OpenSSH Vulnerability - Upgrade to 3.7.1

2003-09-17 Thread Sevatio
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5077796.html?tag=zdfd.newsfeed

http://openssh.org/

You can get the source from http://openssh.org.  Good luck finding the 
rpms.  Let us know where you find them.

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


VNC Konsole

2003-09-11 Thread Sevatio
RH8.0

When you run Konsole within a VNC environment, there are extra spaces 
between the characters.  How can that be fixed?

Thanks,
Sevatio
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Webmin on Redhat?

2003-09-05 Thread Sevatio
Does Webmin come with any of the RedHat releases?

Thanks

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Knetload?

2003-08-27 Thread Sevatio
Is Knetload available for Redhat 8.0 or 9.0?

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Edit KDE Menu For System

2003-08-19 Thread Sevatio
RH8.0:  How do you edit the KDE menu so that it affects every user?

Thanks,

S

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


KDE Panel's DesktopAccess Icon

2003-08-19 Thread Sevatio
RH8.0  KDE:  How do you create an icon on the KDE panel that I can 
click and it will instantly clear all the apps out of the way so I can 
see the desktop?

Sevatio

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Comcast Routing

2003-08-02 Thread Sevatio
Hardware Scenario: 2 PCs connected to a hub/switch and the hub/switch is 
connected to a Comcast cable modem that is then connected to the Comcast 
Cable Internet system.

Main Question: Is it possible to route things in a manner that enables 
the 2 PCs to send data (via FTP or whatever) to each other at LAN speed 
(10/100mbps)?  What happens now is that the data transfer is limited to 
Comcast's upstream limit (256kbps) because the packets are going out to 
the internet and coming back to the other PC.  How would I set this up 
so that the packets to go directly through the hub/switch to the other 
PC resulting in a much faster transfer rate?

Side note: I noticed that 2 PCs running Windows w/ Netbeui and file 
sharing, the data transfer is that of LAN speed.

So what is Netbeui  Windows File Sharing doing that is allowing the LAN 
speed connection between the 2 PCs and how can I get my 2 Linux boxes to 
 ftp to each other at LAN speed given the hardware scenario?

Thanks,
Sevatio
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Comcast Routing

2003-08-02 Thread Sevatio


Otto Haliburton wrote:

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sevatio
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Comcast  Routing
Hardware Scenario: 2 PCs connected to a hub/switch and the hub/switch
is
connected to a Comcast cable modem that is then connected to the
Comcast
Cable Internet system.
Main Question: Is it possible to route things in a manner that enables
the 2 PCs to send data (via FTP or whatever) to each other at LAN
speed
(10/100mbps)?  What happens now is that the data transfer is limited
to
Comcast's upstream limit (256kbps) because the packets are going out
to
the internet and coming back to the other PC.  How would I set this up
so that the packets to go directly through the hub/switch to the other
PC resulting in a much faster transfer rate?
Side note: I noticed that 2 PCs running Windows w/ Netbeui and file
sharing, the data transfer is that of LAN speed.
So what is Netbeui  Windows File Sharing doing that is allowing the
LAN
speed connection between the 2 PCs and how can I get my 2 Linux boxes
to
 ftp to each other at LAN speed given the hardware scenario?
Thanks,
Sevatio
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Are you connected through a hub or a router.  In any case if your
computers are networked together, why do you need to use ftp at all.
Setup the systems as nfs or if they are windows map the drives and you
should not need ftp because you can access the files directly.  The
answer to your question is routing.  If you are using a hub then you
will not have the problem as long as the two computers have a common
protocol to use (windows are using netbeui).

So, you're saying that it makes a difference whether I use a hub or a 
router?  I have both but I've noticed no difference between the two 
because I still can't send packets directly from one pc to another 
through the hub/switch via ftp.  Also, the netbeui thing was an 
experiment.  I prefer not using netbeui and Windows.

Thanks

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Comcast Routing

2003-08-02 Thread Sevatio
The way I've done it is to have your linux box contain two NICs.  Eth0 
(NIC#1) connects to your cable modem.  Eth1 (NIC#2) connects to your 
Windows Box's NIC via a cross-over cat5 cable.  Then activate connection 
sharing in your Linux box by assigning Eth0 to your internet IP address 
and Eth1 to your local IP address (192.168.0.1) which will be the 
gateway for your Windows box.  On your Windows box, set your ip address 
to 192.168.0.2 and your gateway address to 192.168.0.1 and netmask 
255.255.255.0.  For DNS, use the same settings as your Linux box.  Also, 
connection sharing in your linux box might end up running a DHCPd in 
which case, you could just set your Windows box to DHCP.  This path 
eliminates the need for a hub or switch.  If down the road you want to 
get more PCs then you'll need that hub/switch.

Lee Flier wrote:
I will soon have a similar situation... I have two computers at home.  
One is the one I'm using now which is currently dual boot RH9/Windows 
98.  It's connected to the Internet via cable modem (RCA) and has a 
static IP address.

What I would like to do is install RH9 on a second computer, have a 
private LAN with the two machines, so that files/printers can be 
shared.  I would also like them to share my Internet connection without 
having to obtain a second static IP address from my ISP.  I am not a 
network guru by any means, so I've been reading up on the subject, and 
it seems there are several different ways this could be done.  What I am 
thinking would be the simplest way is this:

1) Establish the LAN using private IP addresses and a hub.

2) Connect the hub to the cable modem.

3) Connect to the Internet directly from the Linux box, then configure 
the Windoze box to use the Linux box as a proxy server so I can surf the 
web from the Windoze box (all my email etc. will go to the Linux box).

Is this workable?  Is it the simplest way to do what I want or is there 
a better way?

Also, if I want to share my printer between the two machines, in you 
guys' experience is it better/simpler to hang the printer off the 
Windows box or the Linux box?

Thanks,
Lee



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Command Line for Searching for Files Containing Text?

2003-07-29 Thread Sevatio
From the command line, how do you search for a file containing a 
certain text?

Thanks

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Load Balancing Round Robin

2003-07-21 Thread Sevatio
What would I need to setup two Apache servers to serve the same domain 
name using load balancing  round robin?  Each user session must be 
limited to one server.  And it must be able to sense when one of the 
servers are down and skip over that server and move on to a working server.

thanks,

Sevatio

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Backup Remote Windows 2000 Box with Linux

2003-07-15 Thread Sevatio
I also have to mention that these machines are located miles apart.

Bret Hughes wrote:
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 22:22, Sevatio wrote:

What are some methods for doing Full and Incremental backups of files in
a Windows 2000 box located remotely using a Redhat 8.0 box?  Any
recommendations and sharing of your techniques would be greatly 
appreciated.  The connection speed between the boxes are typically 256kbps.

Thanks,

Sevatio


is smbtar an option here?  I have never used it but seems like it might
do the trick.  Part of the samba suite.
Bret




--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Automated Backups Between Remote Redhat Boxes

2003-07-15 Thread Sevatio
What's a good method to do automated backups between two Redhat8.0 boxes 
located remotely from each other?

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Backup Remote Windows 2000 Box with Linux

2003-07-14 Thread Sevatio
What are some methods for doing Full and Incremental backups of files in
a Windows 2000 box located remotely using a Redhat 8.0 box?  Any
recommendations and sharing of your techniques would be greatly 
appreciated.  The connection speed between the boxes are typically 256kbps.

Thanks,

Sevatio



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


test

2003-07-08 Thread Sevatio
test

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list