Re: List has died!

2003-07-30 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss
 Matthew Galgoci wrote:
 
  Lemma of system administration: 1 server, 4000 list subscribers. 2
users
  complain. Odds are the problem is not with the list server.

 I didn't complain, but the list died for me too.  I continued to
 receive mail from other external sources.  Odd.

I also find it interesting that I continued to receive all of my email
from all other sources, including other lists, but wasn't receiving
anything from this one.  After the email I received from the list
administrator, I assumed that there was a dns issue.  I use
www.no-ip.com for my dynamic dns for the domain that I purchased.  I
haven't had the time to dig into it.

Ben


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-30 Thread David Hart
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 14:12, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:

 I also find it interesting that I continued to receive all of my email
 from all other sources, including other lists, but wasn't receiving
 anything from this one.  After the email I received from the list
 administrator, I assumed that there was a dns issue.  I use
 www.no-ip.com for my dynamic dns for the domain that I purchased.  I
 haven't had the time to dig into it.
 
 Ben
 
The list died for me as well. I have a static IP, open 25 and no routing
or NS issues. All other mail was received properly. When the list came
back from the coma, it all got delivered at once (giving Postfix a good
workout). I have no indication in my logs (router or mail) of any
connection attempts during the DNR period.

Drop it. We'll never sort it out.


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread Reuben D. Budiardja
I've been getting mail from this list since last night and this morning. Not 
as many as usual though.

RDB

On Tuesday 29 July 2003 11:41 am, MKlinke wrote:
 As of yesterday afternoon the list mail has stopped flowing here.

 List admin, will we need to re-subscribe or are you on a path to fix
 this?  I can see there's list mail today at:

 http://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/2003-July/date.html

 and I also note that others have also seen their mail stop flowing.

 Please advise

 Regards,   Mike Klinke

-- 
Reuben D. Budiardja
Department of Physics and Astronomy
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
-
/\  ASCII Ribbon Campaign against HTML
\ /  email and proprietary format  
 X   attachments.
/ \
-
Have you been used by Microsoft today? 
Choose your life. Choose freedom. 
Choose LINUX.
-


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread Bob Buckley


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MKlinke
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: List has died!


As of yesterday afternoon the list mail has stopped flowing here.

List admin, will we need to re-subscribe or are you on a path to fix
this?  I can see there's list mail today at:

http://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/2003-July/date.html

and I also note that others have also seen their mail stop flowing.

Please advise

Regards,   Mike Klinke


--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread Matthew Galgoci

Lemma of system administration: 1 server, 4000 list subscribers. 2 users complain. 
Odds are the
problem is not with the list server.

The list is not dead. Your subscription still shows as active (only checked for [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] 
though). Mail is being delivered, but not to you.

I looked, and from the logs:

Jul 29 04:55:16 hormel postfix/smtp[20935]: 2C8B778495: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], 
relay=none, delay=11630, status=deferred (connect to axsi.com[67.153.21.8]: Connection 
timed out)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/log/maillog | grep 
status=deferred | wc -l
281

I checked from another box offsite that I help admin, and your problems
are obviously not unique to Red Hat's netblock:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# host 67.153.21.8
Host 8.21.153.67.in-addr.arpa not found: 2(SERVFAIL)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]#  telnet 67.153.21.8 25
Trying 67.153.21.8...
telnet: connect to address 67.153.21.8: Connection refused

Please go fix your mail server and dns. I hope you are reading the list archives 
online ;)

Regards,

Matthew Galgoci

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, MKlinke wrote:

 As of yesterday afternoon the list mail has stopped flowing here.  
 
 List admin, will we need to re-subscribe or are you on a path to fix 
 this?  I can see there's list mail today at: 
 
 http://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/2003-July/date.html
 
 and I also note that others have also seen their mail stop flowing.  
 
 Please advise
 
 Regards,   Mike Klinke
 

-- 

Matthew Galgoci Dirty deeds, done dirt cheap
System Administrator
Red Hat, Inc
919.754.3700 x44155


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread MKlinke
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 11:07, Matthew Galgoci wrote:
 Lemma of system administration: 1 server, 4000 list subscribers. 2
 users complain. Odds are the problem is not with the list server.

 The list is not dead. Your subscription still shows as active (only
 checked for [EMAIL PROTECTED] though). Mail is being delivered, but
 not to you.

 I looked, and from the logs:

 Jul 29 04:55:16 hormel postfix/smtp[20935]: 2C8B778495:
 to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=none, delay=11630, status=deferred
 (connect to axsi.com[67.153.21.8]: Connection timed out)

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/log/maillog | grep
 status=deferred | wc -l 281

 I checked from another box offsite that I help admin, and your
 problems are obviously not unique to Red Hat's netblock:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# host 67.153.21.8
 Host 8.21.153.67.in-addr.arpa not found: 2(SERVFAIL)

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]#  telnet 67.153.21.8 25
 Trying 67.153.21.8...
 telnet: connect to address 67.153.21.8: Connection refused

 Please go fix your mail server and dns. I hope you are reading the
 list archives online ;)

 Regards,

 Matthew Galgoci

 On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, MKlinke wrote:
  As of yesterday afternoon the list mail has stopped flowing here.
 
  List admin, will we need to re-subscribe or are you on a path to
  fix this?  I can see there's list mail today at:
 
  http://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/2003-July/date.html
 
  and I also note that others have also seen their mail stop flowing.
 
  Please advise
 
  Regards,   Mike Klinke

Where on earth did you get 67.153.21.8 as our mail server address, 
that's a web server? 

DNS should resolve our mail server to 67.153.21.10 as everyone else's 
seems to be doing today.

You don't find it at least suspicious that at least three of us all of a 
sudden aren't receiving the email from the list?  

I'd be interested if anyone else resolves axsi.com mail server at 
67.153.21.8

Regards,  Mike Klinke





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread Matthew Galgoci

It's possible that there has been an update to your MX records that
hasn't expired yet and is still cached, or even worse, a change was
made to your MX and someone forgot to bump your zone serial numbers.

 Where on earth did you get 67.153.21.8 as our mail server address, 
 that's a web server? 
 
 DNS should resolve our mail server to 67.153.21.10 as everyone else's 
 seems to be doing today.
 
 You don't find it at least suspicious that at least three of us all of a 
 sudden aren't receiving the email from the list?  
 
 I'd be interested if anyone else resolves axsi.com mail server at 
 67.153.21.8
 
 Regards,  Mike Klinke

-- 

Matthew Galgoci Dirty deeds, done dirt cheap
System Administrator
Red Hat, Inc
919.754.3700 x44155


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread MKlinke
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 11:52, you wrote:
 Did someone twiddle with your MX records recently? It's possible
 that the expiration time has not been reached?

 I've restarted postfix, maybe that will cause postfix to refresh.



The restart seems to have done the trick, I am now receiving the mail.  
Thanks for your help!

Regards,  Mike Klinke


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread Michael Kalus
 The restart seems to have done the trick, I am now receiving 
 the mail.  
 Thanks for your help!
 

So am I,

This is the first email I got from the list since yesterday at 4:13pm.

Michael


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread MKlinke
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 12:12, you wrote:
 Postfix may have had it cached, but postfix has been restarted many
 times in the past two months.

 Surely the last change you made hasn't been two months ago?

 Jul 29 13:06:51 hormel postfix/smtp[11832]: 2D81C78F08:
 to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=mail.futzin.com[64.81.113.223],
 delay=8664, status=sent (250 2.0.0 h6TH7Qlq026218 Message accepted
 for delivery)

 Looks like its delivering nicely now.

 Matt

 On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, MKlinke wrote:
  On Tuesday 29 July 2003 11:52, you wrote:
   Did someone twiddle with your MX records recently? It's possible
   that the expiration time has not been reached?
  
   I've restarted postfix, maybe that will cause postfix to refresh.
 
  I'm the keeper of the DNS records an I can say that they haven't
  been touched in nearly two months.  Do you resolve DNS to
  67.153.21.8 or 67.153.21.10 from your end via DIG tool of your
  choice?
 
  Regards,  Mike Klinke

It's been at least that long since 67.153.21.10 mail server has been the 
axsi.com mail server, probably closer to 5 months when it was made 
primary according to the MX record.  The 64.81.113.223  MX record was 
added at the end of June, the 30th, and 67.153.21.10 was demoted to 
secondary mail server on that day.  Even if your DNS cache wasn't 
updated to the new primary, 64.81.113.223, I can't begin to guess how 
your server ever resolved 67.153.21.8 as axsi.com's mail server. I 
guess we'll just have to chalk it up to one of those inexplicable 
glitches unless your seeing this with some of the other posters who 
have also lost list mail

Regards,  Mike Klinke


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread Gerry Doris

 I'd be interested if anyone else resolves axsi.com mail server at
 67.153.21.8

 Regards,  Mike Klinke

I just did a lookup on axsi.com and got back 67.153.21.8.

Gerry


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread MKlinke
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 12:37, Gerry Doris wrote:
  I'd be interested if anyone else resolves axsi.com mail server at
  67.153.21.8
 
  Regards,  Mike Klinke

 I just did a lookup on axsi.com and got back 67.153.21.8.

 Gerry

Was that authoritive?

Regards, Mike Klinke


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread Matthew Galgoci
 It's been at least that long since 67.153.21.10 mail server has been the 
 axsi.com mail server, probably closer to 5 months when it was made 
 primary according to the MX record.  The 64.81.113.223  MX record was 
 added at the end of June, the 30th, and 67.153.21.10 was demoted to 
 secondary mail server on that day.  Even if your DNS cache wasn't 
 updated to the new primary, 64.81.113.223, I can't begin to guess how 
 your server ever resolved 67.153.21.8 as axsi.com's mail server. I 
 guess we'll just have to chalk it up to one of those inexplicable 
 glitches unless your seeing this with some of the other posters who 
 have also lost list mail
 
 Regards,  Mike Klinke

I have seen postfix cache before, but not like this :(

-- 

Matthew Galgoci Dirty deeds, done dirt cheap
System Administrator
Red Hat, Inc
919.754.3700 x44155


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread MKlinke
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 12:46, Matthew Galgoci wrote:
  It's been at least that long since 67.153.21.10 mail server has
  been the axsi.com mail server, probably closer to 5 months when it
  was made primary according to the MX record.  The 64.81.113.223  MX
  record was added at the end of June, the 30th, and 67.153.21.10 was
  demoted to secondary mail server on that day.  Even if your DNS
  cache wasn't updated to the new primary, 64.81.113.223, I can't
  begin to guess how your server ever resolved 67.153.21.8 as
  axsi.com's mail server. I guess we'll just have to chalk it up to
  one of those inexplicable glitches unless your seeing this with
  some of the other posters who have also lost list mail
 
  Regards,  Mike Klinke

 I have seen postfix cache before, but not like this :(

Well, offline, another subscriber just sent me a note that he saw 

starting on the morning of the 23th they started trying to deliver to 
the a-record host for my list signup, rather than the mx-record host. 
late yesterday this appears to have been all they were trying to hit.

and this appears to be what happened to me too, since a host lookup to 
axsi.com will show 67.153.21.8 which is the A-record for axsi.com but 
it is not the MX record!

Regards,  Mike Klinke



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:30:10 -0500, MKlinke wrote:

[...]

It would be polite if you moved your Re: List has died! thread
into private mail, provided that Matthew still wants to see it. ;)

Really, these periodic public complaints about list lag or
temporary list delivery problems are an annoyance. 

Just be patient and demonstrate experience. You've been subscribed
to these lists for a long time.

Thanks in advance.

- -- 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Jrbe0iMVcrivHFQRAvXpAJ9HZETLOcWt1m8Z/V/Q5ngUgtE35ACeL4CV
9+Ej4it78ysdxsFyrpVCe24=
=fF/Z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: rh-l] Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread R P Herrold
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, MKlinke wrote:

 On Tuesday 29 July 2003 12:37, Gerry Doris wrote:
   I'd be interested if anyone else resolves axsi.com mail server at
   67.153.21.8
 
  I just did a lookup on axsi.com and got back 67.153.21.8.
 
  Gerry
 
 Was that authoritive?

Things do not look good at the nameservers providing 
'axsi.com'  Two mail servers are returned from 
   dig axsi.com mx

They are mail.axsi.com and exchange.axsi.com, with 5 and 10 
distances.  Each resolves to the .10 in that netblock, 
implying that at least one is probably a CNAME.  This is a 
misconfiguration if true.

Curiously, reverses are not configured, which will cause some 
mail bouncing on sending.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] cache]# host 67.153.21.8
Host 8.21.153.67.in-addr.arpa not found: 2(SERVFAIL)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cache]# host 67.153.21.10
Host 10.21.153.67.in-addr.arpa not found: 2(SERVFAIL)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cache]#

-- Russ Herrold


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread Matthew Galgoci

Ok, so now I'll admit that there is something fishy going on with postfix delivering
to A records instead of MX records. I'll keep looking and let folks know when I find
something.

In the mean time, if anyone else notices postifix delivering to their domain A record
instead of the proper MX, please let me know offline so I can get some kind of
correlation.

Regards,

Matthew Galgoci

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, MKlinke wrote:

 On Tuesday 29 July 2003 12:46, Matthew Galgoci wrote:
   It's been at least that long since 67.153.21.10 mail server has
   been the axsi.com mail server, probably closer to 5 months when it
   was made primary according to the MX record.  The 64.81.113.223  MX
   record was added at the end of June, the 30th, and 67.153.21.10 was
   demoted to secondary mail server on that day.  Even if your DNS
   cache wasn't updated to the new primary, 64.81.113.223, I can't
   begin to guess how your server ever resolved 67.153.21.8 as
   axsi.com's mail server. I guess we'll just have to chalk it up to
   one of those inexplicable glitches unless your seeing this with
   some of the other posters who have also lost list mail
  
   Regards,  Mike Klinke
 
  I have seen postfix cache before, but not like this :(
 
 Well, offline, another subscriber just sent me a note that he saw 
 
 starting on the morning of the 23th they started trying to deliver to 
 the a-record host for my list signup, rather than the mx-record host. 
 late yesterday this appears to have been all they were trying to hit.
 
 and this appears to be what happened to me too, since a host lookup to 
 axsi.com will show 67.153.21.8 which is the A-record for axsi.com but 
 it is not the MX record!
 
 Regards,  Mike Klinke
 
 
 

-- 

Matthew Galgoci Dirty deeds, done dirt cheap
System Administrator
Red Hat, Inc
919.754.3700 x44155


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread MKlinke
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 13:03, Michael Schwendt wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:30:10 -0500, MKlinke wrote:

 [...]

 It would be polite if you moved your Re: List has died! thread
 into private mail, provided that Matthew still wants to see it. ;)

 Really, these periodic public complaints about list lag or
 temporary list delivery problems are an annoyance.

 Just be patient and demonstrate experience. You've been subscribed
 to these lists for a long time.

 Thanks in advance.

 - --
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

 iD8DBQE/Jrbe0iMVcrivHFQRAvXpAJ9HZETLOcWt1m8Z/V/Q5ngUgtE35ACeL4CV
 9+Ej4it78ysdxsFyrpVCe24=
 =fF/Z
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

While I appreciate your sentiment,  it seems to be doing some good by 
letting these go to the list.  It would seem at this point that the 
list server has some issues and the discussion is generating private 
email as well as public that can help to determine the problem.  If the 
list admin feel this is no longer beneficial to have it in the public 
forum and has enough info to tackle the problem I'll be happy to let it 
die.

Regards,  Mike Klinke


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread Matthew Galgoci
 
 While I appreciate your sentiment,  it seems to be doing some good by 
 letting these go to the list. 

_Exactly!_

-- 

Matthew Galgoci Dirty deeds, done dirt cheap
System Administrator
Red Hat, Inc
919.754.3700 x44155


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread Gerry Doris
 On Tuesday 29 July 2003 12:37, Gerry Doris wrote:
  I'd be interested if anyone else resolves axsi.com mail server at
  67.153.21.8
 
  Regards,  Mike Klinke

 I just did a lookup on axsi.com and got back 67.153.21.8.

 Gerry

 Was that authoritive?

 Regards, Mike Klinke

Not now.  I didn't notice the first time I tried it.  Reverse doesn't work
at all for 67.153.21.8.  I'm at work and have no access to named so I
can't flush the cache.

Gerry


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread James Gibbon

Matthew Galgoci wrote:
 
 Lemma of system administration: 1 server, 4000 list subscribers. 2 users
 complain. Odds are the problem is not with the list server.

I didn't complain, but the list died for me too.  I continued to 
receive mail from other external sources.  Odd.




-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 13:07:33 -0500, MKlinke wrote:

 While I appreciate your sentiment,  it seems to be doing some good by 
 letting these go to the list.  It would seem at this point that the 
 list server has some issues and the discussion is generating private 
 email as well as public that can help to determine the problem.  If the 
 list admin feel this is no longer beneficial to have it in the public 
 forum and has enough info to tackle the problem I'll be happy to let it 
 die.

My message referred to lame complaints and/or test messages from
impatient subscribers and NOT to actual investigation. As soon as
the participants in this thread look into locating any problem (in
particular at Red Hat's side), the thread makes sense and should
continue. Obviously...

- -- 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Jrwy0iMVcrivHFQRAj0mAJ0Zk+j4bkUJCJciqAKJcMCopyyFagCfWbfA
nIYdqzBeqUNRQFdzGbBDI5o=
=GiTW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread John McKinney
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, MKlinke wrote:
Mike,

 On Tuesday 29 July 2003 13:03, Michael Schwendt wrote:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
 
 While I appreciate your sentiment,  it seems to be doing some good by 
 letting these go to the list.  It would seem at this point that the 
 list server has some issues and the discussion is generating private 
 email as well as public that can help to determine the problem.  If the 
 list admin feel this is no longer beneficial to have it in the public 
 forum and has enough info to tackle the problem I'll be happy to let it 
 die.
 
 Regards,  Mike Klinke
 
 
 
If you check your domain at dnsreport.com it shows that the reverse lookup 
for 67.153.21.10 is not working. This would cause the problem you are 
describing. Does your upstream provider handle reverse lookups?

Hope this helps.
John McKinney



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread MKlinke
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 14:35, John McKinney wrote:
 On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, MKlinke wrote:
 Mike,

  On Tuesday 29 July 2003 13:03, Michael Schwendt wrote:
   -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
   Hash: SHA1
 
  While I appreciate your sentiment,  it seems to be doing some good
  by letting these go to the list.  It would seem at this point that
  the list server has some issues and the discussion is generating
  private email as well as public that can help to determine the
  problem.  If the list admin feel this is no longer beneficial to
  have it in the public forum and has enough info to tackle the
  problem I'll be happy to let it die.
 
  Regards,  Mike Klinke

 If you check your domain at dnsreport.com it shows that the reverse
 lookup for 67.153.21.10 is not working. This would cause the problem
 you are describing. Does your upstream provider handle reverse
 lookups?

 Hope this helps.
 John McKinney

Heh, my ISP periodically has reverse lookup issues but that won't create 
the problem we are having.  There are too many of us that had exactly 
the same thing happen at the same time with regard to the list email 
and in each case that I have access to, the list e-mail server was 
trying to send mail to the A-record identified boxen rather than the MX 
record identified boxen.  

The simple fact that I am receiving mail from the list after the postfix 
was restarted, and as you pointed out, still won't reverse resolve, 
should indicate that the reverse lookup won't impact this problem.

Thanks for looking!  Mike Klinke


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: List has died!

2003-07-29 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 03:10:04PM -0500, MKlinke wrote:
 
 Heh, my ISP periodically has reverse lookup issues but that won't create 
 the problem we are having.  There are too many of us that had exactly 
 the same thing happen at the same time with regard to the list email 
 and in each case that I have access to, the list e-mail server was 
 trying to send mail to the A-record identified boxen rather than the MX 
 record identified boxen.  

FWIW, I got no Redhat mail for most of yesterday either. My mail is
forwarded through pobox. Of course maybe they had this A record
problem, but I don't have their logs to see :( 

-- 
Hal Burgiss
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list