[REBOL] Re: REBOL] Agentcities - was OWL

2002-03-23 Thread chaz

http://www.agentcities.org/rec/2/actf-rec-2a.pdf
Am I right in assuming that you're suggesting that we collaborate on
creating REBOL city
and implementing the programs PingAgent and other services in REBOL

- Original Message -
From: Terry Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:06 AM
Subject: [REBOL] REBOL] Agentcities - was OWL


 Check out what agentcities is up to...
 http://www.agentcities.org/

 Agentcities is a global, collaborative effort to construct an open
network
 of on-line systems hosting diverse agent based services.

 A well-heeled international project.

 TB

 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:53 AM
 Subject: [REBOL] Re: designing dialects - was OWL


  Charles:
   Agreement there, too.  However, I'm wondering if Sunanda's initial
 remark
was with regards to implementing it within REBOL, so you can load OWL
   material
with REBOL instead of an intermediary.  Am I wrong?
 
  No -- you are right. My first thoughts on seeing OWL were:
 
  1. Rebol, seems a reasonably close match, so (at the very least) a
 reference
  implementation could be made in Rebol/dialects. That in itself could get
  Rebol under the noses of key decision makers;
 
  2. If OWL is going to be important, then RT should be in there helping
to
  assist its development -- it is clear that Rebol/IOS and OWL/Semantic
Net
 are
  broadly working to the same goals.But, as far as I know, RT is not a
  member of the W3C consortium;
 
  3. If OWL takes off, Rebol will need to talk to it -- just as it does
with
  XML and loads of protocols. It'd make sense to be one of the first
 languages
  off the block with full OWL certification rather than playing catch-up;
 
  4. And the OWL spec is basically language design--and a language for the
  Internet at that --so I thought those who hadn't been following it to
date
  might want to take a peek.
 
  Sunanda.
  --
  To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the
  subject, without the quotes.
 

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the
 subject, without the quotes.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the 
subject, without the quotes.




[REBOL] Re: REBOL] Agentcities - was OWL

2002-03-23 Thread Terry Brownell

Just a thought. The idea needs more assumptions, suggestions and
collaborations.

TB

- Original Message -
From: chaz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 1:37 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: REBOL] Agentcities - was OWL


 http://www.agentcities.org/rec/2/actf-rec-2a.pdf
 Am I right in assuming that you're suggesting that we collaborate on
 creating REBOL city
 and implementing the programs PingAgent and other services in REBOL

 - Original Message -
 From: Terry Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:06 AM
 Subject: [REBOL] REBOL] Agentcities - was OWL


  Check out what agentcities is up to...
  http://www.agentcities.org/
 
  Agentcities is a global, collaborative effort to construct an open
 network
  of on-line systems hosting diverse agent based services.
 
  A well-heeled international project.
 
  TB
 
  - Original Message -
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:53 AM
  Subject: [REBOL] Re: designing dialects - was OWL
 
 
   Charles:
Agreement there, too.  However, I'm wondering if Sunanda's initial
  remark
 was with regards to implementing it within REBOL, so you can load
OWL
material
 with REBOL instead of an intermediary.  Am I wrong?
  
   No -- you are right. My first thoughts on seeing OWL were:
  
   1. Rebol, seems a reasonably close match, so (at the very least) a
  reference
   implementation could be made in Rebol/dialects. That in itself could
get
   Rebol under the noses of key decision makers;
  
   2. If OWL is going to be important, then RT should be in there helping
 to
   assist its development -- it is clear that Rebol/IOS and OWL/Semantic
 Net
  are
   broadly working to the same goals.But, as far as I know, RT is not
a
   member of the W3C consortium;
  
   3. If OWL takes off, Rebol will need to talk to it -- just as it does
 with
   XML and loads of protocols. It'd make sense to be one of the first
  languages
   off the block with full OWL certification rather than playing
catch-up;
  
   4. And the OWL spec is basically language design--and a language for
the
   Internet at that --so I thought those who hadn't been following it to
 date
   might want to take a peek.
  
   Sunanda.
   --
   To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the
   subject, without the quotes.
  
 
  --
  To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the
  subject, without the quotes.
 

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the
 subject, without the quotes.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the 
subject, without the quotes.