Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
In addition, this was reported in the system log after testing a little bit: fsck.reiser4[21575]: segfault at 0008 rip 00444ac5 rsp 7fff34eb4970 error 4 If you need more information I'll provide what I can.
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
Hi Vlad, This was posted a long time before. I was wondering whether the recent patches might have fixed this. Can you please comment? Thanks, Sarath On Monday 03 April 2006 15:51, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: > Hello > > On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 20:21 +0200, Sarath Menon wrote: > > reiserfsprogs and libaal are both 1.0.5. I'll give you the dmesg > > output tommorow - I need to get a livecd with reiser4 patches - its > > more difficult than I initially thought ;) > > > > Here's the gdb bt output - that's the max that I can provide today. > > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > 0x40052dd1 in repair_filter_update_traverse () from /tmp/reiser4/lib > > (gdb) bt > > #0 0x40052dd1 in repair_filter_update_traverse () from /tmp/reiser4 > > #1 0x40015959 in reiser4_tree_trav_node () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/li > > #2 0x40015938 in reiser4_tree_trav_node () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/li > > #3 0x40052356 in repair_filter_traverse () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/li > > #4 0x40051c8c in repair_filter () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/librepair-1 > > #5 0x400575ea in repair_check () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/librepair-1. > > #6 0x0804a1cb in main () > > #7 0x4102eda6 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 > > > > I'll post the dmesg output tommorow. > > I would like to debug this problem. Can you please do > debugfs.reiser4 /dev/thatdevice -P | bzip2 -c > reiser4-metadata.bz2 > and put resulting file somewhere for downloading. That should make > debugging easier. > > > Thanks, > > Sarath > > > > On 3/31/06, Vladimir V. Saveliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello > > > > > > On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 16:21 +0200, Sarath Menon wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I've been using reiser4 for more than a year without any problems. > > > > The filesystem performance has been commendable to say the least. > > > > Yesterday, I had to powercycle my pc (due to a dma hang with my cd > > > > drive - happens occasionaly) and after the reboot, grub would not > > > > load. I use a single root partition (/boot inclusive) and the patched > > > > grub sources. > > > > > > > > I've tried booting into knoppix and compiling reiser4progs and > > > > running an > > > > > > fsck. > > > > > > > This is what I get -: > > > > Master super block (16): > > > > magic: ReIsEr4 > > > > blksize:4096 > > > > format: 0x0 (format40) > > > > label: > > > > > > > > Format super block (17): > > > > plugin: format40 > > > > description:Disk-format for reiser4. > > > > magic: ReIsEr40FoRmAt > > > > flushes:0 > > > > mkfs id:0x3a4f3c7b > > > > blocks: 2443880 > > > > free blocks:428490 > > > > root block: 743745 > > > > tail policy:0x2 (smart) > > > > next oid: 0xf63a06 > > > > file count: 469920 > > > > tree height:5 > > > > key policy: LARGE > > > > > > > > > > > > CHECKING STORAGE TREE > > > > FSCK: Node (743744), item (0), unit (0): Points to the block (743745) > > > > which is in the tree already. > > > > The whole subtree is skipped. > > > > Segmentation fault > > > > > > can you please run dmesg after that and send its output? > > > > > > > debugfs.reiser4 also segfaults, and a mount also fails, it complians > > > > of a duplicate key. (I can't post the exact message because the > > > > second livecd doesn't have X or any mail client :( > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Sarath > > > > > > > > -- > > > > I presume, when you pronounce iptables, you say that you are peeing > > > > tables > > > > -- > > -- > > I presume, when you pronounce iptables, you say that you are peeing > > tables -- I don't even butter my bread. I consider that cooking. -- Katherine Cebrian
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
CC-ing to the list. On 4/5/06, Sarath Menon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Vlad, > > Sorry I missed your email, I wasn't really checking my mails. The dump > is available from http://sarath.dyndns.org/r4/reiser4-metadata.bz2. > > Please let me know if you need more information. > > On 4/3/06, Vladimir V. Saveliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello > > > > On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 20:21 +0200, Sarath Menon wrote: > > > reiserfsprogs and libaal are both 1.0.5. I'll give you the dmesg > > > output tommorow - I need to get a livecd with reiser4 patches - its > > > more difficult than I initially thought ;) > > > > > > Here's the gdb bt output - that's the max that I can provide today. > > > > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > > 0x40052dd1 in repair_filter_update_traverse () from /tmp/reiser4/lib > > > (gdb) bt > > > #0 0x40052dd1 in repair_filter_update_traverse () from /tmp/reiser4 > > > #1 0x40015959 in reiser4_tree_trav_node () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/li > > > #2 0x40015938 in reiser4_tree_trav_node () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/li > > > #3 0x40052356 in repair_filter_traverse () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/li > > > #4 0x40051c8c in repair_filter () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/librepair-1 > > > #5 0x400575ea in repair_check () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/librepair-1. > > > #6 0x0804a1cb in main () > > > #7 0x4102eda6 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 > > > > > > I'll post the dmesg output tommorow. > > > > > > > I would like to debug this problem. Can you please do > > debugfs.reiser4 /dev/thatdevice -P | bzip2 -c > reiser4-metadata.bz2 > > and put resulting file somewhere for downloading. That should make > > debugging easier. > > > > > Thanks, > > > Sarath > > > > > > On 3/31/06, Vladimir V. Saveliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 16:21 +0200, Sarath Menon wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > I've been using reiser4 for more than a year without any problems. The > > > > > filesystem performance has been commendable to say the least. > > > > > Yesterday, I had to powercycle my pc (due to a dma hang with my cd > > > > > drive - happens occasionaly) and after the reboot, grub would not > > > > > load. I use a single root partition (/boot inclusive) and the patched > > > > > grub sources. > > > > > > > > > > I've tried booting into knoppix and compiling reiser4progs and > > > > > running an > > > > fsck. > > > > > > > > > > This is what I get -: > > > > > Master super block (16): > > > > > magic: ReIsEr4 > > > > > blksize:4096 > > > > > format: 0x0 (format40) > > > > > label: > > > > > > > > > > Format super block (17): > > > > > plugin: format40 > > > > > description:Disk-format for reiser4. > > > > > magic: ReIsEr40FoRmAt > > > > > flushes:0 > > > > > mkfs id:0x3a4f3c7b > > > > > blocks: 2443880 > > > > > free blocks:428490 > > > > > root block: 743745 > > > > > tail policy:0x2 (smart) > > > > > next oid: 0xf63a06 > > > > > file count: 469920 > > > > > tree height:5 > > > > > key policy: LARGE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CHECKING STORAGE TREE > > > > > FSCK: Node (743744), item (0), unit (0): Points to the block (743745) > > > > > which is in the tree already. > > > > > The whole subtree is skipped. > > > > > Segmentation fault > > > > > > > > > > > > > can you please run dmesg after that and send its output? > > > > > > > > > debugfs.reiser4 also segfaults, and a mount also fails, it complians > > > > > of a duplicate key. (I can't post the exact message because the second > > > > > livecd doesn't have X or any mail client :( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Sarath > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > I presume, when you pronounce iptables, you say that you are peeing > > > > > tables.
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
Hello On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 20:21 +0200, Sarath Menon wrote: > reiserfsprogs and libaal are both 1.0.5. I'll give you the dmesg > output tommorow - I need to get a livecd with reiser4 patches - its > more difficult than I initially thought ;) > > Here's the gdb bt output - that's the max that I can provide today. > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x40052dd1 in repair_filter_update_traverse () from /tmp/reiser4/lib > (gdb) bt > #0 0x40052dd1 in repair_filter_update_traverse () from /tmp/reiser4 > #1 0x40015959 in reiser4_tree_trav_node () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/li > #2 0x40015938 in reiser4_tree_trav_node () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/li > #3 0x40052356 in repair_filter_traverse () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/li > #4 0x40051c8c in repair_filter () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/librepair-1 > #5 0x400575ea in repair_check () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/librepair-1. > #6 0x0804a1cb in main () > #7 0x4102eda6 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 > > I'll post the dmesg output tommorow. > I would like to debug this problem. Can you please do debugfs.reiser4 /dev/thatdevice -P | bzip2 -c > reiser4-metadata.bz2 and put resulting file somewhere for downloading. That should make debugging easier. > Thanks, > Sarath > > On 3/31/06, Vladimir V. Saveliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello > > > > On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 16:21 +0200, Sarath Menon wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I've been using reiser4 for more than a year without any problems. The > > > filesystem performance has been commendable to say the least. > > > Yesterday, I had to powercycle my pc (due to a dma hang with my cd > > > drive - happens occasionaly) and after the reboot, grub would not > > > load. I use a single root partition (/boot inclusive) and the patched > > > grub sources. > > > > > > I've tried booting into knoppix and compiling reiser4progs and running an > > fsck. > > > > > > This is what I get -: > > > Master super block (16): > > > magic: ReIsEr4 > > > blksize:4096 > > > format: 0x0 (format40) > > > label: > > > > > > Format super block (17): > > > plugin: format40 > > > description:Disk-format for reiser4. > > > magic: ReIsEr40FoRmAt > > > flushes:0 > > > mkfs id:0x3a4f3c7b > > > blocks: 2443880 > > > free blocks:428490 > > > root block: 743745 > > > tail policy:0x2 (smart) > > > next oid: 0xf63a06 > > > file count: 469920 > > > tree height:5 > > > key policy: LARGE > > > > > > > > > CHECKING STORAGE TREE > > > FSCK: Node (743744), item (0), unit (0): Points to the block (743745) > > > which is in the tree already. > > > The whole subtree is skipped. > > > Segmentation fault > > > > > > > can you please run dmesg after that and send its output? > > > > > debugfs.reiser4 also segfaults, and a mount also fails, it complians > > > of a duplicate key. (I can't post the exact message because the second > > > livecd doesn't have X or any mail client :( > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Sarath > > > > > > -- > > > I presume, when you pronounce iptables, you say that you are peeing tables > > > > > > > > > > -- > -- > I presume, when you pronounce iptables, you say that you are peeing tables >
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 08:13 +, Sarath Menon wrote: > Me too, ;) I also found http://www.lxnaydesign.net/, useful if you > need a browser to be around too. > > Here's the dmesg output when i try to mount it. > > reiser4[mount(11756)]: renew_sibling_link > (fs/reiser4/tree_walk.c:441)[nikita-3532]: > WARNING: Sibling nodes on the different levels: 4 != 4 > > reiser4[mount(11756)]: key_warning > (fs/reiser4/plugin/object.c:97)[nikita-717]: > WARNING: Error for inode 42 (-5) > > The kernel version seems to be a bit old at 2.6.10-lxnay3. Should I > try with a newer kernel, with debug args maybe? lxnay may have backported a more recent patch, but there was a plugin set change (see http://www.mail-archive.com/reiserfs-list@namesys.com/ msg18602.html) in 2.6.11-5 such that older kernels would be unable to mount filesystems that had been mounted with newer kernels. > Thanks, > Sarath > > On 4/1/06, Joachim Feise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Michael Weissenbacher wrote on 03/31/06 12:21: > > > > > Hi, > > >> reiserfsprogs and libaal are both 1.0.5. I'll give you the dmesg > > >> output tommorow - I need to get a livecd with reiser4 patches - its > > >> more difficult than I initially thought ;) > > > I'm using RIPLinux, which has reiser4 support. > > > http://www.tux.org/pub/people/kent-robotti/looplinux/rip/ > > > > > > Thanks for that info. I was looking for a boot disk with reiser4 for some > > time. > > > > -Joe > > > > > -- > -- > I presume, when you pronounce iptables, you say that you are peeing tables -- Jake Maciejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
Me too, ;) I also found http://www.lxnaydesign.net/, useful if you need a browser to be around too. Here's the dmesg output when i try to mount it. reiser4[mount(11756)]: renew_sibling_link (fs/reiser4/tree_walk.c:441)[nikita-3532]: WARNING: Sibling nodes on the different levels: 4 != 4 reiser4[mount(11756)]: key_warning (fs/reiser4/plugin/object.c:97)[nikita-717]: WARNING: Error for inode 42 (-5) The kernel version seems to be a bit old at 2.6.10-lxnay3. Should I try with a newer kernel, with debug args maybe? Thanks, Sarath On 4/1/06, Joachim Feise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Weissenbacher wrote on 03/31/06 12:21: > > > Hi, > >> reiserfsprogs and libaal are both 1.0.5. I'll give you the dmesg > >> output tommorow - I need to get a livecd with reiser4 patches - its > >> more difficult than I initially thought ;) > > I'm using RIPLinux, which has reiser4 support. > > http://www.tux.org/pub/people/kent-robotti/looplinux/rip/ > > > Thanks for that info. I was looking for a boot disk with reiser4 for some > time. > > -Joe > -- -- I presume, when you pronounce iptables, you say that you are peeing tables
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
Michael Weissenbacher wrote on 03/31/06 12:21: > Hi, >> reiserfsprogs and libaal are both 1.0.5. I'll give you the dmesg >> output tommorow - I need to get a livecd with reiser4 patches - its >> more difficult than I initially thought ;) > I'm using RIPLinux, which has reiser4 support. > http://www.tux.org/pub/people/kent-robotti/looplinux/rip/ Thanks for that info. I was looking for a boot disk with reiser4 for some time. -Joe
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
Hi, > reiserfsprogs and libaal are both 1.0.5. I'll give you the dmesg > output tommorow - I need to get a livecd with reiser4 patches - its > more difficult than I initially thought ;) I'm using RIPLinux, which has reiser4 support. http://www.tux.org/pub/people/kent-robotti/looplinux/rip/ kind regards, Michael -- /\ | Michael Weissenbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | http://www.dermichi.com/ | | In 2010, M$ Windows will be a quantum processing emulation | | layer for a 128-bit mod of a 64-bit hack of a 32-bit patch | | to a 16-bit GUI for an 8-bit operating system written for | | a 4-bit processor from a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 | | bit of competition.| \/
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
reiserfsprogs and libaal are both 1.0.5. I'll give you the dmesg output tommorow - I need to get a livecd with reiser4 patches - its more difficult than I initially thought ;) Here's the gdb bt output - that's the max that I can provide today. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x40052dd1 in repair_filter_update_traverse () from /tmp/reiser4/lib (gdb) bt #0 0x40052dd1 in repair_filter_update_traverse () from /tmp/reiser4 #1 0x40015959 in reiser4_tree_trav_node () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/li #2 0x40015938 in reiser4_tree_trav_node () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/li #3 0x40052356 in repair_filter_traverse () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/li #4 0x40051c8c in repair_filter () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/librepair-1 #5 0x400575ea in repair_check () from /tmp/reiser4/lib/librepair-1. #6 0x0804a1cb in main () #7 0x4102eda6 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 I'll post the dmesg output tommorow. Thanks, Sarath On 3/31/06, Vladimir V. Saveliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 16:21 +0200, Sarath Menon wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've been using reiser4 for more than a year without any problems. The > > filesystem performance has been commendable to say the least. > > Yesterday, I had to powercycle my pc (due to a dma hang with my cd > > drive - happens occasionaly) and after the reboot, grub would not > > load. I use a single root partition (/boot inclusive) and the patched > > grub sources. > > > > I've tried booting into knoppix and compiling reiser4progs and running an > fsck. > > > > This is what I get -: > > Master super block (16): > > magic: ReIsEr4 > > blksize:4096 > > format: 0x0 (format40) > > label: > > > > Format super block (17): > > plugin: format40 > > description:Disk-format for reiser4. > > magic: ReIsEr40FoRmAt > > flushes:0 > > mkfs id:0x3a4f3c7b > > blocks: 2443880 > > free blocks:428490 > > root block: 743745 > > tail policy:0x2 (smart) > > next oid: 0xf63a06 > > file count: 469920 > > tree height:5 > > key policy: LARGE > > > > > > CHECKING STORAGE TREE > > FSCK: Node (743744), item (0), unit (0): Points to the block (743745) > > which is in the tree already. > > The whole subtree is skipped. > > Segmentation fault > > > > can you please run dmesg after that and send its output? > > > debugfs.reiser4 also segfaults, and a mount also fails, it complians > > of a duplicate key. (I can't post the exact message because the second > > livecd doesn't have X or any mail client :( > > > > > > Cheers, > > Sarath > > > > -- > > I presume, when you pronounce iptables, you say that you are peeing tables > > > > -- -- I presume, when you pronounce iptables, you say that you are peeing tables
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
Hello On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 16:21 +0200, Sarath Menon wrote: > Hello, > > I've been using reiser4 for more than a year without any problems. The > filesystem performance has been commendable to say the least. > Yesterday, I had to powercycle my pc (due to a dma hang with my cd > drive - happens occasionaly) and after the reboot, grub would not > load. I use a single root partition (/boot inclusive) and the patched > grub sources. > > I've tried booting into knoppix and compiling reiser4progs and running an > fsck. > > This is what I get -: > Master super block (16): > magic: ReIsEr4 > blksize:4096 > format: 0x0 (format40) > label: > > Format super block (17): > plugin: format40 > description:Disk-format for reiser4. > magic: ReIsEr40FoRmAt > flushes:0 > mkfs id:0x3a4f3c7b > blocks: 2443880 > free blocks:428490 > root block: 743745 > tail policy:0x2 (smart) > next oid: 0xf63a06 > file count: 469920 > tree height:5 > key policy: LARGE > > > CHECKING STORAGE TREE > FSCK: Node (743744), item (0), unit (0): Points to the block (743745) > which is in the tree already. > The whole subtree is skipped. > Segmentation fault > can you please run dmesg after that and send its output? > debugfs.reiser4 also segfaults, and a mount also fails, it complians > of a duplicate key. (I can't post the exact message because the second > livecd doesn't have X or any mail client :( > > > Cheers, > Sarath > > -- > I presume, when you pronounce iptables, you say that you are peeing tables >
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
Hello On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 16:21 +0200, Sarath Menon wrote: > Hello, > > I've been using reiser4 for more than a year without any problems. The > filesystem performance has been commendable to say the least. > Yesterday, I had to powercycle my pc (due to a dma hang with my cd > drive - happens occasionaly) and after the reboot, grub would not > load. I use a single root partition (/boot inclusive) and the patched > grub sources. > > I've tried booting into knoppix and compiling reiser4progs and running an > fsck. > what is reiser4progs's version? > This is what I get -: > Master super block (16): > magic: ReIsEr4 > blksize:4096 > format: 0x0 (format40) > label: > > Format super block (17): > plugin: format40 > description:Disk-format for reiser4. > magic: ReIsEr40FoRmAt > flushes:0 > mkfs id:0x3a4f3c7b > blocks: 2443880 > free blocks:428490 > root block: 743745 > tail policy:0x2 (smart) > next oid: 0xf63a06 > file count: 469920 > tree height:5 > key policy: LARGE > > > CHECKING STORAGE TREE > FSCK: Node (743744), item (0), unit (0): Points to the block (743745) > which is in the tree already. > The whole subtree is skipped. > Segmentation fault > > debugfs.reiser4 also segfaults, and a mount also fails, it complians > of a duplicate key. (I can't post the exact message because the second > livecd doesn't have X or any mail client :( > > > Cheers, > Sarath > > -- > I presume, when you pronounce iptables, you say that you are peeing tables >
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 11:22:22PM +0400, Konstantin Sobolev wrote: >Yeah. Luckily I've found LiveCD with 2.6.7 sources patched with one of >autosnapshots that successfully mounted my /usr, so now I'll be able to build >new kernel. Can you recommend some more or less stable autosnapshot that I >can use? Seems that generally later autosnapshots are better autosnapshots. It is recommended you turn on assertion debuggings, especially if you don't want any faster performance than "fast enough". Just in case. -- mjt
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
On Thursday 15 July 2004 23:09, Vitaly Fertman wrote: > On Thursday 15 July 2004 22:45, Konstantin Sobolev wrote: > > On Thursday 15 July 2004 16:21, Vitaly Fertman wrote: > > > would you try the latest reiser4progs from > > > www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.07.13-internal.testing/ > > > > It worked OK but now I can't mount it :( > > ahh, last internal releases of reiser4progs -- 0.5.5 you tried > before and the current 0.5.6 -- should be used with the last > autosnapshots only: > http://www.namesys.com/auto-snapshots/ > earlier reiser4 versions do not support plugin sets. After fscking > the root directory got such a pset and as a result the fs cannot be > mounted with an old reiser4 code anymore. you can either build the kernel with the latest reiser4 auto-snapshot or get reiser4progs-0.5.4. If later, fsck.reiser4-0.5.4 should be able to fix the root directory to the old format -- it has worked for my test now at least. > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address > > 0008 followed by registers dump and call trace > > > > I guess my laptop is dead until new LiveCD with fresh reiser4 snapshot > > that will be able to mount it.. -- Thanks, Vitaly Fertman
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
On Thursday 15 July 2004 23:09, Vitaly Fertman wrote: > On Thursday 15 July 2004 22:45, Konstantin Sobolev wrote: > > On Thursday 15 July 2004 16:21, Vitaly Fertman wrote: > > > would you try the latest reiser4progs from > > > www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.07.13-internal.testing/ > > > > It worked OK but now I can't mount it :( > > ahh, last internal releases of reiser4progs -- 0.5.5 you tried > before and the current 0.5.6 -- should be used with the last > autosnapshots only: > http://www.namesys.com/auto-snapshots/ > earlier reiser4 versions do not support plugin sets. After fscking > the root directory got such a pset and as a result the fs cannot be > mounted with an old reiser4 code anymore. Yeah. Luckily I've found LiveCD with 2.6.7 sources patched with one of autosnapshots that successfully mounted my /usr, so now I'll be able to build new kernel. Can you recommend some more or less stable autosnapshot that I can use? Thanks for your help :) -- /KoS * recursion n.: See Recursion -- The Jargon File
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
On Thursday 15 July 2004 22:45, Konstantin Sobolev wrote: > On Thursday 15 July 2004 16:21, Vitaly Fertman wrote: > > would you try the latest reiser4progs from > > www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.07.13-internal.testing/ > > It worked OK but now I can't mount it :( ahh, last internal releases of reiser4progs -- 0.5.5 you tried before and the current 0.5.6 -- should be used with the last autosnapshots only: http://www.namesys.com/auto-snapshots/ earlier reiser4 versions do not support plugin sets. After fscking the root directory got such a pset and as a result the fs cannot be mounted with an old reiser4 code anymore. > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address > 0008 followed by registers dump and call trace > > I guess my laptop is dead until new LiveCD with fresh reiser4 snapshot that > will be able to mount it.. -- Thanks, Vitaly Fertman
Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults
On Thursday 15 July 2004 16:21, Vitaly Fertman wrote: > would you try the latest reiser4progs from > www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.07.13-internal.testing/ It worked OK but now I can't mount it :( Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0008 followed by registers dump and call trace I guess my laptop is dead until new LiveCD with fresh reiser4 snapshot that will be able to mount it.. -- /KoS * (W)indows,(I)cons,(M)ice,(P)ointers,(S)heesh!
Re: Snapshot 2004.07.13 build problems (was: Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults)
On Thu 15 July 2004 16:39, Vitaly Fertman wrote: > > > there is a new version of libaal package that needs to be installed > > > first. > > That's the one I used... > probably you have occasionally not uninstalled libaal.h file somewhere ? > have you run ldconfig after installing the libaal ? There was indeed an old one lying around. I removed that, ran ldconfig, reconfigured and reinstalled libaal, reconfigured reiser4progs and now it compiled and installed cleanly. Thanks once again, Ray
Re: Snapshot 2004.07.13 build problems (was: Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults)
On Thu 15 July 2004 16:27, Vitaly Fertman wrote: > there is a new version of libaal package that needs to be installed first. Is that this one: 1805803b582a8799871bf11f2bc2ef77 libaal-0.5.3.tar.gz from http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.07.13-internal.testing/ ? That's the one I used... If there's a newer one, where can I get it then? Thanks, Ray
Re: Snapshot 2004.07.13 build problems (was: Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults)
On Thursday 15 July 2004 17:11, Raymond A. Meijer wrote: > On Thu 15 July 2004 15:21, Vitaly Fertman wrote: > > Hi, > > > would you try the latest reiser4progs from > > www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.07.13-internal.testing/ > > I'm trying to compile it too, after applying the > reiser4progs-0.5.6-libaux-gauge.c.diff patch, but it doesn't compile: there is a new version of libaal package that needs to be installed first. > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -D_REENTRANT > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DENABLE_SYMLINKS -DENABLE_SPECIAL -DENABLE_R5_HASH > -DENABLE_FNV1_HASH -DENABLE_RUPASOV_HASH -DENABLE_TEA_HASH > -DENABLE_DEG_HASH -DENABLE_LARGE_KEYS -DENABLE_SHORT_KEYS > -DENABLE_DOT_O_FIBRE -DENABLE_EXT_1_FIBRE -DENABLE_EXT_3_FIBRE > -DENABLE_LEXIC_FIBRE -O3 -W -Wall -Wuninitialized -Wno-unused-parameter > -Wredundant-decls -MT librepair_la-filter.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/librepair_la-filter.Tpo -c filter.c -fPIC -DPIC -o > .libs/librepair_la-filter.o filter.c: In function `cb_gauge_tree_percent': > filter.c:61: warning: implicit declaration of function > `aal_gauge_set_value' filter.c: In function `repair_filter_node_check': > filter.c:343: warning: implicit declaration of function > `aal_gauge_set_data' filter.c: In function `repair_filter': > filter.c:656: warning: passing arg 1 of `aal_gauge_create' makes integer > from pointer without a cast filter.c:656: error: too many arguments to > function `aal_gauge_create' make[2]: *** [librepair_la-filter.lo] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Reiser4/reiser4progs-0.5.6/librepair' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Reiser4/reiser4progs-0.5.6' > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > Do you need more info about my system? It's running 2.6.7-cko6, and libaal > compiled and installed cleanly. > > > Thanks, > > Ray -- Thanks, Vitaly Fertman
Snapshot 2004.07.13 build problems (was: Re: fsck.reiser4 segfaults)
On Thu 15 July 2004 15:21, Vitaly Fertman wrote: Hi, > would you try the latest reiser4progs from > www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.07.13-internal.testing/ I'm trying to compile it too, after applying the reiser4progs-0.5.6-libaux-gauge.c.diff patch, but it doesn't compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -D_REENTRANT -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DENABLE_SYMLINKS -DENABLE_SPECIAL -DENABLE_R5_HASH -DENABLE_FNV1_HASH -DENABLE_RUPASOV_HASH -DENABLE_TEA_HASH -DENABLE_DEG_HASH -DENABLE_LARGE_KEYS -DENABLE_SHORT_KEYS -DENABLE_DOT_O_FIBRE -DENABLE_EXT_1_FIBRE -DENABLE_EXT_3_FIBRE -DENABLE_LEXIC_FIBRE -O3 -W -Wall -Wuninitialized -Wno-unused-parameter -Wredundant-decls -MT librepair_la-filter.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/librepair_la-filter.Tpo -c filter.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/librepair_la-filter.o filter.c: In function `cb_gauge_tree_percent': filter.c:61: warning: implicit declaration of function `aal_gauge_set_value' filter.c: In function `repair_filter_node_check': filter.c:343: warning: implicit declaration of function `aal_gauge_set_data' filter.c: In function `repair_filter': filter.c:656: warning: passing arg 1 of `aal_gauge_create' makes integer from pointer without a cast filter.c:656: error: too many arguments to function `aal_gauge_create' make[2]: *** [librepair_la-filter.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Reiser4/reiser4progs-0.5.6/librepair' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Reiser4/reiser4progs-0.5.6' make: *** [all] Error 2 Do you need more info about my system? It's running 2.6.7-cko6, and libaal compiled and installed cleanly. Thanks, Ray
