Re: fatal not directory found error at pass 3a of reiserfsck
Vitaly Fertman wrote: if rebuilding the tree has been finished, you do not need to rebuild it again, you can merely double check the fs consistency with --check (default) option. Even though 3.6.19 apparently succeeded with its rebuild-tree, 3.6.20 with --check still found errors, so we had to run this with rebuild-tree as well. But that run finished all right, and succeeded in retrieving one additional file, which 3.6.19 hadn't. Many thanks, Alain
Re: fatal not directory found error at pass 3a of reiserfsck
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 18:51, Alain Knaff wrote: We have a corrupted reiserfs filesystem here which can't even be repaired with --rebuid-tree. The error messages happens at pass 3a: Pass 3a (looking for lost dir/files): ### Pass 3a (lost+found pass) # Looking for lost directories: lost+found.c 116 _look_for_lost not directory found Aborted What can we do to retrieve our files? this seems to be fixed already. sending the fixed reiserfsprogs version in the next email. -- Vitaly
Re: fatal not directory found error at pass 3a of reiserfsck
Vitaly Fertman wrote: Hi Alain, the fixed reiserfsprogs version is attched, it contains some bugfixes, please run it and report about the result. Thank you. Actually, the problem happened with reiserfs-3.6.18-5 (as shipped by SuSE 9.3. and 10.0.). Later, I downloaded 3.6.19 from namesys, and that one already successfully restored the disk (but due to size and slowness of our hardware this took several hours and terminated just now a quarter of an hour ago). Now, we'll first do a backup (yeah, we learned that lesson!), and after that I'll re-run your 3.6.20 and report back (will probably take until next morning, though) Thanks, Alain
Re: fatal not directory found error at pass 3a of reiserfsck
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 22:35, Alain Knaff wrote: Vitaly Fertman wrote: Hi Alain, the fixed reiserfsprogs version is attched, it contains some bugfixes, please run it and report about the result. Thank you. Actually, the problem happened with reiserfs-3.6.18-5 (as shipped by SuSE 9.3. and 10.0.). Later, I downloaded 3.6.19 from namesys, and that one already successfully restored the disk (but due to size and slowness of our hardware this took several hours and terminated just now a quarter of an hour ago). Now, we'll first do a backup (yeah, we learned that lesson!), and after that I'll re-run your 3.6.20 and report back (will probably take until next morning, though) if rebuilding the tree has been finished, you do not need to rebuild it again, you can merely double check the fs consistency with --check (default) option. -- Vitaly
