[evolution-data-server] Hard-code freeze break request
Hello, I would like to ask for a hard-code freeze break for evolution-data-server due to [1], where is reported that a migration of data can fail when the GConf is configured to conform to XDG folder settings. The attached patch at [1] is pretty simple, it only checks whether the XDG folder exists, and if yes, then it uses it for account migration, otherwise the default folder as before is used. I believe it will be good to have it included in 3.12.0. Thanks and bye, Milan [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726681 ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: [evolution-data-server] Hard-code freeze break request
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Milan Crha wrote: > [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726681 The patch looks fine to me. But is gconf migration still relevant to include at all ? In any case, +1 for the release team. ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: [evolution-data-server] Hard-code freeze break request
Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Milan Crha wrote: > > > [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726681 > > The patch looks fine to me. But is gconf migration still relevant to > include at all ? In any case, +1 for the release team. Seconded. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: [evolution-data-server] Hard-code freeze break request
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 05:32 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Milan Crha wrote: > > > [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726681> > The patch looks fine to me. But is gconf migration still relevant to > include at all ? In any case, +1 for the release team.We still support > restore from a backup of pre-3.6 versions, thus yes, better to have it included. Evolution-data-server doesn't depend on GConf library, it only plays with its internal files (which has its advantages and disadvantages too). Thanks for the approval, to you both, I'm committing this to sources. Bye, Milan ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-initial-setup
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to land gnome-initial-setup's wip/timezone branch before
> the .92 release. This unfortunately adds a new translatable string:
>
> _("We think that your time zone is %s. Press Next to continue"
> " or search for a city to manually set the time zone.")
>
> I know it's coming late, but it would be great to have this in the final
> release.
>
Ping ? Can we get a yay or nay on this from the translators ?
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-initial-setup
2014-03-19 11:34 GMT+01:00 Matthias Clasen :
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to land gnome-initial-setup's wip/timezone branch before
>> the .92 release. This unfortunately adds a new translatable string:
>>
>> _("We think that your time zone is %s. Press Next to continue"
>> " or search for a city to manually set the time zone.")
>>
>> I know it's coming late, but it would be great to have this in the final
>> release.
>>
>
> Ping ? Can we get a yay or nay on this from the translators ?
>
I'm hesitant to approve this. Many translation teams have not yet
finished updating translations for 3.12, and we have only a couple of
days left. Maybe other coordinators feel different.
Best regards,
--
Piotr Drąg
http://raven.fedorapeople.org/
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-initial-setup
I'm a committer of Chinese simplified team. >> Ping ? Can we get a yay or nay on this from the translators ? I don't know how many Gnome translators have subscribed the i18n list. Maybe they prefer be silent, I'm personally a little unhappy with your messages again and again to break string freeze. > > I'm hesitant to approve this. Many translation teams have not yet > finished updating translations for 3.12, and we have only a couple of > days left. Maybe other coordinators feel different. > Actually short after the scheduled string freeze, our zh_CN team have finished 3.12 translation. But since then, you developers are keeping changing strings. Though easy to update and commit, I personally decide to wait for the silence of your mails before fixing them. Yes we translator should follow your pace. But can your work be more predictable? If the release schedule is something to break so freely, why do you set that? And, before the string freeze, for a long time, I saw few string change announcements. I don't know if it's a habit to leave the string changes to the last minutes? I do think there should be better communication between developers and translation teams (at least team coordinators) here. For example, give a banner on top of Damned Lies about your activities, plans and instructions for translation (please translate after MM/DD, translate xx branch now, etc.) Just my personal opinion. ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-initial-setup
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Wylmer Wang wrote: > > I do think there should be better communication between developers and > translation teams (at least team coordinators) here. For example, give > a banner on top of Damned Lies > about your activities, plans and instructions for translation (please > translate after MM/DD, translate xx branch now, etc.) The mail you are replying to _is_ the communication between developers and translators... ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
RE: Missed Release 3.11.92 for gnome-sound-recorder, Request to Include Bug Fixes Either in Late Release or in 3.12
Hi, I ran into some strange issues with Fedora 20 on wacom this past weekend, and was not able to make a release for 3.11.92 because of an unusable system. David King has pointed out that I have a bug in gnome-sound-recorder which is causing the AUTHORS and COPYING files to not be included[1]. He has also suggested that I make some changes to the README and NEWS[3] files. Is it possible for me to make these changes and either include them in a late release or in 3.12? If so, should I send a request to any other lists? Sorry for the issues. Thanks, Meg Ford [1]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726619 [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726621 [3] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726621 ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: [evolution-data-server] Hard-code freeze break request ][
On 19 March 2014 17:09, Milan Crha wrote: > Hello again, > it turned out that a write to an IMAP folder of a certain message type > can lead to a data loss, which was reported as [1]. The bug contains a > trivial fix, which would be good to have in 3.12.0. > Thanks and bye, > Milan > > [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726723 1/2 for release team -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
[evolution-data-server] Hard-code freeze break request ][
Hello again, it turned out that a write to an IMAP folder of a certain message type can lead to a data loss, which was reported as [1]. The bug contains a trivial fix, which would be good to have in 3.12.0. Thanks and bye, Milan [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726723 ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Hard code freeze break for GNOME Photos
Hi, we would like to integrate the help for GNOME Photos in this release. The patch for the pages till now can be found on this bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=711505 and the help is mostly ready to be integrated. The integration would also involve building the help and creating a button in the application UI for the help(Hence the freeze break request). This should be complete by tomorrow. Thanks! ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
[gnome-initial-setup] Created branch gnome-3-12
The branch 'gnome-3-12' was created pointing to: 8392abc... 3.11.92 ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-initial-setup
Ok, thanks for the feedback - we've decided to leave the geolocation support out of gnome-initial-setup for 3.12.0 - it will land on master shortly, after we've branched off gnome-3-12. ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Missed Release 3.11.92 for gnome-sound-recorder, Request to Include Bug Fixes Either in Late Release or in 3.12
Hi Meg, > I ran into some strange issues with Fedora 20 on wacom this past weekend, > and was not able to make a release for 3.11.92 because of an unusable > system. David King has pointed out that I have a bug in > gnome-sound-recorder which is causing the AUTHORS and COPYING files to not > be included[1]. He has also suggested that I make some changes to the > README and NEWS[3] files. Is it possible for me to make these changes and > either include them in a late release or in 3.12? If so, should I send a > request to any other lists? It would be really nice if you managed to roll a 3.11.92 tarball todaoy or tomorrow; that way it will make it in the .92 release. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Hard code freeze break for GNOME Photos
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 23:22 +0530, Aruna S wrote: > Hi, we would like to integrate the help for GNOME Photos in this release. > The patch for the pages till now can be found on this bug: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=711505 and the help is > mostly ready to be integrated. > > The integration would also involve building the help and creating a > button in the application UI for the help(Hence the freeze break > request). Thanks for notifying in advance. The freeze break request can be handled once a patch is available to review. Apart from the UI change of adding a button, would this also introduce any new translatable strings for translators? If so, which? andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-initial-setup
Kalev Lember , Tue, 18 Mar 2014 23:07:34 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to land gnome-initial-setup's wip/timezone branch before
> the .92 release. This unfortunately adds a new translatable string:
>
> _("We think that your time zone is %s. Press Next to continue"
> " or search for a city to manually set the time zone.")
>
> I know it's coming late, but it would be great to have this in the final
> release.
Hi Kalev,
Is this a nice to have feature, or, rather, an important fix? This
late in the cycle, translators tend to only approve fixes that are deemed
critical or very important.
Cheers,
pk
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-initial-setup
On 03/19/2014 08:45 PM, Petr Kovar wrote: > Is this a nice to have feature, or, rather, an important fix? This > late in the cycle, translators tend to only approve fixes that are deemed > critical or very important. Yes, it's a new feature. Thanks for the feedback everybody -- it's fine to postpone it to 3.14. We just wanted to see how the translators team felt for including it in 3.12 since the code was ready. Matthias has now released gnome-initial-setup 3.11.92 and has also branched off the gnome-3-12 branch, which means the master branch is open for development again. I'll push the changes there. Thanks, Kalev ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
