[recoznet2] Fw: [atsic] Media Release: Aboriginal Arts and Crafts Centres - their story told in new report

1999-01-02 Thread Liam


- Liam
 ___
.
In The Spirit Of Crazy Horse
http://itsoch.hypermart.net
KOLA Action Group
http://kola-hq.hypermart.net
Journey of Healing
http://www.journeyofhealing.com
.___
-Original Message-
From: Webcentral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 10:59 AM
Subject: [atsic] Media Release: Aboriginal Arts and Crafts Centres - their
story told in new report


>Aboriginal Arts and Crafts Centres - their story told in new report
>
>An important  new report  about to  be released on Aboriginal community
arts
>centres, The Arts and Crafts Centre Story , was  pre-viewed in Cairns
today.
>
>The Arts and Crafts Centre Story is a series of  four research reports
which
>surveys and documents best practice in 39  Aboriginal Arts and Crafts
>centres operating  in remote area Australia.
>
>Delegates at  the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Visual
Arts
>Conference being held this week in Cairns were given a preview of the first
>volume of the report, by Andrea Nungarrayi Martin, executive member of
>Desart, the Central Australian organisation which began the project in
1996.
>
>Welcoming the report which is about to be released, ATSIC Commissioner Ian
>Delaney  said The Arts and Craft Centre Story  is a vital document which
>will boost the operations and ultimately the success  of indigenous
>community art and crafts centres across the country.
>
>"It assesses how centres are currently run, identifies best practices as
>well as problems that need addressing, and will develop indicators to
assess
>centre's performance.
>
>"Arts and crafts remain critically important "centres" of economic and
>cultural life for many thousands of indigenous people and communities.
>Particularly in remote areas but also in urban and regional centres too.
>
>"Anything that helps make our  arts and craft centres strong and successful
>also helps make our artists, our communities and our cultures strong."
>
>Commissioner Delaney said  the ACCS report is an important new  guide and
>planning resource  for  not only arts and crafts centres but also for
policy
>setting and funding bodies.
>
>Over four volumes, the report gathers together for the first time basic
>information  and profiles of Aboriginal Arts and Crafts centres, their role
>in communities and their relationships with both commercial and government
>sectors of the Aboriginal Arts industry.
>
>The ACCS project was designed and managed by Desart with the majority of
>funding provided by ATSIC, with supplementary funding provided by the
>Australia Council and the Northern Territory Department of Arts and
Museums.
>
>Desart Inc is the association of 26 Aboriginal community art centres in
>Central Australia, and represents more than 3000 artists from the NT, SA
and
>WA.
>
>Media Contact: ATSIC Commissioner Ian Delaney Mobile: 0419  418 336
>Further Information: Gaylene Whenmouth, ATSIC Cairns, 07 4042 8295
>
>Craig Sproule
>A/g Administration Manager
>Office of Public Affairs - ATSIC
>Ph: 02 6121 4952
>Fax: 02 6282 2854
>E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>

---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



[recoznet2] The Age: Reflections on a referendum

1999-01-02 Thread Trudy and Rod Bray

"There go my people, I am their leader - I must follow." -- Mahatma
Gandhi

THE AGE
Reflections on a referendum
 ROB SITCH
 Friday 5 November 1999

 IT'S CLEAR from the opinion polls that Australia is overwhelmingly
republican. It's
 not surprising then that attention has turned to the model. The rise in
the number of
 undecided voters is even less surprising.

 People understand the difference between appointed positions and
elected ones. You
 appoint high court judges, you elect presidents.

 We keep hearing that symbols are important. "Hear, hear," say the
people, so the
 day the symbol of president was chosen it should have come with the
democracy it
 implies. It didn't. Right sentiment, wrong symbol.

 The public have been repeatedly told that we need someone to represent
us to
 ourselves. People don't want to be represented by someone they didn't
choose. The
 third umpire represents nothing except the rules. Appointing auditors,
ombudsmen
 and judges has never been a problem. An appointed president sounds like
an
 oxymoron. The position of governor-general is at its best when it
reflects the
 impartiality of the Constitution. The more the new role was talked up,
the more say
 the people demanded.

 Some aspects that came out of the Constitutional Convention have made
the past
 two years like the screech before a car crash. The public consultation
process is so
 lame, unenforceable and shallow that it's an insult. The SOCOG board
consults
 people, too. The prime minister can basically control the make-up of
the committee
 and then still ignore its findings. How much faith would you have in
the jury system
 if members were appointed by the judge in the hope they come to the
only
 conclusion he will accept. It was probably sincerely conceived, but
honestly...!

 The notion of a minimalist model is appealing, but unfortunately it's
not the huge
 positive we always hoped it would be. The governor-general's role was
conceived in
 1901 and then fashioned by 100 years of democracy and gradual demotion.

 Validating everything that was written 100 years ago can hardly reflect
this.

 Sir William Deane's name and manner have been frequently conscripted.
The
 oscillation between using the regal "Sir William Deane" and the chummy
"Bill
 Deane" is interesting, if not manipulative. I would like to give a
slightly different spin
 on him. William Deane has been at his best when he has reflected human
values, not
 Australian ones. His Australianness is rightly confined to his
constitutional duties, not
 giving fluffy polemics on what it means to be "one of us".

 The advertising campaigns seem to have suffered from too much money and
too
 little they could safely say. Both camps started with advertisements
that seemed to
 be for Qantas and ended the campaign back at the usual level. If the
politicians'
 republic is as scary as the no camp says, then the push will start soon
against a
 politicians' parliament! On the other hand, Bob Hawke doesn't seem to
understand
 the longevity of the Windsors if he thinks this could be a vote for
King CharlesIII.

 Most politicians have been railing against a model whereby the people
elect the head
 of state, at the same time espousing a model whereby they elect the
head of state.
 What was the problem with elected presidents again? The nation is told
that this
 position will be above politics, on the same day that it is revealed
Peter Costello and
 John Howard have done a deal on the republic-vote aftermath. One
politician said
 there won't be another vote for 30 years. Is there a prize for
hyperbole? When has
 any politician dropped an issue that has 80per cent popular support?

 There are many problems with direct-election models, but the democratic
maturity
 of Australians is not one of them. How could so many smart people
centre on the
 one assertion that is unbelievably offensive to the very people they're
trying to
 enlist? Apparently Australians are so shallow, fatuous and unthinking
that they
 would elect an entirely inappropriate person if given the power. The
insult was
 compounded by the assertion that the "right" sort of people would never
lower
 themselves to a vote by the very people they expect to lead.

 Whichever way the vote goes, there will be some positives. We've had a
referendum
 for a start. More please! I've also learnt what a plebiscite is. We've
had another
 demonstration of the gulf between elite and popular views. This is
something Robert
 Manne has touched on a number of times on this page. People want to be
 represented more than they want to be led, and informed more than they
want to be
 told.

 One recent article was so pompously paternalistic it made me laugh out
loud. This
 fellow thought that regional embarrassment was the nation's cruellest
fate. Maybe in
 your circles, pal! "How will we be seen?" he cried.

 Well, let's think about that. We'll probably be seen as a democracy
thoughtfully
 going through the process of peaceful self-determinati

Re: [recoznet2] The Age: Reflections on a referendum

1999-01-02 Thread tdunlop

Interesting that Rob Sitch quotes Ghandi in the article below, India being
one of the countries that appoints rather than directly elects its
Presidents.

Tim
===
>"There go my people, I am their leader - I must follow." -- Mahatma
>Gandhi
>
>THE AGE
>Reflections on a referendum
> ROB SITCH
> Friday 5 November 1999
>


---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] The Age: Reflections on a referendum

1999-01-02 Thread Trudy and Rod Bray

It wasn't Rob Sitch but me;-)

Trudy

tdunlop wrote:

> Interesting that Rob Sitch quotes Ghandi in the article below, India being
> one of the countries that appoints rather than directly elects its
> Presidents.
>
> Tim
> ===
> >"There go my people, I am their leader - I must follow." -- Mahatma
> >Gandhi
> >
> >THE AGE
> >Reflections on a referendum
> > ROB SITCH
> > Friday 5 November 1999
> >
>
> ---
> RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
>http://www.mail-archive.com/
> To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
> of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
> This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
>from the
> copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
>the "fair
> use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
>without
> permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
>
> RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/

---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] The Age: Reflections on a referendum

1999-01-02 Thread tdunlop

Sorry, Trudy - just presumed because it was with the article.

BTW Any chance of a last-minute conversion?  Only one more sleep to go!

Tim


>It wasn't Rob Sitch but me;-)
>
>Trudy
>
>tdunlop wrote:
>
>> Interesting that Rob Sitch quotes Ghandi in the article below, India
being
>> one of the countries that appoints rather than directly elects its
>> Presidents.
>>
>> Tim
>> ===
>> >"There go my people, I am their leader - I must follow." -- Mahatma
>> >Gandhi
>> >
>> >THE AGE
>> >Reflections on a referendum
>> > ROB SITCH
>> > Friday 5 November 1999
>> >
>>
>> ---
>> RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived
at http://www.mail-archive.com/
>> To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in
the body
>> of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
>> This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without
permission from the
>> copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and
research under the "fair
>> use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be
distributed further without
>> permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
>>
>> RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/
>
>---
>RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/
>To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the
body
>of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
>This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without
permission from the
>copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and
research under the "fair
>use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed
further without
>permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
>
>RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/

---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] The Age: Reflections on a referendum

1999-01-02 Thread Trudy and Rod Bray

No, I'm afraid not.

Did you happen to see Lateline either last night or today? It was a very good 
discussion and brought up many
points as to why even though 91% (in the latest poll) expressed a wish for a republic, 
this model isn't
likely to make it tomorrow.

The Gandhi quote was not about a republic but about leadership...

Trudy

tdunlop wrote:

> Sorry, Trudy - just presumed because it was with the article.
>
> BTW Any chance of a last-minute conversion?  Only one more sleep to go!
>
> Tim
> 
>
> >It wasn't Rob Sitch but me;-)
> >
> >Trudy
> >
> >tdunlop wrote:
> >
> >> Interesting that Rob Sitch quotes Ghandi in the article below, India
> being
> >> one of the countries that appoints rather than directly elects its
> >> Presidents.
> >>
> >> Tim
> >> ===
> >> >"There go my people, I am their leader - I must follow." -- Mahatma
> >> >Gandhi
> >> >
> >> >THE AGE
> >> >Reflections on a referendum
> >> > ROB SITCH
> >> > Friday 5 November 1999
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---
> >> RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived
> at http://www.mail-archive.com/
> >> To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in
> the body
> >> of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
> >> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
> >> This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without
> permission from the
> >> copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and
> research under the "fair
> >> use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be
> distributed further without
> >> permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
> >>
> >> RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/
> >
> >---
> >RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/
> >To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the
> body
> >of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
> >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
> >This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without
> permission from the
> >copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and
> research under the "fair
> >use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed
> further without
> >permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
> >
> >RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/
>
> ---
> RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
>http://www.mail-archive.com/
> To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
> of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
> This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
>from the
> copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
>the "fair
> use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
>without
> permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
>
> RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/

---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] The Age: Reflections on a referendum

1999-01-02 Thread tdunlop

>No, I'm afraid not.


Ah, well.  I guess we can have all the arguments again at the next
referendum - if I'm not too arthritic to type by then ;-)

>
>Did you happen to see Lateline either last night or today? It was a very
good discussion and brought up many
>points as to why even though 91% (in the latest poll) expressed a wish for
a republic, this model isn't
>likely to make it tomorrow.

Yes I did see it.  I'm afraid I find Leonie Kramer unbearable and thought
most of what she said was self-serving garbage.  Still, that's just me being
unfair probably.  I take your wider point, though.  It seems it will go
down, though I haven't given up hope entirely.  Maybe enough of all those
republicans out there will find it just too hard to vote for the Queen once
they're in the booth?  We'll see I guess

Tim



>The Gandhi quote was not about a republic but about leadership...
>
>Trudy
>
>tdunlop wrote:
>
>> Sorry, Trudy - just presumed because it was with the article.
>>
>> BTW Any chance of a last-minute conversion?  Only one more sleep to go!
>>
>> Tim
>> 
>>
>> >It wasn't Rob Sitch but me;-)
>> >
>> >Trudy
>> >
>> >tdunlop wrote:
>> >
>> >> Interesting that Rob Sitch quotes Ghandi in the article below, India
>> being
>> >> one of the countries that appoints rather than directly elects its
>> >> Presidents.
>> >>
>> >> Tim
>> >> ===
>> >> >"There go my people, I am their leader - I must follow." -- Mahatma
>> >> >Gandhi
>> >> >
>> >> >THE AGE
>> >> >Reflections on a referendum
>> >> > ROB SITCH
>> >> > Friday 5 November 1999
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ---
>> >> RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is
archived
>> at http://www.mail-archive.com/
>> >> To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in
>> the body
>> >> of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click
here
>> >> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
>> >> This posting is provided to the individual members of this group
without
>> permission from the
>> >> copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and
>> research under the "fair
>> >> use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be
>> distributed further without
>> >> permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
>> >>
>> >> RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/
>> >
>> >---
>> >RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived
at
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/
>> >To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in
the
>> body
>> >of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
>> >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
>> >This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without
>> permission from the
>> >copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and
>> research under the "fair
>> >use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be
distributed
>> further without
>> >permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
>> >
>> >RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/
>>
>> ---
>> RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived
at http://www.mail-archive.com/
>> To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in
the body
>> of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
>> This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without
permission from the
>> copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and
research under the "fair
>> use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be
distributed further without
>> permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
>>
>> RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/
>
>---
>RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/
>To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the
body
>of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
>This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without
permission from the
>copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and
research under the "fair
>use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed
further without
>permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
>
>RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/

---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To u

[recoznet2] Fw: [atsic] Media Release: Seize the Time - says respected Aboriginal Rights activist Terry O'Shane

1999-01-02 Thread tdunlop


Thought this might be of interest to people.


>Seize the Time - says  respected Aboriginal Rights activist Terry O'Shane
>
>On the eve of the referendum, Terry O'Shane,  one of the most senior and
>respected activists for Aboriginal and human rights for more than 30 years,
>has issued  a  passionate and very personal  plea to  indigenous people  to
>vote  "yes" for  a republic.
>
>In doing so,  he has  taken issue  with other prominent indigenous leaders
>who earlier this week issued an open letter to the public and media, urging
>indigenous people to vote down the republic question.
>
>If we as Aboriginal people oppose racism in all its forms, institutional
and
>direct, then we must  raise our voices in unison and vote "YES" for the
>Republic and "NO" for the preamble.
>
>I fear  the continuation of the Monarchy, and all the problems that have
>arisen from the use of the "Crown. " And I'm concerned we may see it's
>continuation because some  of  my  people  are  supporting  the "NO" vote.
>
>In the list of those people who support a "NO" vote are a lot of my
personal
>friends - people that I have enormous respect for and some whom I consider
>as my closest friends.
>
>On this issue I'm afraid we'll need to agree to disagree.
>
>It defies understanding  that indigenous  people may well  help maintain a
>British  Monarch as  Head of State for "our country ", simply because
>neither party spoke to us about the Republic or  the inclusion of our
rights
>in any new Constitution.
>
>This is precisely what their  advocacy for  a "No" vote  this  Saturday
>means.
>
>If that is the outcome,  they are aiding and abetting  the  perpetuation of
>the  great racism  we have been made to live under.
>
>This country was claimed under the doctrine of "Terra Nullius" on behalf of
>the British Crown.
>
>1992 saw that evil lie exposed in the High Court's decision on "Mabo".
Since
>then, against all opposition, we have been making incremental progress,
>slowly but surely.
>
>The latest step forward was  the decision by the UN 's CERD  committee,
>criticising  the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act  by the Howard
>Government,  when it enacted its 10 point plan.
>
>We need to get rid of the Monarchy and with it the legal fiction of Crown
>Land.
>
>So I am asking all Aboriginal People to vote "YES" for a Republic and "NO"
>for the preamble on Saturday.
>
>My position is that I will follow the direction that many good people have
>set for us and continue to set.
>
>My life has been dedicated to the elimination of all forms of racism.
>
>If I remain silent now I would be complicit in the perpetuation of those
>things that I have opposed all my life.
>
>We will, by increments, develop better quality of life for future
>generations of Indigenous people, if we attack the evils of racism when the
>opportunity is with us.
>
>This is one of those times.
>Sieze the Time.
>
>Terry O'Shane: Tel 0417 764 992
>5 November 1999
>
>Craig Sproule
>A/g Administration Manager
>Office of Public Affairs - ATSIC
>Ph: 02 6121 4952
>Fax: 02 6282 2854
>E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>

---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] The Age: Reflections on a referendum

1999-01-02 Thread Trudy and Rod Bray



tdunlop wrote:

> >No, I'm afraid not.
>
> Ah, well.  I guess we can have all the arguments again at the next
> referendum - if I'm not too arthritic to type by then ;-)

Well, it's not stopping me, so you have nothing to worry about. ;-)

> >Did you happen to see Lateline either last night or today? It was a very
> good discussion and brought up many
> >points as to why even though 91% (in the latest poll) expressed a wish for
> a republic, this model isn't
> >likely to make it tomorrow.
>
> Yes I did see it.  I'm afraid I find Leonie Kramer unbearable and thought
> most of what she said was self-serving garbage.

Well, we agree on that at least...;-) I was impressed with David Mallouf's 
contributions.

> Still, that's just me being
> unfair probably.  I take your wider point, though.  It seems it will go
> down, though I haven't given up hope entirely.  Maybe enough of all those
> republicans out there will find it just too hard to vote for the Queen once
> they're in the booth?  We'll see I guess

If that was the problem then the result would be different. Most are not voting 'for' 
the Queen but against
the model...

Trudy

---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] The Age: Reflections on a referendum

1999-01-02 Thread Peter McGrath
Hi Trudy
Doesn't all this remind you of a magicians sleight of hand. The name of the game appears to be misdirection. I am wondering what we are going to find out about after all this furor is over. 

What did get pushed through parliament while we looked elsewhere?


At 03:24 PM 11/5/99 +1100, you wrote:
>No, I'm afraid not.
>






Peter (Possum)McGrath
Phone: +61 07 3844 6887
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepade:http://www.tals.qut.edu.au/staff/peter/index.htm

"Never complain about stupidity it is 
natures way of keeping the gene pool clean" --- RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/ To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission from the copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under the "fair use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/ 

Re: [recoznet2] The Age: Reflections on a referendum

1999-01-02 Thread tdunlop



Maybe enough of all those
>> republicans out there will find it just too hard to vote for the Queen
once
>> they're in the booth?  We'll see I guess
>
>If that was the problem then the result would be different. Most are not
voting 'for' the Queen but against
>the model...
>
>Trudy


Ah, but the net effect is that the Queen (and Howard and her other
supporters) win.  Really can't see them letting go of their victory lightly
(or quickly).

(Sorry, couldn't help myself  ;-))

Tim



---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] The Age: Reflections on a referendum

1999-01-02 Thread Trudy and Rod Bray



tdunlop wrote:

> Maybe enough of all those
> >> republicans out there will find it just too hard to vote for the Queen
> once
> >> they're in the booth?  We'll see I guess
> >
> >If that was the problem then the result would be different. Most are not
> voting 'for' the Queen but against
> >the model...
> >
> >Trudy
>
> Ah, but the net effect is that the Queen (and Howard and her other
> supporters) win.  Really can't see them letting go of their victory lightly
> (or quickly).

Wasn't it the 'yes' side who discounted 'in effect' when Howard used it? Can't have it 
both ways...

> (Sorry, couldn't help myself  ;-))

Neither could I... ;-)

Trudy

---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] The Age: Reflections on a referendum

1999-01-02 Thread tdunlop


>>
>> Ah, but the net effect is that the Queen (and Howard and her other
>> supporters) win.  Really can't see them letting go of their victory
lightly
>> (or quickly).
>
>Wasn't it the 'yes' side who discounted 'in effect' when Howard used it?
Can't have it both ways...
>
>> (Sorry, couldn't help myself  ;-))
>
>Neither could I... ;-)
>
>Trudy

But we can have it both ways, can't we?  Isn't that the whole argument? We
can vote No AND get a Republic?

Tim

>
>---
>RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/
>To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the
body
>of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
>This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without
permission from the
>copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and
research under the "fair
>use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed
further without
>permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
>
>RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/

---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] The Age: Reflections on a referendum

1999-01-02 Thread Trudy and Rod Bray



Peter McGrath wrote:

> Hi Trudy
> Doesn't all this remind you of a magicians sleight of hand. The name of the game 
>appears to be misdirection. I am wondering what we are going to find out about after 
>all this furor is over.

I think we'll be in for a few surprises. I have visions of the ship of state springing 
many leaks...

> What did get pushed through parliament while we looked elsewhere?

Good question. If the papers hadn't been campaigning so hard they might have been able 
to tell us. ;-)

Trudy

>
> 
> Peter (Possum)McGrath
> Phone: +61 07 3844 6887
> Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Homepade:http://www.tals.qut.edu.au/staff/peter/index.htm
>
> "Never complain about stupidity it is
> natures way of keeping the gene pool clean"

---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] The Age: Reflections on a referendum

1999-01-02 Thread Trudy and Rod Bray



tdunlop wrote:

> >>
> >> Ah, but the net effect is that the Queen (and Howard and her other
> >> supporters) win.  Really can't see them letting go of their victory
> lightly
> >> (or quickly).
> >
> >Wasn't it the 'yes' side who discounted 'in effect' when Howard used it?
> Can't have it both ways...
> >
> >> (Sorry, couldn't help myself  ;-))
> >
> >Neither could I... ;-)
> >
> >Trudy
>
> But we can have it both ways, can't we?  Isn't that the whole argument? We
> can vote No AND get a Republic?
>
> Tim

Well, I guess we'll find out, won't we?  ;-)


---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] The Age: Reflections on a referendum

1999-01-02 Thread Rod Hagen

At 04:31 PM 5/11/99, Peter McGrath wrote:
>Hi Trudy
>Doesn't all this remind you of a magicians sleight of hand. The
>name of the game appears to be misdirection. I am wondering what we are
>going to find out about after all this furor is over.
>
>What did get pushed through parliament while we looked elsewhere?
>

I've been reflecting a little about the referendum over the last couple of
days. One thing that strikes me is that the real problem is that , unlike
some of the republics of yore, the real issues in Australia are NOT related
to our system of government.  Our oppressors are not the King , Queen or
the system of government, as they were when the French, Americans, Russians
or Kenyans became republics.

Rather , those calling the shots lie elsewhere. The media barons, the
multi-nationals, the financial institutions , the communication companies,
the mega pastoralists, the huge mining companies -  these are the people
who make the decisions that really affect us.  These are the contemporary
Kings, Queens, Earls and Barons.  Governments perhaps help them to do their
job for them, but they are really merely pawns rather than the power.   It
doesn't really make the slightest difference whether you have a directly
elected president, a parliamentarily approved president or a king or queen.
They all simply provide a "technical" solution to the idea of sovereignty
at a time when the "nation" is less relevant than ever before.

If "the people" are to really rule ("Res publica")  then these are the
matters which must be dealt with. But no referendum, regardless of who
promulgates it,  is really likely to address such matters.

If we were really to address the critical human issues of this hunk of land
between the Indian and Pacific Oceans we would be looking to limit the
manner in which the big players (today's equivalent of the aristocracy)
control our lives.  Instead they seem to become ever more pervasive as the
debate about side issues flows on.

This perhaps explains the lack of passion about the current proposals in
the eyes of most people. The current storm in a tea cup is unlikely to have
any real impact on the real human problems of contemporary life, whoever we
are. We will not overthrow the shackles that constrain us by voting for any
of the alternatives currently offered.

Perhaps, if we become a "republic" then we will be more disposed to
consider such matters in greater depth. The longer we go on "fighting in
the Captain's tower" about the nonsense of monarchy, direct election or
parliamentary selection the less likely we are to move on to the real
issues.  Perhaps not. But at least we will have got this ridiculous
diversion out of the way.

Cheers

Rod

Rod Hagen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hurstbridge, Victoria, Australia
WWWhttp://www.netspace.net.au/~rodhagen


---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/