Re: fatal "not directory found" error at pass 3a of reiserfsck

2006-03-15 Thread Alain Knaff 

Vitaly Fertman wrote:
if rebuilding the tree has been finished, you do not need to rebuild 
it again, you can merely double check the fs consistency with --check

(default) option.



Even though 3.6.19 apparently "succeeded" with its rebuild-tree, 3.6.20 with 
--check still found errors, so we had to run this with rebuild-tree as well.


But that run finished all right, and succeeded in retrieving one additional 
file, which 3.6.19 hadn't.


Many thanks,

Alain

Re: fatal "not directory found" error at pass 3a of reiserfsck

2006-03-14 Thread Vitaly Fertman 
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 22:35, Alain Knaff wrote:
> Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> > Hi Alain,
> > 
> > the fixed reiserfsprogs version is attched, it contains 
> > some bugfixes, please run it and report about the result.
> > 
> > Thank you.
> 
> Actually, the problem happened with reiserfs-3.6.18-5 (as shipped by 
> SuSE 9.3. and 10.0.).
> 
> Later, I downloaded 3.6.19 from namesys, and that one already 
> successfully restored the disk (but due to size and slowness of our 
> hardware this took several hours and terminated just now a quarter of an 
> hour ago).
> 
> Now, we'll first do a backup (yeah, we learned that lesson!), and after 
> that I'll re-run your 3.6.20 and report back (will probably take until 
> next morning, though)

if rebuilding the tree has been finished, you do not need to rebuild 
it again, you can merely double check the fs consistency with --check
(default) option.

-- 
Vitaly

Re: fatal "not directory found" error at pass 3a of reiserfsck

2006-03-14 Thread Alain Knaff 

Vitaly Fertman wrote:

Hi Alain,

the fixed reiserfsprogs version is attched, it contains 
some bugfixes, please run it and report about the result.


Thank you.


Actually, the problem happened with reiserfs-3.6.18-5 (as shipped by 
SuSE 9.3. and 10.0.).


Later, I downloaded 3.6.19 from namesys, and that one already 
successfully restored the disk (but due to size and slowness of our 
hardware this took several hours and terminated just now a quarter of an 
hour ago).


Now, we'll first do a backup (yeah, we learned that lesson!), and after 
that I'll re-run your 3.6.20 and report back (will probably take until 
next morning, though)


Thanks,

Alain

Re: fatal "not directory found" error at pass 3a of reiserfsck

2006-03-14 Thread Vitaly Fertman 
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 18:51, Alain Knaff wrote:
> We have a corrupted reiserfs filesystem here which can't even be repaired 
> with 
> --rebuid-tree.
> 
> The error messages happens at pass 3a:
> 
> 
> Pass 3a (looking for lost dir/files):
> ### Pass 3a (lost+found pass) #
> Looking for lost directories:
> lost+found.c 116 _look_for_lost
> not directory found
> Aborted
> 
> 
> What can we do to retrieve our files?

this seems to be fixed already.
sending the fixed reiserfsprogs version in the next email.

-- 
Vitaly