Re: [reiserfs-list] current state of reiserfs, patches needed with current kernel, lvm, quotas, nfs?

2001-11-27 Thread Vladimir V. Saveliev

Hi

Lars O. Grobe wrote:

 Hi reiserfs-people!

 A description of the current state of reiserfs in linux might be very
 nice...? I installed reiserfs some months ago, and I know that a lot of
 things changed, so I would really like to get a statement on the
 integration of reiserfs in recent Linux and on how much patch-work has
 to be done today.

 Q: Kernel: I suggest a kernel one would install today is 2.4.14?


2.4.16.


 Q: LVM: Do I have to patch anything to use reiserfs with lvm?


I am not sure about this.


 Q: Quotas: Is it still necessary to apply patches to get quotas work? I

Yes.  ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/reiserfs/quota-2.4/2.4.15 (It
should apply to 2.4.16 cleanly)


 use a current quota version, of course, as older ones had a 2GB limit
 etc...

 Q: NFS: afaik the nfs-problems are gone with recent kernels. So can I
 export reiserfs-mounts now, or do I have to patch anything?


You should use 3.6 format for nfs shares


 I hope that anybody can give me a quick answer (usually only yes/no), I
 can get the details myself, of course. But I think it would be good to
 have a complete list of former problems, their current state and
 workarounds in one mail. So maybe this will avoid installation errors in
 trhe future (e.g. my future, as I will update our server installations
 quite soon... ;-)

 Thank You, CU, Lars.

Thanks,
vs





Re: [reiserfs-list] current state of reiserfs, patches needed with current kernel, lvm, quotas, nfs?

2001-11-27 Thread Rasmus Bøg Hansen

On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:

  Q: Quotas: Is it still necessary to apply patches to get quotas work? I
 
 Yes.  ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/reiserfs/quota-2.4/2.4.15 (It
 should apply to 2.4.16 cleanly)

I'm afraid, it doesn't:

The 50_quota-patch-2.4.15-pre5.diff.gz does not apply cleanly:

gzip -dc ../../50_quota-patch-2.4.15-pre5.diff.gz | patch -p1 -s
5 out of 54 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/dquot.c.rej
1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/quota.h.rej

The other ones do, but gives this compile-time error without 
50_quota-patch-2.4.15-pre5.diff.gz:

gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/tmp/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes 
-Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common 
-pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686-c -o inode.o inode.c
inode.c: In function `to_fake_used_blocks':
inode.c:893: warning: implicit declaration of function `inode_get_bytes'
inode.c: In function `init_inode':
inode.c:991: warning: implicit declaration of function `inode_set_bytes'
inode.c: In function `reiserfs_new_inode':
inode.c:1546: structure has no member named `i_bytes'

Regards
Rasmus

-- 
-- [ Rasmus 'Møffe' Bøg Hansen ] ---
To alcohol!
The cause of - and solution to - all of life's problems!
-- Homer Simpson
- [ moffe at amagerkollegiet dot dk ] --





Re: [reiserfs-list] current state of reiserfs, patches needed with current kernel, lvm, quotas, nfs?

2001-11-27 Thread Chris Mason



On Tuesday, November 27, 2001 06:44:51 PM +0100 Rasmus Bøg Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
 
  Q: Quotas: Is it still necessary to apply patches to get quotas work? I
 
 Yes.  ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/reiserfs/quota-2.4/2.4.15 (It
 should apply to 2.4.16 cleanly)
 
 I'm afraid, it doesn't:
 
 The 50_quota-patch-2.4.15-pre5.diff.gz does not apply cleanly:

Thanks to some help from Dirk Mueller and some of the suse guys, we've found
another block counting bug in the reiserfs part of the quota patch.  Fixes
will be uploaded tonight, along with an update to 2.4.16.

-chris




[reiserfs-list] current state of reiserfs, patches needed with current kernel, lvm, quotas, nfs?

2001-11-26 Thread Lars O. Grobe

Hi reiserfs-people!

A description of the current state of reiserfs in linux might be very
nice...? I installed reiserfs some months ago, and I know that a lot of
things changed, so I would really like to get a statement on the
integration of reiserfs in recent Linux and on how much patch-work has
to be done today.


Q: Kernel: I suggest a kernel one would install today is 2.4.14?

Q: LVM: Do I have to patch anything to use reiserfs with lvm?

Q: Quotas: Is it still necessary to apply patches to get quotas work? I
use a current quota version, of course, as older ones had a 2GB limit
etc...

Q: NFS: afaik the nfs-problems are gone with recent kernels. So can I
export reiserfs-mounts now, or do I have to patch anything?


I hope that anybody can give me a quick answer (usually only yes/no), I
can get the details myself, of course. But I think it would be good to
have a complete list of former problems, their current state and
workarounds in one mail. So maybe this will avoid installation errors in
trhe future (e.g. my future, as I will update our server installations
quite soon... ;-)

Thank You, CU, Lars.