Re: online fsck
Hello On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 03:26, marco wrote: > E.Gryaznova wrote: > > > Hello. > > reiserfsck can check reiserfs filesystem mounted read-only. > > Running 'fsck.reiserfs --check -y ' will do the trick. The > equivalent for ext3 and other filesystems is > 'fsck -n ', the ext3 version detects that it is mounted rw, > and does a readonly check. > > What I wonder is if we can get fsck.reiser[fs,4] to honour option > processing in a manner more consistant with > the other fscks, so that adding reiserfs to a list of user choosable > filesystems is not going to cause a nightmare > of an overhead of filesystem detection, command option re-mapping and > other related headaches. > The main problem why reiserfsck does not process similar to other fscks is that reiserfs (as well as reiser4) moves data on filesystem modifications so that even files which were not modified recently change their locations. Online reiserXck should be probably implemented as kernel thread. Or be able to block filesystem updates, or I do not know what. So, in short, reiserXck for r/w mounted filesystem can not be implemened as plain user land tool,imho. Also imho, currently the problem is that it is not very clear how to do it. We would be happy to hear any thoughts on it. > > > > Thanks, > > Lena > > > > btinsley wrote: > > > >> Is there or was there a plan to support running reiserfsck on a > >> mounted v3 filesystem (just a check, not a fix or rebuild)? I seem to > >> remember this being mentioned here at some point in time, but I was > >> unable to find it in the mailing list archive. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
Three steps to the software you need at the prices you want
OS-Adobe-Macromedia etc All under $15-$99 CDS http://vnzfbmr.8fu5t781n08xn9q.hootercdz.com The women's movement hasn't changed my sex life. It wouldn't dare. Clever people master life; the wise illuminate it and create fresh difficulties.
Penis enhancement patch, doctor approved and recommended.
World first Patch Technology for penis Enlargement http://www.jnaz.net/ss/ Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know. Anyone who goes to a psychiatrist ought to have his head examined. Everything you see I owe to spaghetti. You live and learn. Or you don't live long. Any fool can make a rule, and any fool will mind it.
Re: peak performance
On Fri, 27 May 2005 19:26:26 +1000, robby cunningham said: > I've been using your product for 4 months now. I've increased my length from > 2 inches > to nearly 6 inches. Your product has saved my sex life.-Matt, FL I'm glad Reiserfs worked for him, but somehow I don't see Hans listing this one on the "Reiserfs success stories" page. ;) pgpajTaF2JBvl.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: File as a directory - Ordered Relations
On Fri, 27 May 2005 23:56:35 CDT, David Masover said: > Hans, comment please? Is this approaching v5 / v6 / Future Vision? It > does seem more than a little "clunky" when applied to v4... I'm not Hans, but I *will* ask "How much of this is *rationally* doable without some help from the VFS?". At the very least, some of this stuff will require the FS to tell the VFS to suspend its disbelief (for starters, doing this without confusing the VFS's concepts of dentries/inodes/reference counts is going to be interesting... :) pgppFAsfV0InP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: peak performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Fri, 27 May 2005 19:26:26 +1000, robby cunningham said: > > >>I've been using your product for 4 months now. I've increased my length from >>2 inches >>to nearly 6 inches. Your product has saved my sex life.-Matt, FL >> >> > >I'm glad Reiserfs worked for him, but somehow I don't see Hans listing this >one on the "Reiserfs success stories" page. ;) > > hahahaha fantastic! And why not? Imagine something like.. "Reiserfs: for those of us who are filesystem challenged"
Re: peak performance
On Saturday 28 May 2005 21:43, Jander wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >On Fri, 27 May 2005 19:26:26 +1000, robby cunningham said: > >>I've been using your product for 4 months now. I've increased my length > >> from 2 inches > >>to nearly 6 inches. Your product has saved my sex life.-Matt, FL > > > >I'm glad Reiserfs worked for him, but somehow I don't see Hans listing > > this one on the "Reiserfs success stories" page. ;) > > hahahaha fantastic! > And why not? Imagine something like.. > > "Reiserfs: for those of us who are filesystem challenged" "Reiserfs: Makes fsck'ing feel good again" -- Regards, Christian Iversen pgpHHiQe2VzaV.pgp Description: PGP signature
bitkeeper problem?
i'm trying to get the current reiser4 bitkeeper repository to tinker with but every time i try to clone bk://bk.namesys.com/bk/reiser4 i get "bk://bk.namesys.com/bk/reiser4: Connection refused". i'm a CVS user and this is my first time using BK, so it could be a configuration problem, but i can't find anything that describes a problem such as this, and a lot of people talking about problems with the BK daemon causing these problems. thanks for any help! -ryan
