Re: PROPOSAL: Moving the KDEPIM Enterprise Branch into the 3.5 Branch
On Thursday 11 October 2007, Allen Winter wrote: > Does it make sense/Is it plausible to effectively eliminate > the enterprise/kdepim branch by moving it into branches/KDE/3.5? Can I ask the same question about the post-4.0 kdepim branch? kdepim in trunk seems to be quite broken, and why is the stuff not developed in trunk after the release delay? Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Exception request for kdebase/runtime/kioslave/media
On Thursday 11 October 2007, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Can I get an exception for removing it now? If we don't loose functionality, go ahead. Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: PROPOSAL: Moving the KDEPIM Enterprise Branch into the 3.5 Branch
On Thursday 11 October 2007, David Faure wrote: > AFAIK my colleagues have set up svnmerge and kept an eye on changes, > but still it might be a good idea to make sure we're not overwriting a > bugfix. I agree. merging sounds safer, even though it screws up annotate. the two branches diverged quite far though, so its a lot of work. > I support the idea of course, I'm just wondering about those small details. > Another "small detail" would be: checking with the translators that they > are OK with all those new strings appearing in the 3.5 branch - so close to > the release. I guess they're more happy of having a kmail release that *can* be translated over one that is totally untranslated. Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Exception request for kdebase/runtime/kioslave/media
On Thursday 11 October 2007 12:34:17 pm Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > The freeze for the platform is here, and thanks to questions from Lubos about > the old mediamanager I noticed that the media ioslave is still in > kdebase/runtime... while I somehow thought I removed it weeks ago. > > I'm not even sure it's functional right now, and I'm not planning to fix it > since it's conveniently replaced by solid, the places system in kdelibs/kfile > and a couple of applets in plasma. > > Can I get an exception for removing it now? > Am I supposed to move it somewhere particular or simply kill the directory? > No objections here. Moving it into tags/unmaintained/4 is the preferred way to "kill" it. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Exception request for kdebase/runtime/kioslave/media
Hello, The freeze for the platform is here, and thanks to questions from Lubos about the old mediamanager I noticed that the media ioslave is still in kdebase/runtime... while I somehow thought I removed it weeks ago. I'm not even sure it's functional right now, and I'm not planning to fix it since it's conveniently replaced by solid, the places system in kdelibs/kfile and a couple of applets in plasma. Can I get an exception for removing it now? Am I supposed to move it somewhere particular or simply kill the directory? Regards. -- Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net "Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître, Ne font reculer l'ignorance." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: PROPOSAL: Moving the KDEPIM Enterprise Branch into the 3.5 Branch
Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Thursday 11 October 2007 00:31:05 Allen Winter wrote: >> I'm not sure if there will be more releases in the 3.5.x series... but I do >> know that KDAB is on the hook for supporting the 3.5.x KDEPIM stuff >> for many years to come. >> >> Does it make sense/Is it plausible to effectively eliminate >> the enterprise/kdepim branch by moving it into branches/KDE/3.5? ... >> So my proposal is: >> % svn mv branches/KDE/3.5/kdepim branches/kdepim-crappy >> % svn mv branches/kdepim/enterprise/kdepim branches/KDE/3.5/kdepim > > +1 ... > I talked with Till Adam about that last week, and I'm supportive. Your > reasoning closely resembles mind. OpenSuse and Kubuntu Gutsy are shipping the > enterprise branch now, and it looks very solid. Add Fedora to that bunch now too, so definitely +1 here too. -- Rex ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: PROPOSAL: Moving the KDEPIM Enterprise Branch into the 3.5 Branch
On Thursday 11 October 2007 3:47:46 am Thomas Zander wrote: > On Thursday 11 October 2007 00:31:05 Allen Winter wrote: > > So my proposal is: > > % svn mv branches/KDE/3.5/kdepim branches/kdepim-crappy > > % svn mv branches/kdepim/enterprise/kdepim branches/KDE/3.5/kdepim > > 'kdepim-crappy' ? ;) > > Its the one we have been releasing for some time, not a good signal :) I was exaggerating to bias the responses to accept my proposal. :) ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: PROPOSAL: Moving the KDEPIM Enterprise Branch into the 3.5 Branch
On Thursday 11 October 2007 00:31:05 Allen Winter wrote: > So my proposal is: > % svn mv branches/KDE/3.5/kdepim branches/kdepim-crappy > % svn mv branches/kdepim/enterprise/kdepim branches/KDE/3.5/kdepim 'kdepim-crappy' ? ;) Its the one we have been releasing for some time, not a good signal :) -- Thomas Zander signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
