Re: reiserfs messages cleanup patch.

2003-02-21 Thread Manuel Krause
On 02/21/2003 08:37 AM, Oleg Drokin wrote:

Hello!

On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 08:27:32AM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:



If you're ready with the patch (again) I would be glad to receive the 
preliminary version to use it anyways.


Our tester is just busy with other stuff, so I probably release
the patch just for outside testing. If anyone would like to, of course.
(NOTE, THIS WAS ONLY LIGHTLY TESTED BY ME).
Patch is against latest 2.4 bitkeeper snapshot.
Probably should apply fine to 2.4.21-pre4

Bye,
Oleg



Thank you for the quick thing!

It doesn't apply to my kernel setup [-pre4 + data-logging + preempt]
-- too many hunks failing in my eyes.

BTW, the directio-fix fails on the same setup, too [alternatively].

Maybe I've time over the weekend to have a closer look.


Many thanks to you anyways and best regards,

Manuel


 [PATCH: massage-cleanup.diff]




Re: reiserfs messages cleanup patch.

2003-02-21 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello!

On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:22:16AM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:

 It doesn't apply to my kernel setup [-pre4 + data-logging + preempt]
 -- too many hunks failing in my eyes.

datalogging is just too big of a change.

Bye,
Oleg



Re: no reiserfs quota in 2.4 yet? 2.4.21-pre4-ac4 says different

2003-02-21 Thread Dieter Ntzel
Am Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2003 02:10 schrieb Chris Mason:
 On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 17:40, Ookhoi wrote:
   Alan has needed changes to generic quota code already in his patchset
   so probably just leaving out these changes should make everything work
   (but I haven't tested it recently).
 
  You mean, I should use only a few of these?
 
  01-quota-v2-2.4.20.diff

 Not this, -ac already has it

  02-nesting-2.4.20.diff
  03-reiserfs-quota-23-2.4.20.diff

 Or these two, I've got an updated reiserfs-quota patch on top of the
 data logging code in testing here, it should apply more cleanly on -ac.
 The big delay right now is I'm trying to fix another latency bug in
 data=ordered support, and test the fix for the sd_block count on
 symlinks.

Chris do you have something handy (data=ordered latency)?
I'll give it a try with my lantency test under 2.4.21pre4aa3.

Thanks,
Dieter

-- 
Dieter Nützel
Graduate Student, Computer Science

University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel at hamburg.de (replace at with @)




[PATCH] new data logging and quota patches available

2003-02-21 Thread Chris Mason
Hello all,

ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21 will soon be
updated with a new set of data logging and quota patches against
2.4.21-pre4

The data logging code is updated with another set of io stalling fixes,
they should improve performance of data=ordered and data=writeback by
being smarter about forcing commits under heavy write load and kicking
kreiserfsd.

Treat these with care, they've gotten a ton of testing under the suse
kernel, but the port to vanilla was just done today.

The quota patches include a fix for incorrect sd_block counts on
symlinks.

-chris




Re: [PATCH] new data logging and quota patches available

2003-02-21 Thread Philippe Gramoull

Hi Chris,

Well, this is excellent :)

Does that include the jounal overflow fix ?

Thanks,

Philippe

On 21 Feb 2003 18:32:11 -0500
Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  |  Hello all,
  |  
  |  ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21 will soon be
  |  updated with a new set of data logging and quota patches against
  |  2.4.21-pre4
  |  
  |  The data logging code is updated with another set of io stalling fixes,
  |  they should improve performance of data=ordered and data=writeback by
  |  being smarter about forcing commits under heavy write load and kicking
  |  kreiserfsd.
  |  
  |  Treat these with care, they've gotten a ton of testing under the suse
  |  kernel, but the port to vanilla was just done today.
  |  
  |  The quota patches include a fix for incorrect sd_block counts on
  |  symlinks.
  |  
  |  -chris
  |  
  |  


Introduce me please

2003-02-21 Thread Edassi
This mail is probably spam.  The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future.  See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.

Content preview:  Hi,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Welcome to the Internet's
  best kept [EMAIL PROTECTED] Looking for an INTIMATE
  ENCOUNTER with a MARRIED, HOT AND LONELY woman near
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] 

Content analysis details:   (8.40 points, 5 required)
NO_REAL_NAME   (1.3 points)  From: does not include a real name
CLICK_BELOW_CAPS   (0.4 points)  BODY: Asks you to click below (in capital letters)
HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED (0.3 points)  BODY: HTML font color is red
HTML_MESSAGE   (0.0 points)  BODY: HTML included in message
HTML_LINK_CLICK_CAPS (1.0 points)  BODY: HTML link text says CLICK
HTML_40_50 (1.0 points)  BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE (1.0 points)  BODY: HTML link text says click here
DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 (1.4 points)  Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date
MIME_HTML_ONLY (1.0 points)  Message only has text/html MIME parts
PRIORITY_NO_NAME   (1.0 points)  Message has priority setting, but no X-Mailer

The original message did not contain plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam.  If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

---BeginMessage---
Hi,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Welcome to the Internet's best kept secret.[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Looking for an INTIMATE ENCOUNTER 
  with a
  MARRIED, HOT AND LONELY woman 
  near you?[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
As a lonely wife, I decided to create this site. Now, I
  have listings of thousands of women that have joined me
  from all over the US and over 20 countries.
  Maybe even in your own neighborhood.[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
COME HAVE FUN WITH US. 
  CLICK HERE[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---End Message---