Re: [reiserfs-list] current state of reiserfs, patches needed with current kernel, lvm, quotas, nfs?
Hi Lars O. Grobe wrote: Hi reiserfs-people! A description of the current state of reiserfs in linux might be very nice...? I installed reiserfs some months ago, and I know that a lot of things changed, so I would really like to get a statement on the integration of reiserfs in recent Linux and on how much patch-work has to be done today. Q: Kernel: I suggest a kernel one would install today is 2.4.14? 2.4.16. Q: LVM: Do I have to patch anything to use reiserfs with lvm? I am not sure about this. Q: Quotas: Is it still necessary to apply patches to get quotas work? I Yes. ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/reiserfs/quota-2.4/2.4.15 (It should apply to 2.4.16 cleanly) use a current quota version, of course, as older ones had a 2GB limit etc... Q: NFS: afaik the nfs-problems are gone with recent kernels. So can I export reiserfs-mounts now, or do I have to patch anything? You should use 3.6 format for nfs shares I hope that anybody can give me a quick answer (usually only yes/no), I can get the details myself, of course. But I think it would be good to have a complete list of former problems, their current state and workarounds in one mail. So maybe this will avoid installation errors in trhe future (e.g. my future, as I will update our server installations quite soon... ;-) Thank You, CU, Lars. Thanks, vs
Re: [reiserfs-list] current state of reiserfs, patches needed with current kernel, lvm, quotas, nfs?
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Q: Quotas: Is it still necessary to apply patches to get quotas work? I Yes. ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/reiserfs/quota-2.4/2.4.15 (It should apply to 2.4.16 cleanly) I'm afraid, it doesn't: The 50_quota-patch-2.4.15-pre5.diff.gz does not apply cleanly: gzip -dc ../../50_quota-patch-2.4.15-pre5.diff.gz | patch -p1 -s 5 out of 54 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/dquot.c.rej 1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/quota.h.rej The other ones do, but gives this compile-time error without 50_quota-patch-2.4.15-pre5.diff.gz: gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/tmp/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686-c -o inode.o inode.c inode.c: In function `to_fake_used_blocks': inode.c:893: warning: implicit declaration of function `inode_get_bytes' inode.c: In function `init_inode': inode.c:991: warning: implicit declaration of function `inode_set_bytes' inode.c: In function `reiserfs_new_inode': inode.c:1546: structure has no member named `i_bytes' Regards Rasmus -- -- [ Rasmus 'Møffe' Bøg Hansen ] --- To alcohol! The cause of - and solution to - all of life's problems! -- Homer Simpson - [ moffe at amagerkollegiet dot dk ] --
Re: [reiserfs-list] current state of reiserfs, patches needed with current kernel, lvm, quotas, nfs?
On Tuesday, November 27, 2001 06:44:51 PM +0100 Rasmus Bøg Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Q: Quotas: Is it still necessary to apply patches to get quotas work? I Yes. ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/reiserfs/quota-2.4/2.4.15 (It should apply to 2.4.16 cleanly) I'm afraid, it doesn't: The 50_quota-patch-2.4.15-pre5.diff.gz does not apply cleanly: Thanks to some help from Dirk Mueller and some of the suse guys, we've found another block counting bug in the reiserfs part of the quota patch. Fixes will be uploaded tonight, along with an update to 2.4.16. -chris
[reiserfs-list] current state of reiserfs, patches needed with current kernel, lvm, quotas, nfs?
Hi reiserfs-people! A description of the current state of reiserfs in linux might be very nice...? I installed reiserfs some months ago, and I know that a lot of things changed, so I would really like to get a statement on the integration of reiserfs in recent Linux and on how much patch-work has to be done today. Q: Kernel: I suggest a kernel one would install today is 2.4.14? Q: LVM: Do I have to patch anything to use reiserfs with lvm? Q: Quotas: Is it still necessary to apply patches to get quotas work? I use a current quota version, of course, as older ones had a 2GB limit etc... Q: NFS: afaik the nfs-problems are gone with recent kernels. So can I export reiserfs-mounts now, or do I have to patch anything? I hope that anybody can give me a quick answer (usually only yes/no), I can get the details myself, of course. But I think it would be good to have a complete list of former problems, their current state and workarounds in one mail. So maybe this will avoid installation errors in trhe future (e.g. my future, as I will update our server installations quite soon... ;-) Thank You, CU, Lars.