current, the opposite is true. Each one seems to
have a sweet spot for accuracy. Strangely enough, although instantaneous
readings often do not appear right, our TED test unit matched our meter
over the last two months within the specs of 2% error.

Jason Szumlanski
Fafco Solar
http://fafcosolar.com

-Original Message-

Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 12:04:07 -0700
From: i2p 
To: RE-wrenches 
Subject: [RE-wrenches] TED MONITORING
Message-ID: <930bbe08.6c44.43d1.a848.110bcbdff...@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


I was intrigued by a previous thread on Google Powermeter and the TED
5000 and tried to setup on two system.

In both cases, they did not work. ?I know they were installed correctly
and factory support has me moving wires, getting noise filters, using
different branch circuits, etc. In other word they make it my problem.
Their out is "you have too much noise".

Who else has given the TED a try and what are your results? At this
point no comment on Google Power meter since I have not gotten to that
point in the setup yet. ?My suspicion is the TED is not up to speed
design wise.?

Don Lowerburg
Offline Solar

___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



[RE-wrenches] TED MONITORING

2010-05-21 Thread Nick Vida
I would say on TED, which i have a limited exposure to, that they need to do 
some real work on their documentation because it took me a long time to find 
their "firmware" update for mac installation, among others, and wow, providing 
a 3 inch cd rom which is un-usable on most computers instead of your standard 6 
inch CD is problematic to say the least. Also, it seems they are getting a lot 
of tech calls and the guy i deal with hung up on me when I said I was 
installing on a mac, and took a quite abrupt attitude in the next call for the 
whole session, which didnt make me feel like it is a very professional solution.
It is also problematic in my opinion to have that type of communication on a 
piece of gear that is likely right by a computer, which will have a power strip 
full of switching power supplies.
so those are minor gripes which i hope they hear about, but what is pretty 
major, and I havent found any confirmation of this, is that the rumor mill told 
me that their CTs lost their UL listing. Has anyone else heard that, or am I 
wrong?


  ___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



Re: [RE-wrenches] TED MONITORING

2010-05-20 Thread jason pozner
Ironically as I was looking through my TED 5000 package this thread came
through.

I am looking to use the TED for data logging for an off grid project, and
plan on connecting a computer directly to the Gateway, as the client doesn't
have internet access.  I hope to use the information for system sizing.
Have any of you found the logging to be unreliable??  There is no display
involved, and loads are powered by a bit of solar, but mostly generator.

Jay Pozner
Nunatak AES

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Glenn Burt  wrote:

>  As you know, the TED uses a Power Line Carrier communications scheme
> where data is impressed on the 60Hz AC waveform for distribution throughout
> the house. There are many pitfalls in this method of data comms, but it can
> be done and be reliable.
>
>
>
> That being said here is my experience with the TED – I have the previous
> generation (1000) in my house and have had it for a few years now. It works
> well about 80% of the time. It seems to lose communications with the
> transducer in the AC load center when a few different circuits in my house
> are active – a 3 bulb under cabinet light in the kitchen for example. It
> does seem to regain communications within a half hour of the circuit being
> turned off.
>
>
>
> We have a solar customer that installed a 5000 on his house for an
> inexpensive net meter monitor. I happened to visit him last week to install
> an SMA Sunny Beam with BlueTooth on his inverters. He told me his experience
> with the TED was very similar to mine, it would lose communications with the
> display at unpredictable times.
>
>
>
> So reliable? Not in my experience. Inexpensive? Yes.
>
>
>
> YMMV
>
> -Glenn Burt
>
>
>
> *From:* re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:
> re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] *On Behalf Of *i2p
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:04 PM
> *To:* RE-wrenches
> *Subject:* [RE-wrenches] TED MONITORING
>
>
>
>
>
> I was intrigued by a previous thread on Google Powermeter and the TED 5000
> and tried to setup on two system.
>
>
>
> In both cases, they did not work.  I know they were installed correctly and
> factory support has me moving wires, getting noise filters, using different
> branch circuits, etc. In other word they make it my problem. Their out is
> "you have too much noise".
>
>
>
> Who else has given the TED a try and what are your results? At this point
> no comment on Google Power meter since I have not gotten to that point in
> the setup yet.  My suspicion is the TED is not up to speed design wise.
>
>
>
> Don Lowerburg
>
> Offline Solar
>
> ___
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Options & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
>
___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



Re: [RE-wrenches] TED MONITORING

2010-05-20 Thread Glenn Burt
As you know, the TED uses a Power Line Carrier communications scheme where
data is impressed on the 60Hz AC waveform for distribution throughout the
house. There are many pitfalls in this method of data comms, but it can be
done and be reliable.

 

That being said here is my experience with the TED - I have the previous
generation (1000) in my house and have had it for a few years now. It works
well about 80% of the time. It seems to lose communications with the
transducer in the AC load center when a few different circuits in my house
are active - a 3 bulb under cabinet light in the kitchen for example. It
does seem to regain communications within a half hour of the circuit being
turned off.

 

We have a solar customer that installed a 5000 on his house for an
inexpensive net meter monitor. I happened to visit him last week to install
an SMA Sunny Beam with BlueTooth on his inverters. He told me his experience
with the TED was very similar to mine, it would lose communications with the
display at unpredictable times.

 

So reliable? Not in my experience. Inexpensive? Yes.

 

YMMV

-Glenn Burt

 

From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of i2p
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:04 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: [RE-wrenches] TED MONITORING

 

 

I was intrigued by a previous thread on Google Powermeter and the TED 5000
and tried to setup on two system.

 

In both cases, they did not work.  I know they were installed correctly and
factory support has me moving wires, getting noise filters, using different
branch circuits, etc. In other word they make it my problem. Their out is
"you have too much noise".

 

Who else has given the TED a try and what are your results? At this point no
comment on Google Power meter since I have not gotten to that point in the
setup yet.  My suspicion is the TED is not up to speed design wise. 

 

Don Lowerburg

Offline Solar

___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



[RE-wrenches] TED MONITORING

2010-05-20 Thread i2p

I was intrigued by a previous thread on Google Powermeter and the TED 5000 and 
tried to setup on two system.

In both cases, they did not work.  I know they were installed correctly and 
factory support has me moving wires, getting noise filters, using different 
branch circuits, etc. In other word they make it my problem. Their out is "you 
have too much noise".

Who else has given the TED a try and what are your results? At this point no 
comment on Google Power meter since I have not gotten to that point in the 
setup yet.  My suspicion is the TED is not up to speed design wise. 

Don Lowerburg
Offline Solar
___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org