Re: Freeze break request for libgnomekbd
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Michael Catanzarowrote: > Who wants to make a new release? Can you take it Rui? Yes, incoming. Thanks for the acks! Rui ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Freeze break request for libgnomekbd
On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 15:39 +0200, Rui Tiago Cação Matos wrote: > I'm including all the other cleanups in this request since they're > trivial enough and libgnomekbd hasn't had a release since 3.6.0 . Who wants to make a new release? Can you take it Rui? Michael ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Freeze break request for mutter
On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 09:21 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Those patches all look good to me. In particular the rotation fix is > important to claim Wayland feature-completeness, so +1 from me for > the > release team. +2 ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Freeze break request for libgnomekbd
On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 09:49 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > +1 from me. r-t approval 2 of 2. And likely irrelevant; just pointing out: https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgnomekbd/commit/?h=wip/rtcm/cleanups=3f4de28962fa73fdc784c8b4057128b195b5c06c states "It's not needed with modern gtk+" (to be exact, it's deprecated since GTK+ 3.14), however configure.ac still keeps "GTK_REQUIRED=2.90". But I guess noone's going to try a brand new libgnomekbd with an ancient GTK (& not even sure /if/ that'd actually create any issue). andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Freeze break request for libgnomekbd
+1 from me. ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Freeze break request for libgnomekbd
Hi, I'd like to request a freeze break request for libgnomekbd to include this set of small patches https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgnomekbd/log/?h=wip/rtcm/cleanups in particular, these two: https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgnomekbd/commit/?h=wip/rtcm/cleanups=4818b9b131154c103f34367c682af42ba51b871e https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgnomekbd/commit/?h=wip/rtcm/cleanups=0d714a1ed7735bb375a9a7c81009108053ad8d1f are required to make the keyboard layout display tool work on wayland sessions. I'm including all the other cleanups in this request since they're trivial enough and libgnomekbd hasn't had a release since 3.6.0 . Thanks, Rui ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Freeze break request for mutter
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Jonas Ådahlwrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to request freeze breaks for 5 (five) Wayland related bugs. > > One is a feature bug fix, one avoids possibly aborting valid (GTK+) > clients, and three are crash fixes. I'm listing them below: > > Fix output rotation of not-left-most monitors on Wayland: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770672 > > Fix crash happening with pointer warp emulated Xwayland (needs the > xserver patches on xorg-devel to reproduce): > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771345 > > Crash fix for Xdnd interoperability race condition: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770940 > > Don't disconnect (i.e. effectively abort) valid dnd clients when hitting > race condition: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770937 > > Crash fix for mapping popups on systems without pointer device: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771305 > Those patches all look good to me. In particular the rotation fix is important to claim Wayland feature-completeness, so +1 from me for the release team. ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Code freeze exception for Evolution
Hi Tomas, > I'd like to request a code freeze expection for [0]. Without this > change the email printing in Evolution does not work at all. The patch > was approved by Milan Crha. 1/2. (ideally you'd also fix the typo pointed by Andre in the bug report). Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Code freeze exception for Evolution
Hi, I'd like to request a code freeze expection for [0]. Without this change the email printing in Evolution does not work at all. The patch was approved by Milan Crha. Thank you Tom [0] - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771420 ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.