Re: Download the dependencies for a package on RHEL 8.7

2023-09-07 Thread Kaushal Shriyan
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 7:29 AM Kaushal Shriyan 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am using the below command to download dependencies
> for xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.6-2.el8.x86_64
>
> #dnf install --downloadonly --downloaddir=/path/to/dir/
> xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.6-2.el8.x86_64
>
> It does not download the dependencies which are required to install
> xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.6-2.el8.x86_64.
>
> I tried the below option also
>
> # yumdownloader xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.6-2.el8.x86_64 --resolve
> Updating Subscription Management repositories.
> Last metadata expiration check: 2:32:37 ago on Thu 07 Sep 2023 04:55:44 AM
> IST.
> xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.6-2.el8.x86_64.rpm
>
>   99 kB/s |  57 kB 00:00
> # ls
> xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.6-2.el8.x86_64.rpm
> [root@test rhel8xorgrpms]#
>
> Please guide me. Thanks in Advance.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Kaushal
>

Hi,

Is there a way to download the package along with the dependencies which
are already installed on RHEL 8.7?

Please guide me. Thanks in Advance.

Best Regards,

Kaushal
-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-requ...@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Download the dependencies for a package on RHEL 8.7

2023-09-06 Thread Kaushal Shriyan
Hi,

I am using the below command to download dependencies
for xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.6-2.el8.x86_64

#dnf install --downloadonly --downloaddir=/path/to/dir/
xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.6-2.el8.x86_64

It does not download the dependencies which are required to install
xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.6-2.el8.x86_64.

I tried the below option also

# yumdownloader xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.6-2.el8.x86_64 --resolve
Updating Subscription Management repositories.
Last metadata expiration check: 2:32:37 ago on Thu 07 Sep 2023 04:55:44 AM
IST.
xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.6-2.el8.x86_64.rpm

  99 kB/s |  57 kB 00:00
# ls
xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.10.6-2.el8.x86_64.rpm
[root@test rhel8xorgrpms]#

Please guide me. Thanks in Advance.

Best Regards,

Kaushal
-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-requ...@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-20 Thread Ed Wilts
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:51:43PM -0500, Rigler, Steve wrote:
 Assuming we're talking about the same Tora:
 
 Name: tora Relocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 1.3.9.2   Vendor: Red Hat, Inc.
 Release : 1 Build Date: Mon 17 Feb 2003 07:28:46 AM 
 CST
 Install Date: Wed 08 Oct 2003 01:09:07 PM CDT  Build Host: porky.devel.redhat.com
 Group   : Applications/DatabasesSource RPM: tora-1.3.9.2-1.src.rpm

[snip]

 Mine came with RH9.  It's probably not available for AS (yet).

Please note that taroon (RHEL 3 beta) includes tora. 

I would not attempt to upgrade kdelibs to resolve a dependency since
you'll end up in dependency hell - many, many packages will depend on
parts of kde and you'll find yourself running in circles to the point
where you will not be running AS 2.1 at all by the time you're done.

You have 2 basic choices:
1.  Download the source rpm and recompile and hope it works.
2.  Wait for RHEL 3 to ship and upgrade to that.  I believe it should be
released before month's end.

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Failed Red Hat 9 Dependencies

2003-10-18 Thread John Nichel
Randy Chrismon wrote:
John Nichel wrote:

Randy Chrismon wrote:

I have the complete Red Hat 9 rpm database installed but I guess I 
just don't know how to query it. What provides libcrypto and libssl? 
Particularly the versions required by MySQL (libcrypto.0.9.6 and 
libssl.0.9.6)? I have both files on my system but they are version 
0.9.7. and MySQL doesn't seem to be interested in the later version.

Use rpm -qf filename to get what package a file belongs too.

I've tried but all it gets me is no such file or directory. I've also 
tried rpm -q --whatprovides to no avail.

Randy

Did you compile SSL from source, and not RPM by chance?

--
By-Tor.com
It's all about the Rush
http://www.by-tor.com
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Failed Red Hat 9 Dependencies

2003-10-18 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 13:59 10/18/2003, you wrote:
Randy Chrismon wrote:
John Nichel wrote:

Randy Chrismon wrote:

I have the complete Red Hat 9 rpm database installed but I guess I just 
don't know how to query it. What provides libcrypto and libssl? 
Particularly the versions required by MySQL (libcrypto.0.9.6 and 
libssl.0.9.6)? I have both files on my system but they are version 
0.9.7. and MySQL doesn't seem to be interested in the later version.
Use rpm -qf filename to get what package a file belongs too.
I've tried but all it gets me is no such file or directory. I've also 
tried rpm -q --whatprovides to no avail.
Randy
Did you compile SSL from source, and not RPM by chance?
Kept the whole message since I couldn't readily see who said what.

rpm -qf /usr/bin/mrtg will tell me which of the installed packages owns 
this file. Which package is supposed to provide a file, whether or not it 
exists on the current system, is given (I think) by rpm -q 
--redhatprovides /usr/bin/mrtg. Check to see if that works, I'm not sure.

--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Dave Martini 1
I am trying to install a 3rd. party package and there are many dependencies.
What's the best way to find these packages that it needs?
I tried http://rpmfind.net and typed in some of the ones below
but some don't come up. Is the first column the actual name
of the package? Can I find these on the Red Hat website? Is there 
a way to have it automatically insall the dependencies?

rpm -i tora-1.3.9.2-1.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
libDCOP.so.4   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libgcc_s.so.1   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libkdecore.so.4   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libkdeprint.so.4   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libkdeui.so.4   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libkhtml.so.4   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libkio.so.4   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libkparts.so.2   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libqt-mt.so.3   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libstdc++.so.5   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2)   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2)   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1

Thank You
David Martini
LLNL


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 10:10 10/17/2003, you wrote:
I am trying to install a 3rd. party package and there are many dependencies.
What's the best way to find these packages that it needs?
up2date will automatically resolve all dependencies for Red Hat-supplied 
packages, and there are tools like yum, current, and apt-get which work in 
a similar way for third-party packages. I do not have any experience with 
them as yet, but I see apt-get (and its GUI front end, synaptic) mentioned 
very favorably on these lists all the time.

I tried http://rpmfind.net and typed in some of the ones below
but some don't come up.
In the first column you can also type the filename, like libkdecore.so.4 
and it should find which package provides that filename.

--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread hanfamily
 I am trying to install a 3rd. party package and there are many dependencies.
 What's the best way to find these packages that it needs?
 I tried http://rpmfind.net and typed in some of the ones below
 but some don't come up. Is the first column the actual name
 of the package? Can I find these on the Red Hat website? Is there 
 a way to have it automatically insall the dependencies?
 
 rpm -i tora-1.3.9.2-1.i386.rpm
 error: failed dependencies:
   libDCOP.so.4   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
   libgcc_s.so.1   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1

I don't know of a fast way but if you plug in the names one by one
with google it usually finds them for instance the first one
is part of kdelibs-3.1-0
  Linda


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Chris W. Parker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Friday, October 17, 2003 10:57 AM said:

 I don't know of a fast way but if you plug in the names one by one
 with google it usually finds them for instance the first one
 is part of kdelibs-3.1-0

I've dealt with this same issue (as I'm sure everyone has) and I have
one question: Are you saying that a person should install the entire
kdelibs-3.1-0 to get that one dependancy solved, or are you suggesting
to somehow extract that one file from the kdelibs tar?


Chris.

--
Don't like reformatting your Outlook replies? Now there's relief!
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 09:53:04AM -0700, Chris W. Parker wrote:
 
 kdelibs-3.1-0 to get that one dependancy solved, or are you suggesting
 to somehow extract that one file from the kdelibs tar?

That would not work, since the rpm database would not know about the
one file. It only knows about what is installed via rpm itself. 

-- 
Hal Burgiss
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Reuben D. Budiardja
On Friday 17 October 2003 12:53 pm, Chris W. Parker wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 on Friday, October 17, 2003 10:57 AM said:
  I don't know of a fast way but if you plug in the names one by one
  with google it usually finds them for instance the first one
  is part of kdelibs-3.1-0

 I've dealt with this same issue (as I'm sure everyone has) and I have
 one question: Are you saying that a person should install the entire
 kdelibs-3.1-0 to get that one dependancy solved
Yes, that's true

 or are you suggesting
 to somehow extract that one file from the kdelibs tar?

I don't think you can do that with RPM. RPM database only keep track of RPM 
packages, not files.
This is probably one of the shortcomings of RPM (or not, I don't know).

RDB

-- 
Reuben D. Budiardja
Department of Physics and Astronomy
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
-
To be a nemesis, you have to actively try to destroy 
something, don't you? Really, I'm not out to destroy 
Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional 
side effect.
 - Linus Torvalds -


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 10:53 10/17/2003, you wrote:
I've dealt with this same issue (as I'm sure everyone has) and I have
one question: Are you saying that a person should install the entire
kdelibs-3.1-0 to get that one dependancy solved, or are you suggesting
to somehow extract that one file from the kdelibs tar?
Dependencies deal with packages, not files. You need to install the package 
to make sure RPM knows that the dependency has been met.

--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Dave Martini 1
So let me see if I understand this.

The dependency called libDCOP.so.4

is part of the package called

kdelibs-3.1.4-3.src.rpm

And to just get that one dependency I have to download the package

kdelibs-3.1.4-3.src.rpm

And extract this one file from that package?

This can take some time if there are many dependencies.

David.

 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 17 09:43 PDT 2003
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
 List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Subscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list,
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Id: General Red Hat Linux discussion list redhat-list.redhat.com
 List-Unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list,
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Archive: https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/
 X-Original-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:56:57 -0500 (CDT)
 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:56:57 -0500 (CDT)
 
  I am trying to install a 3rd. party package and there are many dependencies.
  What's the best way to find these packages that it needs?
  I tried http://rpmfind.net and typed in some of the ones below
  but some don't come up. Is the first column the actual name
  of the package? Can I find these on the Red Hat website? Is there 
  a way to have it automatically insall the dependencies?
  
  rpm -i tora-1.3.9.2-1.i386.rpm
  error: failed dependencies:
  libDCOP.so.4   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
  libgcc_s.so.1   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
 
 I don't know of a fast way but if you plug in the names one by one
 with google it usually finds them for instance the first one
 is part of kdelibs-3.1-0
   Linda
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Rigler, Steve


 -Original Message-
 From: Dave Martini 1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:17 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???
 
 
 So let me see if I understand this.
 
 The dependency called libDCOP.so.4
 
 is part of the package called
 
 kdelibs-3.1.4-3.src.rpm
 
 And to just get that one dependency I have to download the package
 
 kdelibs-3.1.4-3.src.rpm
 
 And extract this one file from that package?
 
 This can take some time if there are many dependencies.
 
 David.
 

Easy solution:

up2date -i tora

This will resolve the dependencies for you.

-Steve


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 11:17 10/17/2003, you wrote:
So let me see if I understand this.

The dependency called libDCOP.so.4

is part of the package called

kdelibs-3.1.4-3.src.rpm

And to just get that one dependency I have to download the package

kdelibs-3.1.4-3.src.rpm

And extract this one file from that package?
No, you download and install the package. Or you use a tool (up2date, 
apt-get, depending on circumstance) which does this automatically for you. 
In this case, trying to install tora appears to require enough dependencies 
that your time will be better spent on learning apt-get, then using that to 
install tora.

--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Dave Martini 1
Steve, tora is a 3rd. party package it doesn't exist on 
the Red Hat Network.

up2date -i tora

Fetching package list for channel: redhat-advanced-server-i386...


Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: redhat-advanced-server-i386...


Fetching rpm headers...
None of the packages you requested were found, or they are already updated.


David.


 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 17 10:34 PDT 2003
 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
 content-class: urn:content-classes:message
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Subject: RE: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???
 X-MS-Has-Attach: 
 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
 Thread-Topic: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???
 Thread-Index: AcOU09NBghlbsvb8Taa82FYLBTaPDgAADMwA
 From: Rigler, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Oct 2003 17:29:09.0093 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C225150:01C394D4]
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com id 
 h9HHTFr28551
 X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
 List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Subscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list,
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Id: General Red Hat Linux discussion list redhat-list.redhat.com
 List-Unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list,
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Archive: https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/
 X-Original-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:29:08 -0500
 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:29:08 -0500
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Dave Martini 1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:17 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???
  
  
  So let me see if I understand this.
  
  The dependency called libDCOP.so.4
  
  is part of the package called
  
  kdelibs-3.1.4-3.src.rpm
  
  And to just get that one dependency I have to download the package
  
  kdelibs-3.1.4-3.src.rpm
  
  And extract this one file from that package?
  
  This can take some time if there are many dependencies.
  
  David.
  
 
 Easy solution:
 
 up2date -i tora
 
 This will resolve the dependencies for you.
 
 -Steve
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Bret Hughes
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 12:32, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
 At 11:17 10/17/2003, you wrote:
 So let me see if I understand this.
 
 The dependency called libDCOP.so.4
 
 is part of the package called
 
 kdelibs-3.1.4-3.src.rpm
 
 And to just get that one dependency I have to download the package
 
 kdelibs-3.1.4-3.src.rpm
 
 And extract this one file from that package?
 
 No, you download and install the package. Or you use a tool (up2date, 
 apt-get, depending on circumstance) which does this automatically for you. 
 In this case, trying to install tora appears to require enough dependencies 
 that your time will be better spent on learning apt-get, then using that to 
 install tora.
 

That assumes the tora package is available on an apt repository some
where doesn't it?  This is one of the reasons I built my own apt
repository.  This way I put an rpm in my apt RPMS.addons directory and
rebuild the apt database and then I can go apt-get install
whateverpackage and the dependencies are resolved and installed as well.

one way to locate the rpms you need is to install the rpmdb-redhat
package and use the --redhatprovides switch.  This wil read the rpmdb
that includes all the redhat packages.

I put all your deps into a file :

[EMAIL PROTECTED] bhughes]$ cat /tmp/tora.deps 
libDCOP.so.4   
libgcc_s.so.1 
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)  
libkdecore.so.4  
libkdeprint.so.4
libkdeui.so.4  
libkhtml.so.4
libkio.so.4
libkparts.so.2
libqt-mt.so.3
libstdc++.so.5
libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2)
libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bhughes]$ 


then ran this little oneliner (thisis on a rh7.3 box)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] bhughes]$ for dep in `cat /tmp/tora.deps`; do echo -n
$dep provided by ; rpm -q --redhatprovides $dep ;done
libDCOP.so.4 provided by kdelibs-3.0.0-10
libgcc_s.so.1 provided by no package provides libgcc_s.so.1
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) provided by no package provides
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)
libkdecore.so.4 provided by kdelibs-3.0.0-10
libkdeprint.so.4 provided by kdelibs-3.0.0-10
libkdeui.so.4 provided by kdelibs-3.0.0-10
libkhtml.so.4 provided by kdelibs-3.0.0-10
libkio.so.4 provided by kdelibs-3.0.0-10
libkparts.so.2 provided by kdelibs-3.0.0-10
libqt-mt.so.3 provided by qt-3.0.3-11
libstdc++.so.5 provided by no package provides libstdc++.so.5
libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2) provided by no package provides
libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2)
libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) provided by no package provides
libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2)


so looking at this kdelibs and qt are needed as well as a couple that
did not resolve most likely due to the note in parens

I'll leave to you to find those (I would remove the text in parens and
try that.

HTH

Bret

 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Dave Martini 1
Ok I downloaded apt-get. By the way I have Red Hat 
Enterprise AS 2.1 will the version of apt-get for Red Hat Linux 9
work ok? From what I understand version 9 and AS 2.1 are the same
other than the clustering and multi processor etc. What does the
i386 mean?

When I went  to install it I now have dependencies

# rpm -i apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
libelf.so.1   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
libgcc_s.so.1   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
librpm-4.2.so   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
librpmdb-4.2.so   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
librpmio-4.2.so   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
libstdc++.so.5   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2)   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2)   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2.2)   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1

So I checked on the first dependency on rpmfind.net and it also has
dependencies

# rpm -i glibc-2.3.2-27.9.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
glibc-common = 2.3.2-27.9 is needed by glibc-2.3.2-27.9
glibc  2.2.4 conflicts with glibc-common-2.2.4-32.8

This is frustrating!

David.

 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 17 10:37 PDT 2003
 X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mail.simpaticus.com
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From: Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???
 Mime-Version: 1.0
 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse 
 report
 X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - rita.choice-secure.com
 X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - redhat.com
 X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
 X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - simpaticus.com
 X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
 List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Subscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list,
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Id: General Red Hat Linux discussion list redhat-list.redhat.com
 List-Unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list,
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Archive: https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/
 X-Original-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:32:19 -0600
 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:32:19 -0600
 
 At 11:17 10/17/2003, you wrote:
 So let me see if I understand this.
 
 The dependency called libDCOP.so.4
 
 is part of the package called
 
 kdelibs-3.1.4-3.src.rpm
 
 And to just get that one dependency I have to download the package
 
 kdelibs-3.1.4-3.src.rpm
 
 And extract this one file from that package?
 
 No, you download and install the package. Or you use a tool (up2date, 
 apt-get, depending on circumstance) which does this automatically for you. 
 In this case, trying to install tora appears to require enough dependencies 
 that your time will be better spent on learning apt-get, then using that to 
 install tora.
 
 
 -- 
 Rodolfo J. Paiz
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 12:21 10/17/2003, you wrote:
Ok I downloaded apt-get. By the way I have Red Hat
Enterprise AS 2.1 will the version of apt-get for Red Hat Linux 9
work ok? From what I understand version 9 and AS 2.1 are the same
other than the clustering and multi processor etc. What does the
i386 mean?
Don't take my word for it, but I think AS2.1 is built on RHL-7.3 not 9. 
This might be a good part of your issues here.

--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 12:20 10/17/2003, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bhughes]$ for dep in `cat /tmp/tora.deps`; do echo -n
$dep provided by ; rpm -q --redhatprovides $dep ;done
libDCOP.so.4 provided by kdelibs-3.0.0-10
libgcc_s.so.1 provided by no package provides libgcc_s.so.1
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) provided by no package provides
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)
libkdecore.so.4 provided by kdelibs-3.0.0-10
libkdeprint.so.4 provided by kdelibs-3.0.0-10
libkdeui.so.4 provided by kdelibs-3.0.0-10
libkhtml.so.4 provided by kdelibs-3.0.0-10
libkio.so.4 provided by kdelibs-3.0.0-10
libkparts.so.2 provided by kdelibs-3.0.0-10
libqt-mt.so.3 provided by qt-3.0.3-11
libstdc++.so.5 provided by no package provides libstdc++.so.5
libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2) provided by no package provides
libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2)
libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) provided by no package provides
libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2)
So, at least he (who is the OP on this, anyway? I forgot) needs to get 
kdelibs and qt. I also checked and there is a libstdc++ package on one of 
my boxes, so he can check whether that package provides libstdc++.so..5. 
That ought to cure most of them.

To the OP: after getting kdelibs and qt (and checking whether libstdc++ 
solves the other) what is left as an unresolved dependency?

--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:10:21 -0700 (PDT), Dave Martini 1 wrote:

 I am trying to install a 3rd. party package and there are many dependencies.
 What's the best way to find these packages that it needs?

[I don't cover package tools like Yum or APT-RPM here.]

First of all, install the rpmdb-redhat package which contains a
complete RPM database of what is shipped with Red Hat Linux. When that
package is installed, rpm tells you the names of any packages you're
missing upon installation of a new package, provided that the package
is on your install CDs. Additionally, you can add option --aid which
would try to add any missing package automatically in order to solve
dependencies. It requires that you keep all rpms in current directory,
though.

- -- 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/kDov0iMVcrivHFQRAtWkAJ9g6//H6o8Pv0+BDEFZ9Lq2goPjoACfTnwV
fR+Iw7s9/a1PakNXSs5YPjU=
=kVDO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Rigler, Steve
Dave,

Assuming we're talking about the same Tora:

Name: tora Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1.3.9.2   Vendor: Red Hat, Inc.
Release : 1 Build Date: Mon 17 Feb 2003 07:28:46 AM CST
Install Date: Wed 08 Oct 2003 01:09:07 PM CDT  Build Host: porky.devel.redhat.com
Group   : Applications/DatabasesSource RPM: tora-1.3.9.2-1.src.rpm
Size: 11831882 License: GPL
Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Mon 24 Feb 2003 12:02:53 AM CST, Key ID 219180cddb42a60e
Packager: Red Hat, Inc. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla
URL : http://www.globecom.se/tora/
Summary : A GUI-based database development program.
Description :
Tora (Toolkit for Oracle - note that we do not ship the Oracle
plugin) is a GUI-based database development program, offering SQL
worksheets and a database browser.

Mine came with RH9.  It's probably not available for AS (yet).

-Steve

 -Original Message-
 From: Dave Martini 1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:41 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???
 
 
 Steve, tora is a 3rd. party package it doesn't exist on 
 the Red Hat Network.
 
 up2date -i tora
 
 Fetching package list for channel: redhat-advanced-server-i386...
 
 
 Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: redhat-advanced-server-i386...
 
 
 Fetching rpm headers...
 None of the packages you requested were found, or they are 
 already updated.
 
 
 David.
 
 
  From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 17 10:34 PDT 2003
  X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
  content-class: urn:content-classes:message
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  Subject: RE: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???
  X-MS-Has-Attach: 
  X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
  Thread-Topic: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???
  Thread-Index: AcOU09NBghlbsvb8Taa82FYLBTaPDgAADMwA
  From: Rigler, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Oct 2003 17:29:09.0093 (UTC) 
 FILETIME=[2C225150:01C394D4]
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
  X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
 int-mx1.corp.redhat.com id h9HHTFr28551
  X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
  List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  List-Subscribe: 
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list,
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  List-Id: General Red Hat Linux discussion list 
 redhat-list.redhat.com
  List-Unsubscribe: 
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list,
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  List-Archive: https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/
  X-Original-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:29:08 -0500
  Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:29:08 -0500
  
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Dave Martini 1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:17 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???
   
   
   So let me see if I understand this.
   
   The dependency called libDCOP.so.4
   
   is part of the package called
   
   kdelibs-3.1.4-3.src.rpm
   
   And to just get that one dependency I have to download the package
   
   kdelibs-3.1.4-3.src.rpm
   
   And extract this one file from that package?
   
   This can take some time if there are many dependencies.
   
   David.
   
  
  Easy solution:
  
  up2date -i tora
  
  This will resolve the dependencies for you.
  
  -Steve
  
  
  -- 
  redhat-list mailing list
  unsubscribe 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
  
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 12:51 10/17/2003, you wrote:
Dave,

Assuming we're talking about the same Tora:

Name: tora Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1.3.9.2   Vendor: Red Hat, Inc.
Release : 1 Build Date: Mon 17 Feb 2003 
07:28:46 AM CST

Mine came with RH9.  It's probably not available for AS (yet).
Perhaps then the OP could also benefit  by taking the SRPM and rebuilding 
for his system?

--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Jason Dixon
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 14:21, Dave Martini 1 wrote:
 Ok I downloaded apt-get. By the way I have Red Hat 
 Enterprise AS 2.1 will the version of apt-get for Red Hat Linux 9
 work ok? From what I understand version 9 and AS 2.1 are the same
 other than the clustering and multi processor etc. What does the
 i386 mean?

AS 2.1 is built off of RH 7.2, IIRC.  It might have errata (update 2,
perhaps?) build off of 7.3.  I've never heard of anyone providing apt or
yum repositories for anything RHEL, since only Red Hat distributes
binary rpms for the Enterprise stuff.

 When I went  to install it I now have dependencies
 
 # rpm -i apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1.i386.rpm
 error: failed dependencies:
   libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
   libelf.so.1   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
   libgcc_s.so.1   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
   libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
   librpm-4.2.so   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
   librpmdb-4.2.so   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
   librpmio-4.2.so   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
   libstdc++.so.5   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
   libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2)   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
   libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2)   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
   libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2.2)   is needed by apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
 
 So I checked on the first dependency on rpmfind.net and it also has
 dependencies
 
 # rpm -i glibc-2.3.2-27.9.i386.rpm
 error: failed dependencies:
   glibc-common = 2.3.2-27.9 is needed by glibc-2.3.2-27.9
   glibc  2.2.4 conflicts with glibc-common-2.2.4-32.8
 
 This is frustrating!

No disrespect, but if you don't have the stomach for it, you probably
shouldn't a) be using tora or b) be using Red Hat.  Don't blame the
platform (IMO) for the way the package maintainer (tora) distributes the
software.  It's pretty obvious that you're unfamiliar with the
versioning between the various distributions, you're bound to break
something very soon.

It would save us all a lot of traffic volume and wasted time if you want
to just give me ssh access, and I'll install it for you.

-- 
Jason Dixon, RHCE
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Rigler, Steve


 -Original Message-
 From: Rodolfo J. Paiz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 1:43 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???
 
 
 At 12:21 10/17/2003, you wrote:
 Ok I downloaded apt-get. By the way I have Red Hat
 Enterprise AS 2.1 will the version of apt-get for Red Hat Linux 9
 work ok? From what I understand version 9 and AS 2.1 are the same
 other than the clustering and multi processor etc. What does the
 i386 mean?
 
 Don't take my word for it, but I think AS2.1 is built on 
 RHL-7.3 not 9. 
 This might be a good part of your issues here.
 
 
 -- 
 Rodolfo J. Paiz
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AFAIK, AS2.1 is built on 7.2.  We run SGI Propack 2.2.1, which is
based on AS2.1.  The kde and qt packages are all prehistoric:

$ rpm -q kdelibs
kdelibs-2.2.2-7
$ rpm -q qt
qt-2.3.1-7

I usually avoid installing newer RPM's simply because of the dependency
issues and the risk to altering the base OS.

In cases like this I would download the source (not src.rpm's...they usually
barf on dependencies too) and build it from scratch.

-Steve


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Dave Martini 1
Hi thank I do already have that package installed

# pm -qa|grep rpmdb
rpmdb-redhat-9-0.20030313

David


 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 17 11:53 PDT 2003
 From: Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???
 Mime-Version: 1.0
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
 List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Subscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list,
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Id: General Red Hat Linux discussion list redhat-list.redhat.com
 List-Unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list,
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List-Archive: https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/
 X-Original-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:51:27 +0200
 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:51:27 +0200
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:10:21 -0700 (PDT), Dave Martini 1 wrote:
 
  I am trying to install a 3rd. party package and there are many dependencies.
  What's the best way to find these packages that it needs?
 
 [I don't cover package tools like Yum or APT-RPM here.]
 
 First of all, install the rpmdb-redhat package which contains a
 complete RPM database of what is shipped with Red Hat Linux. When that
 package is installed, rpm tells you the names of any packages you're
 missing upon installation of a new package, provided that the package
 is on your install CDs. Additionally, you can add option --aid which
 would try to add any missing package automatically in order to solve
 dependencies. It requires that you keep all rpms in current directory,
 though.
 
 - -- 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQE/kDov0iMVcrivHFQRAtWkAJ9g6//H6o8Pv0+BDEFZ9Lq2goPjoACfTnwV
 fR+Iw7s9/a1PakNXSs5YPjU=
 =kVDO
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


SUMMARY: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Dave Martini 1
Hi and thanks to everyone that replied to my message there were
many of you. I learned from your replies that the RH 9 version
of  tora that I had originally downloaded would probably cause
me problems on RH AS 2.1 since this version is based on 7.3.

I coudln't find a version of tora for 7.3 so I rebuilt
it from the source with a 

rpmbuild --rebuild tora-1.3.9.2-1.i386.src.rpm

This worked.

I then did a configure and make and make install and that worked.

It installed it  in /usr/local/bin/tora and I can  fire up the
GUI on my RH AS machine.

Here is my original question

I am trying to install a 3rd. party package and there are many dependencies.
What's the best way to find these packages that it needs?
I tried http://rpmfind.net and typed in some of the ones below
but some don't come up. Is the first column the actual name
of the package? Can I find these on the Red Hat website? Is there 
a way to have it automatically insall the dependencies?

rpm -i tora-1.3.9.2-1.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
libDCOP.so.4   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libgcc_s.so.1   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libkdecore.so.4   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libkdeprint.so.4   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libkdeui.so.4   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libkhtml.so.4   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libkio.so.4   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libkparts.so.2   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libqt-mt.so.3   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libstdc++.so.5   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2)   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1
libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2)   is needed by tora-1.3.9.2-1

Thank You
David Martini
LLNL


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: SUMMARY: What's the easiest way to deal with dependencies???

2003-10-17 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:51:37 -0700 (PDT), Dave Martini 1 wrote:

 Hi and thanks to everyone that replied to my message there were
 many of you. I learned from your replies that the RH 9 version
 of  tora that I had originally downloaded would probably cause
 me problems on RH AS 2.1 since this version is based on 7.3.

You have learned also that you should have added more details to your
original posting. In particular, you should have mentioned the
distribution versions.

- -- 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/kK/C0iMVcrivHFQRAqLRAJ9PxqjUZdzqIEzthR/5MPZps23PSACeJiSD
zVSg8bJSuOuEUF1r5X2rxek=
=rFl3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


up2date upgrade failed dependencies

2003-09-06 Thread Jay Moore
i attempted to upgrade up2date for the new certificate.
i downloaded to rpm (not srpm) for RH8 and verified the MD5sum
after following the instructions on the red hat network site (rpm -Fvh 
up2date-*)
i get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jay81]# rpm -Fvh up2date-*
error: Failed dependencies:
   up2date = 3.0.7.2 is needed by up2date-gnome-3.0.7.2-1
i then did

[EMAIL PROTECTED] jay81]# rpm -q up2date
up2date-3.0.7.1-2
am i missing something?  i've kept my system fully updated.  

any help greatly appreciated.
thanks
Jay


--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: up2date upgrade failed dependencies

2003-09-06 Thread Edwin Robertson
You'll need to upgrade both up2date and up2date-gnome.


Shamelsss Advertisement
Issue-Tracker Support System
Project Page: http://sourcforge.net/projects/issue-tracker
Donations: http://donations.tuxmonkey.com/
/Shameless Advertisement
- Original Message - 
From: Jay Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 2:38 AM
Subject: up2date upgrade failed dependencies


 i attempted to upgrade up2date for the new certificate.
 i downloaded to rpm (not srpm) for RH8 and verified the MD5sum
 after following the instructions on the red hat network site (rpm -Fvh 
 up2date-*)
 i get
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay81]# rpm -Fvh up2date-*
 error: Failed dependencies:
 up2date = 3.0.7.2 is needed by up2date-gnome-3.0.7.2-1
 i then did
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay81]# rpm -q up2date
 up2date-3.0.7.1-2
 
 am i missing something?  i've kept my system fully updated.  
 
 any help greatly appreciated.
 thanks
 Jay
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: up2date upgrade failed dependencies

2003-09-06 Thread Otto Haliburton
You must update both at the same time.  Ie

Rpm -Fvh rpm1 rpm2 ...

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edwin Robertson
 Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 1:41 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: up2date upgrade failed dependencies
 
 You'll need to upgrade both up2date and up2date-gnome.
 
 
 Shamelsss Advertisement
 Issue-Tracker Support System
 Project Page: http://sourcforge.net/projects/issue-tracker
 Donations: http://donations.tuxmonkey.com/
 /Shameless Advertisement
 - Original Message -
 From: Jay Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 2:38 AM
 Subject: up2date upgrade failed dependencies
 
 
  i attempted to upgrade up2date for the new certificate.
  i downloaded to rpm (not srpm) for RH8 and verified the MD5sum
  after following the instructions on the red hat network site (rpm -
 Fvh
  up2date-*)
  i get
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay81]# rpm -Fvh up2date-*
  error: Failed dependencies:
  up2date = 3.0.7.2 is needed by up2date-gnome-3.0.7.2-1
  i then did
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay81]# rpm -q up2date
  up2date-3.0.7.1-2
 
  am i missing something?  i've kept my system fully updated.
 
  any help greatly appreciated.
  thanks
  Jay
 
 
 
 
  --
  redhat-list mailing list
  unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 
 
 --
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: up2date upgrade failed dependencies

2003-09-06 Thread Jay Moore
so i downloaded the up2date and up2date-gnome files from the redhat 
network. when i do [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay81]# rpm -Fvh 
up2date-3.1.23.2-1.i386.rpm up2date-gnome-3.0.7.2-1.i386.rpm i get 
error: Failed dependencies: python = 2.2.2 is needed by 
up2date-3.1.23.2-1 rhpl = 0.81-2 is needed by up2date-3.1.23.2-1 
up2date = 3.0.7.2 is needed by up2date-gnome-3.0.7.2-1 redhat network 
says the most up to date python is 2.2.1-17 which i have [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
jay81]# rpm -q python python-2.2.1-17 so now i'm very confused. i have a 
dependency on a package that I can't even download yet? is redhat 
providing incorrect rpms? thanks for any help Jay Message: 26 From: 
Otto Haliburton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: up2date upgrade failed 
dependencies Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 06:08:51 -0500 Reply-To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] You must update both at the same time. Ie Rpm 
-Fvh rpm1 rpm2 ...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edwin Robertson
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 1:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: up2date upgrade failed dependencies
You'll need to upgrade both up2date and up2date-gnome.

Shamelsss Advertisement
Issue-Tracker Support System
Project Page: http://sourcforge.net/projects/issue-tracker
Donations: http://donations.tuxmonkey.com/
/Shameless Advertisement
- Original Message -
From: Jay Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 2:38 AM
Subject: up2date upgrade failed dependencies

 

 i attempted to upgrade up2date for the new certificate.
 i downloaded to rpm (not srpm) for RH8 and verified the MD5sum
 after following the instructions on the red hat network site (rpm -
   

Fvh
 

 up2date-*)
 i get
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay81]# rpm -Fvh up2date-*
 error: Failed dependencies:
 up2date = 3.0.7.2 is needed by up2date-gnome-3.0.7.2-1
 i then did

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay81]# rpm -q up2date
 up2date-3.0.7.1-2

 am i missing something?  i've kept my system fully updated.

 any help greatly appreciated.
 thanks
 Jay




 



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: up2date upgrade failed dependencies

2003-09-06 Thread Otto Haliburton
I don't think you downloaded the packages for your distribution.  There
are different packages for each distribution.  It looks like you
downloaded the one for RH9 which I can verify works.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Moore
 Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 12:44 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: up2date upgrade failed dependencies
 
 so i downloaded the up2date and up2date-gnome files from the redhat
 network. when i do [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay81]# rpm -Fvh
 up2date-3.1.23.2-1.i386.rpm up2date-gnome-3.0.7.2-1.i386.rpm i get
 error: Failed dependencies: python = 2.2.2 is needed by
 up2date-3.1.23.2-1 rhpl = 0.81-2 is needed by up2date-3.1.23.2-1
 up2date = 3.0.7.2 is needed by up2date-gnome-3.0.7.2-1 redhat network
 says the most up to date python is 2.2.1-17 which i have [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 jay81]# rpm -q python python-2.2.1-17 so now i'm very confused. i have
 a
 dependency on a package that I can't even download yet? is redhat
 providing incorrect rpms? thanks for any help Jay Message: 26 From:
 Otto Haliburton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: up2date upgrade failed
 dependencies Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 06:08:51 -0500 Reply-To:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You must update both at the same time. Ie Rpm
 -Fvh rpm1 rpm2 ...
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edwin Robertson
  Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 1:41 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: up2date upgrade failed dependencies
 
  You'll need to upgrade both up2date and up2date-gnome.
 
 
  Shamelsss Advertisement
  Issue-Tracker Support System
  Project Page: http://sourcforge.net/projects/issue-tracker
  Donations: http://donations.tuxmonkey.com/
  /Shameless Advertisement
  - Original Message -
  From: Jay Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 2:38 AM
  Subject: up2date upgrade failed dependencies
 
 
 
 
   i attempted to upgrade up2date for the new certificate.
   i downloaded to rpm (not srpm) for RH8 and verified the MD5sum
   after following the instructions on the red hat network site
 (rpm -
 
 
  Fvh
 
 
   up2date-*)
   i get
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay81]# rpm -Fvh up2date-*
   error: Failed dependencies:
   up2date = 3.0.7.2 is needed by up2date-gnome-3.0.7.2-1
   i then did
  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay81]# rpm -q up2date
   up2date-3.0.7.1-2
  
   am i missing something?  i've kept my system fully updated.
  
   any help greatly appreciated.
   thanks
   Jay
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 --
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Dependencies problem!

2003-08-14 Thread Paul Fabre Jimenez
Hi folks please help!

I have a RH Linux 7.3 box and i wanted to upgrade my sendmail 8.11 to
the 8.12.x.x (the latest) when i tried to install the package using RPM
it said that i needed the glibc 2.3.x to install it properly so i
downloaded the glibc-common and glibc-2.3.x.x and the rpm reported a
conflict with the existing glibc 2.2.34 that i had previously installed.


I had the brilliant idea to uninstall the older glibc's components
with the --nodeps parameter to disregard the dependiencies and install
the newest but for my unpleasant surprise, several xinetd services
stopped working, looking for .so.x shared libraries that are still
present on the system! 

I could finally install my sendmail 8.12.x.x but now several of my
xinetd daemons such as the ipop3d are damaged and worse, the X operating
system cannot start looking for libXmmu.x libraries that are still
present in the system but can't be found and i don't know why.. I tried
to reinstall the original glibc 2.2.x but it didn't work.. I don't want
to reinstall my Linux again because i'd have to do a lot of
configurations and i dont want that. I have lost the graphical
capabilities of my computer and also the execution of important services
like the POP3.

How can i restore the original dependencies and make my linux box work
again without a complete reinstallation?

Please help me!

Thank you in advance,

- Paul.


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Dependencies problem!

2003-08-14 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:43:44PM -0500, Paul Fabre Jimenez wrote:
 
 How can i restore the original dependencies and make my linux box work
 again without a complete reinstallation?

Do a custom upgrade, and deselect whatever packages you don't want to
re-install. Make sure your backups are up to date first, just in case.

-- 
Hal Burgiss
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Dependencies problem!

2003-08-04 Thread Jason Dixon
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 21:43, Paul Fabre Jimenez wrote:

 I had the brilliant idea to uninstall the older glibc's components
 with the --nodeps parameter to disregard the dependiencies and install
 the newest but for my unpleasant surprise, several xinetd services
 stopped working, looking for .so.x shared libraries that are still
 present on the system! 

OMG, I've fallen and I can't get up!  I'm sorry... couldn't help
myself.  I can't believe you did what you did.  Just about everything
that *is* your operating system is compiled from these libraries. 
Without glibc, you're screwed.

Well, this is what rescue disks are for.  I don't think this will work
since (what would normally be) your chrooted glibc is toast.  Try this
anyways, maybe you can alternatively use an rpm --prefix option or
something.

abbreviated version
Grab your 7.3, boot it up, ask for rescue mode.  Mount your hard drives
chrooted via bash and reinstall your rpms.
/abbreviated version

1) Slap your 7.3 CD into your system.  Boot it.
2) Choose rescue mode.
3) Mount your hard drive partitions onto a temporary mount point.  If
you had /boot, /, and /home on a primary IDE drive, you might do
something like this (assuming hda5 == /, hda6 == /home, hdc == cdrom,
and you're using ext3):

$ mkdir /mnt/rescue
$ mkdir /mnt/rescue/home
$ mkdir /mnt/rescue/mnt
$ mkdir /mnt/rescue/mnt/cdrom
$ mount -text3 /dev/hda5 /mnt/rescue
$ mount -text3 /dev/hda6 /mnt/rescue/home
$ mount -tiso9660 /dev/hdc /mnt/rescue/mnt/cdrom
$ chroot /mnt/rescue /bin/bash
$ rpm -ivh /mnt/cdrom/.../RedHat/RPMS/glibc*

I'm not sure this is exactly right, but it should get you close enough. 
I've managed to avoid deleting my required libraries for some time now,
so this hasn't been necessary.  ;-)

Worst case, rather than chrooting and installing via the rpm command,
you could use rpm2cpio to extract your glibc files and manually copy
them over to the mounted partitions.

Good Luck!

-- 
Jason Dixon, RHCE
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


failed dependencies

2003-07-28 Thread Haley Crowe
Hello all.  I'm trying to a couple packages on my Linux system, and I
keep getting an error about a failed dependency saying that libcurl.so.2
  (and several other .so files)  is needed.  What is that?  What is an
.so file?  

Thanks!!

HCC


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: failed dependencies

2003-07-28 Thread David Hart
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 08:07, Haley Crowe wrote:
 Hello all.  I'm trying to a couple packages on my Linux system, and I
 keep getting an error about a failed dependency saying that libcurl.so.2
   (and several other .so files)  is needed.  What is that?  What is an
 .so file?  
 
Input it here and it will tell you which packages you need (RedHat's
search is a bit idiosyncratic).

http://rpmfind.net/


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: failed dependencies

2003-07-28 Thread Haley Crowe


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/28/03 07:33AM 
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 08:07, Haley Crowe wrote:
 Hello all.  I'm trying to a couple packages on my Linux system, and
I
 keep getting an error about a failed dependency saying that
libcurl.so.2
   (and several other .so files)  is needed.  What is that?  What is
an
 .so file?  
 
Input it here and it will tell you which packages you need (RedHat's
search is a bit idiosyncratic).

http://rpmfind.net/ 

Great, I'll try that.  Thanks!!

HCC


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list 



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: failed dependencies

2003-07-28 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 07:07:12 -0500, Haley Crowe wrote:

 Hello all.  I'm trying to a couple packages on my Linux system, and I
 keep getting an error about a failed dependency saying that libcurl.so.2
   (and several other .so files)  is needed.  What is that?  What is an
 .so file?  

$ rpm --redhatprovides libcurl.so.2
curl-7.9.8-5

Tells you to install the package named curl to solve the
dependency. Roughly, a .so file is a program code library
(so is short for shared objects).

Depending on what couple of packages you tried to install, 
you might want to look into using a tool that solves the
dependencies for you, e.g. up2date, yum, apt-rpm, ...

- -- 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/JSZ90iMVcrivHFQRAvJIAJ96MukifFW2nl+U0Ko5WiVty7vj6QCeOFJd
LuuNKduSJRuacznGiJyOh3o=
=PKy/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Strange kernel-2.4.20-19.9 Dependencies

2003-07-28 Thread David Hart
I finally got around to updating this weekend. First I installed the
19.9 RPM and made sure that it was OK.

Then I recompiled the source for NTFS read support and made a few other
changes - eliminating some of the bloat. Added .NTFS to the version
number.

Reboot. Great. Works fine. 

While not essential, I went to delete 2.4.20-19.9 with an RPM -e and got
a list of dependencies. For example:

kernel = 2.2.0 is needed by (installed) libpcap-0.7.2-1

Figuring that RPM was confused I rebuilt the DB. Same result. This was
the exact same procedure that I used with 2.4.20-18.9 without a problem.

Now what?


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Strange kernel-2.4.20-19.9 Dependencies

2003-07-28 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hallo David,

 While not essential, I went to delete 2.4.20-19.9 with an RPM -e and got
 a list of dependencies. For example:
 
 kernel = 2.2.0 is needed by (installed) libpcap-0.7.2-1
 
 Figuring that RPM was confused I rebuilt the DB. Same result. This was
 the exact same procedure that I used with 2.4.20-18.9 without a problem.

 Are you telling us that your rpmdb did not contain any kernel entry 
after your upgrade to 2.4.20-18.9? That's more surprising to me than 
the fact that you can't remove the only kernel reference from the 
rpmdb.

 You could remove the kernel by ignoring the dependencies and 
afterwards add it using --justdb, so the kernel rpm will be gone, but 
you do have a reference to it in the rmpdb.

Bye,
Leonard.

--
How clean is a war when you shoot around nukelar waste?
Stop the use of depleted uranium ammo!
End all weapons of mass destruction.


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Strange kernel-2.4.20-19.9 Dependencies

2003-07-28 Thread David Hart
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 10:35, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:

  Are you telling us that your rpmdb did not contain any kernel entry 
 after your upgrade to 2.4.20-18.9? That's more surprising to me than 
 the fact that you can't remove the only kernel reference from the 
 rpmdb.
 
Yes. I am, Once I recompiled from source there was no reason to keep the
one installed from the RPM. I had no dependency issues when deleting
2.4.20-18.9. Strange. Perhaps I typed --nodeps and didn't realize it. Oh
well.

  You could remove the kernel by ignoring the dependencies and 
 afterwards add it using --justdb, so the kernel rpm will be gone, but 
 you do have a reference to it in the rmpdb.
 
Thanks.


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Strange kernel-2.4.20-19.9 Dependencies

2003-07-28 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 28 Jul 2003 09:41:46 -0400, David Hart wrote:

 I finally got around to updating this weekend. First I installed the
 19.9 RPM and made sure that it was OK.
 
 Then I recompiled the source for NTFS read support and made a few other
 changes - eliminating some of the bloat. Added .NTFS to the version
 number.
 
 Reboot. Great. Works fine. 
 
 While not essential, I went to delete 2.4.20-19.9 with an RPM -e and got
 a list of dependencies. For example:
 
 kernel = 2.2.0 is needed by (installed) libpcap-0.7.2-1
 
 Figuring that RPM was confused I rebuilt the DB. Same result. This was
 the exact same procedure that I used with 2.4.20-18.9 without a problem.
 
 Now what?

What is strange about system components requiring a kernel package
to be installed?

$ rpm -q --whatrequires kernel
tcpdump-3.7.2-1.9.1
quota-3.06-9
prelink-0.2.0-18
pciutils-2.1.10-7
libpcap-0.7.2-1
rp-pppoe-3.5-2
vconfig-1.6-2
shapecfg-2.2.12-13
nfs-utils-1.0.1-3.9
iptables-1.2.7a-2
[...]

If your customized kernel in non-rpm form is compatible with Red
Hat's kernel, this would be an opportunity to make good use of
rpm's --nodeps option upon erasing the last kernel package that
is left. But why don't you keep the stock kernel as a backup
kernel?

- -- 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/JT3z0iMVcrivHFQRAtciAJ9NAOntlReHjJZyuje6GofjRNSPrACbBGBe
vAiUIUyzt8GCD6fGftf7B9k=
=TP7+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Unsatisfied dependencies

2003-07-25 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:09:39 -0700, YoloIts wrote:

 Red Hat Up2date won't finish an update Xfree.
 
 When I run Up2date I get the message Test install failed because of package
 conflicts: packages
 XFree86-4.2.1-21 is already installed
 
 
 I ran rpm --verify --all and received the following message.
 
 
 
 Unsatisfied dependencies for XFree86-4.2.1-21: XFree86-xfs = 4.2.1-21,
 XFree86-libs = 4.2.1-21, XFree86-base-fonts = 4.2.1-21
 
 
 
 How do I resolve this problem?

First of all, note that you replied to an existing thread of
messages. Instead you should have composed a new message in order to
not disturb the threading.

On the command-line, what do you get for...?

  rpm -qa 'XFree*'
  up2date XFree86-libs XFree86-base-fonts XFree86-xfs

- -- 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/IURD0iMVcrivHFQRArdGAJ45/UQPGpNkqPnkt/i1ounBs6CjQwCghZRN
5O0h9i85zvXWaqq/gNMhY6A=
=G122
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Unsatisfied dependencies

2003-07-25 Thread YoloIts
On the command-line, what do you get for...?

  rpm -qa 'XFree*'
  up2date XFree86-libs XFree86-base-fonts XFree86-xfs


I get this:

root]# rpm -qa 'XFree*'

XFree86-Mesa-libGL-4.2.1-21

XFree86-4.2.1-20

XFree86-xauth-4.2.1-21

XFree86-truetype-fonts-4.2.1-21

XFree86-libs-4.2.1-20

XFree86-twm-4.2.1-21

XFree86-xfs-4.2.1-20

XFree86-tools-4.2.1-21

XFree86-Mesa-libGLU-4.2.1-21

XFree86-4.2.1-21

XFree86-100dpi-fonts-4.2.1-21

XFree86-75dpi-fonts-4.2.1-21

XFree86-font-utils-4.2.1-21

XFree86-base-fonts-4.2.1-20

XFree86-xdm-4.2.1-21


root# up2date XFree86-libs XFree86-base-fonts XFree86-xfs



Fetching package list for channel: redhat-linux-i386-8.0...





Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: redhat-linux-i386-8.0...





Fetching rpm headers...

##

Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies...



RPM package conflict error.  The message was:

Test install failed because of package conflicts:

package XFree86-4.2.1-21 is already installed



On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:09:39 -0700, YoloIts wrote:

 Red Hat Up2date won't finish an update Xfree.

 When I run Up2date I get the message Test install failed because of
package
 conflicts: packages
 XFree86-4.2.1-21 is already installed


 I ran rpm --verify --all and received the following message.



 Unsatisfied dependencies for XFree86-4.2.1-21: XFree86-xfs = 4.2.1-21,
 XFree86-libs = 4.2.1-21, XFree86-base-fonts = 4.2.1-21



 How do I resolve this problem?

First of all, note that you replied to an existing thread of
messages. Instead you should have composed a new message in order to
not disturb the threading.

On the command-line, what do you get for...?

  rpm -qa 'XFree*'
  up2date XFree86-libs XFree86-base-fonts XFree86-xfs


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Unsatisfied dependencies

2003-07-25 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 09:03:15 -0700, YoloIts wrote:

 On the command-line, what do you get for...?
 
   rpm -qa 'XFree*'
 
 
 I get this:
 
 root]# rpm -qa 'XFree*'

[regrouped]

 XFree86-Mesa-libGL-4.2.1-21
 XFree86-xauth-4.2.1-21
 XFree86-truetype-fonts-4.2.1-21
 XFree86-libs-4.2.1-20
 XFree86-twm-4.2.1-21
 XFree86-xfs-4.2.1-20
 XFree86-tools-4.2.1-21
 XFree86-Mesa-libGLU-4.2.1-21
 XFree86-100dpi-fonts-4.2.1-21
 XFree86-75dpi-fonts-4.2.1-21
 XFree86-font-utils-4.2.1-21
 XFree86-base-fonts-4.2.1-20
 XFree86-xdm-4.2.1-21
 XFree86-4.2.1-20
 XFree86-4.2.1-21

Watch those two last ones closely! Two conflicting installations of
the same package. Can you live without XFree86 for a short time? If
so, get rid of those two packages and then run up2date again in
text mode:

  rpm --erase --allmatches XFree86 --nodeps
  up2date XFree86-libs XFree86-base-fonts XFree86-xfs
 
- -- 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/IXMF0iMVcrivHFQRAhsYAJ9RnEhQdLLQ22POfhfmKiFeaDhlUACeMOmM
qjpW+m0IwuniFGQ+foH3hlw=
=eRLy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Unsatisfied dependencies

2003-07-24 Thread YoloIts
Red Hat Up2date won't finish an update Xfree.

When I run Up2date I get the message Test install failed because of package
conflicts: packages
XFree86-4.2.1-21 is already installed


I ran rpm --verify --all and received the following message.



Unsatisfied dependencies for XFree86-4.2.1-21: XFree86-xfs = 4.2.1-21,
XFree86-libs = 4.2.1-21, XFree86-base-fonts = 4.2.1-21



How do I resolve this problem?



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the best way to resolve RPM dependencies?

2003-07-20 Thread Audioslave - 7M3 - Live
hank wrote:
where can I get this red-carpet? program at?


this is part of ximian. (who made the evolution mail program). Try 
http://www.ximian.com --

I agree with the previous post. Red-carpet is a great rpm manager and 
system dependacy resolver.

You can opt to just subscribe to RH 9 for package retrieval or choose 
their version of the GNOME desktop. Them might be doing some work on 
improving the screen reader interactions or might be interested in 
starting to add these features within their development cycles.

ximian is sort of a GNOME multi-distribution with their own retrieval 
and rpm managers. They aren't really a distribution, as far as I have 
checked out the company.

Jim

--
No wonder you're tired!  You understood so much today.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


What's the best way to resolve RPM dependencies?

2003-07-19 Thread James Pifer
I'm trying to install an application, GOPchop, which needs gtk-config. I
believe this is part of one of the gtk devel rpms. 

Every time I try to install one of the devels it fails dependencies. Try
to install those and they fail depenecies and so on. 

All the RPMs I'm trying to install are in the RPMS directory. Is there
any way for RPM to automatically figure out which ones are needed and
install them as well? 

Is there a better way to accomplish this?

My searches on google did not give me what I hope is an existing easy
solution.

Thanks,
James


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the best way to resolve RPM dependencies?

2003-07-19 Thread John Aldrich
On Saturday 19 July 2003 08:44 pm, James Pifer wrote:
 I'm trying to install an application, GOPchop, which needs gtk-config. I
 believe this is part of one of the gtk devel rpms.

 Every time I try to install one of the devels it fails dependencies. Try
 to install those and they fail depenecies and so on.

 All the RPMs I'm trying to install are in the RPMS directory. Is there
 any way for RPM to automatically figure out which ones are needed and
 install them as well?

 Is there a better way to accomplish this?

 My searches on google did not give me what I hope is an existing easy
 solution.

use a package manager which can auto-detect and install the dependencies. 
IIRC, KPackage or one of the others should work. Or, you can use apt  and 
synaptic to get and install all the dependencies.
John


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the best way to resolve RPM dependencies?

2003-07-19 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 7/19/2003 20:44 -0400, you wrote:
I'm trying to install an application, GOPchop, which needs gtk-config. I
believe this is part of one of the gtk devel rpms.
up2date install GOPchop

works for me when I try to to install stuff from RedHat. It may or may not 
work for other stuff; give it a try, or man up2date.

--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the best way to resolve RPM dependencies?

2003-07-19 Thread Lorenzo Prince
Probably the best way to resolve dependencies automatically is throu apt or another 
program I
found called yum.  THe only drawback to these programs is that they download the
packages from the internet rather than using your existing CD's.  If you want to try 
apt, it
can be found at:

http://www.freshrpms.net

or to try yum you can find it at:

http://linux.duke.edu/projects/yum

HTH.

Lorenzo Prince
happy Red Hat 9 user ;)
-- 
Fatal Error: Found [MS-Windows] System - Repartitioning Disk for Linux...
(By [EMAIL PROTECTED], Christopher Browne)


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the best way to resolve RPM dependencies?

2003-07-19 Thread hank
thanks!!!
I could use these aplications


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the best way to resolve RPM dependencies?

2003-07-19 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Saturday 19 July 2003 20:02, John Aldrich wrote this in an attempt to 
be witty and informative:
snip
 use a package manager which can auto-detect and install the
 dependencies. IIRC, KPackage or one of the others should work. Or,

KPackage sucks.

 you can use apt  and synaptic to get and install all the
 dependencies.
   John

I strongly suggest using Red-Carpet. The best RPM package manager to 
date.

-- 
Wielder of the mighty +1 LARTsaber of Unsubscribe Instructions At End of
Message, the +3 Clue-by-Four of No Attachments to a Mailing List, and
the -4 Shield of No Spell Checker
http://joseph-a-nagy-jr.homelinux.org http://mc-luug.homelinux.org/


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the best way to resolve RPM dependencies?

2003-07-19 Thread hank
where can I get this red-carpet? program at?


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: What's the best way to resolve RPM dependencies?

2003-07-19 Thread Marty Buchaus
http://www.ximian.com
hank wrote:
where can I get this red-carpet? program at?

 



--
Marty Buchaus
CTO Big Sky Internet Inc. - http://www.bigskyinternet.com
RHCE (Red Hat Certified Engineer) - 807101943103186
ICQ 10579998 AIM snuffychi 



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Opera 7.11 failed dependencies: libXm.so.2/Redhat 9

2003-06-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 20 Jun 2003 20:41:38 -0400, Medhat Galal wrote:

 I found the solution later on yesterday. I just removed the openmotif
 package from my system. Then,  I reinstalled new one, openmotif21
 2.1.20-8 (the compatibility libraries for running Open Motif 2.1
 applications.).
 
 I then installed latest opera 7.11 rpm (shared QT) using rpm -ivh -force
 opera**.rpm
 
 it installed without a hitch.

You know what --force would do in case there were conflicts?

Don't use --force unless you have really good reason to do so,
which is rarely the case.

- -- 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+9E3Q0iMVcrivHFQRAiFLAJ4mooiTQXlTegxG/UP6nDDDLbteSwCeLScp
F2gCvTenQ6i9UTpb0zWlBq0=
=voHP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Opera 7.11 failed dependencies: libXm.so.2/Redhat 9

2003-06-20 Thread Medhat Galal
I found the solution later on yesterday. I just removed the openmotif
package from my system. Then,  I reinstalled new one, openmotif21
2.1.20-8 (the compatibility libraries for running Open Motif 2.1
applications.).

I then installed latest opera 7.11 rpm (shared QT) using rpm -ivh -force
opera**.rpm

it installed without a hitch.


Thanks guys for your response.
regards,
Medhat Galal 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Opera 7.11 failed dependencies: libXm.so.2/Redhat 9

2003-06-19 Thread Medhat Galal
Has any one tried to install Opera 7.11 on Redhat 9? I know it's not a
supported, But I don't see a reason why it shouldn't work. I have also
searched and googled a lot trying to find someone who tried doing so. I
have overcome most problems, however, I am getting dependency failure
for the motif library libXm.so.2. 

Any Ideas on how to point to the libXm.so.2 when using rpm?

Thanks in advance,
Medhat Galal


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Opera 7.11 failed dependencies: libXm.so.2/Redhat 9

2003-06-19 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 19 Jun 2003 12:20:28 -0400, Medhat Galal wrote:

 Has any one tried to install Opera 7.11 on Redhat 9? I know it's not a
 supported, But I don't see a reason why it shouldn't work. I have also
 searched and googled a lot trying to find someone who tried doing so. I
 have overcome most problems, however, I am getting dependency failure
 for the motif library libXm.so.2. 
 
 Any Ideas on how to point to the libXm.so.2 when using rpm?

What error do you get?


$ rpm --query opera
opera-7.11-20030515.1
$ rpm --query --whatprovides libXm.so.2
openmotif21-2.1.30-8

- -- 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+8ewt0iMVcrivHFQRAk5HAJ9JAP0Zb02a9zld5C/bQjJcRUIrRQCbBi+j
rdlw3OWwKn6blQFjO/U1F6Q=
=gaM0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Opera 7.11 failed dependencies: libXm.so.2/Redhat 9

2003-06-19 Thread rm
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 11:20, Medhat Galal wrote:
 Has any one tried to install Opera 7.11 on Redhat 9? I know it's not a
 supported, But I don't see a reason why it shouldn't work. I have also
 searched and googled a lot trying to find someone who tried doing so. I
 have overcome most problems, however, I am getting dependency failure
 for the motif library libXm.so.2. 
 
 Any Ideas on how to point to the libXm.so.2 when using rpm?

I had problems with this also.  I'm using Redhat 7.1 and it seemed that
the packaged motif library wasn't compatible with Opera.  I ended up
downloading a new motif rpm and installed it - then Opera installed with
no problem.

Maybe someone else has a better idea.

regis
-- 
rm [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Opera 7.11 failed dependencies: libXm.so.2/Redhat 9

2003-06-19 Thread Manuel Aróstegui Ramirez
apt-get install opera --fix-broken
;-)
 --- Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On 19 Jun 2003 12:20:28 -0400, Medhat Galal wrote:
 
  Has any one tried to install Opera 7.11 on Redhat
 9? I know it's not a
  supported, But I don't see a reason why it
 shouldn't work. I have also
  searched and googled a lot trying to find someone
 who tried doing so. I
  have overcome most problems, however, I am getting
 dependency failure
  for the motif library libXm.so.2. 
  
  Any Ideas on how to point to the libXm.so.2 when
 using rpm?
 
 What error do you get?
 
 
 $ rpm --query opera
 opera-7.11-20030515.1
 $ rpm --query --wh

atprovides libXm.so.2
 openmotif21-2.1.30-8
 
 - -- 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
 

iD8DBQE+8ewt0iMVcrivHFQRAk5HAJ9JAP0Zb02a9zld5C/bQjJcRUIrRQCbBi+j
 rdlw3OWwKn6blQFjO/U1F6Q=
 =gaM0
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list 

=
--

Manuel Aróstegui Linux user 200896

___
Yahoo! Sorteos  -  http://loteria.yahoo.es
Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Auto-Download Dependencies

2003-06-05 Thread Scott Taylor
does anyone know if there is a tool that I can install in Red Hat 9 that
when I'm installing something that it will go and grab the files it
needs??  Something that makes Linux work like FreeBSDs' package system?

I'm trying to install Ethereal and it refuses to install because it
needs me to install other things first.  Normally this isn't such a
problem however, it wants libcrypto.so.0.9.6.1, and when I Google for
it, I get openssl.  I installed openssl-0.9.7b and Ethereal still says
that it's not installed.

Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks in advance!!

Scott 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: Auto-Download Dependencies

2003-06-05 Thread Richard Humphrey
Did you try up2date ethereal?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Auto-Download Dependencies


does anyone know if there is a tool that I can install in Red Hat 9 that
when I'm installing something that it will go and grab the files it
needs??  Something that makes Linux work like FreeBSDs' package system?

I'm trying to install Ethereal and it refuses to install because it
needs me to install other things first.  Normally this isn't such a
problem however, it wants libcrypto.so.0.9.6.1, and when I Google for
it, I get openssl.  I installed openssl-0.9.7b and Ethereal still says
that it's not installed.

Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks in advance!!

Scott


--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE : Auto-Download Dependencies

2003-06-05 Thread Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL)
Personnay i use apt the debian tool to manage the package you can download it to :
http://apt.freshrpms.net/

it is very easy to use :
for examples if you want to install gpm you type :

apt-get install gpm

it would download and install gpm and all the dependancies it needs

at the first use  :

apt-get update

...and then

aptget-upgrade

apt will update first the source list of the archine and then upgrade th rpm which are 
not up2date

good luck
-Message d'origine-
De : Scott Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : mercredi 4 juin 2003 23:24
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Auto-Download Dependencies

does anyone know if there is a tool that I can install in Red Hat 9 that
when I'm installing something that it will go and grab the files it
needs??  Something that makes Linux work like FreeBSDs' package system?

I'm trying to install Ethereal and it refuses to install because it
needs me to install other things first.  Normally this isn't such a
problem however, it wants libcrypto.so.0.9.6.1, and when I Google for
it, I get openssl.  I installed openssl-0.9.7b and Ethereal still says
that it's not installed.

Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks in advance!!

Scott 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Auto-Download Dependencies

2003-06-05 Thread Michael Mansour
You can use up2date like:

up2date --solvedeps libcrypto.so

and that should grab you the package you need.

Michael.

--- Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 does anyone know if there is a tool that I can
 install in Red Hat 9 that
 when I'm installing something that it will go and
 grab the files it
 needs??  Something that makes Linux work like
 FreeBSDs' package system?
 
 I'm trying to install Ethereal and it refuses to
 install because it
 needs me to install other things first.  Normally
 this isn't such a
 problem however, it wants libcrypto.so.0.9.6.1, and
 when I Google for
 it, I get openssl.  I installed openssl-0.9.7b and
 Ethereal still says
 that it's not installed.
 
 Anyone have any ideas?
 
 Thanks in advance!!
 
 Scott 
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Transcode Dependencies [was cdrecord-ProDVD]

2003-06-04 Thread achillemiele
Alle 12:25, marted 03 giugno 2003, James Pifer ha scritto:
 Everything works great with dvdrecord except for two things.

 1) Is there a way to assign a volume label on the DVD? I don't see
 anything in the MAN page.

mkisofs -o image.iso -V volumelabel

 2) My DVD is a Pioneer DVR-105. It's supposed to write at 4x and I use
 speed equal 4, but it writes at 2. How do I get it to write at 4?

AFAIK it writes at higher speed possible: maybe you are using a 2x media (not 
supporting 4x, you cannot force writing speed with dvd-recorder if you use 
original firmware)

 Thanks,
 James

Achille


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Transcode Dependencies [was cdrecord-ProDVD]

2003-06-03 Thread James Pifer
I'm trying to load dvdrecord and it says it requires transcode.
transcode then says it requires a whole bunch of stuff. My system is a
Redhat 9 Everything install. What's the best way to find all these
dependencies?

Thanks,
James

[EMAIL PROTECTED] DVDRecord Tools - Linux]# rpm -ivh *.rpm
warning: transcode-0.6.1-2.i686.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
f9651d5a
error: Failed dependencies:
liba52.so.0 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libaviplay-0.7.so.0 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libdv.so.2 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libdvdread.so.2 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libfame-0.8.so.8 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libjbig.so.0 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
liblcms.so.1 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libmp3lame.so.0 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libmpeg2.so.0 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libmpeg3.so.1 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libplot.so.2 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libquicktime.so.1 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libstdc++.so.2.10 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libwmf-0.2.so.2 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
ImageMagick-libs is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
XFree86-DPS is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
a52dec-libs is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
avifile is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
jbigkit is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
lame-libs is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
lcms is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libdv is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libdvdread is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libfame is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libmpeg3 is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libplot is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
libwmf is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
mpeg2dec is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
quicktime4linux is needed by transcode-0.6.1-2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] DVDRecord Tools - Linux]#




-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Transcode Dependencies [was cdrecord-ProDVD]

2003-06-03 Thread Robert Keeney

Try http://freshrpms.net/

I would install apt first and then use apt to install transcode. You may also want to 
install the gpg key.
http://freshrpms.net/packages/RPM-GPG-KEY.txt

On 02 Jun 2003 11:56:41 -0400
James Pifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What's the best way to find all these
 dependencies?


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Transcode Dependencies [was cdrecord-ProDVD]

2003-06-03 Thread achillemiele
Alle 17:56, luned 02 giugno 2003, James Pifer ha scritto:
 I'm trying to load dvdrecord and it says it requires transcode.
 transcode then says it requires a whole bunch of stuff. My system is a
 Redhat 9 Everything install. What's the best way to find all these
 dependencies?

 Thanks,
 James

Sorry, I said you to use dvdrecord if you had problems with cdrecord-ProDVD.
I think you are trying to install another software (dvd::record, if I'm not 
wrong).
Try going here http://www.nongnu.org/dvdrtools/
Anyway I've found dvdrecord already installed in my RH9, so I think you could
already have it. Try typing dvdrecord in the shell


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Transcode Dependencies [was cdrecord-ProDVD]

2003-06-03 Thread David Hollister
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 08:56, James Pifer wrote:
 I'm trying to load dvdrecord and it says it requires transcode.
 transcode then says it requires a whole bunch of stuff. My system is a
 Redhat 9 Everything install. What's the best way to find all these
 dependencies?
 
 Thanks,
 James

http://rpmfind.net

Search for transcode, go to the version you want, then you can click on
each of the items in the list of dependencies and download what you
need.

-- 
David Hollister
Furthurnet - Free, legal P2P - share the tunes:  http://furthurnet.org


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Transcode Dependencies [was cdrecord-ProDVD]

2003-06-03 Thread James Pifer
Oops, it is already installed. Sorry. Don't suppose there are any GUI
front ends for it?

That's why I was trying to use xcdroast and cdrecord-ProDVD. Supposedly
it supports it, I just couldn't get it to work. 

On the dvdrecord side, I assume you use mkisofs to create an ISO of the
structure you're trying to burn, then use dvdrecord to write the ISO to
a DVD. I'll check out the sites you sent earlier about how to use it. 

Thanks,
James

On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 12:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Alle 17:56, luned 02 giugno 2003, James Pifer ha scritto:
  I'm trying to load dvdrecord and it says it requires transcode.
  transcode then says it requires a whole bunch of stuff. My system is a
  Redhat 9 Everything install. What's the best way to find all these
  dependencies?
 
  Thanks,
  James
 
 Sorry, I said you to use dvdrecord if you had problems with cdrecord-ProDVD.
 I think you are trying to install another software (dvd::record, if I'm not 
 wrong).
 Try going here http://www.nongnu.org/dvdrtools/
 Anyway I've found dvdrecord already installed in my RH9, so I think you could
 already have it. Try typing dvdrecord in the shell
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Transcode Dependencies [was cdrecord-ProDVD]

2003-06-03 Thread achillemiele
Alle 19:49, luned 02 giugno 2003, James Pifer ha scritto:
 Oops, it is already installed. Sorry. Don't suppose there are any GUI
 front ends for it?

 That's why I was trying to use xcdroast and cdrecord-ProDVD. Supposedly
 it supports it, I just couldn't get it to work.

 On the dvdrecord side, I assume you use mkisofs to create an ISO of the
 structure you're trying to burn, then use dvdrecord to write the ISO to
 a DVD. I'll check out the sites you sent earlier about how to use it.

 Thanks,
 James

Don't know about gui, but I can give you just what you need into two commands:

#mkisofs -dvd-video -o /home/user/image.img  /path/to/dvdhome
#dvdrecord speed=2 -dao -dev=0,0,0 /home/user/image.img

Meaning:-dvd-video (image in dvd video mode compatible, if you are not 
 
writing data but a film)
-o /home/user/image.img (where to save iso image file)
/path/to/dvdhome(where you have your dvd files, VIDEO_TS  
AUDIO_TS 
directories if a video dvd)

speed=2 (writing speed, also if it seems that always writes at faster 
available speed)
-dao (disk at once, also if it doesn't use that no problem)
-dev=0,0,0 (to find your correct type #dvdrecord -scanbus in the shell)
/home/user/image.img (iso image to write)

When it starts, it always gives me an error (like reported in the link) about 
'wrong startsect... -150' or something like that. Anyway the rusults are much 
better than any win solution (I've tried almost everyone)

Achille


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Transcode Dependencies [was cdrecord-ProDVD]

2003-06-03 Thread James Pifer
Since you've been so forthcoming, let me push my luck (and be a little
bit lazy), what would the command be for mkisofs if I just want to burn
a data DVD?

For example, I have a whole bunch of data I want to archive onto DVDs.
So let's say I have:
directory/data1
directory/data2
directory/data3
directory/data4

What would the command be to to burn data1 and data2 directories to a
DVD?

Thanks for all your assistance. I am interested in burning some old home
movies to, so at some point I'll have to tackle how to create the dvd
video files. 

Thanks again,
James

On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 14:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Alle 19:49, luned 02 giugno 2003, James Pifer ha scritto:
  Oops, it is already installed. Sorry. Don't suppose there are any GUI
  front ends for it?
 
  That's why I was trying to use xcdroast and cdrecord-ProDVD. Supposedly
  it supports it, I just couldn't get it to work.
 
  On the dvdrecord side, I assume you use mkisofs to create an ISO of the
  structure you're trying to burn, then use dvdrecord to write the ISO to
  a DVD. I'll check out the sites you sent earlier about how to use it.
 
  Thanks,
  James
 
 Don't know about gui, but I can give you just what you need into two commands:
 
 #mkisofs -dvd-video -o /home/user/image.img  /path/to/dvdhome
 #dvdrecord speed=2 -dao -dev=0,0,0 /home/user/image.img
 
 Meaning:  -dvd-video (image in dvd video mode compatible, if you are not 
  
 writing data but a film)
   -o /home/user/image.img (where to save iso image file)
   /path/to/dvdhome(where you have your dvd files, VIDEO_TS  
 AUDIO_TS 
 directories if a video dvd)
 
   speed=2 (writing speed, also if it seems that always writes at faster 
 available speed)
   -dao (disk at once, also if it doesn't use that no problem)
   -dev=0,0,0 (to find your correct type #dvdrecord -scanbus in the shell)
   /home/user/image.img (iso image to write)
 
 When it starts, it always gives me an error (like reported in the link) about 
 'wrong startsect... -150' or something like that. Anyway the rusults are much 
 better than any win solution (I've tried almost everyone)
 
 Achille
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Transcode Dependencies [was cdrecord-ProDVD]

2003-06-03 Thread achillemiele
Alle 21:03, luned 02 giugno 2003, James Pifer ha scritto:
 Since you've been so forthcoming, let me push my luck (and be a little
 bit lazy), what would the command be for mkisofs if I just want to burn
 a data DVD?

 For example, I have a whole bunch of data I want to archive onto DVDs.
 So let's say I have:
 directory/data1
 directory/data2
 directory/data3
 directory/data4

 What would the command be to to burn data1 and data2 directories to a
 DVD?

 Thanks for all your assistance. I am interested in burning some old home
 movies to, so at some point I'll have to tackle how to create the dvd
 video files.

 Thanks again,
 James

#mkisofs -o image.iso -x directory/data3 directory/data4 directory
#dvdrecord speed=x -dao -dev=0,0,0 image.iso

As you can see, I exclude the directories I don't need from the source dir 
(directory/). Before burning you could use

#isoinfo -i image.iso -l

to see the structure.

Achille


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Transcode Dependencies [was cdrecord-ProDVD]

2003-06-03 Thread James Pifer
Everything works great with dvdrecord except for two things.

1) Is there a way to assign a volume label on the DVD? I don't see
anything in the MAN page.

2) My DVD is a Pioneer DVR-105. It's supposed to write at 4x and I use
speed equal 4, but it writes at 2. How do I get it to write at 4?

Thanks,
James

On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 16:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Alle 21:03, luned 02 giugno 2003, James Pifer ha scritto:
  Since you've been so forthcoming, let me push my luck (and be a little
  bit lazy), what would the command be for mkisofs if I just want to burn
  a data DVD?
 
  For example, I have a whole bunch of data I want to archive onto DVDs.
  So let's say I have:
  directory/data1
  directory/data2
  directory/data3
  directory/data4
 
  What would the command be to to burn data1 and data2 directories to a
  DVD?
 
  Thanks for all your assistance. I am interested in burning some old home
  movies to, so at some point I'll have to tackle how to create the dvd
  video files.
 
  Thanks again,
  James
 
 #mkisofs -o image.iso -x directory/data3 directory/data4 directory
 #dvdrecord speed=x -dao -dev=0,0,0 image.iso
 
 As you can see, I exclude the directories I don't need from the source dir 
 (directory/). Before burning you could use
 
 #isoinfo -i image.iso -l
 
 to see the structure.
 
 Achille
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: finding rpm dependencies

2003-06-02 Thread Jonathan Michael Nowacki
You can also try 
rpm -qR file
this command lists the components that package depends on. (such as
libraries and commands)

Hope that helps. :-)

On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 note down the file required for dependencies and then go to www.rpmseek.com and 
 search the corresponding rpm package for the file.
 
 Nabin Limbu
 
 On 1 Jun 2003 at 14:19, Suryaman Maharjan wrote:
 
  hi all! 
  
  while insatlling rpm i get the message: failed dependencies
  trying rpmfind command following message is delivered:
  
  Cannot install or locate resource
  Do you want to search it in the catalog? [Y/n]:
  
  what's the another way to find the dependencies?
  
  regards,
  Maharjan, S.
  
  
  -- 
  redhat-list mailing list
  unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 
 
 With Regards
 Nabin Limbu
 Program Officer
 HealthNet Nepal
 Ph : 977-1-429722
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 
 
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


finding rpm dependencies

2003-06-01 Thread Suryaman Maharjan
hi all! 

while insatlling rpm i get the message: failed dependencies
trying rpmfind command following message is delivered:

Cannot install or locate resource
Do you want to search it in the catalog? [Y/n]:

what's the another way to find the dependencies?

regards,
Maharjan, S.


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: finding rpm dependencies

2003-06-01 Thread nlimbu
note down the file required for dependencies and then go to www.rpmseek.com and 
search the corresponding rpm package for the file.

Nabin Limbu

On 1 Jun 2003 at 14:19, Suryaman Maharjan wrote:

 hi all! 
 
 while insatlling rpm i get the message: failed dependencies
 trying rpmfind command following message is delivered:
 
 Cannot install or locate resource
 Do you want to search it in the catalog? [Y/n]:
 
 what's the another way to find the dependencies?
 
 regards,
 Maharjan, S.
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


With Regards
Nabin Limbu
Program Officer
HealthNet Nepal
Ph : 977-1-429722


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Dependencies issue

2003-05-30 Thread Mathieu Masse




I am knew to Linux so this might be an easy one,

I installed Red Hat 9.0 this weekend and now when I try to install packages using the add/remove tool and get weird dependencies.

Here is what I am trying to install:

 Development Tools: automake, gcc, etc..
 X Software Development

I get the following dependencies:

 krb5-libs = 1.2.7-10 Required by krb5-devel
 openssl = 0.9.7a-2 Required by openssl-devel

The thing I dont get is that when I try to install those 2 packages it tells me that they are already installed, newer versions.

 What do I do?




Mathieu Mass M.SC.

The whole of science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday thinking. -- Albert Einstein








RE: Dependencies issue

2003-05-30 Thread Karim Nowruzi









May be you should rebuild the rpm database
(see the man pages for rpm)

Another option is to uninstall these 2
packages and then try to install them again.







-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mathieu Masse
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 8:39
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dependencies issue



I am knew to Linux so this might be an easy one,

I installed Red Hat 9.0 this weekend and now when I try to install packages
using the add/remove tool and get weird dependencies.

Here is what I am trying to install:

 Development Tools: automake, gcc, etc..
 X Software Development

I get the following dependencies:

 krb5-libs = 1.2.7-10 Required by
krb5-devel
 openssl = 0.9.7a-2 Required by
openssl-devel

The thing I dont get is that when I try to install those 2 packages it tells me
that they are already installed, newer versions.

 What do I do?


 
  
  Mathieu Massé M.SC.
  
  The whole of science is
  nothing more than a refinement of everyday thinking. -- Albert Einstein
  
  
 











Re: Dependencies issue

2003-05-30 Thread Matthew Saltzman
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Mathieu Masse wrote:

 I am knew to Linux so this might be an easy one,

I knew you were new...


 I installed Red Hat 9.0 this weekend and now when I try to install
 packages using the add/remove tool and get weird dependencies.

 Here is what I am trying to install:

 Development Tools: automake, gcc, etc..
 X Software Development

 I get the following dependencies:

 krb5-libs = 1.2.7-10Required by krb5-devel
 openssl = 0.9.7a-2Required by openssl-devel

 The thing I dont get is that when I try to install those 2 packages it
 tells me that they are already installed, newer versions.

 What do I do?

You probably ran up2date at some point (good for you) and got newer
versions of krb5-libs and openssl.  Your simplest bet is to ask up2date to
install the corresponding versions of krb5-devel and openssl-devel.

# up2date krb5-devel
# up2date openssl-devel

That will install the latest versions of those packages.


 Mathieu Massé M.SC.

 The whole of science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday
 thinking. -- Albert Einstein


-- 
Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


CUPS printer installation problem-failed dependencies

2003-05-29 Thread Mark Neidorff
Hi All,

I think that I'm making the much harder than need be...or that it can't be 
done.

I have a RH 7.3 system and I've gotten a new HP Laserjet 1300 printer. OK, 
so I checked and found that there is a driver for this printer on the CUPS 
site. I download it only to find out that I am missing a component which I 
must get with a new version of ghostscript. sigh  Ghostscript won't 
install cause it needs GLIBC_2_3 and mine is glibc_2_2.  OK, fine.  I'll 
just build ghostscript from source...but when I try to do that, it tells 
me that in order to build ghostscript, I need gimp-print-devel. So, I dl 
the source of gimp-print-devel and rpm tells me that ghostscript-devel is 
needed by gimp-print-devel. And, of course, ghpostscript is needed by 
ghostscript-devel (another failed dependency). 

Normally, I'd put everything on one rpm command line and let rpm figure 
everything out (as good old rpm should) but some packages are src and 
others are regular rpms.  

I worry about upgrading glibc because the upgrade may break many things. 
My questions then are:
1. Will upgrading glibc break things as I fear?  (If not, then I do that 
and the install should work)
2. Failing that, is there a way to get the ghostscript, gimp-devel, etc. 
install to work?
3. the CUPS driver is a postscript driver for this printer.  If I don't go 
with CUPS, what alternate do I have for printing with my new printer?

Thanks for any thoughts,

Mark


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: CUPS printer installation problem-failed dependencies

2003-05-29 Thread Chris Benson
I normally get around this using apt-get.

It looks into the dependancies ( make sure you dont add any custom
repositories) and gets whats needed. rpmfind.net will get you apt-get.

]# apt-get -s install ghostscript

that will simulate installing ghostscript and tell you all the
dependancies.

as always man apt-get.

cb 


On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 08:33, Mark Neidorff wrote:
 Hi All,
 
 I think that I'm making the much harder than need be...or that it can't be 
 done.
 
 I have a RH 7.3 system and I've gotten a new HP Laserjet 1300 printer. OK, 
 so I checked and found that there is a driver for this printer on the CUPS 
 site. I download it only to find out that I am missing a component which I 
 must get with a new version of ghostscript. sigh  Ghostscript won't 
 install cause it needs GLIBC_2_3 and mine is glibc_2_2.  OK, fine.  I'll 
 just build ghostscript from source...but when I try to do that, it tells 
 me that in order to build ghostscript, I need gimp-print-devel. So, I dl 
 the source of gimp-print-devel and rpm tells me that ghostscript-devel is 
 needed by gimp-print-devel. And, of course, ghpostscript is needed by 
 ghostscript-devel (another failed dependency). 
 
 Normally, I'd put everything on one rpm command line and let rpm figure 
 everything out (as good old rpm should) but some packages are src and 
 others are regular rpms.  
 
 I worry about upgrading glibc because the upgrade may break many things. 
 My questions then are:
 1. Will upgrading glibc break things as I fear?  (If not, then I do that 
 and the install should work)
 2. Failing that, is there a way to get the ghostscript, gimp-devel, etc. 
 install to work?
 3. the CUPS driver is a postscript driver for this printer.  If I don't go 
 with CUPS, what alternate do I have for printing with my new printer?
 
 Thanks for any thoughts,
 
 Mark
-- 
Chris Benson


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: CUPS printer installation problem-failed dependencies

2003-05-29 Thread Matthew Saltzman
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Mark Neidorff wrote:

 Hi All,

 I think that I'm making the much harder than need be...or that it can't be
 done.

 I have a RH 7.3 system and I've gotten a new HP Laserjet 1300 printer. OK,
 so I checked and found that there is a driver for this printer on the CUPS
 site. I download it only to find out that I am missing a component which I
 must get with a new version of ghostscript. sigh  Ghostscript won't
 install cause it needs GLIBC_2_3 and mine is glibc_2_2.  OK, fine.  I'll
 just build ghostscript from source...but when I try to do that, it tells
 me that in order to build ghostscript, I need gimp-print-devel. So, I dl
 the source of gimp-print-devel and rpm tells me that ghostscript-devel is
 needed by gimp-print-devel. And, of course, ghpostscript is needed by
 ghostscript-devel (another failed dependency).

 Normally, I'd put everything on one rpm command line and let rpm figure
 everything out (as good old rpm should) but some packages are src and
 others are regular rpms.

 I worry about upgrading glibc because the upgrade may break many things.
 My questions then are:
 1. Will upgrading glibc break things as I fear?  (If not, then I do that
 and the install should work)

If there is a Red Hat errata, then using that should be OK, but if not,
this is Extremely Risky Behavior.  Glibc version bumps are usually cause
for a new RHL release.

 2. Failing that, is there a way to get the ghostscript, gimp-devel, etc.
 install to work?

I did something similar for RH8 to get a driver for my HP InkJet 5550, but
I can't recall exactly how...  I think I installed pre-compiled
gimp-print-devel, as I don't appear to have an SRPM for that lying around,
then rebuilt ghostscript.  I'm not sure how to get around circular
dependencies with SRPMs.  If the binary ones will install, first install
those, then build the source ones.


 3. the CUPS driver is a postscript driver for this printer.  If I don't go
 with CUPS, what alternate do I have for printing with my new printer?

If it's got native PostScript, you could just use the native PostScript
driver.  I don't know what kind of support you'd get in LPRng, but you
might look at that too.


 Thanks for any thoughts,

 Mark




-- 
Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: RPM Dependencies

2003-02-09 Thread Mike Vanecek
-- Original Message ---
From: Michael Fratoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 21:02:26 -0500
Subject: Re: RPM Dependencies

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On Saturday 08 February 2003 08:10 pm, Mike Vanecek wrote:
  This question is really about dependencies, I am using Mozilla as an
  example.
 
  I upgraded Mozilla from 1.0.1 to 1.3a on a RH 8 system.
 [snip]
  mozilla-psm needs mozilla and mozilla-nss
  mozilla-nss needs mozilla-nspr
  mozilla needs mozilla-nspr
  plugger needs mozilla
 
  When trying to upgrade, no matter what rpm -Uvh I tried, a dependency
  got me. Force did not work since it does not overcome dependencies.
 
 rpm -Uvh mozilla*.rpm should have worked. Install multiple upgrades as 
 part of the same transaction. The packages need not just mozilla-psm (for 
 example), but the proper version of mozilla-psm. Upgrading them all at 
 once lets rpm see that the dependencies are all met.
--- End of Original Message ---

I thought I had tried that, but maybe not. I will find me another machine and
give it a whirl.




-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RPM Dependencies

2003-02-08 Thread Mike Vanecek
This question is really about dependencies, I am using Mozilla as an example.

I upgraded Mozilla from 1.0.1 to 1.3a on a RH 8 system.

[admin@team900 admin]$ rpm -qa | grep mozilla
mozilla-1.3a-0_rh8_xft
mozilla-psm-1.3a-0_rh8_xft
mozilla-nspr-1.3a-0_rh8_xft
mozilla-nss-1.3a-0_rh8_xft

If I examine the dependencies that exist between these packages, I find:

[admin@team900 admin]$ rpm -q --requires  mozilla | grep mozilla
mozilla-nspr = 1.3a-0_rh8_xft

[admin@team900 admin]$ rpm -q --requires  plugger  | grep mozilla
mozilla

[admin@team900 admin]$ rpm -q --requires  mozilla-nss | grep mozilla
mozilla-nspr = 1.3a-0_rh8_xft

[admin@team900 admin]$ rpm -q --requires  mozilla-psm | grep mozilla
mozilla = 1.3a-0_rh8_xft
mozilla-nss = 1.3a-0_rh8_xft

which defines these dependencies:

mozilla-psm needs mozilla and mozilla-nss
mozilla-nss needs mozilla-nspr
mozilla needs mozilla-nspr
plugger needs mozilla

When trying to upgrade, no matter what rpm -Uvh I tried, a dependency got me.
Force did not work since it does not overcome dependencies.

I finally, did a rpm -e on mozilla-psm, mozilla-nss, plugger, and mozilla (in
that order) and reinstalled things.

Did a better method exist to have installed Mozilla?

Does a better way exist to determine dependencies on installed packages?

Thanks.



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: RPM Dependencies

2003-02-08 Thread Michael Fratoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 08 February 2003 08:10 pm, Mike Vanecek wrote:
 This question is really about dependencies, I am using Mozilla as an
 example.

 I upgraded Mozilla from 1.0.1 to 1.3a on a RH 8 system.
[snip]
 mozilla-psm needs mozilla and mozilla-nss
 mozilla-nss needs mozilla-nspr
 mozilla needs mozilla-nspr
 plugger needs mozilla

 When trying to upgrade, no matter what rpm -Uvh I tried, a dependency
 got me. Force did not work since it does not overcome dependencies.

rpm -Uvh mozilla*.rpm should have worked. Install multiple upgrades as 
part of the same transaction. The packages need not just mozilla-psm (for 
example), but the proper version of mozilla-psm. Upgrading them all at 
once lets rpm see that the dependencies are all met.

- -- 
- -Michael

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.{2,3}|8.0 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+Rbayn/07WoAb/SsRAlkIAJ96g5A4jOVza33/4M2Yp6ora1OsdQCeLbJ+
2O7UDnFwYwLwXCN1DJ9n/GM=
=LOQv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Failed dependencies

2003-01-29 Thread Jeff Biss



Andrew and Lau,

Thanks for the replies and the advice. I am starting to figure out how to
use rpm and have been using it to identify which packages the missing files
(failed dependencies) belong to. This has allowed me to download the correct
packages.

I appreciate the help. This little learning experience is good. It might
be a bit frustrating but at least there are ways to correct a failed install
unlike Microsoft where an install just fails.

Sincerely, Jeff Biss

Andrew Pasquale wrote:

  On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 09:52:44PM -0600 or thereabouts, Jeff Biss wrote:
  
Hello All,I searched all over and found nothing that covered this problem. I just hope I didn't miss it. Here's my question:I have attempted to install some RPMs and had them fail with the failed dependencies error message. Some packages can be found on Red Hat such as Pythonxxx.rpm but there are files that cannot be found such as libxxx.xx.x. Sometimes the files are on my machine yet the RPM fails to find them even after I "fix" the manager database.

Here is the procedure to fix corrupted rpm databases:(excerpted from http://www.rpm.org/hintskinks/repairdb/)Hangs are often caused by stale locks.  Fix by doing:rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db*Otherwise,All that needs repairing is /var/lib/rpm/Packages, the indices can/willbe rebuilt with rpm --rebuilddb later.Save a copy just in case:cd /var/lib tar czvf /tmp/rpmdb.tar.gz rpmVerify integrity withcd /var/lib/rpm db_verify PackagesIf there are any errors, repair by doingmv Packages Packages-ORIG db_dump Packages-ORIG | db_load PackagesRead all the headers in Packages by doingrpm -qaIf you segfault here, make an entry at http://bugzilla.redhat.com andI'll tell you what to do.Rebuild the indices
rpm --rebuilddb 

  1. Where do I find the missing files/programs? The RPM downloads did not list entire categories of RPMs such as System libraries.
  
  One nice resource is rpmfind.net.  You can search for libraries and itwill tell you what package contains the file you are missing.
  
2. Where is the documentation that explicitly details the procedure for providing one's system with all requisite files/programs?

I'm not sure what you are looking for here.  The "requisite"programs vary depending on what kind of install you have.Here is a reference guide from RH that covers some basics of RPM:http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7-Manual/ref-guide/ch-rpm.htmlAlso, read the man pages: $man rpm

  3. How do I point the RPM to files on my system it claims are not there? (I have regenerated the database and this still happens)
  
  If you already have installed the proper version of the package, try reinstalling the package over the old version:# rpm -ivh --force package_nameIf none of this helps, you could try posting on the rpm mailing list.Although RPM is certainly not perfect, it does provide dependency checking.  Dependency management, while it seems more trouble than it is worth sometimes, is critical to maintaining a properly functioning system.  Many people recommend apt-rpm for package management.  You might want tocheck out this option.
  
  
  
  


Re: Failed dependencies

2003-01-28 Thread Jeff Biss



Lau,

Thanks for the quick reply.

1. For the files that are on my system but the RPM could not find:

 Yes they had the same name.
 - In some cases such as with rhn_register (identified when trying
to rpm an update of up2date), it does exist but it must be the wrong version
number because the failed dependencies error specifically identified a version
number; I do not know how to retrieve the version numbers of the files.
 - In other cases such as with libreadline.so.4 (identified when trying
to rpm python) it exists on my system. There is no version number or date
provided.

2. I sort of understand the files dependencies thing and did run rpm --rebuilddb
to attempt to get the system to "see" the files found missing but that
are on my system. This did not seem to do much in my situation.

3. I have performed both types of installations: tar -zxvf filename.tar.gz
 and rpm -i filename.rpm but I am limiting this question specifically
to using the supposedly simple rpm. I have searched for missing files using
google and would get nothing in many instances, especially with what appeared
to be library files (libxxx.xx.x).

4. I am now reading what I can find on Red Hat regarding RPM.

I can only assume that this is a bigger problem than I can see on the list.
Why doesn't Red Hat have more information on solving RPM problems since this
is the "simple" method offered as an alternative to Microsoft's Install programs?

Any other suggestions for avenues for finding missing system files that I
can try?

Do most people just give up and go back to Windows OSes?

Thanks, Jeff Biss

Lau wrote:

  Hi,First, to check about something,
  
I have attempted to install some RPMs and had them fail with the failed dependencies error message. Some packages can be found on Red Hat such as Pythonxxx.rpm but there are files that cannot be found such as libxxx.xx.x. Sometimes the files are on my machine yet the RPM fails to find them even after I "fix" the manager database.

Are you sure the exactly version number is the same?i.e. libfoobar.so.2 is different from libfoobar.so.1

  1. Where do I find the missing files/programs? The RPM downloads did not list entire categories of RPMs such as System libraries.
  
  Yes, it is really a very troublesome work for beginner.But usually, where get a pkg, you will also find the dependency information on there.For example, if you grab a licq.*.rpm from licq.org, you probably can find some otherinformation about licq's dependency pkg / files.Another approache, (if the last one doesn't work), you can search the gooble with exactly the filename which make you in trouble. You usually got the neccessaryinformation there.
  
2. Where is the documentation that explicitly details the procedure for providing one's system with all requisite files/programs?

First, there is no rules to gover the completeness of files in a system. As differentpkgs will require differ files. E.g. if you install a Gnome2 desktop, you will need gtk2, pango, atk, gnome-desktop, etc. however, if you install KDE, you will need anotherfiles.Basically, if you are using RedHat, and installing all the software through "rpm -Uvh"all the files dependency info in the system should be well maintained in the rpm database. 

  3. How do I point the RPM to files on my system it claims are not there? (I have regenerated the database and this still happens)
  
  Did you install something by manually compile and install it? (i.e. something ./configuremake, make install, etc procedure).Anyway, a last option for this is rpm -Uvh --nodeps xxx.rpmHowever, it is only useful if you know what you are doing.Sure, you can also provide more detail information here, ask for advice.Cheers,Lau
  
  
  
  


Re: Failed dependencies

2003-01-28 Thread Andrew Pasquale
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 09:52:44PM -0600 or thereabouts, Jeff Biss wrote:
 Hello All,
 
 I searched all over and found nothing that covered this problem. I just 
 hope I didn't miss it. Here's my question:
 
 I have attempted to install some RPMs and had them fail with the failed 
 dependencies error message. Some packages can be found on Red Hat such 
 as Pythonxxx.rpm but there are files that cannot be found such as 
 libxxx.xx.x. Sometimes the files are on my machine yet the RPM fails to 
 find them even after I fix the manager database.
 

Here is the procedure to fix corrupted rpm databases:
(excerpted from http://www.rpm.org/hintskinks/repairdb/)

Hangs are often caused by stale locks.  Fix by doing:
rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db*

Otherwise,

All that needs repairing is /var/lib/rpm/Packages, the indices can/will
be rebuilt with rpm --rebuilddb later.

Save a copy just in case:

cd /var/lib tar czvf /tmp/rpmdb.tar.gz rpm
Verify integrity with

cd /var/lib/rpm db_verify Packages
If there are any errors, repair by doing

mv Packages Packages-ORIG db_dump Packages-ORIG | db_load Packages
Read all the headers in Packages by doing

rpm -qa
If you segfault here, make an entry at http://bugzilla.redhat.com and
I'll tell you what to do.

Rebuild the indices

rpm --rebuilddb 

 1. Where do I find the missing files/programs? The RPM downloads did not 
 list entire categories of RPMs such as System libraries.
 

One nice resource is rpmfind.net.  You can search for libraries and it
will tell you what package contains the file you are missing.


 2. Where is the documentation that explicitly details the procedure for 
 providing one's system with all requisite files/programs?
 

I'm not sure what you are looking for here.  The requisite
programs vary depending on what kind of install you have.

Here is a reference guide from RH that covers some basics of RPM:
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7-Manual/ref-guide/ch-rpm.html

Also, read the man pages: 
$man rpm

 3. How do I point the RPM to files on my system it claims are not there? 
 (I have regenerated the database and this still happens)
 

If you already have installed the proper version of the package, try 
reinstalling the package over the old version:

# rpm -ivh --force package_name

If none of this helps, you could try posting on the rpm mailing list.

Although RPM is certainly not perfect, it does provide dependency 
checking.  Dependency management, while it seems more trouble than it 
is worth sometimes, is critical to maintaining a properly functioning 
system.  

Many people recommend apt-rpm for package management.  You might want to
check out this option.


-- 
Andrew Pasquale  http://www.elytra.net:8080



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Failed dependencies

2003-01-28 Thread Lau
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:51:14 -0600
Jeff Biss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Lau,
 
 Thanks for the quick reply.
 
 1. For the files that are on my system but the RPM could not find:
 
 Yes they had the same name.
 - In some cases such as with rhn_register (identified when trying to 
 rpm an update of up2date), it does exist but it must be the wrong 
 version number because the failed dependencies error specifically 
 identified a version number; I do not know how to retrieve the version 
 numbers of the files.
 - In other cases such as with libreadline.so.4 (identified when 
 trying to rpm python) it exists on my system. There is no version number 
 or date provided.
 
 2. I sort of understand the files dependencies thing and did run rpm 
 --rebuilddb to attempt to get the system to see the files found 
 missing but that are on my system. This did not seem to do much in my 
 situation.
 
 3. I have performed both types of installations: tar -zxvf 
 filename.tar.gz and rpm -i filename.rpm but I am limiting this question 
 specifically to using the supposedly simple rpm. I have searched for 
 missing files using google and would get nothing in many instances, 
 especially with what appeared to be library files (libxxx.xx.x).
Note about the tar ... make... make install way, in this way, you are compiling a 
software and install it in your system.
For example, the make install step will copy a list of file to your /usr/lib/ 
directory
The result is, you got a lot of file there (sure the file is useful, as you install 
it), but
the rpm database will not record it at all.
If this is your case, just rpm -Uvh --nodeps xxx.rpm will do the job.
The --nodeps tell the rpm program, not to border about the dependency, as you
have make sure that, the depending file are on your system.

Doubtlessly, you need to make sure that, not depending file are actually there.

The method Andrew Pasquale may also worth give it a try.
But he is looking on the other side, i.e. your rpm database is broken, so repaire
and stop the strange error message from rpm!!

Cheers,
Lau



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Failed dependencies

2003-01-27 Thread Jeff Biss
Hello All,

I searched all over and found nothing that covered this problem. I just 
hope I didn't miss it. Here's my question:

I have attempted to install some RPMs and had them fail with the failed 
dependencies error message. Some packages can be found on Red Hat such 
as Pythonxxx.rpm but there are files that cannot be found such as 
libxxx.xx.x. Sometimes the files are on my machine yet the RPM fails to 
find them even after I fix the manager database.

1. Where do I find the missing files/programs? The RPM downloads did not 
list entire categories of RPMs such as System libraries.

2. Where is the documentation that explicitly details the procedure for 
providing one's system with all requisite files/programs?

3. How do I point the RPM to files on my system it claims are not there? 
(I have regenerated the database and this still happens)

I have Red Hat 7 on an Intel based system.

Thanks in advance, Jeff Biss



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Failed dependencies

2003-01-27 Thread Lau
Hi,

First, to check about something,
 
 I have attempted to install some RPMs and had them fail with the failed 
 dependencies error message. Some packages can be found on Red Hat such 
 as Pythonxxx.rpm but there are files that cannot be found such as 
 libxxx.xx.x. Sometimes the files are on my machine yet the RPM fails to 
 find them even after I fix the manager database.
Are you sure the exactly version number is the same?
i.e. libfoobar.so.2 is different from libfoobar.so.1

 
 1. Where do I find the missing files/programs? The RPM downloads did not 
 list entire categories of RPMs such as System libraries.
Yes, it is really a very troublesome work for beginner.
But usually, where get a pkg, you will also find the dependency information on there.
For example, if you grab a licq.*.rpm from licq.org, you probably can find some other
information about licq's dependency pkg / files.
Another approache, (if the last one doesn't work), you can search the gooble 
with exactly the filename which make you in trouble. You usually got the neccessary
information there.

 
 2. Where is the documentation that explicitly details the procedure for 
 providing one's system with all requisite files/programs?
First, there is no rules to gover the completeness of files in a system. As different
pkgs will require differ files. E.g. if you install a Gnome2 desktop, you will need 
gtk2, 
pango, atk, gnome-desktop, etc. however, if you install KDE, you will need another
files.
Basically, if you are using RedHat, and installing all the software through rpm -Uvh
all the files dependency info in the system should be well maintained in the rpm 
database. 

 
 3. How do I point the RPM to files on my system it claims are not there? 
 (I have regenerated the database and this still happens)
Did you install something by manually compile and install it? (i.e. something 
./configure
make, make install, etc procedure).

Anyway, a last option for this is rpm -Uvh --nodeps xxx.rpm
However, it is only useful if you know what you are doing.

Sure, you can also provide more detail information here, ask for advice.

Cheers,
Lau



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



failed dependencies while trying to install with RPM

2003-01-07 Thread anthony caskey
Dear everybody:

I have tried to install tetex-xdvi... from both the web and from disk.  
Either way, I get the error:

error:  failed dependencies:

Then RPM lists about 22 libraries upon which xdvi is dependent.

Is there a switch I can add to rpm -i so the libraries upon which xdvi is 
dependent can be automatically installed by rpm?

Many thanks.

Tony Caskey

_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: failed dependencies while trying to install with RPM

2003-01-07 Thread Johnathan Bailes
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 06:39, anthony caskey wrote:
 Dear everybody:
 
 I have tried to install tetex-xdvi... from both the web and from disk.  
 Either way, I get the error:
 
 error:  failed dependencies:
 
 Then RPM lists about 22 libraries upon which xdvi is dependent.
 
 Is there a switch I can add to rpm -i so the libraries upon which xdvi is 
 dependent can be automatically installed by rpm?
 
 Many thanks.
 
 Tony Caskey
 
 _
 MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* 
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

Better solution download apt and synaptic.

http://freshrpms.net

If you are using RH8 these are the direct links to the files you need.

http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/psyche/apt/apt-0.5.4cnc7-fr1.i386.rpm

http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/psyche/synaptic/synaptic-0.24-fr1.i386.rpm

Synaptic is a graphical tool for rpm apt.  

Install both rpms.  

Go to command line as root and issue:

apt-get update (this updates the list of packages available to you)

Then issue:

apt-get -f install xdvi


Yes, tying apt into the RH package system and including them by default
would be wonderful.  

-- 
Johnathan Bailes [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



failed dependencies when installing ...

2003-01-07 Thread anthony caskey
Mr. Bailes:

Your advice worked perfectly.  Thank you much.

Sincerely,

Tony Caskey





_
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: dependencies woes

2002-11-21 Thread Martin Marques
On Mar 19 Nov 2002 17:42, Distribution Lists wrote:
 okay, what rpms do I need to install mysql

 rpm -hiv mysql-server-3.23.52-3.i386.rpm
 error: failed dependencies:
 mysql = 3.23.52 is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3
 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)   is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3
 libgcc_s.so.1   is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3
 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)   is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3
 libgcc_s.so.1(GLIBC_2.0)   is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3
 libmysqlclient.so.10   is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3
 libstdc++.so.5   is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3
 libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2)   is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3

apt for rpms mayby?

http://freshrpms.net/apt

-- 
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-
Martín Marqués  |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programador, Administrador, DBA |   Centro de Telematica
   Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: dependencies woes

2002-11-20 Thread Yoink!
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Distribution Lists wrote:
 okay, what rpms do I need to install mysql

 rpm -hiv mysql-server-3.23.52-3.i386.rpm
 error: failed dependencies:
 mysql = 3.23.52 is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3
 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)   is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3
 libgcc_s.so.1   is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3
 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)   is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3
 libgcc_s.so.1(GLIBC_2.0)   is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3
 libmysqlclient.so.10   is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3
 libstdc++.so.5   is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3
 libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2)   is needed by mysql-server-3.23.52-3

You obviously need the mysql package (notice that mysql, mysql-server and
mysql-client are three different packages), but you also don't seem to
have installed the right glibc or libstdc++. This suggests to me that
you're trying to install a recent mysql package on an older version of
RedHat.

I'd suggest grabbing a mysql package for that distribution.

-- 
\ \/ / _   |~\  _ In God We Trust. All Others Pay Cash.
/ \|\  /|+- | |   The world is a comedy to those that think,
/ /\ \\_/| \/ ||__)|_|a tragedy to those who feel. - Horace Walpole




-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



  1   2   3   >