Re: UI freeze break request for g-c-c

[Jordan Petridis via release-team]

2/2 from me, while its fairly late it doesn't make sense not to do the 
adjustments that correspond to the shell changes.

Jordan

publickey - jordan@alatiera.com - 0x0BDAD30B.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for g-c-c

[Michael Catanzaro]

+1 from me on both MRs, since this is tied to the freeze break for the 
lock screen itself.


That said, I fear we've pushed this *really* late. Stability during the 
final weeks of the release cycle is important in order to properly test 
changes and avoid regressions. Let's be more conservative in the future.


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

UI freeze break request for g-c-c

[Tobias Bernard]

Hello release team,

The recent lock screen changes require some adjustments to the background 
settings panel, because the lock screen now uses a blurred version of the 
session wallpaper rather than a separate one. This means that we need to remove 
the lock screen wallpaper setting from control-center:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/merge_requests/705

In order to make the overall layout work better with only one preview, we also 
need to change the thumbnails to a smaller size:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/merge_requests/706

I'd like to ask for a freeze break for these relatively small changes, which 
are needed to avoid some pretty visible regressions in UX quality for the 
background panel. These are pure UI changes, and don't change or introduce new 
strings.

Both MRs are already reviewed by maintainers and ready to be merged.

Cheers,
Tobias
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

[mcatanzaro]

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 1:17 PM, Matthias Clasen via release-team 
 wrote:

Tentatively ok with it, but I left a comment.
And since this has some string additions, please also ask 
gnome-i...@gnome.org for their ok.


It's not great to see this so late, but here's your second +1


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

[Matthias Clasen via release-team]

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:05 PM Georges Basile Stavracas Neto via
release-team  wrote:

> To the Release Team,
>
> I hereby ask for String and UI freeze break exceptions for landing GNOME
> Shell's
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/675. This merge
> request is an important last step for feature-completeness of the ability
> to create
> and delete folders within GNOME Shell.
>
>
Tentatively ok with it, but I left a comment.
And since this has some string additions, please also ask
gnome-i...@gnome.org for their ok.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell

[Georges Basile Stavracas Neto via release-team]

To the Release Team,

I hereby ask for String and UI freeze break exceptions for landing 
GNOME Shell's
. This 
merge
request is an important last step for feature-completeness of the 
ability to create

and delete folders within GNOME Shell.

With respect,
Georges

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for g-c-c

[Andre Klapper]

On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 17:50 +0300, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> Approval 1 / 2

Yes please. r-t approval 2/2.

andre
--
Andre Klapper  |  ak...@gmx.net
https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for g-c-c

[mcatanzaro]

Copying the original mail below, because this got stuck in the 
moderation queue:


On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:17 PM, Gunnar Hjalmarsson 
 wrote:

Hello release team,

I'd like to request a freeze break to allow the merge of:



into 3.34. It completes the fix of



The part in gnome-desktop, including the API which the 
gnome-control-center change depends on, is already in.


The remaining g-c-c change affects the display of certain items in 
the Language widget in Region & Language, meaning that for instance 
the item


Serbian Serbia

which actually refers to the latin locale will instead be shown as

Serbian (Latin) Serbia

to distinguish it from the cyrillic locale which will keep being 
shown as


Serbian Serbia

The g-c-c change does not add any new strings to be translated - that 
has already be taken care of in gnome-desktop.


The merge request has been reviewed and otherwise cleared by Robert 
Ancell.


Thanks for your consideration!

--
Cheers,

Gunnar Hjalmarsson



___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for g-c-c

[mcatanzaro]

Approval 1 / 2

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

UI freeze break request for g-c-c

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson]

Hello release team,

I'd like to request a freeze break to allow the merge of:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/merge_requests/507

into 3.34. It completes the fix of

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-desktop/issues/50

The part in gnome-desktop, including the API which the 
gnome-control-center change depends on, is already in.


The remaining g-c-c change affects the display of certain items in the 
Language widget in Region & Language, meaning that for instance the item


Serbian Serbia

which actually refers to the latin locale will instead be shown as

Serbian (Latin) Serbia

to distinguish it from the cyrillic locale which will keep being shown as

Serbian Serbia

The g-c-c change does not add any new strings to be translated - that 
has already be taken care of in gnome-desktop.


The merge request has been reviewed and otherwise cleared by Robert Ancell.

Thanks for your consideration!

--
Cheers,

Gunnar Hjalmarsson
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for gnome-initial-setup

[Javier Jardón via release-team]

On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, 16:17 Michael Catanzaro via release-team <
release-team@gnome.org wrote:

>
> Approval 1 of 2, nice quality improvement!
>

2/2

Cheers,
Javier

>
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for gnome-initial-setup

[Ondrej Holy via release-team]

st 6. 2. 2019 v 19:29 odesílatel Javier Jardón  napsal:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, 16:17 Michael Catanzaro via release-team 
> >
>>
>> Approval 1 of 2, nice quality improvement!
>
>
> 2/2

Thanks!

Ondrej
-- 
Ondrej Holy
Software Engineer, Core Desktop Development
Red Hat Czech s.r.o
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: g-c-c display panel UI freeze break request to closer match the 3.30 interface

[Javier Jardón]

On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 16:04,  wrote:
>
>
> +1 of 2

2/2

Cheers,
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: g-c-c display panel UI freeze break request to closer match the 3.30 interface

[mcatanzaro]

+1 of 2

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

g-c-c display panel UI freeze break request to closer match the 3.30 interface

[Benjamin Berg]

Hi,

during UI review of the display panel changes a few regressions were
found. The main change is that the scaling UI should be reverted to
match 3.30. The current UI was not quite finished with some more
experimentations happening that were not finalised.

The following changes are requested:

 * Revert scaling UI to closer match 3.30 (i.e. up to 5 buttons instead
   of a dropdown menu)
 * Move arrangement instructions outside of view area. This closer
   matches the 3.30 UI and avoids a UI regression where the monitors
   are clipped unexpectedly at the bottom while dragging.

These changes are based on feedback from the design team and the review
in:
  
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/merge_requests/367#note_426885

Screenshots of the panel comparing the 3.30, 3.31.90 and the patched
version can be found in the MR at:
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/merge_requests/384

Benjamin


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for gnome-initial-setup

[Michael Catanzaro via release-team]

Approval 1 of 2, nice quality improvement!

Michael

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

UI freeze break request for gnome-initial-setup

[Ondrej Holy via release-team]

Hi,

I would like to ask for UI freeze break to add "offline mode" for
accounts page of gnome-initial-setup:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-initial-setup/merge_requests/23

The accounts page allows creating of enterprise accounts, but you have
to be online first, which doesn't have to be obvious and leads to
errors:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-initial-setup/issues/63

The "offline mode" prevents you from switching to enterprise page and
informs you about the need to be online. We have already something
similar in gnome-control-center for some time.

The mentioned merge request contains screenshots. The change is based
on mockup from Allan Day and has been already reviewed by him and by
the maintainer Will Thompson.

Regards

Ondrej
-- 
Ondrej Holy
Software Engineer, Core Desktop Development
Red Hat Czech s.r.o
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI Freeze Break Request for GNOME Initial Setup

[Matthias Clasen via release-team]

I am +1 for this too

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 2:56 PM  wrote:

>
> I'll give a hesitant +1 here. (You also need a second approval.)
>
>  * Please consider Will's concern about the network appearing to
> disappear after it's selected. That doesn't seem like a great user
> experience.
>
>  * Use of NetworkManager in gnome-initial-setup is a known cause of
> crashers in the past, and there's not really any way to recover the
> first boot experience after that happens. So be careful.
>
> But the benefits do seem worth the late freeze break.
>
> Michael
>
> ___
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gnome-doc-l...@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
>
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI Freeze Break Request for GNOME Initial Setup

[mcatanzaro]

I'll give a hesitant +1 here. (You also need a second approval.)

* Please consider Will's concern about the network appearing to 
disappear after it's selected. That doesn't seem like a great user 
experience.


* Use of NetworkManager in gnome-initial-setup is a known cause of 
crashers in the past, and there's not really any way to recover the 
first boot experience after that happens. So be careful.


But the benefits do seem worth the late freeze break.

Michael

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

UI Freeze Break Request for GNOME Initial Setup

[Joaquim Rocha via release-team]

Hi,

I have recently created a Merge Request that improves how the WiFi list in
the GNOME Initial Setup behaves. The reason is described in the MR's
description [1].

So I would like to request that we break UI freeze and merge it (it doesn't
break string freeze).

[1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-initial-setup/merge_requests/16

Joaquim Rocha
http://www.joaquimrocha.com
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI Freeze break request for control-center/wifi

[Matthias Clasen]

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Michael Catanzaro 
wrote:

>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:23 AM, Felipe Borges 
> wrote:
>
>> It pretty much consists of hiding the button in the screenshot below:
>>
>> https://i.imgur.com/JOl3no2.png
>>
>
> +1
>
>
Seconded
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI Freeze break request for control-center/wifi

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:23 AM, Felipe Borges  
wrote:

It pretty much consists of hiding the button in the screenshot below:

https://i.imgur.com/JOl3no2.png


+1

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

UI Freeze break request for control-center/wifi

[Felipe Borges]

Hi,

This is a very minor UI change but it can be misleading so we decided
to drop before the stable release.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/793238

There's now (git master) a refresh button in the Wifi list which is
supposed to trigger manually the scan for new networks. Considering
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/793238#c0 we want to revert the commit that
introduced this feature.

It pretty much consists of hiding the button in the screenshot below:

https://i.imgur.com/JOl3no2.png

Thanks,
Felipe.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for Epiphany

[Michael Catanzaro]

Pushed, thanks for the approvals.

Michael
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for Epiphany

[Javier Jardón]

On 20 February 2017 at 16:33, Michael Catanzaro  wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 06:35 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> Thats quite a bit of new code to land; but if really simplifies
>> things as much as you say, I'm willing to give a +1.
>
> Yup. I wouldn't have asked for this later in the freeze, but since
> we're near the start
>
>> I guess those are new strings ?
>
> Yup.
>

+1 from me



-- 
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for Epiphany

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 06:35 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Thats quite a bit of new code to land; but if really simplifies
> things as much as you say, I'm willing to give a +1.

Yup. I wouldn't have asked for this later in the freeze, but since
we're near the start

> I guess those are new strings ? 

Yup.

Michael
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for Epiphany

[Matthias Clasen]

Thats quite a bit of new code to land; but if really simplifies things as
much as you say, I'm willing to give a +1.

I guess those are new strings ?

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Michael Catanzaro 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We were hoping to have this finished before freeze, but unfortunately
> the work was completed a week late. We have patches to add a search
> engines manager to Epiphany in Bugzilla:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776738
>
> Screenshot attached. The UI could still use more polish, but I want to
> merge it now anyway, even though it's a lot for a freeze break, for a
> couple reasons:
>
>  * It adds support for DuckDuckGo-style search engine bangs, an
> important feature request.
>
>  * It massively simplifies how search engine management works in
> Epiphany. Currently it's handled by adding %s to a bookmark, which is
> undiscoverable and kinda nuts. It's called "smart bookmarks." In
> Epiphany 3.22, it was at least possible to edit these bookmarks
> manually via the bookmarks dialog. But in current master, there is no
> way to edit an existing smart bookmark. You can add smart bookmarks,
> but you can never remove them.
>
>  * Accordingly, it greatly simplifies some of the backing code for our
> new bookmarks popover. The bookmarks popover has been the source of
> lots of bugs recently, so simplifying this code would be very
> beneficial for us. In particular, it enables us to remove the
> EphyBookmarksListModel class, which is a fragile class that exists just
> to filter out our smart bookmarks.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael
> ___
> release-team@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
>
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

UI freeze break request for Epiphany

[Michael Catanzaro]

Hi,

We were hoping to have this finished before freeze, but unfortunately
the work was completed a week late. We have patches to add a search
engines manager to Epiphany in Bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776738

Screenshot attached. The UI could still use more polish, but I want to
merge it now anyway, even though it's a lot for a freeze break, for a
couple reasons:

 * It adds support for DuckDuckGo-style search engine bangs, an
important feature request.

 * It massively simplifies how search engine management works in
Epiphany. Currently it's handled by adding %s to a bookmark, which is
undiscoverable and kinda nuts. It's called "smart bookmarks." In
Epiphany 3.22, it was at least possible to edit these bookmarks
manually via the bookmarks dialog. But in current master, there is no
way to edit an existing smart bookmark. You can add smart bookmarks,
but you can never remove them.

 * Accordingly, it greatly simplifies some of the backing code for our
new bookmarks popover. The bookmarks popover has been the source of
lots of bugs recently, so simplifying this code would be very
beneficial for us. In particular, it enables us to remove the
EphyBookmarksListModel class, which is a fragile class that exists just
to filter out our smart bookmarks.

Thanks,

Michael___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for gnome-control-center

[Richard Hughes]

On 16 February 2017 at 17:17, Matthias Clasen  wrote:
> I'll give another approval for the release team.

Great, pushed to master. Thanks all!

Richard.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for gnome-control-center

[Matthias Clasen]

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Michael Catanzaro 
wrote:

> On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 10:56 +, Allan Day wrote:
> > Some screenshots here too.
> >
> > Allan
>
> +1 of 2 from me.
>


I'll give another approval for the release team.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for gnome-control-center

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 10:56 +, Allan Day wrote:
> Some screenshots here too.
> 
> Allan 

+1 of 2 from me.

Michael
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for gnome-control-center

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 15:08 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> I'd like to include 9039eb7b8c14000a64b6d416d0593c0e8898c87a which
> makes the dialog match the latest mockup from Allan. Questions
> welcome, thanks.
> 
> Richard.

Reference: 
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-control-center/commit/?id=9039eb7b8c14000a64b6d416d0593c0e8898c87a

Can you show us before/after screenshots please?

Michael
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

UI freeze break request for gnome-control-center

[Richard Hughes]

I'd like to include 9039eb7b8c14000a64b6d416d0593c0e8898c87a which
makes the dialog match the latest mockup from Allan. Questions
welcome, thanks.

Richard.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Second UI freeze break request for Epiphany

[Andre Klapper]

On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 08:08 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-02-28 at 20:16 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > 
> > The visual improvement looks great to me. I've commented on a minor
> > issue in the patch.
> I'm going to take this as 1/2... it would be nice to get 2/2 soon so it
> can go into today's release.

r-t approval 2 of 2.

Note that the patch also includes string changes which need to get
announced to gnome-i18n@.

Cheers,
andre
-- 
Andre Klapper  |  ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Second UI freeze break request for Epiphany

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Sun, 2016-02-28 at 20:16 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> The visual improvement looks great to me. I've commented on a minor
> issue in the patch.

I'm going to take this as 1/2... it would be nice to get 2/2 soon so it
can go into today's release.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Second UI freeze break request for Epiphany

[Matthias Clasen]

The visual improvement looks great to me. I've commented on a minor
issue in the patch.

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Michael Catanzaro
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For 3.20 we added a new initial state page, so you don't get a
> confusing completely blank page when opening Epiphany for the first
> time.
>
> In https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762812 I redesign this
> page to make it look more GNOME-ey. I attached before/after screenshots
> to this bug. I'd like to push this for 3.20, ideally before tomorrow's
> release and string freeze.
>
> (Note that Carlos found a preexisting issue to fix in that bug, which
> does not require any freeze break request; I'll probably deal with it
> later.)
>
> Michael
> ___
> release-team@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Second UI freeze break request for Epiphany

[Michael Catanzaro]

Hi,

For 3.20 we added a new initial state page, so you don't get a
confusing completely blank page when opening Epiphany for the first
time.

In https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762812 I redesign this
page to make it look more GNOME-ey. I attached before/after screenshots
to this bug. I'd like to push this for 3.20, ideally before tomorrow's
release and string freeze.

(Note that Carlos found a preexisting issue to fix in that bug, which
does not require any freeze break request; I'll probably deal with it
later.)

Michael
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for Epiphany

[Andre Klapper]

Approval 2 of 2 from release-team (though I added a small question in 
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761857#c43 ).

andre

On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 13:57 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> +1 for the release team
> 
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Iulian Radu wrote:
> > There were some questions to be settled as you said. We have came to
> > an agreement in the end and the patch is now ready to be pushed.
> > Please have another look.
-- 
Andre Klapper  |  ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for Epiphany

[Matthias Clasen]

+1 for the release team

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Iulian Radu  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There were some questions to be settled as you said. We have came to
> an agreement in the end and the patch is now ready to be pushed.
> Please have another look.
>
> Thanks,
> Iulian
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for Epiphany

[Iulian Radu]

Hi,

There were some questions to be settled as you said. We have came to
an agreement in the end and the patch is now ready to be pushed.
Please have another look.

Thanks,
Iulian
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI Freeze Break Request for gnome-software

[Matthias Clasen]

Given that you are talking about new translatable strings, I would
suggest to resend this with gnome-i18n (and the docs team list) added
to CC

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Richard Hughes  wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm fixing up the GNOME Software review dialogs to Allans new mockups:
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-mockups/master/software/version3/app-page.png
> -- this involves adding 7 tiny new strings and moving a button. The
> star rating description change I can do today with acks and the review
> modification thing I can do on Monday.
>
> Okay to break UI freeze? It just affects the new review dialog and
> there are no user docs with screenshots of this stuff. Thanks.
>
> Richard
> ___
> release-team@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for Epiphany

[Matthias Clasen]

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Iulian Radu  wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I attached a patch to this bug [0], updating the layout of the
> downloads popover in Epiphany. Michael Catanzaro (CC'd) suggested I
> should ask for a UI freeze break with the justification that this
> popover is brand new in 3.20 and introducing it in one release and
> redesigning it in the next one is a bad idea.
>
> [0] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761857
>

I'm fine with finishing up the polishing of this new ui for 3.20, but
it seems there's still some questions to be settled in the bug before
this is ready to land ?
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

UI freeze break request for Epiphany

[Iulian Radu]

Hello all,

I attached a patch to this bug [0], updating the layout of the
downloads popover in Epiphany. Michael Catanzaro (CC'd) suggested I
should ask for a UI freeze break with the justification that this
popover is brand new in 3.20 and introducing it in one release and
redesigning it in the next one is a bad idea.

[0] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761857

Thank you,
Iulian
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

UI Freeze Break Request for gnome-software

[Richard Hughes]

Hi all,

I'm fixing up the GNOME Software review dialogs to Allans new mockups:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-mockups/master/software/version3/app-page.png
-- this involves adding 7 tiny new strings and moving a button. The
star rating description change I can do today with acks and the review
modification thing I can do on Monday.

Okay to break UI freeze? It just affects the new review dialog and
there are no user docs with screenshots of this stuff. Thanks.

Richard
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[Evolution] String/UI freeze break request for gnome-3-16

[Milan Crha]

Hello,
I just committed a change into git master of evolution for:
  Follow GNOME notification settings under gnome-shell   
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735747
I was told that users of GNOME 3.16 are confused with the way evolution
notifies the users and that it doesn't follow their preference as set
in Notifications.

I added one localized string "Open _GNOME Notification settings", thus
I cannot simply commit it also to the gnome-3-16 branch, the same as
Edit->Plugins->Mail Notification->Configuration tab looks differently
in GNOME, most of the options were hidden and a button with the above
caption is shown instead.

Can I commit the same change with the added string into the evolution's
gnome-3-16 branch, please?
Thanks and bye,
Milan

P.S.: I'm not subscribed to any of the lists, thus please keep me in
the loop when replying. Thanks.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for eog

[Felix Riemann]

Am Freitag, den 13.03.2015, 00:40 +0100 schrieb Frederic Peters:
> Sure, 2/2; but it's still time to update the documentation, from a
> quick look to it it would mostly be updating references to menu
> actions to either the top panel menu or the right-click menu.
> 
> Felix, it would be great if you could assist the documentation team in
> these updates.

Sure, I can help as time permits. There's probably also several pages
that reference the removed toolbar. A few screenshots may also need
updating.

I actually was under the impression that the docs were also affected by
the string freeze. But I just noticed in the wiki that that's not case.

Felix

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for eog

[Frederic Peters]

Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Felix Riemann  wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > This is a really tiny UI freeze break request for Eye of GNOME.
> > While testing the new UI Allan Day found that the margin to the sides of
> > the revamped metadata sidebar are pretty small and suggested increasing
> > the margins.
> >
> > It would be nice if we could get this in as the broader margins indeed
> > looks nicer (esp. at the window border) and improve the separation
> > between image and sidebar.
> >
> > I prepared a Bugzilla ticket that contains comparision images and the
> > necessary two lines of code:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746105
> >
> > Documentation is unaffected by this change as we unfortunately didn't
> > manage to update the docs for the new UI in this cycle.
> 
> +1 from me for the release team.

Sure, 2/2; but it's still time to update the documentation, from a
quick look to it it would mostly be updating references to menu
actions to either the top panel menu or the right-click menu.

Felix, it would be great if you could assist the documentation team in
these updates.



Fred
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for eog

[Matthias Clasen]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Felix Riemann  wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is a really tiny UI freeze break request for Eye of GNOME.
> While testing the new UI Allan Day found that the margin to the sides of
> the revamped metadata sidebar are pretty small and suggested increasing
> the margins.
>
> It would be nice if we could get this in as the broader margins indeed
> looks nicer (esp. at the window border) and improve the separation
> between image and sidebar.
>
> I prepared a Bugzilla ticket that contains comparision images and the
> necessary two lines of code:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746105
>
> Documentation is unaffected by this change as we unfortunately didn't
> manage to update the docs for the new UI in this cycle.

+1 from me for the release team.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

UI freeze break request for eog

[Felix Riemann]

Hi!

This is a really tiny UI freeze break request for Eye of GNOME.
While testing the new UI Allan Day found that the margin to the sides of
the revamped metadata sidebar are pretty small and suggested increasing
the margins.

It would be nice if we could get this in as the broader margins indeed
looks nicer (esp. at the window border) and improve the separation
between image and sidebar.

I prepared a Bugzilla ticket that contains comparision images and the
necessary two lines of code:

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746105

Documentation is unaffected by this change as we unfortunately didn't
manage to update the docs for the new UI in this cycle.

Regards

Felix

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for gnome-shell

[Andre Klapper]

On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 17:13 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> > I'd like to request a UI freeze break to solve bug 660293 (which is a dupe
> > of 740750).
> >
> > There are no screenshots in the bug, but what it does is fairly simple:
> > instead of popping up a network password modal dialog out of the blue, it
> > shows a notification asking for password.
> > You click on the notification and you get the usual dialog. You dismiss the
> > notification and the connection fails.
> > The UI was acked by designers.
> >
> > I made sure to reuse existing strings (including some typographical fixes
> > which are not visible in the patch attached to the bug, but I have locally),
> > so this is only a UI freeze break, not a string freeze break.
> 
> Hi Giovanni,
> 
> a strong +1 from me for the release team. Getting rid of spontaneous
> modal dialogs has been one of the things we've pushed for with the
> target bug list. Nice to see that we'll make some progress on this
> before the gates close for 3.16.

Second +1 for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660293#c42 ;
this sounds like a way better approach to me.

andre
-- 
Andre Klapper  |  ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for gnome-shell

[Matthias Clasen]

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Giovanni Campagna
 wrote:
> Hello release-team,
>
> long time no see :)
>
> I'd like to request a UI freeze break to solve bug 660293 (which is a dupe
> of 740750).
>
> There are no screenshots in the bug, but what it does is fairly simple:
> instead of popping up a network password modal dialog out of the blue, it
> shows a notification asking for password.
> You click on the notification and you get the usual dialog. You dismiss the
> notification and the connection fails.
> The UI was acked by designers.
>
> I made sure to reuse existing strings (including some typographical fixes
> which are not visible in the patch attached to the bug, but I have locally),
> so this is only a UI freeze break, not a string freeze break.

Hi Giovanni,

a strong +1 from me for the release team. Getting rid of spontaneous
modal dialogs has been one of the things we've pushed for with the
target bug list. Nice to see that we'll make some progress on this
before the gates close for 3.16.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

UI freeze break request for gnome-shell

[Giovanni Campagna]

Hello release-team,

long time no see :)

I'd like to request a UI freeze break to solve bug 660293 (which is a dupe
of 740750).

There are no screenshots in the bug, but what it does is fairly simple:
instead of popping up a network password modal dialog out of the blue, it
shows a notification asking for password.
You click on the notification and you get the usual dialog. You dismiss the
notification and the connection fails.
The UI was acked by designers.

I made sure to reuse existing strings (including some typographical fixes
which are not visible in the patch attached to the bug, but I have
locally), so this is only a UI freeze break, not a string freeze break.

Cheers

Giovanni
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Boxes: UI freeze break request

[Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)]

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Andre Klapper  wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 08:10 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> +1 for the release team from me.
>
> And another +1 from the release team.

Cool, thanks!

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)

Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Boxes: UI freeze break request

[Andre Klapper]

On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 08:10 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> +1 for the release team from me.

And another +1 from the release team.

andre
-- 
Andre Klapper  |  ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Boxes: UI freeze break request

[Matthias Clasen]

+1 for the release team from me.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Boxes: UI freeze break request

[Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)]

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Matthias Clasen
 wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Not sure this is really a UI break (at least its a tiny new feature)
>> but I thought I ask before pushing:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693391
>>
>> Everything on that bug should be self-explanatory but if not, please do ask.
>
> I asked in the bug.

I answered. Yay or no for going into today's release?

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)

Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Boxes: UI freeze break request

[Matthias Clasen]

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure this is really a UI break (at least its a tiny new feature)
> but I thought I ask before pushing:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693391
>
> Everything on that bug should be self-explanatory but if not, please do ask.

I asked in the bug.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Boxes: UI freeze break request

[Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)]

Hi,

Not sure this is really a UI break (at least its a tiny new feature)
but I thought I ask before pushing:

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693391

Everything on that bug should be self-explanatory but if not, please do ask.

BTW, no string breaks so not including i18n list.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)

Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: g-c-c UI freeze break request - bug 743400

[Frederic Peters]

Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > I'd like to push the patches in
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743400 .
> >
> > There's a screenshot with changes there. Those patches also add new
> > translatable strings for a11y purposes.
> 
> +1 from me for the release team. I'll point out that this (being able
> to reorder input sources) was an explicit feature request from the
> Fedora i18n team.

That's also fine for me.

@docs, keyboard-layouts.page doesn't have a screenshot of that panel,
could gain a remark about reordering layouts but is stil fine as is.


Fred
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: g-c-c UI freeze break request - bug 743400

[Matthias Clasen]

> I'd like to push the patches in
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743400 .
>
> There's a screenshot with changes there. Those patches also add new
> translatable strings for a11y purposes.

+1 from me for the release team. I'll point out that this (being able
to reorder input sources) was an explicit feature request from the
Fedora i18n team.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

g-c-c UI freeze break request - bug 743400

[Rui Tiago Cação Matos]

Hi,

I'd like to push the patches in
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743400 .

There's a screenshot with changes there. Those patches also add new
translatable strings for a11y purposes.

Thanks,
Rui
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Boxes: UI freeze break request

[Frederic Peters]

Matthias Clasen wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
>  wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wanted to ask for a UI freeze break for the following bug:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738517
> >
> > The only change that I'd call an actual UI break is addition of string
> > "No snapshots created yet. Create one using the button below." to the
> > snapshots view when no snapshots are available.
> >
> > I'll attach screenshot to bug after sending this mail.
> >
> 
> Thanks for the screenshots. +1 for the release team. Seems harmless,
> and a clear improvement.

Seconded.

Fred
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Boxes: UI freeze break request

[Matthias Clasen]

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to ask for a UI freeze break for the following bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738517
>
> The only change that I'd call an actual UI break is addition of string
> "No snapshots created yet. Create one using the button below." to the
> snapshots view when no snapshots are available.
>
> I'll attach screenshot to bug after sending this mail.
>

Thanks for the screenshots. +1 for the release team. Seems harmless,
and a clear improvement.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Boxes: UI freeze break request

[Alexandre Franke]

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to ask for a UI freeze break for the following bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738517
>
> The only change that I'd call an actual UI break is addition of string
> "No snapshots created yet. Create one using the button below." to the
> snapshots view when no snapshots are available.

The i18n team thanks you for respecting the string change announcement
period. :-)

-- 
Alexandre Franke
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Boxes: UI freeze break request

[Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)]

Hi,

I wanted to ask for a UI freeze break for the following bug:

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738517

The only change that I'd call an actual UI break is addition of string
"No snapshots created yet. Create one using the button below." to the
snapshots view when no snapshots are available.

I'll attach screenshot to bug after sending this mail.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)

Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for Yelp

[David King]

Hi

On 2014-09-11 17:48, Andre Klapper  wrote:

On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 17:36 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:

Here's your first release team approval.


Second r-t approval.


Pushed to master. Thanks!

--
http://amigadave.com/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for Yelp

[Andre Klapper]

On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 17:36 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > I would like to request a UI freeze break request for Yelp. Shaun has
> > approved the patch:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736408#c9
> > https://bug736408.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=285837
> > 
> > The change adds border styling to the find bar in Yelp, to make it match the
> > find bar in gedit. Without the patch, the find bar appears to float over the
> > content, so it would be a nice bit of polish to get the change in.
> > (...)
> 
> Here's your first release team approval.
> Fred

Second r-t approval.

andre
-- 
Andre Klapper  |  ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for Yelp

[Frederic Peters]

Hi David,

> I would like to request a UI freeze break request for Yelp. Shaun has
> approved the patch:
> 
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736408#c9
> https://bug736408.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=285837
> 
> The change adds border styling to the find bar in Yelp, to make it match the
> find bar in gedit. Without the patch, the find bar appears to float over the
> content, so it would be a nice bit of polish to get the change in.
> (...)

Here's your first release team approval.


Fred
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

UI freeze break request for Yelp

[David King]

Hi!

I would like to request a UI freeze break request for Yelp. Shaun has 
approved the patch:


https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736408#c9
https://bug736408.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=285837

The change adds border styling to the find bar in Yelp, to make it match 
the find bar in gedit. Without the patch, the find bar appears to float 
over the content, so it would be a nice bit of polish to get the change 
in.


Before the fix: 
https://bug736408.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=285839


After the fix: 
https://bug736408.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=285840


From the documentation side, I do not think that there are any 
screenshots of Yelp in gnome-user-docs that would be affected by this 
change.


Thanks!

--
http://amigadave.com/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: gnome-control-center UI freeze break request

[Marek Kasik]

On 02/27/2014 02:05 AM, Javier Jardón wrote:
> On 26 February 2014 20:21, Matthias Clasen  wrote:
>> +1 for the release team.
> 
> 2/2 from release team

Thank you for the approvals. I've pushed the patches and sent
notification to gnome-doc-l...@gnome.org and gnome-i...@gnome.org.

Marek

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: gnome-control-center UI freeze break request

[Javier Jardón]

On 26 February 2014 20:21, Matthias Clasen  wrote:
> +1 for the release team.

2/2 from release team


-- 
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: gnome-control-center UI freeze break request

[Matthias Clasen]

+1 for the release team.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-control-center UI freeze break request

[Marek Kasik]

Bug 693183 - GNOME Printer Setup Tool: List of discovered printers
should better describe duplicate entries
 - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693183

I want to push a change which will better describe found print devices
in the new printer dialog.

There are 2 UI changes and 6 new strings.

The first change is a fix of a long standing bug when a selected printer
had its location shown in gray color. It uses default colors for
selected text with the patch.

The second change adds description of connection type of found printers.
It shows "USB", "Bluetooth", "Serial Port" or "Parallel Port" for local
printers below the names of found devices and "Address: %s" or
"Location: %s" for network printers.

You can see a screenshot of the changes here:
https://bug693183.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=270117 .

The changes were reviewed by Bastien and Allan.

Regards

Marek
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request to add Help in gnome-music

[Javier Jardón]

On 22 February 2014 00:26, Matthias Clasen  wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Shobha Tyagi  wrote:
>>
>> here is link to the bug for which freeze break is requested:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724908
>>
>>
>
> First freeze break request of this cycle !
>
> +1 for the release team from me. Adding a Help menu item in the app menu
> doesn't seem like much of a UI break to me.

2/2 for release team



-- 
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request to add Help in gnome-music

[Matthias Clasen]

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Shobha Tyagi  wrote:

> here is link to the bug for which freeze break is requested:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724908
>
>
>
First freeze break request of this cycle !

+1 for the release team from me. Adding a Help menu item in the app menu
doesn't seem like much of a UI break to me.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request to add Help in gnome-music

[Shobha Tyagi]

here is link to the bug for which freeze break is requested:

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724908

thanks,


On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Shobha Tyagi  wrote:

> Hi!
> app-menu.ui and appliaction.py are modified in the patch attached for the
> help menuitem in gnome-music.
> for implementing the patch we request UI freeze break.
>
> Thanks&Regards
> Shobha Tyagi
>
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

UI freeze break request to add Help in gnome-music

[Shobha Tyagi]

Hi!
app-menu.ui and appliaction.py are modified in the patch attached for the
help menuitem in gnome-music.
for implementing the patch we request UI freeze break.

Thanks&Regards
Shobha Tyagi
From 11968eecebc59fa6ad8a0bc21c379970901fffda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shobha Tyagi 
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:44:37 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] data/app-menu.ui modified for user help

application.py modified for introducing user-help
---
 data/app-menu.ui  | 5 +
 gnomemusic/application.py | 7 +++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/data/app-menu.ui b/data/app-menu.ui
index dc98b87..7df19bc 100644
--- a/data/app-menu.ui
+++ b/data/app-menu.ui
@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
 
 
   
+_Help
+app.help
+F1
+  
+  
 app.about
 _About
   
diff --git a/gnomemusic/application.py b/gnomemusic/application.py
index 61ab7e8..1154cbc 100644
--- a/gnomemusic/application.py
+++ b/gnomemusic/application.py
@@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ class Application(Gtk.Application):
 aboutAction.connect('activate', self.about)
 self.add_action(aboutAction)
 
+helpAction = Gio.SimpleAction.new('help', None)
+helpAction.connect('activate', self.help)
+self.add_action(helpAction)
+
 newPlaylistAction = Gio.SimpleAction.new('newPlaylist', None)
 newPlaylistAction.connect('activate', self.new_playlist)
 self.add_action(newPlaylistAction)
@@ -85,6 +89,9 @@ class Application(Gtk.Application):
 def now_playing(self, action, param):
 pass
 
+def help(self, action, param):
+Gtk.show_uri(None, "help:gnome-music", Gdk.CURRENT_TIME)
+
 def about(self, action, param):
 builder = Gtk.Builder()
 builder.add_from_resource('/org/gnome/Music/AboutDialog.ui')
-- 
1.8.3.1

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: gnome-online-accounts: UI freeze break request (#708399)

[Piñeiro]

On 10/05/2013 04:48 PM, Javier Jardón wrote:
> On 5 October 2013 11:11, Debarshi Ray  wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I would like to request a UI freeze break so that we can use better icons for
>> chat accounts: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708399
>>
>> Screenshots are attached in the bug report.
>>
>> Please note that I have only pushed the patch to master. I need your 
>> permission
>> to push it to gnome-3-10 for 3.10.1.
> 1/2for release team

Probably late as the bug is resolved (I guess that agreed on IRC) but in
any case:
2/2 for release team.

BR

-- 
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: gnome-online-accounts: UI freeze break request (#708399)

[Javier Jardón]

On 5 October 2013 11:11, Debarshi Ray  wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I would like to request a UI freeze break so that we can use better icons for
> chat accounts: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708399
>
> Screenshots are attached in the bug report.
>
> Please note that I have only pushed the patch to master. I need your 
> permission
> to push it to gnome-3-10 for 3.10.1.

1/2for release team



-- 
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-online-accounts: UI freeze break request (#708399)

[Debarshi Ray]

Hello everybody,

I would like to request a UI freeze break so that we can use better icons for
chat accounts: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708399

Screenshots are attached in the bug report.

Please note that I have only pushed the patch to master. I need your permission
to push it to gnome-3-10 for 3.10.1.

Thanks,
Debarshi

-- 
Wearing non-prescription glasses and embracing obscurity doesn't
necessarily make you a hipster.  -- Anonymous

pgpQsNEpmrNwn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: gnome-control-center: UI Freeze Break request (Bug 706239)

[Ondrej Holy]

Thanks, commited:

commit 3f8d1ca21e2571d8afd871239a29dff81ff429de

Regards

Ondrej Holy
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: gnome-control-center: UI Freeze Break request (Bug 706239)

[Piñeiro]

On 09/10/2013 07:51 PM, Javier Jardón wrote:
> On 10 September 2013 13:12, Ondrej Holy  wrote:
>> It would be nice to land this:
>>
>> Bug 706239 - Background in login history is different from all other lists
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706239
>> (screenshot: 
>> https://bug706239.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=254567)
>>
>> This patch slightly change UI of the history dialog in the User Accounts 
>> panel. It ports history dialog to use GtkListBox instead of GtkGrid to be 
>> more consistent with other panels. It changes background color to white as 
>> was designed before (it has been changed with gnome themes changes before 
>> while).
>>
>> The patches is reviewed and accepted to commit now by Rui Matos and approved 
>> by Andreas Nilsson.
> Little change and reviewed by already 2 developers:
>
> 1/2 for release team

I agree. 2/2 now


-- 
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: gnome-shell-extensions: UI Freeze Break Request

[Jiro Matsuzawa]

Thank you. I've committed.
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell-extensions/commit/?id=17663f5f200716d148921061d7028db3ac6bc03d


On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Frederic Peters  wrote:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
>> > The bug is:
>> > The order of the favorite apps in the application menu, differs in
>> > that used in the dash
>> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704248
> [...]
>>
>> +1 for the release team.
>
> Seconded. (hopefully it's fine for the design team)
>
>
> Fred



-- 
Jiro Matsuzawa
E-mail:
 jmatsuz...@gnome.org
 matsuzawa...@gmail.com
GPG Key ID: 0xECC442E9
GPG Key Fingerprint: E086 C14A 869F BB0E 3541 19EB E370 B08B ECC4 42E9
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: gnome-shell-extensions: UI Freeze Break Request

[Frederic Peters]

Matthias Clasen wrote:

> > The bug is:
> > The order of the favorite apps in the application menu, differs in
> > that used in the dash
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704248
[...]
> 
> +1 for the release team.

Seconded. (hopefully it's fine for the design team)


Fred
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: gnome-shell-extensions: UI Freeze Break Request

[Matthias Clasen]

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Jiro Matsuzawa  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to request a UI freeze break of apps-menu in gnome-shell-extensions.
>
> The bug is:
> The order of the favorite apps in the application menu, differs in
> that used in the dash
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704248
>
>
> Here are screenshots which show the effect of the patch.
>
> Order in Dash
> -
> https://cloud.gnome.org/public.php?service=files&t=48806db6455e2ccbd9aace55297c3b63
> It is users' favorite order.
>
> Order in app-menu (Before Fix)
> --
> https://cloud.gnome.org/public.php?service=files&t=44f3b01515167917a8f2cce171b76137
> It is the alphabetical order, not users' favorite one.
>
> Order in app-menu (After Fix)
> -
> https://cloud.gnome.org/public.php?service=files&t=8bd19eec43e04e7f4cc3b3ef090d034e
> It is the same order as that of dash.
>

+1 for the release team.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-shell-extensions: UI Freeze Break Request

[Jiro Matsuzawa]

Hi,

I'd like to request a UI freeze break of apps-menu in gnome-shell-extensions.

The bug is:
The order of the favorite apps in the application menu, differs in
that used in the dash
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704248


Here are screenshots which show the effect of the patch.

Order in Dash
-
https://cloud.gnome.org/public.php?service=files&t=48806db6455e2ccbd9aace55297c3b63
It is users' favorite order.

Order in app-menu (Before Fix)
--
https://cloud.gnome.org/public.php?service=files&t=44f3b01515167917a8f2cce171b76137
It is the alphabetical order, not users' favorite one.

Order in app-menu (After Fix)
-
https://cloud.gnome.org/public.php?service=files&t=8bd19eec43e04e7f4cc3b3ef090d034e
It is the same order as that of dash.

Best regards,

-- 
Jiro Matsuzawa
E-mail:
 jmatsuz...@gnome.org
 matsuzawa...@gmail.com
GPG Key ID: 0xECC442E9
GPG Key Fingerprint: E086 C14A 869F BB0E 3541 19EB E370 B08B ECC4 42E9
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: gnome-control-center: UI Freeze Break Request

[Frederic Peters]

Matthias Clasen wrote:
> +1 of 2 for the release team - that seems minor.

Indeed, second approval.


Fred
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: gnome-control-center: UI Freeze Break Request

[Matthias Clasen]

+1 of 2 for the release team - that seems minor.

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Thomas Wood  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a small change to the display settings panel that ensures the
> "Apply" buttons are insensitive until any of the settings have actually been
> changed.
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600225
>
> Regards,
>
> Thomas
> ___
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gnome-doc-l...@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-control-center: UI Freeze Break Request

[Thomas Wood]

Hi,

This is a small change to the display settings panel that ensures the 
"Apply" buttons are insensitive until any of the settings have actually 
been changed.


https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600225

Regards,

Thomas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: gnome-control-center: UI Freeze Break request (Bug 706239)

[Javier Jardón]

On 10 September 2013 13:12, Ondrej Holy  wrote:
> It would be nice to land this:
>
> Bug 706239 - Background in login history is different from all other lists
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706239
> (screenshot: 
> https://bug706239.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=254567)
>
> This patch slightly change UI of the history dialog in the User Accounts 
> panel. It ports history dialog to use GtkListBox instead of GtkGrid to be 
> more consistent with other panels. It changes background color to white as 
> was designed before (it has been changed with gnome themes changes before 
> while).
>
> The patches is reviewed and accepted to commit now by Rui Matos and approved 
> by Andreas Nilsson.

Little change and reviewed by already 2 developers:

1/2 for release team



-- 
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-control-center: UI Freeze Break request (Bug 706239)

[Ondrej Holy]

It would be nice to land this:

Bug 706239 - Background in login history is different from all other lists
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706239
(screenshot: 
https://bug706239.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=254567)

This patch slightly change UI of the history dialog in the User Accounts panel. 
It ports history dialog to use GtkListBox instead of GtkGrid to be more 
consistent with other panels. It changes background color to white as was 
designed before (it has been changed with gnome themes changes before while). 

The patches is reviewed and accepted to commit now by Rui Matos and approved by 
Andreas Nilsson.

Regards

Ondrej Holy

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request: App picker

[Frederic Peters]

Matthias Clasen wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Carlos Soriano Sánchez
>  wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It will be good if we can land the new implementation of the gnome-shell app
> > picker. It is not a small change, but a good change for 3.10.
> >
> > It's not changing anything fundamental - the app picker still consists of
> > frequent and all views. All view groups some applications in folders.
> > It does add a lot of polish to the app picker though.
> >
> > The link is: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706081
> > All patches are reviewed and accepted to commit now by the gnome-shell
> > maintainer Florian Müllner.
> >
> > Sorry for the delay to request the freeze break.
> >
> 
> Thanks for getting it to this point before .91 - I know you two have
> been working very hard to get it in shape since guadec. I am in favor
> of allowing this in - we don't have a very long feature list for 3.10,
> this will be a great addition to it.
> 
> +1 from me.

And here's the second approval for the release team; as Shaun is ok
wrt the documentation, go ahead.


Fred
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request: App picker

[Javier Jardón]

Thanks for all the data provided: 2/2 for release team


Regards

On 2 September 2013 00:20, Shaun McCance  wrote:
> Screenshots, description, and a video. Thanks Florian and Carlos. These
> are very helpful. I don't see any major problems for the docs.
>
> --
> Shaun
>
> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 21:32 +0200, Carlos Soriano Sánchez wrote:
>> > What are those various other changes and improvements?
>>
>> - Popup never exceeds the app picker view, so there's not needed to
>> navigate through the view to search for an application. Also, now the
>> popup or the close button of the popup is never cut off. (Note that
>> when there's more items in the popup that don't fit, we add a scroll
>> bar to the popup)
>>
>> - The positioning of the popup is fixed in small resolutions where the
>> popup was displaced.
>>
>> - The items inside the popup are aligned with the main app picker
>> view. That's itself an improvement, but this solve several bugs we
>> have previously. i.e. Misposicioned popup in the x position when the
>> width of the screen is big and the popup are in some corner position;
>> arrow of the popup bad drawn in a similar situation; etc.
>>
>> - Changing between resolutions makes the popup to adapts the new
>> resolution.
>>
>> - As Florian said, now the icons reescale satisfying some minimums
>> rows/columns requirements, making the overall experience better in
>> small resolutions (like laptops, netbooks or tablets);
>>
>> - Added some animations when opening folders, changing between pages,
>> or the pages indicators itself.
>>
>> - Added transitions to the overall app picker (i.e. when opening a
>> popup, the icons now change its opacity in a transition)
>>
>> - Pan action response reworked for better touch interactivity. Now
>> instead of a smooth scrolling, we have something similar to the
>> workspace switcher, but with a good touch response, taking into
>> account the velocity the user gives to the action (looking forward to
>> apply the same response to workspace switcher)
>>
>> - Icons style reworked to match overall gnome-shell and to make the
>> label below icons more readable.
>>
>>
>> Maybe I forgot something, but I think these are the most important
>> things.
>>
>>
>> Since there are animations, a short video to see the changes:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObisRbDujqw&feature=youtu.be
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/9/1 Florian Müllner 
>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Shaun McCance
>>  wrote:
>> > Can we get some screenshots of the pagination and a
>> description of
>> > any particular behaviors?
>>
>>
>> Sure, I'm attaching two screenshots.
>>
>> The first one shows the "All" section of the app picker
>> without an
>> open app collection. As seen in that screenshot, the scrolled
>> view has
>> been replaced with pages (icons are never cut off at the
>> bottom, the
>> scrollbar on the right has been replaced with a pages
>> indicator),
>> though scrolling through the application list (using the
>> scroll wheel
>> or swiping the background) still works as it did in 3.8.
>>
>> The second one shows the same section with an open app
>> collection. In
>> contrast to 3.8, collections now open inline, and their grid
>> is
>> aligned with the icons of the main grid.
>>
>>
>> > What are those various other changes and improvements?
>>
>>
>> Carlos is probably in a better position to elaborate on this,
>> but
>> there are some clear improvements on smaller display sizes -
>> while
>> previously we ended up with a very small number of huge icons,
>> items
>> are now scaled to always display a reasonable minimum number
>> of items
>> (for now: 4x4). Also folder collections now work well with
>> those
>> displays, while in 3.8 they could end up being misplaced and
>> cropped.
>>
>>
>> Florian
>>
>>
>> ___
>> gnome-doc-list mailing list
>> gnome-doc-l...@gnome.org
>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
>
>
> ___
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gnome-doc-l...@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list



-- 
Javier Jardón Cabezas
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request: App picker

[Shaun McCance]

Screenshots, description, and a video. Thanks Florian and Carlos. These
are very helpful. I don't see any major problems for the docs.

--
Shaun

On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 21:32 +0200, Carlos Soriano Sánchez wrote:
> > What are those various other changes and improvements?
> 
> - Popup never exceeds the app picker view, so there's not needed to
> navigate through the view to search for an application. Also, now the
> popup or the close button of the popup is never cut off. (Note that
> when there's more items in the popup that don't fit, we add a scroll
> bar to the popup)
> 
> - The positioning of the popup is fixed in small resolutions where the
> popup was displaced.
> 
> - The items inside the popup are aligned with the main app picker
> view. That's itself an improvement, but this solve several bugs we
> have previously. i.e. Misposicioned popup in the x position when the
> width of the screen is big and the popup are in some corner position;
> arrow of the popup bad drawn in a similar situation; etc.
> 
> - Changing between resolutions makes the popup to adapts the new
> resolution.
> 
> - As Florian said, now the icons reescale satisfying some minimums
> rows/columns requirements, making the overall experience better in
> small resolutions (like laptops, netbooks or tablets);
> 
> - Added some animations when opening folders, changing between pages,
> or the pages indicators itself.
> 
> - Added transitions to the overall app picker (i.e. when opening a
> popup, the icons now change its opacity in a transition)
> 
> - Pan action response reworked for better touch interactivity. Now
> instead of a smooth scrolling, we have something similar to the
> workspace switcher, but with a good touch response, taking into
> account the velocity the user gives to the action (looking forward to
> apply the same response to workspace switcher)
> 
> - Icons style reworked to match overall gnome-shell and to make the
> label below icons more readable.
> 
> 
> Maybe I forgot something, but I think these are the most important
> things.
> 
> 
> Since there are animations, a short video to see the changes:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObisRbDujqw&feature=youtu.be
> 
> 
> 
> 2013/9/1 Florian Müllner 
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Shaun McCance
>  wrote:
> > Can we get some screenshots of the pagination and a
> description of
> > any particular behaviors?
> 
> 
> Sure, I'm attaching two screenshots.
> 
> The first one shows the "All" section of the app picker
> without an
> open app collection. As seen in that screenshot, the scrolled
> view has
> been replaced with pages (icons are never cut off at the
> bottom, the
> scrollbar on the right has been replaced with a pages
> indicator),
> though scrolling through the application list (using the
> scroll wheel
> or swiping the background) still works as it did in 3.8.
> 
> The second one shows the same section with an open app
> collection. In
> contrast to 3.8, collections now open inline, and their grid
> is
> aligned with the icons of the main grid.
> 
> 
> > What are those various other changes and improvements?
> 
> 
> Carlos is probably in a better position to elaborate on this,
> but
> there are some clear improvements on smaller display sizes -
> while
> previously we ended up with a very small number of huge icons,
> items
> are now scaled to always display a reasonable minimum number
> of items
> (for now: 4x4). Also folder collections now work well with
> those
> displays, while in 3.8 they could end up being misplaced and
> cropped.
> 
> 
> Florian
> 
> 
> ___
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gnome-doc-l...@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request: App picker

[Carlos Soriano Sánchez]

> What are those various other changes and improvements?
- Popup never exceeds the app picker view, so there's not needed to
navigate through the view to search for an application. Also, now the popup
or the close button of the popup is never cut off. (Note that when there's
more items in the popup that don't fit, we add a scroll bar to the popup)
- The positioning of the popup is fixed in small resolutions where the
popup was displaced.
- The items inside the popup are aligned with the main app picker view.
That's itself an improvement, but this solve several bugs we have
previously. i.e. Misposicioned popup in the x position when the width of
the screen is big and the popup are in some corner position; arrow of the
popup bad drawn in a similar situation; etc.
- Changing between resolutions makes the popup to adapts the new resolution.
- As Florian said, now the icons reescale satisfying some minimums
rows/columns requirements, making the overall experience better in small
resolutions (like laptops, netbooks or tablets);
- Added some animations when opening folders, changing between pages, or
the pages indicators itself.
- Added transitions to the overall app picker (i.e. when opening a popup,
the icons now change its opacity in a transition)
- Pan action response reworked for better touch interactivity. Now instead
of a smooth scrolling, we have something similar to the workspace switcher,
but with a good touch response, taking into account the velocity the user
gives to the action (looking forward to apply the same response to
workspace switcher)
- Icons style reworked to match overall gnome-shell and to make the label
below icons more readable.

Maybe I forgot something, but I think these are the most important things.

Since there are animations, a short video to see the changes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObisRbDujqw&feature=youtu.be


2013/9/1 Florian Müllner 

> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Shaun McCance  wrote:
> > Can we get some screenshots of the pagination and a description of
> > any particular behaviors?
>
> Sure, I'm attaching two screenshots.
>
> The first one shows the "All" section of the app picker without an
> open app collection. As seen in that screenshot, the scrolled view has
> been replaced with pages (icons are never cut off at the bottom, the
> scrollbar on the right has been replaced with a pages indicator),
> though scrolling through the application list (using the scroll wheel
> or swiping the background) still works as it did in 3.8.
>
> The second one shows the same section with an open app collection. In
> contrast to 3.8, collections now open inline, and their grid is
> aligned with the icons of the main grid.
>
>
> > What are those various other changes and improvements?
>
> Carlos is probably in a better position to elaborate on this, but
> there are some clear improvements on smaller display sizes - while
> previously we ended up with a very small number of huge icons, items
> are now scaled to always display a reasonable minimum number of items
> (for now: 4x4). Also folder collections now work well with those
> displays, while in 3.8 they could end up being misplaced and cropped.
>
>
> Florian
>
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request: App picker

[Shaun McCance]

On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 02:23 +0200, Carlos Soriano Sánchez wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> It will be good if we can land the new implementation of the
> gnome-shell app picker. It is not a small change, but a good change
> for 3.10.
> 
> It's not changing anything fundamental - the app picker still consists
> of frequent and all views. All view groups some applications in
> folders.
> It does add a lot of polish to the app picker though.
> 
> 
> The link is: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706081
> 
> All patches are reviewed and accepted to commit now by the gnome-shell
> maintainer Florian Müllner.

Can we get some screenshots of the pagination and a description of
any particular behaviors? Also, the wiki page that Florian linked
to[1] says "various other changes and improvements to make the
picker more pleasant and touch-friendly". What are those various
other changes and improvements?

[1] https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointNine/Features/AppPicker

--
Shaun


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request: App picker

[Matthias Clasen]

On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Carlos Soriano Sánchez
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It will be good if we can land the new implementation of the gnome-shell app
> picker. It is not a small change, but a good change for 3.10.
>
> It's not changing anything fundamental - the app picker still consists of
> frequent and all views. All view groups some applications in folders.
> It does add a lot of polish to the app picker though.
>
> The link is: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706081
> All patches are reviewed and accepted to commit now by the gnome-shell
> maintainer Florian Müllner.
>
> Sorry for the delay to request the freeze break.
>

Thanks for getting it to this point before .91 - I know you two have
been working very hard to get it in shape since guadec. I am in favor
of allowing this in - we don't have a very long feature list for 3.10,
this will be a great addition to it.

+1 from me.
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request: App picker

[Florian Müllner]

Hey,

it is probably worth pointing out that this has been on the 3.10
feature list[0].


Florian

[0] https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointNine/Features/AppPicker
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

UI freeze break request: App picker

[Carlos Soriano Sánchez]

Hi,

It will be good if we can land the new implementation of the gnome-shell
app picker. It is not a small change, but a good change for 3.10.

It's not changing anything fundamental - the app picker still consists of
frequent and all views. All view groups some applications in folders.
It does add a lot of polish to the app picker though.

The link is: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706081
All patches are reviewed and accepted to commit now by the gnome-shell
maintainer Florian Müllner.

Sorry for the delay to request the freeze break.

Cheers,
Carlos Soriano
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: gnome-themes-standard: UI Freeze Break Request

[Jim Campbell]

+1 from the docs team, as well. Thank you for providing the attachment that
shows the differences.

Jim


On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Matthias Clasen  wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Javier Jardón  wrote:
> > On 30 August 2013 18:18, Thomas Wood  wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This is a small change to the Adwaita GTK+ 3 theme to improve the
> contrast
> >> of dimmed labels in GtkListBox rows, especially when the rows are
> selected:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706408
> >
> > Thanks for the screenshots: its clear that the patch is important for
> > the readability of the panel
> >
> > 1/2 for release team
>
> Second approval.
> ___
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gnome-doc-l...@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
>
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.