RE: RedHat 9 and Hyperthread CPUs
Hi, I cannot get hyperthread to work on a new kernel. RH9 installs fine and, using the 2.4.20-8smp kernel, hyperthread worked. I can see the 2 cpus in /proc/cpuinfo. However, after compiling a new kernel, v2.4.22, with SMP support and for P4 CPU, only 1 cpu is found in /proc/cpuinfo. Do you know what I have missed? The hardware is Intel S875WP-1 motherboard. HT is enabled on it. CPU is a P4-2.4c 800MHz front side bus with HT support. You help is much appreciated. Regards, Clement -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Problem with SATA disk on Intel D865GBFL M/B
Hi Ed, Thank you very much for your reply. However, the D865GBFL does not have the RAID feature! I called up Intel. And they have no answer either. Sad :( Regards, Clement > Clement wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > Do you know how to connect a Seagate SATA disk to an Intel > > D865GBFL motherboard under RH9? > > > > When installing RH9 with the SATA disk only, RH9 reported no > > hard disk. > > > > I then installed RH9 on a PATA disk, it then sees > the SATA disk > > but hanged right there. > > > > I upgraded the kernel to 2.4.21 and the situation > remains the > > same. Can you help? > > Clement, the only thing I know for a fact (we > specialize in the > D865PERLL boards - chipset would be the same), is > that IF the board > supports RAID (I'm not sure, and don't have time at > the moment to find > out), then you must use the RAID BIOS part of the > main system BIOS to > set the single drive to striping mode. > > Yes, it seems stupid, and I don't have time at the > moment to go into it, > but try it. If it's anything like the D865PERLL it will work. > > Regards, > Ed. > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Problem with SATA disk on Intel D865GBFL M/B
Hi Guys, Do you know how to connect a Seagate SATA disk to an Intel D865GBFL motherboard under RH9? When installing RH9 with the SATA disk only, RH9 reported no hard disk. I then installed RH9 on a PATA disk, it then sees the SATA disk but hanged right there. I upgraded the kernel to 2.4.21 and the situation remains the same. Can you help? Regards, Clement -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Usage accounting
Do you know if there is any way to tell how many CPU clocks a user has used and how many disk space a user has used? Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
suExec enable apache RPM
Do you know of an apache RPM that is suExec enabled? Or an RPM that can upgrade the default RH7 apache installation to support suEXEC? Thank you very much. Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Automatic power down the machine
In making a customer 2.4.1 dkernel, do you know which option(s) that I need to enable to allow automatic power down the machine? Before I can do that by enable the Advanced Power Management. But it fails this time. The stock 2.2.16 came with RH 7 works fine. Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Reiserfs questions & Discussion
um, > > stuff happens. Despite all one's best attempts at planning etc. > > No--I've said all along it's a matter of probability and cost/benefit analysis. > That pretty explicitly assumes there's always risk. The important point is > that there *are* silly things that most certainly can be prevented--and those > live squarely under the rubric of "best practices". > > > Some things you can't really plan for, like say a meteor hits your > > machine room (though some folks actually do plan for things like this) > > but are pretty remote possibilities. > > I'm *so* glad you added that--I'm one of those folks. I've planned both > wholly-owned and leased off-site replacement facilities. I've written > plans to totally reconstruct an installation, up to and including > having to go out and buy new but compatible hardware and restoring > from vault tapes. There are people out here who make a living out of > being paranoid; the only real question, as that old joke goes, is are > we paranoid _enough_. > > > Most management I've worked with/for understands that stuff beyond your > > control happens, and you won't get fired for that. What *will* get you > > fired is if there was a prevalent industry practice that you could have > > been implementing to prevent the problem in the first place, and you > > weren't doing it. > > Yes; or if you can't show, _before_ the problem, that you considered both > the possiblity of that problem and its associated costs, and the course > you took was one that had been evaluated and approved. (It's gratifying > to point out to the CEO that you *did* ask for that fully redundant UPS > installation, and when the CFO refused, you had to take the second-best > soluition (It's gratifying to point out to the CEO that you *did* ask > for that fully redundant UPS installation, and when the CFO refused, > you had to take the second-best solution. It's more gratifying if you > can show that your solution still saved the data...) > > I don't really think we're disagreeing about ultimate ends--in a > mission- critical installation, all risks must be assessed, and costs > for mitigating them compared to the perceived benefits. > > Our only difference is in the perception of current risk levels in > Linux vs. commercial Unix; and in the relative benefits of journaling > filesystems _for most installations_. That's fair grounds for discussion, > but probably has passed beyond the bounds of relevance for this discussion > group. > > Cheers, > -- > Dave Ihnat > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Mirroring a HD for offline backup
Well this must be the answer. I will try it today. Thank you very much. "Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Clement wrote: > > > Can you suggest an easy way to do it? Now after copying all files to a > > new harddisk, I cannot make the new drive bootable! Lilo insists on > > writing to the real boot device. The chroot '-r' switch cannot change > > this behaviour. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Clement > > > > > Make a special lilo.conf for writing lilo to the backup disk. Name it > something like lilo.conf.bootb and change the "boot=/dev/hda" or > "boot=/dev/sda" to "boot=/dev/hdb" or "boot=/dev/sdb". > > Now, run "lilo -c lilo.conf.bootb", and you should be all set. > > Mikkel > -- > > Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, > for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup. > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Mirroring a HD for offline backup
Yes, this is workable. But ... is not that perfect, is it? Floppies are always something that I can't really trust. Mike Burger wrote: > > Don't worry about making the replacement drive bootable, to start. > > Create a boot disk...if your system crashes, move the mirrored drive into > the primary spot, boot from the floppy, and run lilo once the system is > up. > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Clement wrote: > > > Can you suggest an easy way to do it? Now after copying all files to a > > new harddisk, I cannot make the new drive bootable! Lilo insists on > > writing to the real boot device. The chroot '-r' switch cannot change > > this behaviour. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Clement > > > > > > > > ___ > > Redhat-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > _______ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Mirroring a HD for offline backup
Can you suggest an easy way to do it? Now after copying all files to a new harddisk, I cannot make the new drive bootable! Lilo insists on writing to the real boot device. The chroot '-r' switch cannot change this behaviour. Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Help with RAID on RH 7.0
>From namesys web page, it mentioned the 2.4.1pre8. Do you know where to get it? kernel.org does not have it. Thornton Prime wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Clement wrote: > > > 1. Do you mean Reiserfs and RAID cannot be used together in Kernel > > 2.2.18? > > I wouldn't. > > > 2. Do you really mean Kernel 2.4.1? I only found 2.4.0 kernel source > > and reiserfs patch for up to 2.4.0 > > I don't know what the FAQ means by that, but from the sound of it 2.2.x is > not worth the trouble and 2.4.x can be done if you have patched your > kernel and you are careful. > > thornton > > > Thornton Prime wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Clement wrote: > > > > > > > Can you also give me a hand? > > > > > > > > When running mkraid, I get this error, as reported in /proc/mdstat: > > > > > > > > read_ahead not set > > > > > > > > The kernel is 2.2.18 from linux.org, patched with reiserfs 3.5.29. > > > > > > >From the reiserFS FAQ: > > > > > >Can I use ReiserFS with software RAID. > > > > > >For Linux 2.4.1, yes, if you apply the patch on our download > > >page. Not with raid5 under linux 2.2.x, our journaling and their > > >raid code step on each other in the buffering code. Also, you must > > >use the mirror syncing tools with the FS unmounted. Otherwise, yes, > > >you may do striping and concatenating and mirroring. > > > > > > thornton > > > > > > ___ > > > Redhat-list mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Failing to compile Kernel 2.4.0 in RH7.0
Do you know how to fix this? When 'make bzImage', I get the following: net/network.o: In function `ftp_nat_expected': net/network.o(.text+0x37204): undefined reference to `ip_nat_setup_info' net/network.o: In function `delete_sack': net/network.o(.text+0x37743): undefined reference to `ip_nat_cheat_check' net/network.o: In function `help': net/network.o(.text+0x37bf7): undefined reference to `ip_nat_cheat_check' net/network.o(.text+0x37c0d): undefined reference to `ip_nat_cheat_check' net/network.o: In function `init': net/network.o(.text.init+0x1bb7): undefined reference to `ip_nat_expect_register' net/network.o(.text.init+0x1bca): undefined reference to `ip_nat_helper_register' net/network.o(.text.init+0x1bdd): undefined reference to `ip_nat_expect_unregister' make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 It is kernel 2.4.0 patched with linux-2.4.0-reiserfs-3.6.25-patch. Compiler is kgcc (ie gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux). Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Help with RAID on RH 7.0
1. Do you mean Reiserfs and RAID cannot be used together in Kernel 2.2.18? 2. Do you really mean Kernel 2.4.1? I only found 2.4.0 kernel source and reiserfs patch for up to 2.4.0 Thornton Prime wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Clement wrote: > > > Can you also give me a hand? > > > > When running mkraid, I get this error, as reported in /proc/mdstat: > > > > read_ahead not set > > > > The kernel is 2.2.18 from linux.org, patched with reiserfs 3.5.29. > > >From the reiserFS FAQ: > >Can I use ReiserFS with software RAID. > >For Linux 2.4.1, yes, if you apply the patch on our download >page. Not with raid5 under linux 2.2.x, our journaling and their >raid code step on each other in the buffering code. Also, you must >use the mirror syncing tools with the FS unmounted. Otherwise, yes, >you may do striping and concatenating and mirroring. > > thornton > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Help with RAID on RH 7.0
Can you also give me a hand? When running mkraid, I get this error, as reported in /proc/mdstat: read_ahead not set The kernel is 2.2.18 from linux.org, patched with reiserfs 3.5.29. tc lewis wrote: > > nothing special. linux software raid should work with any hard > drives/block devices. it'll be easiest if you get 2 identical drives. if > you use ide drives, make sure to put them on separate ide controllers or > you might get some nasty performance, but since you mentioned scsi, you > don't have to worry about that. > > there are hardware raid options as well, if you don't want to use linux > software raid. mylex hardware raid cards are rather popular and seem to > work well. > > either way would be fine. i have a few machines using linux software > (kernel) raid, and they work like champs. i also have one or two using a > mylex card, and they work like champs too. redhat 7.0 supports both > software raid and mylex cards. redhat 6.2 does also. > > -tcl. > > On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, K Old wrote: > > > Thanks for your replyone more question...What type of hardware would I > > need (brands, etc) > > > > Thanks, > > Kevin > > > > > > >From: tc lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Re: Help with RAID on RH 7.0 > > >Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 18:15:48 -0500 (EST) > > > > > > > > >rh7.0 supports raid. 2.4 supports raid as well. the latest 2.2 kernels > > >do not support all forms of raid, but there are patches readily available > > >for it, and redhat 7.0 includes them. > > > > > >the redhat 7.0 graphical installer allows you to setup raid devices during > > >the install. that would probably be the easy way if you're installing > > >from scratch. > > > > > >also, "raid1" is the type of raid you want for mirroring. > > > > > >-tcl. > > > > > > > > >On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, K Old wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I am setting up a server that will have 2 SCSI hard drives in it and > > >would > > > > like to have the second one mirror the first. I'm not sure if RH 7.0 > > > > supports it, in fact I doubt itbut I've seen that the 2.4 kernel has > > > > support for RAID. > > > > > > > > I have 2 questions. > > > > > > > > 1) Does RH 7.0 support RAID? Does the 2.4 kernel? > > > > > > > > 2) If they do, does anyone know how to set this up? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Kevin > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > Redhat-list mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >___ > > >Redhat-list mailing list > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > _ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > > > > > > ___ > > Redhat-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RAID Creation Problem
Hi, I cannot create RAID on a new system with RH7.0. Your help is much appreciated. The problem comes when running 'mkraid /dev/md0'. Here are the details: Kernel: 2.2.18, sourced from linux.org, patched with reiserfs 3.5.29. # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities: [3 raid1] read_ahead not set md0: inactive md1: inactive md2: inactive md3: inactive # cat raidtab_01 raiddev /dev/md0 raid-level 1 nr-raid-disks 2 chunk-size 4 persistent-superblock 1 device /dev/hdb1 raid-disk 0 device /dev/hdc1 raid-disk 1 raiddev /dev/md1 raid-level 1 nr-raid-disks 2 nr-spare-disks 0 chunk-size 4 persistent-superblock 1 device /dev/hdb2 raid-disk 0 device /dev/hdc2 raid-disk 1 raiddev /dev/md2 raid-level 1 nr-raid-disks 2 nr-spare-disks 0 chunk-size 4 persistent-superblock 1 device /dev/hdb3 raid-disk 0 device /dev/hdc3 raid-disk 1 # fdisk -l /dev/hdb Disk /dev/hdb: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 2491 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes Device BootStart EndBlocks Id System /dev/hdb1 1 255 2048256 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/hdb2 256 1275 8193150 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/hdb3 1276 2491 9767520 fd Linux raid autodetect # fdisk -l /dev/hdc Disk /dev/hdc: 16 heads, 63 sectors, 39714 cylinders Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 bytes Device BootStart EndBlocks Id System /dev/hdc1 1 4064 2048224+ fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/hdc2 4065 20318 8192016 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/hdc3 20319 39714 9775584 fd Linux raid autodetect Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Email Filters with imapd
Thank you very much to everyone who has help/tried to help. The real answer is an un-documented program - dmail that comes with the UW-Imapd distribution. Procmail alone is not the answer. It is not compatible with the imap message files. At least that was what someone suggests. dmail is the email deliver agent for UW-Imapd. Greg Wright wrote: > > *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** > > On 20/01/01 at 16:46 Clement wrote: > > >Do you mind to give one promail example? The hardest part is always the > >first part. > > man procmail > man procmailrc > man procmailex > > IIRC the last has some examples . > > Regards > > Greg Wright > -- > > IT Consultant Sydney Australia PH 0418 292020 > Available for Global Contracts Int. +61 418 292020 > web http://www.ausit.come-mail Greg AT AusIT.com > Trading As - AAA Computers, ITpro, Ozzie Soft, providers of IT services. > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Regards, Clement ANS Communications P/L === Post Addr: P O Box 6626 Blacktown BC, NSW 2148 Tel: (02) 9552 1655 Fax: (02) 9972 2633 ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Email Filters with imapd
Do you mind to give one promail example? The hardest part is always the first part. Charles Galpin wrote: > > I'm not sure what you mean. I use the imap server that comes stock w/ red > hat, and use procmail to sort my mail. It works great. > > On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Clement wrote: > > > Imapd stores emails and gives me the mobility to handle emails from > > difference computers. > > > > To provide the greatest mobility, however, I need a centralised email > > filter facility. Do you know if there is any with the imapd? The > > situation is, if I connect to the imapd from someone else's computer > > without my messages filters, emails like those from this list will be > > all jammed in the inbox. It will be a nightmare to separate the emails. > > > > In Netscape, the message filters has a greyed button named 'Filters on > > Server'. If that is another option, do you know how can I store the > > filters on the server? > > > > Your help will be very helpful. Thank you very much. > > > > Regards, > > > > Clement > > _______ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Email Filters with imapd
Imapd stores emails and gives me the mobility to handle emails from difference computers. To provide the greatest mobility, however, I need a centralised email filter facility. Do you know if there is any with the imapd? The situation is, if I connect to the imapd from someone else's computer without my messages filters, emails like those from this list will be all jammed in the inbox. It will be a nightmare to separate the emails. In Netscape, the message filters has a greyed button named 'Filters on Server'. If that is another option, do you know how can I store the filters on the server? Your help will be very helpful. Thank you very much. Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Compiling New Kernel
Hi Everyone, How are you? I have been using stock RH kernel rpms for a long time. But now, wishing to usr reiserfs, I need to build a tailored kernel but get an error: 'unresolved ref: memcpy' Do you know how to fix it? My platform is Intel Celeron 667/128MB/RH7.0/Kernel 2.2.18. The machine works flawlessly in all other areas. Alternatively, do you know if there is any stock kernel rpms with reiserfs support? Your help is much appreciated. -- Regards, Clement ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Hardware raid recommendation.
Thank you very much for your recommendation. I get the low cost Mylex AcceleRAID 150. It comes with all the drivers for OS/Win/NT/NW but not Linux althought its web pages says Linux 2.2 is support. Do you know where to get the driver for Linux? Cokey de Percin wrote: > > Jason Costomiris wrote: > > > > Looking for a raid card that will handle 2 or 3 channels, preferably > > capable of handling U2 LVD disks. Obviously, a card that has SOLID > > drivers under the 2.2 kernels would be preferred... > > > > If you've got the $$,look at the Mylex Extreme Raid controllers. > They're very nice and I believe VA uses them. Note that they don't > use a SCSI driver, but a block driver. Should make them more > efficient. > > Best > > Cokey > > -- > -- > Cokey de Percin, DBAEmail: > Policy Management Systems Corp. Work - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Columbia, South Carolina Home - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" > as the Subject. -- Regards Clement -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
Create a RAID
Hi, Can you give hints or instructions to create a RAID? I have 2 identical SCSI drives and would like them to mirror each other, ie a RAID-1 array. Thank you very much. Regards Clement -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
FTP and MySQL
Hi, Can you give me a suggestion for a FTP server daemon that can support external authentication, like the MySQL database? Thank you very much. Regards Clement -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
Adaptec RAID controller AAA-131
Has anyone used this RAID controller? I connected 2 identical HD to the controller. Then used Adaptec's config utility to create a RAID-1 disk mirror (one mirror the other) with no trouble. But when installing RH-6.1, I still see 2 HDs instead of 1. Never mind, I thought, so I continued to install RH on the first one, expect to see miracle. Unfortunately, it is not there. When rebooted, the machine hanged after identifying the 2 HDs. Can you give me some suggestions? Regards Clement -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
Re: GCC not working on 6x86
Thank you very much to all who have replied. Following your recommendations, the problem is found to be one with the memory. Interesting though, it is fixed by re-fitting the SIMM modules. To Hidong, the Cyrix chip is considered by Linux as a i586 chip. 6x86-PR166+ is the name that Cyrix gives that chip. "Thomas Ribbrock (Design/DEG)" wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 05:08:40PM +1100, Clement wrote: > > > When compiling package on a 6x86-PR166+ using gcc from egcs-1.1.2-24, I > > got this error message: > > > > gcc -g -O2 -I./../Include -I.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c ./parsermodule.c > > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 > [...] > > You're not going to like this, but in my experience you stand a fair > chance that you have a hardware problem on that machine, e.g. faulty > RAM, faulty cache, maybe even a faulty CPU (that happened to me once - I > also got random segfaults during compiles and it proved to be a broken > K6-2/300...). I recommend having a look at the Sig11 FAQ: > > http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ > > HTH, > > Thomas > -- > "Look, Ma, no obsolete quotes and plain text only!" > > Thomas Ribbrock | http://www.bigfoot.com/~kaytan | ICQ#: 15839919 >"You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!" > > -- > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" > as the Subject. Regards, Clement -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
GCC not working on 6x86
Hi When compiling package on a 6x86-PR166+ using gcc from egcs-1.1.2-24, I got this error message: gcc -g -O2 -I./../Include -I.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c ./parsermodule.c gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 It happens in a few packages, python, openssl, etc. It works fine on the PPro or P-II machines. Do you if there is fix somewhere? Thank you very much. Regards Clement -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
Re: linuxconf core dumps
You are genius. Linuxconf failed when it open a file "included" in the named.conf. It looks like linuxconf simply do not know how to take care of that. Gordon Messmer wrote: > > Clement wrote: > > In preparing a new Redhat 6.1 machine, the linuxconf worked well in the > > first place. However, after installing other applications, apache, > > samba, etc, the linuxconf is now giving me core dumps only! > > I've seen that happen when linuxconf isn't able to correctly parse a > config file. I recommend: > > strace linuxconf 2>/tmp/linuxconf.strace > > After linuxconf crashed, there will be a complete stack trace in > /tmp/linuxconf.strace. You can examine that file to find out what it > was doing when it crashed. Try "grep open /tmp/linuxconf.strace". The > last file opened is _probably_ the culprit. > > MSG > > -- > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" > as the Subject. -- Regards Clement -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
linuxconf core dumps
Hi, In preparing a new Redhat 6.1 machine, the linuxconf worked well in the first place. However, after installing other applications, apache, samba, etc, the linuxconf is now giving me core dumps only! Removing and re-installing linuxconf will only give me the first info screen, then core dumped again. Do you know how to fix this? Here are the details: cpu PPro 200 memory 64MB linuxconf linuxconf-1.16r3.2-2.i386.rpm initscripts-4.68-1.i386.rpm Regards, Clement -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
Re: 6.1 Problems
Thank you everyone. Your help is timely and extremely helpful. It makes feel so privileged to be a Linux user. Regards Clement -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
6.1 Problems
Please give me a hand. On 6.1, when I install ssh-1.2.26, I get an error --- missiong libz.so. Do you know which package contains that? I used the "server" installation. I know ssh-1.2.27 is out but forget which site has it. Can you tell me? The IP alias does not work. Apparently it is this script that is not working. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-aliases Do you know if there is an update somewhere? Do you know how to install the ORB removable E-IDE drive? Thank you very much. Regards, Clement -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
XNTP3 problem
Hi everyone, I have a problem in using xntp3 daemon v3-5.93. The daemon updates the clock accurately. But when it serves time to other clients, some, mostly Linux, would work. Others, like Dimension 4 would report "The NTP message received is invalid! ..." Can you give me a hand? Regards Clement -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
