This is the appropriate fix, it's not going to get any better. But I understand
if you don't want to ship it so close to the deadline.
Thanks,
verdre
> With 24 hours to go from the cut off deadline for 3.30, I don’t think this is
> a good idea; this can wait for 3.30.1, and might as well use the appropriate
> fix. Most distros will ship that version anyway.
>
>
> Ciao,
> Emmanuele.
>
>
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 at 17:13, verdre < ver...@v0yd.nl> wrote:
> > I have an alternative solution which would be more compatible with
> > changes we'll make in the future, could this one also get an approval?
> >
> > It's even less intrusive than the other one since there's no need to
> > stop initially hiding the label.
> >
> > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/215
> >
> > Thank you,
> > verdre
> >
> > On 02.09.2018 02:37, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll give a hesitant +1 to this one, since the change is small.
> > >
> > > If you consider it important enough for a 3.30.0 freeze break, rather
> > > than waiting three weeks for 3.30.1, then it should also important
> > > enough to backport to 3.28. It would be nice to see this fixed there too.
> > >
> > > Thanks for solving it,
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > ___
> > release-team@gnome.org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> > Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
>
>
> --
>
> https://www.bassi.io
> [@] ebassi [@ [gmail.com](http://gmail.com)]
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
