On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 11:14 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net> > wrote: > > Which would mean nothing called "gtk+" in the modulesets? Why not > > keep > > either gtk 3.x or gtk 4.x with that name? > > > > I'd expect the "gtk+" module to build GTK+ 4.x ("the latest"). > > I have no strong opinion on this. Not having gtk+ in the moduleset > doesn't seem like a big deal to me. The + in the name is a bit > awkward, tbh.
Losing the gtk+ module would mean third-party modulesets are forced to make a decision on whether they want gtk3 or gtk4, which seems like it might be desirable? S _______________________________________________ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.